San Francisco Giants Top 20 Prospects for 2011
San Francisco Giants Top 20 Prospects for 2011
All grades are EXTREMELY PRELIMINARY and subject to change. Don't get too concerned about exact rankings at this point, especially once you get past the Top 10. Grade C+/C guys are pretty interchangeable depending on what you want to emphasize.
Feel free to critique the list, but use logic and reason rather than polemics to do to. The list and grades are a blending of present performance and long-term potential. Full reports on all of players can be found in the 2011 Baseball Prospect Book. We are now taking pre-orders. Order early and order often!
QUICK PRIMER ON GRADE MEANINGS:
Grade A prospects are the elite. They have a good chance of becoming stars or superstars. Almost all Grade A prospects develop into major league regulars, if injuries or other problems don't intervene. Note that is a major "if" in some cases.
Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.
Grade C prospects are the most common type. These are guys who have something positive going for them, but who may have a question mark or three, or who are just too far away from the majors to get an accurate feel for. A few Grade C guys, especially at the lower levels, do develop into stars. Many end up as role players or bench guys. Some don't make it at all.
A major point to remember is that grades for pitchers do NOT correspond directly to grades for hitters. Many Grade A pitching prospects fail to develop, often due to injuries. Some Grade C pitching prospects turn out much better than expected.
Also note that there is diversity within each category. I'm a tough grader; Grade C+ is actually good praise coming from me, and some C+ prospects turn out very well indeed.
Finally, keep in mind that all grades are shorthand. You have to read the full comment for my full opinion about a player, the letter grade only tells you so much. A Grade C prospect in rookie ball could end up being very impressive, while a Grade C prospect in Triple-A is likely just a future role player.
San Francisco Giants Top 20 Prospects for 2011
1) Brandon Belt, 1B, Grade A-: Totally legitimate in my opinion, and second-only to Eric Hosmer among first base prospects.
2) Gary Brown, OF, Grade B: I admit some trepidation here. I love the speed, athleticism, and defense, but I admit I'm enough of a stathead to be concerned about the extremely low walk rate in college. I'll project him as a regular with this rating, but the shape that regular status takes is still uncertain in my mind, if his offense will really be as good as people expect. We'll see.
3) Zack Wheeler, RHP, Grade B: Not a great season, but the strikeouts and grounders are promising and I'll cut him some grade slack for another year.
4) Francisco Peguero, OF, Grade B-: Hit .329 in the Cal League with 40 steals and good gap power. But he doesn't draw walks, and needs to be more efficient about stealing bases. If he doesn't hit .300+ at higher levels he'll have a problem, although his tools will get him to the majors and keep him there for some time.
5) Thomas Neal, OF, Grade B-: I know his season in the Eastern League may look a bit disappointing, but I think he could put up some huge numbers in the PCL in '11, and I still think he has a chance to be a non-star regular player.
6) Jose Casilla, RHP, Grade B-: Power sinker could make him a future closer.
7) Jarrett Parker, OF, Grade B-: No professional data. Very toolsy outfielder with some questions about his bat.
8) Ehire Adrianza, SS, Grade C+: Love the glove, but not sure he'll hit enough to get beyond a utility spot.
9) Jorge Bucardo, RHP, Grade C+: Strong sinker, but I'd like to see a higher strikeout rate.
10) Charlie Culberson, 2B, Grade C+: Good rebound season, bat looks interesting although Double-A Richmond will test it. Glove gets mixed reviews.
11) Brandon Crawford, SS, Grade C+: Terrific glove, showed a few positive signs with the bat last year.
12) Eric Surkamp, LHP, Grade C+: Intriguing finesse lefty, but can't rank higher until we see how Double-A goes.
13) Kendry Flores, RHP, Grade C+: Live-armed sleeper from rookie ball needs to be watched closely in 2011.
14) Michael Main, RHP, Grade C+: I think he is a decent prospect, but was being overrated by Rangers fans. History of weird health problems has slowed his development.
15) Mike Kickham, LHP, Grade C+: Spotty in college despite live arm, could do better against wooden bats.
16) Tommy Joseph, C, Grade C+: I respect the power potential and youth, but glove issues and bad plate discipline need to be addressed.
17) Heath Hembree, RHP, Grade C+; borderline C: Power-armed reliever threw strikes in rookie ball but needs to prove out at higher levels.
18) Jake Dunning, RHP, Grade C+; borderline C: Infielder conversion throws hard, showed surprisingly good command in Northwest League.
19) Chris Dominguez, 3B, Grade C, borderline C+. Strong power is obvious, but he had significant contact issues in the Sally League despite being a college guy. That worries me enough to limit the grade, though with some adjustments he could break out and rank much higher next year.
20) Roger Kieschnick, OF, Grade C, borderline C+: As with Dominguez, he could rank much better next year with some adjustments. If you go with the C+ grade, both of these guys could rank above Hembree and Dunning. Remember this is all preliminary.
Others of Note: Marvin Barrios, RHP; Brock Bond, 2B; Dan Burkhart,C; Ryan Cavan, 2B; Jacob Dunnington, RHP; Steve Edlefsen, RHP; Edwin Escobar, LHP; Conor Gillaspie, 3B; Stephen Harrold, RHP; Chuckie Jones, OF; Reinier Roibal, RHP; Seth Rosin, RHP; Hector Sanchez, C; Henry Sosa, RHP; Jason Stoffel, RHP; Clayton Tanner, LHP; Ryan Verdugo, LHP.
The graduations of Madison Bumgarner and Buster Posey take the top level off this system. Brandon Belt is a stud, but the remaining hitters have serious question-marks of some variety. There are a lot of live arms, beginning with Zack Wheeler, although even the pitchers come with a set of questions. Overall, the Giants are in the re-entry phase of a farm system talent flow. It will be interesting to see how fast it recharges, and which of these names will be at the top next year.
173 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow, you and I have very different lists
You have Brown, Culberson, and Flores much higher than I do. I also would have Rosin ahead of Main and Gillaspie ahead of Dominguez.
Hector Sanchez is also in my top 15
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
+1
With the exception of Gillaspie, he hits like a 2B/SS except he’s not very good with the glove. Don’t expect much from him.
"I signed up for this job, the day I was born" - Brian Wilson, Ninja
by Giant Torture on Nov 14, 2010 8:43 PM EST up reply actions
I expect more from him then I do from Dominguez though
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
Not to pick on you...
but I see comments like this after every list, and wonder what people think they add to the discussion. It’s not interesting that you think a name should be above another name. WHY you think a player deserves to be higher makes for an interesting comment.
by PissedMick on Nov 15, 2010 8:06 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
He thinks that...
Because he believes the negative stuff more than the positive stuff about player X and the opposite for player Y. Unless someone has some new information about a player, you can just assume that he is basing his opinion on whatever is out there already. It is getting really really tiresome to read this kind of pointless criticism over and over again here.
by auclairkeithbc on Nov 15, 2010 9:52 AM EST up reply actions
Not to pick on you....
but it’s not interesting that you think someone’s comment isn’t interesting enough to you.
by DenverBears on Nov 15, 2010 1:03 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
John said it himself.
Feel free to critique the list, but use logic and reason rather than polemics to do to.
Take it up with him if you think your way is superior.
Once you learn what polemics is
You’ll be less of a jerk to people nicely stating their own opinions.
by auclairkeithbc on Nov 15, 2010 2:01 PM EST up reply actions
I understand. Do you?
“Polemics” in this instance refers to arguments that are opinion-based. It often refers to hostile arguments, yes. The important part though is that arguments solely of opinion are worthless, while arguments that actually use logic and reason to back up opinion make for a good discussion.
You are crazy
If you think John really doesn’t want anyone to express their opinions here. He doesn’t want harsh critiques, obviously, but I’m sure he doesn’t care if people say what they think, even if they don’t quote some random blurb from Keith Law or whoever else to back it up.
by auclairkeithbc on Nov 15, 2010 3:31 PM EST up reply actions
It is really pathetic
When people rip on other people here because they don’t find those posts informative enough. The same thing happens when people do their top 100 prospect lists. If you aren’t interested in someone’s comment, just don’t respond. Don’t attack them for being worthless. I’d be willing to bet John dislikes your attacks more than people harmlessly stating a difference of opinion.
by auclairkeithbc on Nov 15, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
I'm sure you're right.
I’ve definitely outsnarked myself today, and that’s not productive either. The point getting lost here is that anyone who feels their opinion should be heard should respect others here enough to back up what they say with at least a little bit of reasoning. Otherwise, what we have here is just a bunch of noise, rather than a meaningful prospecting discussion. We all have reasons for what we think, so not taking the time to explain those reasons is just lazy, and makes for an unproductive discussion.
