Draft Review - Pittsburgh Pirates
I've posted a review of the Pittsburgh Pirates' draft over at MLB Bonus Baby. There's comments on all 51 picks. The next team up will be the Baltimore Orioles.
Here's an excerpt for you, this being the size of each year in my draft previews before the draft:
1. Tony Sanchez, C, Boston College, #4 overall, 6’0’’/215: I, like many observers, absolutely loathed this pick when it occurred. This smelled like old Pirates’ ball, the kind where Moskos is better than Wieters. Sanchez is a good player, and easily the best college catcher in the 2009 class, but he’s not top ten good. However, he was affordable for slot, and the Pirates value that. He signed almost immediately, and after a quick 4-for-13 stint with State College in the NYPL, Sanchez is now 13-for-30 (.433) with West Virginia in the single-A Sally League. DOB: 5/20/88. Signing bonus: $2.5 million.
1s. Victor Black, RHP, Dallas Baptist, #49 overall, 6’4’’/205: Though I wasn’t a fan of the Sanchez pick, I immediately liked this one. Black greatly improved from 2008 to 2009 due to hard work on his mechanics, thus improving his command. He’s got great natural stuff, with a hard fastball that lacks movement, but also paired with an effective slider. He’s got a bit longer to go than most college junior pitchers, but he’s got the natural stuff of a potential #3 starter. Good pick for talent, about average for draft value, and he signed quickly. He’s thrown 6 good innings for State College. DOB: 5/23/88. Signing bonus: $717,000.
2. Brooks Pounders, RHP, Temecula Valley HS (CA), #53 overall, 6’4’’/225: Pounders has a big body, but he’s not going to be throwing every pitch past batters. Rather, Pounders comes with an advanced repertoire for a prep, including a changeup that is already considered something close to average. His command is solid, and there’s a chance he can move fairly fast. I expected Pounders to last to the next round or so, and this isn’t really a projectability pick, so I’m a tad down on it, but Pounders could easily work his way up to becoming a solid #3 or 4 workhorse in the rotation. He signed fairly quickly, but was lit up for a couple of runs in just two-thirds of an inning in his GCL debut. He followed that up nicely with 3 perfect innings five days later. DOB: 9/26/90. Signing bonus: $670,000.
3. Evan Chambers, OF, Hillsborough CC (FL), #84 overall, 5’11’’/210: I’m not a big fan of this pick at all. Chambers has some thunder in his bat, but I don’t think his recognition skills are good enough to warrant this high of a selection. I expected him to go somewhere early in the second day, probably in the neighborhood of the 5th round, so this was also a bit of an overdraft. He’s got enough skills to be an average center fielder, but the whole package is generally some plus tools with some average ones with some minus skills. He’ll need time, and I’m not sure he was worth the risk of such an expensive investment. He signed fairly quickly and is off to a 7-for-36 (.194) start with State College. DOB: 3/24/89. Signing bonus: $423,900.
4. Zack Dodson, LHP, Medina Valley HS (TX), #115 overall, 6’2’’/190: Dodson’s also a very risky pick. I’ve heard multiple reports that his mechanics are Purke-like, though his command in games was much worse than Matt Purke’s. My initial reaction is that he might need a remake of his mechanics altogether. However, even with the shaky mechanics, Dodson is able to unleash an average fastball for a lefty, combined with a nice slow curve. BA has speculated that he has a seven-figure asking price, so this is a bad pick for signability. The talent is there, however, and this is about where I thought he might go, possibly landing a round later. He still has not signed, and this one will probably go down to the wire. DOB: 7/23/90. Commitment: Baylor.
The cutoff point in the Pirates' draft in terms of transitioning to unsignable or organizational players is after the Peter Bako pick in the 15th round.
What do you guys think?
4 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Underrated Draft
Sanchez was an overdraft but if the Pirates can end up signing Von Rosenberg, Cain, Stevenson, Inman & Den Dekker then their draft would be very good
Grab Some Pine Meat!
by Gobroks on Jul 13, 2009 6:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agree...
by shooting low with sanchez the bucs freed up some cash to sign some higher end picks later in the draft
by gorilla_baller on Jul 13, 2009 6:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sanchez signed for slot
They did not save any money and deserve to be ripped for drastically overpaying him.
And a very big thank you for the work that you’ve done, Andy.
by jar75 on Jul 13, 2009 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
right
but instead of drafting someone who’s demands will be above slot it still saves them cash in the end that can be used to add depth to a pretty depleted system
by gorilla_baller on Jul 13, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I think they could have got a better player to accept 4th pick slot money (my choice would have been Borchering). The saving money argument would have made sense if he Sanchez signed for well below slot, but that just wasn’t the case.
I also think the Pirates could use top end talent more than depth right now.
by jar75 on Jul 13, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree the Pirates should've gone another direction
especially considering only 3 catchers (including Sanchez) were gone before the Pirates 2nd pick… and if the Pirates wanted someone cheap why not take Kyle Gibson…a broken forearm isn’t as bad as an elbow or shoulder or if they wanted a MIF more reliable than Sano take Grant Green, however if the pirates do sign Sano then their future line up looks pretty good, with only the closer situation needed to be addressed.
C-Tony Sanchez
1B-Neil Walker
2B-Shelby Ford
SS-Miguel Sano
3B-Pedro Alvarez
LF-Gorkys Hernandez
CF-Andrew McCutchen
RF-Jose Tabata
SP-Zach Duke
SP-Paul Maholm
SP-Zack Von Rosenberg
SP-Brad Lincoln
SP-Victor Black
Grab Some Pine Meat!
by Gobroks on Jul 14, 2009 3:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Issues
-Pedro is a first baseman at this point
-From all reports, Sano will not stay at SS
-Neil Walker’s bat is a huge question mark, and he’ll probably best fit as a second baseman
-I don’t believe in Gorkys as anything more than a defensive OFer
-I definitely do not trust Zach Duke
by jar75 on Jul 14, 2009 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Duke is a fine fit to pencil into the rotation for a fair amount of time. He’s been a little bit lucky this year, and certainly isn’t a #1 SP type, but this is the first year his FIP has exceeded his ERA in four years. I think he’s probably right around a 4.10-4.20 FIP type pitcher, which is a serviceable back-end SP, which is clearly what Duke is. He also fits with the organizational philosophy of Pittsburgh, which is to pitch to contact and maximize the length of outings (you can debate whether or not that’s a justifiable strategy if you’d like..). I’d have Maholm (FIP this season of 3.54) higher than Duke, but he’s more of a MOR if anything.
Brad Lincoln may not have front of the rotation upside, but I think he’s probably the guy in the majors or high in the minors with the best chance to anchor a staff (quality repetoire, excellent control, strong K/BB ratios, mediocre FB/GB ratios). The Buccos could badly use an Ace, but I think they can get by between Duke, Maholm, Ohlendorf, Lincoln plus Gorzelanny, Snell, etc. in the back-end.
I’d be much more worried about their dire lack of impact bats.
by WrenFGun on Jul 14, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Last Post
Is assuming Von Rosenberg signs
Grab Some Pine Meat!
by Gobroks on Jul 14, 2009 5:02 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs

by 








