Community Prospect #81
by gatling on Mar 17, 2010 4:06 PM EDT
Email
Print
With 20.8% of the vote, Mike Trout is elected Community Prospect #80.
1. Jason Heyward - 51%
2. Stephen Strasburg - 76%
3. Buster Posey - 20% (43% runoff)
4. Michael Stanton - 20% (54% runoff)
5. Jesus Montero - 20% (45% runoff)
6. Brian Matusz - 21%
7. Pedro Alvarez - 23%
8. Desmond Jennings - 29%
9. Carlos Santana -37% (50% runoff)
10. Neftali Feliz -37% (50% runoff)
11. Justin Smoak - 46%
12. Domonic Brown - 23% (59% runoff)
13. Madison Bumgarner - 30%
14. Martin Perez - 28%
15. Dustin Ackley - 31%
16. Chris Carter - 33.6%
17. Jeremy Hellickson - 29.4%
18. Michael Taylor - 36.9%
19. Alcides Escobar - 37.0%
20. Christian Friedrich - 29.0%(53.2% runoff)
21. Logan Morrison - 45.6%
22. Ryan Westmoreland - 24.7%
23. Aroldis Chapman - 32.0%
24. Wade Davis - 40.8%
25. Fernando Martinez - 30.5%
26. Aaron Hicks - 33.3%
27. Kyle Drabek - 34.0%
28. Lonnie Chisenhall - 24.5%
29. Jenrry Mejia - 18.8%(51.6% runoff)
30. Yonder Alonso - 25.5%
31. Matt Moore - 19.0%(70.7% runoff)
32. Brett Wallace - 24.3%
33. Dan Hudson - 20.2%
34. Freddie Freeman - 17.4%
35. Jhoulys Chacin - 21.2%
36. Casey Kelly - 27.8%
37. Casey Crosby - 29.8%
38. Starlin Castro - 27.5%
39. Brett Lawrie - 18.4% (42.9% runoff)
40. Derek Norris - 17.3% (42.9% runoff)
41. Tyler Flowers - 20.2%
42. Tyler Matzek -22.7%
43. Jacob Turner - 23.0%
44. Michael Montgomery - 30.8%
45. Dee Gordon - 22%
46. Julio Teheran - 19.4%
47. Grant Green - 24.4%
48. Hector Rondon - 20.9%
49. Josh Bell - 22.4%
50. Jaff Decker - 22.3%
51. Michael Saunders - 22.6%
52. Chris Withrow - 19.4%
53. Aaron Crow - 21.2%
54. Jason Castro - 18.8%
55. Tanner Scheppers - 23.2% (60.9% runoff)
56. Jordan Lyles - 23.2%(39.1% runoff)
57. Jake Arrieta - 28.0%
58. Todd Frazier - 23.1%
59. Jared Mitchell - 28.8%
60. Arodys Vizcaino - 21.1%
61. Zach Britton - 21.0%
62. Matt Dominguez - 19.7%
63. Simon Castro - 25.0%
64. Jarrod Parker - 24.6%
65. Zach Stewart - 18.5%
66. Tim Beckham - 22.2%
67. Alex Colome - 20.3%
68. Wil Myers - 23.1%
69. Mike Leake - 18.3%(55.1% runoff)
70. Jiovanni Mier - 20.7%
71. Josh Vitters - 20.3%
72. Kyle Gibson - 18.9%
73. Donovan Tate - 17.6%
74. Reid Brignac - 19.0%(54.5% runoff)
75. Ike Davis - 21.7%
76. Ryan Kalish - 27.6%
77. Mike Moustakas - 20.3%(54.8% runoff)
78. Tony Sanchez - 15.7%
79. Shelby Miller - 18.6%(66.6% runoff)
Players will get 1 round on the poll as a tester, if they fail to draw 5% they will then be removed and sit out up to 3 rounds.
Players off the poll(will sit out up to 3 rounds: Jose Iglesias(#80-3.8%), Wilmer Font(#80-1.9%), Mat Gamel(80-0%), Wilson Ramos(#79), Alex Liddi(#79)Hak-Ju Lee(#78-0%), Michael Main(#77-0%), Eric Hosmer(#77-0%), Thomas Neal(#76-3.4%), Nick Hagadone(#76-0%), Miguel Sano(#75-0%), Tim Melville(#75-0%), Jay Jackson(#74-0%), Jason Knapp(#74-1.6%), Danny Duffy(#73-2.9%)
Tester pool: Adrian Cardenas, Travis D'Arnaud
The candidates:
James Darnell 9.4%
Jemile Weeks 7.5%
Brett Jackson 15.1%
Randall Delgado
Josh Reddick 13.2%
Chase D'Arnaud 7.5%
Hank Conger 9.4%
Zach Wheeler 9.4%
74 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Vote with a +1 here for James Darnell
http://bullpenbanter.com
by gatling on Mar 17, 2010 4:06 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
+1
What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.
+1
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
by biggentleben on Mar 18, 2010 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions
+1
As I said before, Reddick = 90% of Jackson’s upside and 10% of the risk.
+1
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
+1
Wow Blackburn makes nearly identical money as Baker does now....
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Mar 18, 2010 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions
+1
The 2009 draftees are being almost universally underrated by the community here.
well
is that really such a bad thing though? Personally I’d rather vote the way of actual data to go with scouting reports unless the talent is obviously there, lots go wrong with unproven h.s. talent, esp arms.
I guess that all comes down to what kind of evaluator you are
Personally, I trust the scouting reports when the organizations follow through on those reports and take a guy very high (like Tate and Wheeler). Sure it’s great to see actual data on the field, but at the same time I would suggest the burnout rate of unproven hs talent is equivalent to the burnout rate of guys that put up gaudy numbers in the lower levels that don’t have the scouting reports to match. Results are not everything.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