Kind of a disappointing year for the Giants farm system overall, but the list doesn’t look as bad as I was expecting (thanks mostly to Mr. Belt.)
Maybe I’ve just been swayed by Fla-Giant, but I think I’d have Chuckie Jones in the bottom part of my top 20.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
"Out, out, Fred Lewis!" - JCTillam Gamerspeare
I like Jones a lot too
Not sure where he should go on this list, but I think at the least his tools merit some sort of “extra special honorable mention”— wouldn’t surprise me at all if he’s in the top 15 at this time next year and steadily climbs the list after that.
Other than that, I think I would bump Thomas Neal down a little bit and Culberson and Adrianza up.
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Nov 14, 2010 8:26 PM EST up reply actions
I’m still cautious about Culberson until I see what he does next year. A few good weeks in a strong hitting environment isn’t enough to sway me… yet. But he looked completely useless before this year.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
"Out, out, Fred Lewis!" - JCTillam Gamerspeare
+1
He still had a 3:1 K:BB in San Jose…I’m skeptical. Oh and I’d have Chuckie in my top 20 as well
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
I don't love him either
But I guess I like him more than Bucardo and Parker (who I would also probably drop down to a C+)…Culberson would be my top C+ guy, because I think if he just continues to hit like he has this year he would have to be a B-range guy.
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Nov 14, 2010 8:36 PM EST up reply actions
Why Bucardo that low?
He was dominant in Augusta this year, and his promotion didn’t go so well, but it was the end of the year and he might have been fatigued. I think he’s got #3 potential, personally.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
Just a guess, but I imagine that it’s probably a combination of his relative lack of velocity and the wildness and hittability that he displayed in his last several starts in the Cal League. I chalk the season-ending blip up to his being tired after a long season where he pitched the most innings he ever has by a long shot. All-in-all though, I would say that a C+ is also how I would rate him.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Me as well. I’d probably put him over Kieschnick and Dominguez. Still I expect his age 18 season will rectify that and put him on the list. Really I think this is a strikingly reasonable list and comments. The biggest difference I have is Brown’s high placement (I had him at 5 behind Belt, Wheeler, Peguero and Neal), but given how persuasive the list is en toto, I’m thinking maybe I should reevaluate my opinion of Brown. I do know there were scouts last year who went to see Christian Colon and came away thinking Brown was the better player, and he certainly has a toolbox. The walk rate this year will be a serious test.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Darren Ford
I was somewhat hoping to see your thoughts on Darren Ford, but I guess he’s just too old and unpolished to warrant a mention on a list like this. Still, I’m curious, do you see any chance he develops into something of value? Or, is his ceiling that of a glorified pinch runner?
Ford hit .251/.315/.365 in AA as a 24-year old. He’s just not very good.
GROUGTHINK ALERT
This baseball thing is pretty cool
But
He’s got vrooooooom.
"I signed up for this job, the day I was born" - Brian Wilson, Ninja
by Giant Torture on Nov 14, 2010 8:41 PM EST up reply actions
Darren Ford's major league highlight
"He knocks a stake through the heart of the Cardinals! The Cardinals are dead! The Giants are going to the World Series!!!" -Jon Miller
t's Posey time!!
Screw you Flannery.
Woops posted before I finished.
Anyways his highlight will be the Colorado game. Other than that he probably won’t be a major league starter and would be a pinch runner at best.
"He knocks a stake through the heart of the Cardinals! The Cardinals are dead! The Giants are going to the World Series!!!" -Jon Miller
t's Posey time!!
Screw you Flannery.
Really don't like Dominguez at 19
The dude was way too old for his league last year and still didn’t hit, not to mention being a defensive liability. I see the potential, and he could become a great power hitter, but there isn’t ANYTHING going right for him and he’s only in Low-A, so I find it hard to believe that things will go better as he moves up the ladder. Kieschnick, Cavan, Bond, Rosin, Gillaspie, Jones, Sanchez, Stoffel, and Tanner are all higher than him IMO.
Other than that, I like the list. Sanchez, Bond, and Stoffel would probably bump Casilla (love the stuff and results, but he’s already a reliever only in Augusta and he doesn’t get enough K’s), Adrianza (absolutely do not believe in the bat), and Dominguez (for reasons already given).
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
+1
24 years old in A ball with only a .782 OPS and a load of clank at third base. I can’t really see the light at the end of the tunnel
Thomas Neal
Et tu John? At this point I agree with others that he’s likely to develop into a 4th OF, doubtful that he turns into anything more and if you’re going to include someone like Neal based on one good year in high-A ball along with speculation and conjecture than Chuckie Jones and his light-tower power for a teenager belongs in the top 20.
I agree with your take on Culberson, even in the pitching thin AFL his performance has been noteworthy, and Richmond will be a good test for him. His glove remains a question-mark, but I think this is a good bell-weather season for a guy that could go either way.
I think you need to show some more love for Hembree and Rosin. Granted, Hembree’s numbers are from a league that doesn’t fit his age, but they’re still stellar and I think Rosin has all the marks of someone who winds up being a steal (big innings eating type frame, live fastball and height that he doesn’t fully use to his advantage. ) since the Giants have had great success helping pitchers develop secondary pitches which is what Rosin is in need of.
All, in all though it’s a tough group to rank because one you get past Belt and Wheeler there’s more questions than answers and a lot of guys who could go either way.
"I signed up for this job, the day I was born" - Brian Wilson, Ninja
Missing pitcher
Sorry, but I still think Rafael Cova should be on that list. I see him better than Casilla. I think, at this point, Parker and Brown are overvalued. I think Brown ahead of Pegeuro is a huge stretch.
Cova was released.
But I agree with you about Brown over Peguero. I also have Parker over Brown.
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
Cova was also a 28 year old minor league vet and a reliever. Which isn’t exactly the best prospect profile.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Yeah, I didn't really consider him when I made my list
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
Age...
is a bit overrated, in my view. I think guys that can play are guys that can play, and a late bloomer is possible.
I don’t know that Parker and Brown are that overvalued, or that the rest of the farm has a pretty big drop in draft pedigree and/or performance last season. “B” range for them both seems fair, although you can quibble about one over the other.
co-dad w/AfDC of
Ishikawa, the Topps Rookie All Star Team's First baseman. Does he get a chance in 2010?
"Because I don’t know what it means anymore, in the PCL. It’s almost like years ago."
"That’s not to say Buster isn’t fully committed or all-in. He is. He’s smart and he’s got the advance reports. Anybody who said he’s not ready to catch in the big leagues is crazy because he’s a pretty good catcher, especially throwing." - Sabean 7/11/10
Noonan
I know he had a pretty bad year, but what are people in the know saying about him now?
by ofsticksandbats on Nov 14, 2010 9:01 PM EST reply actions
I still have some hope, but not a ton
I said above that I’m not a fan of Culberson, but I do think he surpassed Noonan. I send Noonan back to A+ ball in 2011
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
Questions about probability labels
Grade A prospects are the elite. They have a good chance of becoming stars or superstars. Almost all Grade A prospects develop into major league regulars, if injuries or other problems don’t intervene. Note that is a major “if” in some cases.
Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.
John, thanks for the work!
Can you give a rough estimate of what “good chance” mean? over 30%, 50%?Or maybe a range, e.g. 40%-75%?
It would also be interesting if you can tabulate your previous evaluations to find the percentage of your “good chance” evaluations end up being correct. This obviously is going to take a lot of work though.
Proud adopted parent of the ball dudes, who have grounded into 109 fewer double plays than the Giants.
Not just the tabulation
It would also be interesting if you can tabulate your previous evaluations to find the percentage of your "good chance" evaluations end up being correct. This obviously is going to take a lot of work though.
But how do you adjust for the fact that most prospects get rated several times, often with different ratings?
"The two worst things in football are: 1) They think that a 30-year old professional athlete has to be locked up in a hotel room, with a curfew, the night before a qame; and 2) They're right."
- Cowboy safety Cliff Harris
I would do it multiple times, meaning each rating is one data point.
Because the objectives here (at least mine) is to figure out the quantitative probability value of “good chance”, and maybe also “very good chance,” and “unlikely,” assuming John also uses those. As a prospect spend more years in the minors, a more precise predictions can be made, and the rating from each year provide some information that we can use to evaluate the predictions.
