Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Roy Nelson Willing to Pay for His Next Opponent's Drug Test

The Final Month before the Draft: Why Does It Matter?

Draftees1942_medium
Draftees, Circa 1940.....This way, son, said the man with the gun...there's room for you inside

With a month to go before the draft, a thought occurs to me: is it wrong that so much emphasis gets placed on last second performance in determining where a player ends up on draft day? I'm not talking about a guy who has a massive injury or something...obviously if a pitcher tears his labrum on May 17th that will rightly impact his draft status...but is it a mistake that the last flurry of games before the draft can have so much influence?

The sample size issue is always present: if a guy has a bad game in front of the crosschecker or scouting director, that doesn't necessarily mean anything. Maybe it was just a bad/unlucky game...or maybe it means the player has trouble under pressure. "Draftitis." I suppose that's the job of the scout, crosschecker and director to know the difference.

Just one more factor to consider.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Minor League Ball

Toronto Blue Jays Draft Review

Jun 2010 by John Sickels - 10 comments

Tampa Bay Rays Draft Review

Jun 2010 by John Sickels - 6 comments

Boston Red Sox Draft Review

Jun 2010 by John Sickels - 3 comments

Baltimore Orioles Draft Review

Jun 2010 by John Sickels - 10 comments

Comments

Display:

I'd look towards psychology theory for the answer

Specifically, people tend to remember three things in this order:

1) What happened last
2) What happened first
3) What happened most often

So is it “right”? Well it IS right in that this is how our minds function.

by mrkupe on May 7, 2010 12:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Shouldn't make a difference

I think you have to keep in mind the entire body of work of player in question. Anyone can hit a hot streak, can’t put too much stock in them

by daman316 on May 7, 2010 2:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Seems like major league clubs would have studied this

How important is the last few weeks of an amateur career in predicting professional success? If I were a MLB owner, I would sure want my scouts and statisticians to have this figured out. What does history tell us?

This question would be very important to me, because I would always be trying to build my team from the draft & through my minor league organization, rather than through trades. I would strongly resist paying the kind of salaries that you see in the majors today. I realize that my club would, to some extent, become a farm team for the rest of the league. But I just can’t understand this business of having one guy sitting next to another on the bench when one of them makes 20 or 30 times as much.

by The Seagull on May 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Isn't it context?

If the last weeks’ performance builds on previous performances, or shows a reversion to previous form (good or bad), then why shouldn’t it be considered? Kyle Blair just struck out 15 yesterday after a string of starts that have been much better than his early-season outings. Slow, steady improvement followed by an explosive performance is bound to be noted; it would be remiss not to. I think an evaluator is going to account for the level of opponent and probably want some corresponding change in approach as an explanation, but that’s just common sense. If Ranaudo suddenly finds his footing I guarantee it will be discussed both in terms of whether it’s just a hot streak or a return to form.

Overall though, why wouldn’t a guy’s performance at the end of a season be judged differently? It’s not occurring in a vacuum, it’s a continuum. Guys whose stuff is down (think Ranaudo and Hultzen in last year’s CWS) may be gassed, and conversely, a guy who finishes strong is at the very least exhibiting stamina and an ability to adjust, right?

by blackoutyears on May 8, 2010 3:47 PM EDT reply actions  

quality of competition

The last games before the draft are HS playoffs and the conference and NCAA tournaments. For many players, this is the highest quality amateur competition they will face outside of showcases. Some organizations (the Braves are notably on the record as looking at this) also believe that there is such a thing as a big game player and want to see how a player does under the pressure of playoff and tournament games. Health, endurance, and learning are also factors.

by rlwhite on May 10, 2010 3:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Me_at_8_small
Minor League Ball Gameday Discussion, MiLB 5/24
Me_at_8_small
Today in Minor League Baseball Discussion, MiLB 5/23
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/22
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/21
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/20

Recent FanPosts

Timmyace_small
MLB Mock Draft Round 1, 1s, 2, 3
Small
MOD#6 - Rangers (2nd Round - 93rd Pick)
Molina_small
Cardinals MOD #3
Small
MOD Dodgers 2: First Blood
Small
A's MOD 3.5
Christy_mathewson_baseball_small
Mod #3 SF GIANTS
220px-scouts_small
2012 MLB DRAFT (mock report)
Small
Orioles MOD #4 (2nd Round pick
Small
MOD#5 - Rangers (2nd Round - 83rd Pick)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Editors

Small Craig Goldstein

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter