Not a Rookie: Dexter Fowler
Here's a look at Colorado Rockies outfielder Dexter Fowler.
Not A Rookie: Dexter Fowler
Dexter Fowler was drafted in the 14th round in 2004, out of high school in Alpharetta, Georgia. His draft position was deceptive: he could have gone as high as the supplemental round due to his tools and exceptional makeup, but college options made his signability doubtful. He could have played baseball at Miami or basketball at Harvard, and no one was sure if he was willing to put those aside to play pro ball. The Rockies ended up signing him for $925,000, though it was too late for him to make his pro debut that summer. Colorado found the money to sign him after the organization traded Larry Walker.
Fowler began his career with 62 games for Casper in the Pioneer League in 2005. He hit .273/.357/.409 with 18 steals, 27 walks, and 73 strikeouts in 220 at-bats. Offensively, he showed speed and scouts identified some power potential, but his plate discipline needed work and his bat was considered raw. His defense drew very positive reviews. I gave him a Grade C in the 2006 book, noting that Fowler had a high ceiling but needed more polish.
Promoted to full-season Asheville in the Sally League for '06, Fowler hit .296/.373/.462, with 43 walks and 79 strikeouts in 405 at-bats along with 43 steals. He made progress refining his swing and showed improved command of the zone, with a much lower strikeout rate compared to '05. He continued to draw positive comment for his defense, work ethic, and intelligence. I moved him up to a Grade B in the '07 book, impressed with the combination of a lower strikeout rate with better power production.
2007 was a weaker campaign. He hit .273/.397/.367 for Modesto in the California League, limited to 65 games by a broken hand. His power declined, but on the other hand he almost doubled his walk rate, drawing 44 in just 245 at-bats. Scouts quibbled about his swing mechanics cutting into his power production. I lowered his grade slightly to a Grade B- in the '08 book, concerned about the drop in power, though I was intrigued with the boost in walks.
Sent to Double-A Tulsa for 2008, Fowler had a breakthrough campaign with a .335/.431/.515 mark, drawing 65 walks against 89 strikeouts in 421 at-bats, setting career-best marks in every offensive category except steals. He continued to impress scouts with his defense, brightness, and friendly personality. He struggled during a brief trial in the majors (4-for-26) but no one was concerned given the small sample size. In the 2009 book I wrote that Fowler probably needed "some Triple-A time, but he is a rare player who combines excellent tools with a good shot at having excellent skills as well. . .he should combine a strong batting average with a high OBP, plenty of speed, moderate power, and a terrific glove." I gave him a Grade A- entering the '09 season.
Fowler didn't get the Triple-A time that I recommended, jumping straight to the Rockies in 2009, playing 135 games. He posted a .266/.363/.406 line, with 29 doubles, 10 triples, but just four homers. He drew 67 walks against 433 at-bats, with 116 strikeouts. He swiped 27 bases but was caught 10 times. He proved an adept bunter with 14 sacrifices.
Fowler's hitting was perhaps a tad less than I expected. He had a strong home/road split (.818 OPS at home, .717 on the road), and he also had a strong platoon split (.729 OPS against lefties, .859 against right-handers). He struck out a lot for a guy who doesn't hit many homers. Despite these issues, I remain optimistic about his bat in the long run. He was making the jump to the majors directly from Double-A, and he wasn't overwhelmed by the experience. He retained a good walk rate, and I expect that his power will gradually increase. The long-term outlook for his bat remains the same: at his peak he'll have a strong combination of OBP, speed, and moderate power. My expectation is that he'll stay about the same or improve very slightly this year and in 2011, but starting in 2012 his hitting will take off.
What I'm not certain about is the defense. His minor league defensive reviews from scouts were always excellent, but his UZR was awful last year and that situation will have to be monitored. I didn't see enough Rockies games to get a good feel with what was going on with his glove, if there was a statistical illusion of some kind going on. He did have some injury problems last year, including nagging back and knee problems that may have hampered his mobility. If the range assessments remain poor in '10, a switch to left field should be considered. His arm won't be good enough for right. You can read more about the UZR issue for Fowler in this fanpost.
Overall, despite some rough spots with the bat and the sabermetric questions about his glove, I like Fowler a lot and consider him to be a bright light for the future.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
John...
I love these “Not a Rookie” write-ups, but I have a request. Do you think you could include the grade of each if they were still a rookie. I know you did for the first couple, and I ‘d really appreciate it. I’m guessin Fowler’s considered an A- ish from this article. Thanks
*Pete Rose is my BFF
+1
Really dig the “Not a Rookie” as well and would love to see what their grades would be today.
by The Colonel on Feb 14, 2010 11:58 PM EST up reply actions
I pointed out in the Fowler UZR thread various things that may or may not mean anything.
What I’m not certain about is the defense. His minor league defensive reviews from scouts were always excellent, but his UZR was awful last year and that situation will have to be monitored.
Sure, but let’s not confuse “monitoring” with “questioning” someone before we have reason to. A single season’s worth of UZR is near useless in terms of analysis, and he didn’t even have a full season. If the scouts like his defense, then he’s probably as good a defender as they say. Most likley he was having issues with getting used to Coors or perhaps defensive positioning did have a lot to do with it.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Feb 13, 2010 7:56 PM EST reply actions
Positioning could be it
Hardball times did a few pieces on the affect positioning can have on defense, and it makes guys who, in terms of their defensive tools, are slightly above average, into great defenders (Chase Utley), and vice-versa (Willy Taveras/Nook Logan). He has the length, speed, and supposed baseball IQ for it, so I’m not OVERLY concerned.
I thought Fowler did excellent, especially in the OBP department, when you consider his rookie year in the context of his skip from Double A and losing time because of an injury the year before he exploded
I also think the defensive metrics to be a fluke; I saw him as average-to slightly above average in center this year, though he did make some mental errors. I’ve seen some other metrics disagree with UZR, though I do agree that Fowler should be looked at in left considering Gonzalez is the better defender. The power isn’t going to come this year until he matures more as a hitter, but he did show some adept gap power. If you look at his ISO in Double A last year, it was a .180, and it dropped to .140 upon reaching the MLB, so his power drop and increase in K’s were his only problems offensively in the majors, and against way tougher competition, that should be expected. With his patience actually improving as he went to the majors, and looking at what he did after the All Star break until he got injured, he seems to be a likely candidate to improve majorly going forward in 2010 and 2011, probably more than CarGo, whose his second half seems to be his ceiling and will likely regress a little next year. Also, Fowler will get the opportunity to hit 2nd in the lineup behind CarGo and in front of Helton, where he’ll likely see way more pitches to hit than in the leadoff spot where he often seemed to K or walk to start off a game.
Impossible not to have positive thoughts.
I want Sam Deduno to pitch already.

by 