Proud adopted parent of the ball dudes, who have grounded into 109 fewer double plays than the Giants.
chances
I’ve never tried to sit down and figure out what a “percentage chance” is. I guess I don’t really believe things like that can be quantified.
by John Sickels on Nov 15, 2010 10:08 AM EST up reply actions
The Heavyweight Brandon Belt!!!
I took some heat for ranking him the 2nd best 1B prospect but I am glad I did!!!! This kid is a great athlete with a huge stick and could become a hitter in the mold of Derek Lee.
by King Billy Royal on Nov 14, 2010 9:19 PM EST reply actions
I was definitely one of them
Belt does seem to be getting very good reviews though. I think there is a certain level of SNTS going on with Belt and I’d still go with the guy 18 months younger than proved himself at AAA, but only time will tell.
Rafael Rodriguez?
John, do you have an opinion on Rodriguez?
by King Billy Royal on Nov 14, 2010 9:20 PM EST reply actions
Rodriguez
I’m surprised he didn’t make the top 20, for potential alone. However I can certainly understand based on production, still I think he deserves to be an honorable mention.
by mattp31 on Nov 14, 2010 9:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
FYI, I remember that John stated in a psot about 2 months ago that he had pretty much given up on RafRod.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Jason Stoffel
Surprised Stoffel didn’t crack your Top 20.
He definitely had some command issues in 2010 (as evidenced by the 4.80 ERA and the .392 BABIP against). But I still like this kid. He’s only 22 and in 50.2 IP this past year, struck out 66 (11.7 K/9) against just 24 walks (2.75 K/BB). Power arm with the same body build as Cain (but obviously not the horse Cain is). Hits 94 on the gun and his breaking ball (which he is still mastering) was hitting 80-81 in San Jose.
McCovey Chronicles: a bunch of shellacking know-it-alls.
How does a 3.92 BABIP demonstrate command issues? That’s bad luck is what it is, and it explains the high ERA despite a low walk rate (which indicates good command) and a high K rate. He also had a 63.7% LOB%, which either means he can’t handle high-pressure situations or he once again got unlucky. Given that he was the closer at Stanford and has experience in that role, I’m going with unlucky.
But you’re right, Stoffel is probably a top-20 prospect. Certainly better than Jose Casilla IMO.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
not necessarily
It COULD be bad luck, at least to some degree . . .but low BABIPs are a repeatable skill, and high BABIPs are the same way. Not all mid-90s fastballs are created equal. If Stoffel is pumping 94-95 MPH right down the plate, it’s going to get hit.
Yep, he seems to be mistaking control for command as well
Perhaps the low BB rate (along with the high BABIP) is because he just pumps the FB down the middle. In no way does a low BB rate show a guy has good command.
Proof?
What is your proof that a low BABIP is a skill? BABIP is primarily a function of defense (not a skill) and ball in play type (partial skill…GB/FB difference is a skill, but research indicates LD% is fairly random). Please link to some actual research if you’re going to make statements like this contrary to what other research has actually shown…what you “think” is irrelevant.
Now writing for BaseballInstinct.com
by Franchise887 on Nov 14, 2010 10:42 PM EST up reply actions
Even Voros, the creator of FIP, now admits BABIP is a skill
Its also important to note that the research you’re talking about looked at the MLB level. The spread of BABIP among pitchers at the ML level is going to be much closer than it will be at minor league levels, because all ML pitchers were actually good enough in the minors to reach that level. The guys who are abnormally bad in terms of BABIP get weeded out before they reach the majors. If a RP has a terrible BABIP one year in the majors you don’t need to worry nearly as much as you do if it happens in the minors (especially if its basically the only data you have to go on).
Conversely
The bad defenders that can’t cut it also get weeded out…
Yes, BABIPs are higher across the minors than the majors
That’s really neither here or there. I was talking about the spread of BABIPs, not the raw numbers.
Okay
So ONE guy, who is fairly important historically, but hasn’t really registered on the sabr scene since FIP (technically DIPS is the stat he invented, but whatever), thinks that BABIP is repeatable (which as far as I can tell may not even be true; do you have a link or something where he says that?), while logic and everyone else disagrees. BABIP is by definition a “luck” metric that measures how lucky or unlucky a player got. This is why individual pitchers (and hitters) have up and down years with BABIP, but controllable things like K/9 and BB/9 don’t fluctuate all that much barring injury/change in mechanics. That’s the whole point of FIP.
The guys who are abnormally bad with BABIP do get weeded out, but they shouldn’t. If a pitcher posts good peripherals but a poor BABIP, he’s likely to have an ugly ERA and not move through the system like he should.
I also don’t think you’re adequately weighing the differences between the minors and the majors. The spread of BABIP across the minors is likely due to two factors: the staggering number of minor league games played relative to major league games (larger sample size = more ridiculous outliers), and the huge variance in talent level, both offensively and defensively. This explains BABIP variation in both directions: some pitchers have an insanely high BABIP because they’re facing better offensive talent and have poorer defenders, and some pitchers have an insanely low BABIP because they’re facing worse offensive talent and have better defenders. The minor leagues are full of glovemen, positionless bats, and various other players that will never make it to the show because some aspect(s) of their game is(are) too raw. But they can make the stats do some crazy things.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
The point is everyone accepts BABIP as a skill at this point
Seriously, everyone of importance within the sabr community realizes this. Now, it does take a fairly large MLB sample size to figure out whether a high/low BABIP is due to luck or skill, but everyone realizes that some people do have BABIP skill. Its the reason a guy like Maddux was able to run a .270 BABIP out there for 1900+ continuous innings over an 8 season span during his prime.
If you really think that guys with abnormally bad BABIPs at the minor league level shouldn’t get weeded out, that you need to spend some more time with this prospecting thing. There are guys out there who get shelled by minor league hitters on pitches in the zone because there stuff isn’t good enough. If they didn’t get weeded out, you’d see guys giving up some insane BABIPs at the ML level, but teams are smarter than that.
I’m weighing the differences between the two levels just fine. You just don’t seem to understand that the difference in talent level goes beyond just the things we see as controllable at the ML level. There are pitchers in the minors that post incredibly high HR/FB because there stuff isn’t that good. There are guys who post incredibly high BABIP because there stuff isn’t that good. Sure, the differences in talent on defense make a difference, but we can just compare them to their teammates to get an idea of how big of a deal it actually is. Even after that, there are guys who will far way outside the MLB spread.
I think
there is general consensus that an above average BABIP is indicative of skill for a hitter but for a pitcher, on the other hand, it largely is independent of skill. That is, hitters do have some ability to hit for an above average BABIP but pitchers do not have the ability, b/c they lack control over the ball once it’s hit, to consistently produce below average BABIPs by any method other than luck.
If you know of something different, please post the link.
Seriously?
I’m not even sure where to go, because its just accepted at this point. Yeah, hitters have a whole lot more control than pitchers, but pitchers still have a measure of control, it just falls into a narrow range (~.280-.320). Look at a guy like Maddux, who is below .290 with over 5000 innings pitched. That doesn’t happen due solely to luck.
Not that I am taking a side in this argument
But it doesn’t sound “accepted” at this point, it seems like a lot of people disagree with you. I do think some people may sustain a higher BABIP then others (maybe .320 as opposed to .290) but I’ve never heard of anyone sustain a .392 BABIP, so I think that is definitely inflated.
And I’m not sure if the “grooving down the middle” hypothesis really explains it, there are a ton of pitchers who have absolutely no control and still maintain a normal to below normal BABIP; ex: Jonathan Sanchez. Additionally, given his low BB rate, I’d like to believe he has some control of where his pitches are going. And given how his stuff is pretty good, I still don’t think it would be that easy to make consistently solid contact.
First
Maddux has a career BABIP of .289, ONE POINT below .290. And .11 points away from the MLB average isn’t ridiculously insane, it’s just random variation. Maddux had that variation in his BABIP over the years too, so either he magically lost and found this skill (something that didn’t happen anywhere else BTW), or it’s luck.
Please, please, please, please, if you have any research that indicates BABIP is a skill, POST IT!
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
Now, I'm typically on your side of these BABIP debates...
but you’ve strayed from the flock so much I have to bring you back. Over 5000 innings, luck hardly exists as a factor, and certainly not enough to make it part of the discussion. Pitchers do have control of BABIP to a small degree, and elite pitchers (like Maddux) can sometimes control it to a large degree (like .11 points).
Some guys cause a disproportionately large number of IFFBs (Matt Cain’s a good example, and this is my explanation for why he always kills his xFIPs). If you rank qualified 2010 starting pitchers by IFFB%, you have to get to #15 before you see a guy with a BABIP over .300, and he’s the only one in the top 22. Ted Lilly was #1 in 2010 with 16.9% of his flyballs not reaching the outfield grass. He’s averaged a 14% IFFB% for his career (league average is about 9%). Not coincidentally, he’s allowed a .283 BABIP in over 1700 innings.
BABIP is a great tool for predicting regression. It’s also a pretty new one though, and we have to be careful not to think that we already know all there is about it.
Maybe
Maybe they control it to a small degree. The “induce weak contact” argument is slightly persuasive. And the IFFB% obviously makes a difference; whether pitchers can consistently induce popouts is another question, though.
On the other hand, if you have thousands of pitchers throwing thousands of innings every year for decades, there’s a good chance a few of them are going to have BABIPs that deviate from the average. And while Maddux may or may not have had some small measure of control, I’d say it’s likely he was lucky to post a BABIP as low as he did.
In any case, a .392 BABIP is not sustainable without a crazy-high LD% which should preclude a player from advancing anyway.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
To be fair, I think he was referring to Maddux’ peak rather than his full career, and it is notable that Maddux has a long stretch through his peak where his BABIP was: .282, .258, .278, .261, .253, .292, .285, .272. That really does appear to be a fairly sustained bit of exceptionally low BABIP. He only exceed .300 4 times in a 22 year career.
Frankly, as someone who is no expert on these concepts or discussions, I thought that the real thrust of the BABIP argument was that even the greatest pitchers experience random variation swings from year to year and, based on that, when I went to look up Maddux’ record I actually expected to see a lot more up and down random variation than I encountered. That stat line does look to me like evidence that Maddux had some consistent role in suppressing BABIP at a higher than normal rate.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Maddux did have a series of very low BABIPs through several years. Whether that was luck or a repeatable skill is certainly not a decided question, though, and given that BABIP is nearly always a luck factor, I’m leaning toward mostly luck. Perhaps he had an ability to induce weak ground balls or pop flies.
Looking at the data, the 2002-2003 Braves and 2004-2005 Cubs were very good defensive teams (lowest team UZR was 12.5 for the ‘03 Braves), and those are the earliest years UZR was kept. So his relatively low BABIPs were helped out by that. And his high HR/FB rate probably helped too, though he didn’t seem to have a problem with that earlier in his career.
The point is that Greg Maddux is an outlier; he’s a guy with a pretty damned low career BABIP considering the number of innings he’s pitched, and it seems ridiculous to think that Jason Stoffel has control over his BABIP and so he’ll never make the majors.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
Some examples
Low career BABIP, post 1968:
Sid Fernandez: .259
Mario Soto: .263
Dave Stieb: .265
Tom Seaver: .267
Larry Gura: .268
Eric Show: .268
Bud Black: .270
Guys from the 90s and 00s:
Barry Zito: .276
Ben McDonald: .276
Orlando Hernandez: .277
Ramon Martinez: .280
Jarrod Washburn: .280
etc.
On the other end:
Glendon Rusch: .334
Shane Reynolds: .325
Aaron Sele: .319
Charles Nagy: .316
etc.
Not arguing one way or another
But how do you explain Matt Cain
Year BABIP
2005 .166
2006 .279
2007 .284
2008 .304
2009 .268
2010 .260
Career .274
"I signed up for this job, the day I was born" - Brian Wilson, Ninja
by Giant Torture on Nov 16, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions
Cain's a good example
He definitely benefits from the ballpark, but his ability to induce infield flies shouldn’t be discounted when looking at his consistently below-average BABIP marks.
Baseball is my preferred sport. It should be yours, too.
I'm an editor for Beyond the Box Score, an SB Nation blog.
by Satchel Price on Nov 17, 2010 9:42 AM EST up reply actions
This
And defense; the Giants have been a good-great defensive team over the last few years; higher range means a lower BABIP for pitchers because fielders get to more balls.
But besides that, there are outliers in any distribution. Francisco Liriano has a career .321 BABIP. Take a large enough sample and you’ll get some weird individual stats.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
ok , i have a question
not to say I disagree with your assessment of the Giants D (because I dont watch them nearly enough) but they’ve run out guys I would be skeptical of defensively. you’ve had renteria and uribe roaming the infield, not to mention the panda. sanchez I’m pretty sure is decent, but he’s been injured fairly often. Torres is certainly good, but you had rowand out there before that, not to mention the guys like burrell and huff out in the OF. you’ve got good guys too, of course, ishikawa, and the catcher position was likely fielded pretty well with posey/molina, scheirholtz is decent, I would imagine lewis was good.
again, I dont doubt that youre right, it just seems surprising to me given some of the age out in the field, it makes me wonder if the park is really the bigger factor here. not that any of rowand, huff, renteria, uribe, or panda are BAD defensively, just not plus. (maybe I’m underrating them) where am I going wrong in thinking about this?
You are right....
You don’t watch the Giants much. Most of the Giants pitchers have been Fly Ball – Strike out pitchers, with only recently becoming more ground ball oriented. The giants out field defense (which you would need) has been exceptional for a few years. From the Rowand-Winn Outfields to the Torres- Ross Outfield, they have had exceptional range, and sure hands.
Yes, there was a reason I mentioned that
I’d watch the Giants a lot more if MLB.TV’s blackout laws weren’t draconian, I can be 12+ hours from SF and for some reason that’s in market. f-ing stupid.
also FWIW
the numbers say different things sometimes than what your instincts might. Sandoval’s defense got worse towards the tail end of 2010, but prior to that he was an at least competent 3B. and the stats seemed to really like Uribe’s D last season as well.
But a lot of it is about the OF defense where guys like Torres, Ross, Schierholtz, Winn, etc. have been exceptional defensively and other guys have been at least decent. Even the guys with really bad defensive reputations have for the most part played pretty decently in SF (Jose Guillen being an exception to that trend— he was just as bad as we’d heard).
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Nov 18, 2010 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
what about Burrell?
he was probably bad, as normal. Even so, thanks for the responses. the fly-ball strikeout thing makes sense, given the park. obviously, as i pointed out, I am probably underrating these guys (like rowand or uribe) and I’m too lazy to look up their def stats.
Your insistence that it is "accepted"
doesn’t make it so. Once again, please provide a link. If this is settled, it should be easy to find.
Some links
Tom Tippett was one of the first guys to really thoroughly debunk the notion that pitchers had no control, here. There’s a nice summary contained here (pdf) which says:
Two years later, Tippett responded by performing an analysis of all pitcher seasons dating back to 1913. After adjusting BABIP to account for park and team defense effects, Tippett revealed that certain pitchers have shown a distinct ability to prevent hits on balls in play. In fact, 12% of pitchers with at least 6,000 career balls in play prevented hits at a rate that would appear in less than 1% of random samples. Year-by-year analysis shows that pitchers such as Pedro Martinez, Charlie Hough and Walter Johnson were able to prevent hits at a significantly greater rate than the average throughout much of their careers, debunking the assertion that inherent ability is nonexistent.2 Today, the general consensus is that pitchers do generally demonstrate some level of control over balls in play, although to a lesser degree than defense-independent factors such as walks or strikeouts.
The catch there is that there is so much noise in the data that most of the variation you see in year to year samples is going to be luck. And for MLB pitchers, most skill is contained in other measurable factors, such as GB, FB, and LD percentages, and especially ability to induce infield flys (popups).
So while some degree of skill may exist, and it may be significant (even a fairly small degree might be significant), it would be very dangerous to treat a minor league pitcher’s actual BABIP as in any way indicative of this possible skill, given the small sample size involved.
I do somewhat agree with 22gigantes above though in thinking that a high BABIP for a minor league pitcher might be indicative of a lack of command within the zone. My evidence is more anecdotal and deductive though.
Logically, if you believe that pitchers exist who have sufficient command, but insufficient stuff, to get big league hitters out, apart from a complete inability to strike batters out, this would be true. It seems to me to be sometimes true of pitchers with underpowered fastballs, when they top out at higher levels, that poor results on balls in play has a role.
I also have seen more than once where a pitcher has temporary problems with his location within the zone, that BABIP is a problem. Jonathan Niese for example, after adjusting his grips to add a cutter, and get better movement on his fastball, struggled badly in AAA in the first half of 2009, but with very good peripherals. His BABIP and results got much better in the second half. If you only looked at the data, you might have argued he was “unlucky” in the first half, and his luck simply improved. The scouting reports at the time though, said he was struggling with his location in the zone, and predicted it would typically take a few weeks for him to adjust to the new movement on his pitches and learn to locate them better.
Logically also, if there is such a thing as a mistake pitch, a pitch in the zone that is more likely to be hit, than it must be the case that it is possible to have a poor BABIP due to poor location in the strikezone. And it can be shown through pitchFX data that certain sections of the strike zone produce lower or higher BABIP (see here and here, for example).
So I think 22gigantes’s argument is more than plausible. I would only partly agree with Nixa, though. When you have scouting reports of good stuff, combined with reasonable walk rates, I wouldn’t treat a possible problem with command within the zone as such a fatal flaw. I would treat it more as something that is often temporary, and a matter of making an adjustment. As well as something we have no firm evidence is really the problem (absent scouting which confirms this), given the unreliability of the sample and the noise in the data.
In any case, if it is an issue, a young pitcher adjusting to a new level for example may only have to learn where to locate vs. better hitters. If it’s temporary, that’s not too much different than treating it as “luck”.
But I wouldn’t dismiss the argument altogether. I’d still value a guy more highly after he has made those adjustments and is getting results than when he is struggling.
This is great
And makes a ton of sense.
You’re right, I shouldn’t say that it’s completely out of a pitcher’s control. But with metrics that more directly correlate to pitcher success, and the uncertainty that comes with attributing results to some sort of BABIP skill, why would we point to BABIP?
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
A bit more
I don’t have a link for this, but my memory is that the standard deviation for MLB pitchers actual ability to influence balls on play is under 10 points of BABIP, while the standard deviation for hitters is around twice as much.
So it’s a bit more complex than saying hitters have control and pitchers have none, it’s more like hitters have twice as much control.
Also, with regard to Stoffel, his FIP was decent at 3.16, but his batted ball profile wasn’t great. So tRA has him only at 4.73, which implies an ERA of about 4.40.
http://statcorner.com/pitcher.php?id=572168
I think that tends to support Nixa’s case; if his stuff is that good, he should maybe be getting more infield flys or allowing less line drives. It may be more than just bad luck. He doesn’t appear to be a very good pitcher at this point in time.
No one writes about it anymore because its accepted
Feel free to bring it up in a Fangraphs chat or something. I’m sure Dave Cameron will tell you everyone accepts that pitchers have a level of control over BABIP. The question is when we can be confident that what we’re seeing in the stats is true skill and not just random noise.
I’m glad some other people took up this discussion. This is such a tired argument that its not really worth discussing anymore.
The wrong is strong in this one
Greg Maddux posted a FAIRLY low BABIP for his career (according to Fangraphs, .289, not .270, which is pretty close to the major league average of around .300). This is true. So you’re half right, which of course means you’re half wrong.
You go further wrong when you say that everyone realizes that some people do have BABIP skill. Well, flyball pitchers will have lower BABIPs (they allow more HR, but that doesn’t factor into BABIP, and fly balls have a far lower BABIP than grounders), and pitching to a certain location may lower BABIP, and higher-FIP pitchers may have a lower BABIP. But again, this is all very, very small variation. It might make a small difference, a couple more runs allowed or prevented each year, but luck can play a far larger role. And I’ve again yet to see the research that indicates BABIP is a skill. I’ve seen stuff that indicates some pitchers may have a little control, but again, this is too small an effect and the research is never able to draw a resounding conclusion. And Stoffel’s BABIP is .392, so I doubt that’s just a skill issue.
And you’re right, there are pitchers who get shelled on stuff in the zone because their stuff isn’t good enough. And those pitchers have a high BABIP. But what’s more important is LD%, K/9, and BB/9. A high LD-rate means players are hitting the ball hard, and that usually translates to a high BABIP. Most of those guys do get weeded out because their stuff isn’t very good, and legitimately so. The opposite is also true. But sometimes, you have pitchers with a low LD rate and high BABIP that get weeded out but don’t deserve to, because the hitters aren’t hitting them well but they’re still getting on base, or pitchers with a high LD rate and low BABIP, and this causes their ERAs to mask what they’re really doing. But LD-rate, K/9 and BB/9 tell the real story on their stuff and their control. In short, some pitchers get lucky or unlucky, and LD%, K/9 and BB/9 give you a good idea of exactly how good they are, with BABIP as a chaser to make sure they’re not being drastically affected by luck.
I also do see guys giving up insane BABIPs at the ML level, because BABIP is based primarily on luck, and therefore isn’t controllable, so some great pitchers sometimes have high BABIPs. Francisco Liriano posted a .340 BABIP this year; do you think that’s because Francisco Liriano is a bad pitcher, or because he got unlucky?
Again, some pitchers in the minors post HR/FB rates that are very high because their stuff isn’t good, you’re right. But again, I’d look past the HR/FB rates to the LD%, K/9 and, BB/9. HR/FB typically fluctuates quite a bit as well, it’s another luck factor, though it is one with more control than BABIP, and it is affected by park. Still, pitchers will post abnormally high or low HR/FB rates with no prior history of doing so, and this may seriously affect their surface stats. Tim Hudson posted a 13.1% HR/FB this year despite a 10.8% for his career. In fact, looking at his player page, you can obviously see that HR/FB isn’t repeatable; he went from 14.4 to 6.5 to 11.5 over the span of three years.
The year to year variation of BABIP in the majors and minors (Maddux posted a .334 BABIP one season!) and teammate-to-teammate variation suggest the only true factor here is luck. If it were a skill, it wouldn’t vary much (like LD%, K/9, BB/9) between seasons, and if it were primarily defense, it wouldn’t vary much between teammates. Luck is the only thing that really explains the crazy BABIP variations we see.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
Now, this is far from scientific...
but I know I’ve heard (or read) it posited somewhere that guys who pitch consistently away will induce weaker contact, leading to lower BABIPs. I checked the first two guys I thought of, and I’d encourage all of you to do the same:
Tom Glavine – .286 BABIP over 4400+ IP
Jamie Moyer – .290 BABIP over 4000+ IP
Again, I’m not suggesting that’s anything in the hemisphere of conclusive. Just something I thought was interesting.
I know Mike Fast does some stuff with xBABIP based on pitch location
Apparently location is more indicative of future BABIP than anything else.
If it were a skill, it wouldn’t vary much (like LD%, K/9, BB/9) between seasons, and if it were primarily defense, it wouldn’t vary much between teammates. Luck is the only thing that really explains the crazy BABIP variations we see.
This isn’t really true. Players can have different baselines (see Barry Zito vs. Glendon Rusch), even if the year-to-year variations around those baselines can be rather notable.
It stands to reason that the players with the highest “baseline” BABIP would stall out in the minors due to poor performance, and thus you can’t just point to high minors BABIP and say it is luck.
It's not entirely true
On the other hand, what is?
And high BABIP pitchers in the minors do stall out, but as I said before, they shouldn’t. Unless there is something in the peripherals stats or scouting reports that indicate the high BABIP may be caused by the pitcher being bad or lacking command within the zone, I find it difficult to assume that a pitcher will maintain a high BABIP, simply because most pitchers who don’t have those issues don’t.
Again, outliers. Some pitchers have higher baseline BABIPs due to some skill, perhaps, and some pitchers have those now because they’ve been unlucky. So unless you can point to the reason why a pitcher would have a high baseline BABIP, OR you have several years of data, I think it’s unfair to chalk it up to a poor performance by the pitcher instead of unluckiness.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
It makes sense that BABIP would correlate with BP fastballs, e.g., but it seems strange to me that Stoffel’s BABIP problem could be something different than luck when his K rate is so high and his HR rate is so low—seems like both numbers would be much more affected if his BABIP issue was stuff-based. Does that happen often?
uh, chill dude
I don’t think what I said deserved such a vehement response. I even gave Stoffel an out in this case, allowing that his numbers could be the result of bad luck.
Minor league and major league BABIPs are totally different. At the major league level, you can still find examples of pitchers who have exhibited relatively low/high BABIPs throughout their careers, but the range isn’t as large. Pitcher BABIPs have a much larger range in the minors, in part because the range of talent levels is much larger.
If you disagree with any of this, let me know.
Don't confuse what we know about BABIP at the major league level with what is true in the minors.
A Jugs pitching machine would run a very low walk rate and a high BABIP in the low minors, and would even strike plenty of guys out if the speed was set high enough. I doubt the pitching machine would ever make it to the majors though.
*nitpick
He was the Closer at Arizona.
Also, I agree that Stoffel is a top 20 prospect, but I’ll take Casilla over him
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
I don’t think Stoffel is top 20. Besides Hembree and Casilla, I’d take several other relievers over Stoffel – including Dunning, Dunnington, and Verdugo.
Several posters above claimed that Stoffel has a low BB rate, but that’s just not true. Since when is a BB/9 of 4.3 considered good? By comparison, Jonathan Sanchez had a BB/9 of 4.5 this past season and he was considered inconsistent and wild (rightly so).
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
I'd probably take Stoffel over Hembree, Dunning(& ton) and Verdugo
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
I agree
Except for Hembree that is.
Hembree has closer stuff and even though he’s a little young for the AZL and it’s a relatively SSS, but zero walks in 12 appearances is an impressive run, especially when you toss in 22 K’s. He has a plus fastball, with excellent command and could be coming out of the Giants pen very, very soon. If he can improve his secondary pitches, he could be seeing a lot of 8th inning work until Brian Wilson departs.
"I signed up for this job, the day I was born" - Brian Wilson, Ninja
by Giant Torture on Nov 16, 2010 4:29 PM EST up reply actions
They're fairly close on my list
Stoffel is 19 and Hembree is 25.
I gave Stoffel the edge because he’s proven it at a higher level, and while Hembree’s BB rate was amazing, a college player should dominate the AZL. I’ll be curious where they send Hembree next year.
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
I don’t know why I posted that. I could have sworn I saw a BB/9 of 2.something. I think I may have inverted a couple numbers (4.26 went to 2.46 in my mind for some reason).
Anyway, I like Stoffel’s velocity. I don’t know enough about the 2010 draftees (despite your valiant efforts to educate me) to take them over Stoffel, and I’d rather have a guy who throws 95 MPH than a guy who relies on a sinker, just because velocity is something that really can’t be taught (in very few situations you can change mechanics and gain velo, but that’s not something you should count on), but offspeed stuff can be taught, and the Giants coaches are very good at doing that (see: Bumgarner, Lincecum). So I’ll take the natural ability guy and try to round him out instead of the smoke and mirrors guy. Of course, that’s all just personal opinion anyway.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
Pffft. I don’t know why I connected him to Stanford.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
Confused him with Drew Storen?
"I thought he was going to punch me and I was totally accepting of it. I was planning a reason to thank him if he did." Brian Wilson on Buster Posey
Follow me: Twitter.com/gobroks
the one time I saw Stoffel
after a few walks, he started grooving fastballs. Had a real high BABIP that night.
proud, yes I said proud, adoptive papa of "Geno" Eugenio Velez--
more game changing bunts than Buster Posey!
a World Champions San Francisco Giant of 2010!
by foothillsfan on Nov 15, 2010 6:22 PM EST up reply actions
Power arm with the same body build as Cain
Have you seen Stoffel recently? The guy is fat and out of shape. His body build is nothing like Cain’s.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
so...
more like Billingsley? or Broxton?
:p
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Nov 15, 2010 2:24 AM EST up reply actions
Fat-letes
Wow, just found new pics of Stoffel (http://bit.ly/bDC7jT). You’re right, he has ballooned. I might even compare him to Bob Wickman or Chad Cordero now.
Here’s the “before” image >> http://bit.ly/cdtaw5
Not that “big-bodied” pitchers can’t have success in the Majors (see C.C. Sabathia, Livan Hernandez, Sid Fernandez, Bartolo Colon).The NL’s best closer this year — Heath Bell — is a good example of a “fat-lete” who gets it done.
Proudly banned from Skankville, 4-7-10.
Mostly Stoffel had 4 awful appearances last year. And they came in chunk, so he had back to back terrible appearances in the April and then again later on in July or August. Take away those 4 games and his season looks like this:
G 48
ERA 2.44
FIP 2.24
WHIP 1.27
BAA .227
BABIP .339
K/BB 3.2
K/9 11.44
GO/FO 2.04
which isn’t really bad at all.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
on the bright side
He seems to have developed some real offensive tools this year.
Funny to think that besides Bumgarner, Culberson is now the best prospect remaining of the early picks from that pick-heavy class a few years ago . ..
It is mixed
Some people say “horrible” and some people say “gruesome”
GROUGTHINK ALERT
This baseball thing is pretty cool
I was thinking the same thing
Every time I hear about Culberson’s glove I hear it’s pretty terrible.
"He knocks a stake through the heart of the Cardinals! The Cardinals are dead! The Giants are going to the World Series!!!" -Jon Miller
t's Posey time!!
Screw you Flannery.
Feelin’ fairly fine, friend.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
They had so much success with Barry Bonds and Sabean is obviously trying to recapture the magic.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Of course that’s because Bobby Bonds was doing so well and so he named his kid BB too.
Proud adopted parent of the ball dudes, who have grounded into 109 fewer double plays than the Giants.
Does this mean Brandon Belt is going to be successful too?
perhaps John should include this in his analysis
If Belt is so highly ranked
I’d expect at least a B ranking for Jerry Sands. Possibly B+, but that may be a tad optimistic.
"If we hit that bull's eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate"
The scouting reports on Belt are what got him so high
The scouting reports on Sands don’t seem nearly as strong. Add in the fact that Belt is 7 months younger and put up better significantly better AA numbers and I don’t think the two are all that close.
I don't expect the two to be that closely compared
But I expect at least a B rating for Sands while Belt got the A- because he did it at a higher level, and I likely wouldn’t put Sands any higher than a B because he did it in Low A and AA. The difference to me is that Sands can still play outfield, and from what I know of Belt he is pretty much just a 1B. Also I know people think Sands is a bat only type of player, but I’ve seen quite a bit saying that Sands is at worst an average outfielder, and possibly an above average one at that.
That said, Belt sure did freaking mash this year. I’m getting more afraid of the Giants future every day…and it makes me mad, lol.
"If we hit that bull's eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate"
Sands an average or above-average outfielder...
Because those are the guys that get moved to first base in the minors, right?
I recall there being an OF jam at Chattanooga, fine, but if Sands were a significantly better prospect who had a chance of sticking in the OF, he would have been in the OF. I think he’s an outfielder in the way that Albert Pujols was an outfielder.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU_9zTD9B98&feature=related
Apparently there's an epilepsy warning on this video. But it's so incredibly cool.
by Dan Strittmatter on Nov 15, 2010 7:52 AM EST up reply actions
Very insightful
Glad you posted.
"If we hit that bull's eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate"
Adrianza, Culberson and Rosin
Like the inclusion fo Ehire Adrianza and Charles Culberson in your Top 10. Would have thought Seth Rosin would have cracked the Top 20. Big strong kid with some velocity who throws strikes. Can see a little Cainer in him.
HUGE year ahead for Chris Dominguez. Should be able to smash 30 dingers in Cal league. Ryan Verdugo is an interesting pitcher to follow. Will the organization convert Verdugo to a starter?
I agree with you on Rosin, he’s got to be in the top 20. I also like Verdugo a lot, but don’t think the Giants are grooming him as a starter. At this point I believe they are just stretching him out to see if that helps him get a grip on his wildness.
I don’t agree with you on Dominguez though. As mentioned by others above, Dominguez is just plain old. Not to mention that he’s as physically mature as he ever will be, which puts him way ahead of the vast majority of the kids he was playing against in Augusta. He’ll turn 24 next week. I think at his age and maturity that the Giants should move him to AA very quickly next year. Anything that he produces in the Cal League will be almost meaningless.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Chris Dominguez
Fact: he was old for A ball. Old enough to drive team bus.
I’m looking at his improvement in the second half of his 2010 season. For player development purposes assign CD to Hi A San Jose. Let his bat tell the organization when he is ready to be promoted to AA Richmond. Hopefully CD will earn a promotion to AA in 2011.
If CD fails with the bat in 2011 the organization then will need to have a “come to Jesus meeting” and get the kid a rosin bag. Tidrow smiles.
Sounds good.
He needs some aggressive promotions, IMO. Not as sure about him toeing the rubber.
co-dad w/AfDC of
Ishikawa, the Topps Rookie All Star Team's First baseman. Does he get a chance in 2010?
"Because I don’t know what it means anymore, in the PCL. It’s almost like years ago."
"That’s not to say Buster isn’t fully committed or all-in. He is. He’s smart and he’s got the advance reports. Anybody who said he’s not ready to catch in the big leagues is crazy because he’s a pretty good catcher, especially throwing." - Sabean 7/11/10
When Mark Reynolds was Dominguez’ age he hit .279/.349/.495 in the National League. Dominguez just hit .272/.326/.456 in the South Atlantic League.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Yes 23 is old for Sally League
Both are free swinging slugging 3b.
I view age differently than most. I believe a 26 rookie can be very beneficial to a team.
Teams can control a player for up to 6.7 seasons
Player prime years generally considered between ages 26 – 32
Would try to have the two groups intersect for the largest period. I would be ok with CD making his major league debut at 26. Bat him 5th or 6th behind Posey/Belt/???? and CD could be smashing 2 and 3-run HRs while K about 180 times a season.
I understand that, but in development age relative to level is very important in determining just where that path is going to lead. A good comparison isn’t likely to be someone putting up better numbers 4 levels higher at the same age.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
To be fair
Reynolds did that while playing in the NL West, which, as many in the know constantly suggest (especially American League fans in the EST), is pretty comparable to the Sally League. LOL
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
I like Rosin a lot too… it will be interesting to see how he does this year
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Nov 15, 2010 2:26 AM EST up reply actions
Wow...
We just finalized the Top 50, and boy….we have a different list.
I have to admit, the inclusion of Ehire Adrianza and Jarrett Parker so high do surprise me. Adrianza I’ve railed on in the past, I just don’t believe in his bat. Parker just has so little to go on, and more than a few questions. I get Brown…he’s got a true ‘80’ tool to build off of, but Parker not so much. Dunning also seems high to me, though I do like his potential.
I like ranking Dominguez so high. He didn’t make the top 20 in our list, but I really do like his potential. His defense is better rated than it showed and some give him credit for, but the Giants really should push him. His power is legitimate, and he’s hit the deepest home runs many have seen at Lake Olmstead, according to the local people I talk to.
I’ll have to echo the questions about not including Verdugo. When I did my first, raw rating just looking at age, performances, etc…he actually made the Top 10, a big part of that including that he’s starting in the AFL and I’m hearing that the conversion will happen this season, a la David Mixon (who just had his first pro season of starting this year in Double-A).
"The knowledge of the game is inversely proportional to the price of the seat." ---Bill Veeck. •Check out the new look of SFDugout.com•
i like Adrianza
Parker maybe that high is a bit of a stretch …but not really
it isn’t a top 5 or 10 system in the League anymore.
I don’t like Dominguez or Gillispie all that much Culberson is intriguing hmmm……….
I called it - Joe Mauer's first career Home-Run at Target Field !!!
Why Oh Why did the D'Backs select A.J. Pollock over Mike Trout?
I hate Hunter Wendelstedt, you hate Hunter Wendelstedt we all hate hunter w
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Nov 15, 2010 2:07 AM EST up reply actions
I like Verdugo a lot, but it’s surprising to me that the Giants believe he can be converted into a starter. I’m all for starting him in the minors in order to stretch him out and teach him to better control his stuff. However, this is a college guy who just finished his 3rd year in the minors and he can’t control his FB – much less his secondary pitches. If they were going to try to convert him they should have done it sooner. He’s going to be Rule V-eligible at the end of the 2012 season. That gives him only 2 full seasons to become a starter. Conversely, I could see him as being ready to pitch out of the SF bullpen as early as next September.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Good work John!
It’s obvious that you put a lot of time and effort into it, because most of these guys aren’t well-known or highly thought of. It would have been very easy for you to just assume the party line and say that the Giants have nothing in the cupboard beyond the top 3 or 4 guys.
On the whole I agree with your letter grades. Strangely enough, you’ve rated several of these guys higher than I do, and I’m a huge Giants fan. I’m especially surprised to see that you have Peguero, Casilla, and Parker as high as B-. I would rank them as C+, C+, and C, respectively (with Parker being the C). I would also drop Michael Main to a C, and Chris Dominguez to a C-. On the other hand, you do have 1 guy (Chuckie Jones) rated as a C- (or even lower – you didn’t give him an actual grade) that I would rate as a solid C+. He’s a 5-tool stud that displayed the ability to stick in CF, and instantly translated his plus power potential into actual game power while playing in the AZL as a 17 year old. BA rated him as having the best pro debut of any high school player in the 2010 draft.
Those are minor quibbles, while we have some major disagreements on where everybody should be ranked. Obviously, from what I wrote previously, I think you’ve got Peguero, Casilla, Parker, and Dominguez ranked too high – with Casilla being the most egregious over-ranking. I’m also surprised that you like Peguero so much, because he seems to have way too many holes in his game that will be exploited mercilessly as he heads to AA next season, and continues to try and climb the ladder.
The main guys that I think you have too low are Chuckie Jones, Brandon Crawford, Kickham, and Hembree. Crawford’s defense is on par with Adrianza’s, but his bat is already much better than Adrianza’s will likely ever be able to evolve into. Don’t ignore the fact that Crawford made big strides in his approach at the plate this past season, while repeating in the EL. He upped his OBP from .294 in 2009 to .337 in 2010, and his BB-rate jumped up to 11.6% (way above-average) as compared to the 4.8% rate that he posted in 2009.
Mike Kickham struggled with his control and had inconsistent results in college in 2010, but he improved as the year progressed, and he produced a significant and prolonged jump in his velocity. By the summer his FB was sitting around 92 mph, and touching 95. He also developed a good power curve/slurve with great depth that could easily become a plus pitch for him. Lefties with that kind of stuff are hard to find. Give Kickham some time with Dick Tidrow, Steve Kline, and the other Giants pitching gurus this offseason and watch him explode onto the scene next year.
Heath Hembree already has a plus FB and above-average slider. His FB sits at 94-96 and has touched 100 mph. He’s also one of those rare things – a college closer whose team made it into the NCAA tournament, but who wasn’t overused and abused. He’s a thrower now, and just needs to learn how to be a pitcher in the pros. He could easily be pitching in the SF pen by the beginning of the 2011 season.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Good points about Crawford
Crawford is a guy I want badly to believe in, but find it hard sometimes. Maybe that’s because the Giants don’t have a stellar lineup and can’t absorb a guy hitting .250 with no pop and a lower OBP. That being said those are huge strides that he made this year and I wonder how much that was affected by his wrist injury. His defense is major league ready right now and if he could hit .260 with a .320 OBP he’d be in San Francisco right now.
You and I are pretty much in the same camp on Hembree, great stuff that’s a lot closer than I think people realize.
I like Kickham, but I like Rosin a lot better. He can touch 95, and has the frame to eat innings, couple that with being 6’7" and I think his upside is tremendous. He needs work on his secondary pitches, but the Giants have been very, very adept at helping young pitchers develop their changeup and slider, and really secondary pitches in general for that matter. I haven’t seen enough video of him to make this assertion, but it seems that a guy who’s that tall could take a little longer to progress in terms of mechanics, just thinking Randy Johnson, not that his mechanics are bad, but that at that height he could continue to add to his fastball.
Of all the Giants prospects outside of Belt though, Chuckie Jones is the one that has the potential to be truly special. I agree with your assessment that he belongs in the top 20 and I don’t see him staying in CF, but his raw power is astounding for someone his age and if he can cut down on the K’s and increase the BB he could be a more athletic version of Pat Burrell.
"I signed up for this job, the day I was born" - Brian Wilson, Ninja
by Giant Torture on Nov 15, 2010 8:06 AM EST up reply actions
I would imagine Chuckie Jones ends up in RF. What do you think?
"(Christy) Mathewson pitched against Cincinnati yesterday. Another way of putting it is that Cincinnati lost a game of baseball. The first statement means the same as the second." - Damon Runyon
Either or
I see him as a Cody Ross type who can play all three outfield positions, but doesn’t play CF well enough to be an everyday guy. As for RF or LF, I think it will be a pick’em depending on team need. Unless his arm develops at an alarming rate, I don’t think he has the arm to be a RF only type of guy. For the Giants, it will depend on what they do with Belt, some of the rumblings seem to say that the Belt in RF experiment is over, but that remains to be determined. If Belt sticks in RF, than I think Jones could wind up in LF. Of course, if in 3 or 4 years, they don’t have a CF, I think he could play there adequately, but that will depend on what happens with Brown.
"I signed up for this job, the day I was born" - Brian Wilson, Ninja
by Giant Torture on Nov 15, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions
I agree with a lot that you wrote in your above 2 postings. However, I think Jones is more than just an adequate CF. I think he’ll play an above-average D in CF if he makes it to the majors and that’s where his team puts him. Certainly nothing that he showed in Scottsdale would lead to the conclusion that he will be just an adequate major league CF. Also, his arm is more than strong enough to play in RF – it’s definitely above-average. Finally, he had a BB-rate of 10.5% this season, so I don’t see why you think he needs to “increase the BB” going forward. It would be great if he could, but he already showed that he can work a walk at a rate that is well above-average for a player his age and power profile
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Agree
I’m going off of what I’ve read since I’ve never actually seen Jones play, but he doesn’t seem to have the elite speed necessary to say that he’s a CF and will stay there barring some cataclysmic event. More to the point, he’s not as good of a defender as Gary Brown. If Brown pans out that will mean that Jones needs to make the shift to either RF or LF. Also, I wasn’t saying that he had a sub-par arm, just that it wasn’t in that Vlad Guerrero—Jeff Francouer level, where he gives you a distinct advantage in RF over LF. I think it will still come down to what pieces are in place when/if he gets called up. He’s got a plus arm that will allow him to play either RF or LF.
You’re right about the BB-rate, I was thinking of his K-rate, which he needs to cut down on. BTW where are you getting your minor league stats from these days now that minorleaguesplits is no more? Baseball reference doesn’t list k% or BB%, you have to crunch the numbers yourself.
"I signed up for this job, the day I was born" - Brian Wilson, Ninja
by Giant Torture on Nov 15, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, Jones’s arm isn’t in the Vlad zone, and he doesn’t start in CF over Gary Brown if they both make it to SF as starters.
As for my numbers, I’ve been getting them from milb.com and then crunching them myself. For Chuckie Jones, I actually have a record of what he did in every game this year, so lack of data is not a problem when it comes to him. That’s not something usual for me, but I went back and read through all the game recaps for Scottsdale (when they still had them inthe database) in preperation for an in-depth posting I’m going to be doing on Jones in the near future.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
In-depth posting on Jones
Awesome, looking forward to it.
"I signed up for this job, the day I was born" - Brian Wilson, Ninja
by Giant Torture on Nov 15, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions
I find Surkamp intriguing.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
"Out, out, Fred Lewis!" - JCTillam Gamerspeare
Graduations
It is generous to say that the graduations of Posey and Bumgarner take the top level off the system. Every team has a long list of “failed” prospects, and the Giants have lost some big hype guys this past season (or so): Noonan, Rafael Rodriguez, Henry Sosa, Kieschnick, and (if you go back 14 months or so) Villalona. Former B grade players (2009 or 2010) who are now off the top 20, so probably C (or worse or gone). Although really, this is just griping – that is sort of what the “B” grade means: not sure things.
co-dad w/AfDC of
Ishikawa, the Topps Rookie All Star Team's First baseman. Does he get a chance in 2010?
"Because I don’t know what it means anymore, in the PCL. It’s almost like years ago."
"That’s not to say Buster isn’t fully committed or all-in. He is. He’s smart and he’s got the advance reports. Anybody who said he’s not ready to catch in the big leagues is crazy because he’s a pretty good catcher, especially throwing." - Sabean 7/11/10
Thanks John!
I like the list you put out, nothing seems extraordinarily out of sorts, though I generally agree with others above who like certain pitchers a lot. But I think your list is fair and makes sense for the most part.
My only nitpick is regarding Brown, and not with the grade. He has shown the ability to take a walk. People are focusing too much on his 2010 season, where it was very low. One needs to look at his entire college career.
When he first started college, his walk rate was much higher, both in Big West and in Cape Cod. He wasn’t that good a hitter and he took a lot more walks to enable him to get on base and use his speed. As he got better in hitting in whatever league he was in, he took less walks, but his OBP was still high because he was hitting for a better average. So he knows how to take walks, he just didn’t see as much need to when he got better with the bat.
If one took linear weights and calculate the value of his BABIP, sliced for 5 PA, and compared it with changing that to 5 walks, the value of his BABIP was higher than the value of 5 walks. When you hit that well, walks are just not as valuable to the team.
Walks are obviously good, but hits are better and when you get enough of them, even when intermixed with the outs, the overall value is greater when compared.
Personally, I really like Brown’s potential and have no quibble with the grading. Only one full season in CF and he was excellent defensively there. He should only get better with experience. He should not have to hit much more than the average CF to have good value there just due to defense.
However, his hitting was great in the Big West, only three hitters had a better OPS than he did over the past 5-6 seasons: Evan Longoria, Kurt Suzuki, and Blumenthal (Mike?). And as I noted, he adjusted his hitting style as needed to enable him to get on base in order to use his speed, which should be noted is as fast to 1B from the batter’s box (he’s RH) as the best LHB. That’s extra speed that will pay off in gaining more hits on grounders, on the basepaths as a runner, as well as the outfield defense. I’m also partial to defense up the middle, and with Posey at C and hopefully Brown in CF, our defensive bookends will be gold glove caliber.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"Be a lot of happy" - Juan Uribe
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Nov 15, 2010 11:21 AM EST reply actions
Control issues, still in AAA, I’d say emergency MR right now, MAYBE closer if he gets his walks under control. Don’t expect too much, though, I don’t think he becomes anything special.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
I know what you mean. He went from being ranked as a B- prospect in John’s 2010 rankings to not even being an honorable mention in the end of the year rankings. I think the answer is that everybody loves his power arm (FB velocity in the 95-97 mph range), but he has yet to learn how to pitch – which is not good considering he’ll turn 24 in 6 weeks. He just gives up way too many hits and walks to be trusted in the majors. He’s currently getting lit up through his first 3 games in the Dominican Winter League.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Not only can he not pitch, but he doesn’t really get much in the way of swing thrus with his velocity (somewhat like Felix Rodriguez in the old days). Although another possible explanation for why he’s not on the list may be that his eligibility is gone. At this point his major league service is up to about .05. Is he still rookie eligible? If he is, then just the disappointing results serves to answer. He’s got the velocity, but not the hop, the command or ability to deceive.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Do they have any recent news on him?
How does he like MLB so far? What are the Giants trying to get him to work on? Where does he think he’ll pitch next year, and will he be a starter? Please share any insights, because he’s a guy that’s been impossible to get any news on.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
BABIP has to have some degree of skill and luck.
If you take two major league hitters over a period of ten years who have the same walk, and K ratios, and perhaps even pitches per at bat, then over a ten year period if BABIP was purely luck, the players would be very close and the range would be very close. However my guess is that you can find players who put the ball in play a similar amount throughout their careers and one has a much better BABIP consistently than the other. One might be a career 330 hitter while the other is a 270 hitter. Obviously their BABIP’s over a career are quite different, and the variance in fielding cannot be that much, so the skill of hitting the ball where they ain’t is definitely a skill. Just ask Tony Gwynn Sr. Not always, as Ted Williams would show, but often guys who hit to all fields, will have a better BABIP then a pull hitter. Of course Williams would be an exception. If over ten years a guy with similar K, and BB per Ab, where one player has a BABIP range of 270-310 and the other has 285- 325, then perhaps the 15 point swing could be viewed as the skill factor. Of course this is an oversimplification, but both intuitively and statistically, it makes sense that part of the correlation of balls in play, to actual batting average, is related to skill, and part related to luck.
I thought they were talkin about pitcher BABIP and not hitter BABIP
I think pitcher BABIP tends to be more consistent.
Yeah, we're talking pitcher BABIP
Hitter BABIP is definitely skill-related. Faster runners have higher BABIPs.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
Faster runners?
Manny Ramirez career BABIP: .339
Joe Mauer career BABIP: .344
Billy Butler career BABIP: .325
Miguel Cabrera career BABIP: .345
Jack Cust career BABIP: .336
Ryan Howard career BABIP: .328
I think there’s a bit more to it than that.
and hitter with high line drive rates
but this is all very beside the point. Stoffel is not going to have a .400 BABIP his entire career, that much I can guarantee you.
We can agree there.
The point still stands though what we know about BABIP for major league pitchers does not apply in the minors, and that BABIPs are much higher on the whole in the minors. Still, .400 is obviously an outlier that will likely regress.
Ichiro Suzuki career BABIP: .357
Jacoby Ellsbury career BABIP: .320
Carl Crawford career BABIP: .331
Scott Podsednik career BABIP: .328
I didn’t mean that you had to be fast to have a high BABIP, but that players who are fast tend to have high BABIPs.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
Belt is going to wear out triples alley at the phone park
by TimLaser and MattyC on Nov 15, 2010 10:21 PM EST reply actions
Inside-the-park-homers if his speed is to be believed.
Ain't no Posey like a Buster Posey cause a Buster Posey don't stop...hitting.
Giants baseball: We're stupid enough to WIN that (TM)
and it is
think of any player with speed….. Darren Ford? Rajai Davis? Manny Burriss? Gary Brown can run step for step with each if not faster. Brown has shown the ability to hit to all fields and the gaps. Easily will go from first to third on a single. Can score from first on a Gerald Posey double.
When/if Brown makes it to MLB you will fall in love with his game changing speed.

by 















