Prospect Profile: Matt Maloney
Prospect Profile: Matt Maloney
The Reds are expected to promote Matt Maloney to the majors tonight, so that he can start on Saturday against the Cubs. Who is Maloney and what can we expect from him?
Matt Maloney was drafted by the Phillies in the third round in 2005, from the University of Mississippi. He was very successful in college, posting a 3.11 ERA with a 111/26 K/BB in 104 innings his junior year, but lasted until the third round due to an average fastball. He performed fairly well in short-season ball, with a 3.89 ERA and a 36/15 K/BB in 37 innings for Batavia in the New York-Penn League. I gave him a Grade C+ in the 2006 book, writing that as a college-trained finesse pitcher, he should do well in A-ball, but that Double-A would be the real test.
The Phillies sent Maloney to Lakewood in the Sally League in '06. He was brilliant, going 16-9, 2.03 with a 180/73 K/BB in 169 innings, 120 hits allowed. The walk rate was higher than ideal, but his K/IP and hit rates were excellent, even though his fastball was just 85-89 MPH. His curve, slider, and changeup were all solid. I gave him a Grade B- in the '07 book, still wondering how he would transition to Double-A.
The Phillies wondered that too, so they jumped him up to Reading in 2007, skipping the High-A level. He was still effective at the higher level, with a 3.94 ERA and a 115/45 K/BB in 126 innings with 117 hits allowed. Traded to the Reds for in the Kyle Lohse deal that July, he made a parallel move to Double-A Chattanooga after the trade, posting a 2.57 ERA and a sharp 39/3 K/BB in 28 innings. The Reds moved up to Triple-A in late August and he continued to perform very well, with a 3.18 ERA and a 23/6 K/BB in 17 innings.
Maloney's velocity picked up a bit in '07, still not great at 86-91. But his slider and changeup improved, and his command proved very strong even against advanced minor league competition. I gave him a Grade B in the 2008 book, writing that he was one of my favorite finesse pitchers.
Assigned to Triple-A to begin 2008, he went 11-5 and posted a fine 132/39 K/BB in 140 innings. His hit rate went up and he gave up 18 homers, boosting his ERA to 4.68. Despite this, I was still pretty sanguine about him in the book this year, writing that "I like Maloney more than most other analysts do" and that he could be a decent number four starter. I also warned that he had no clear opportunity in Cincinnati. I did lower his rating to Grade C+.
Maloney has been terrific for Louisville this year, with a 2.00 ERA and a 58/9 K/BB in 67 innings with 60 hits allowed. He was particularly outstanding in his last start, fanning 10 with zero walks and just three hits against Scranton on June 1st. Maloney is getting his chance in the majors now. Questions to consider: how will his command transition to the majors? Will his fly ball tendencies result in excessive home runs in the majors?
Although he doesn't have the hot fastball, his K/IP and hit rates are those of a power pitcher, and that's a very positive sign. He has nothing left to prove at the minor league level. Given sufficient adjustment time, I think he will surprise some people. Prediction for his first start: 6 innings, 6 hits, 2 runs, one homer allowed, one walk, three strikeouts, victory.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
I'm glad to see Maloney getting a shot
I’ve always been a fan of his, and while he’s not a flashy prospect I do think he can stick in the back end of a rotation for while. As long as his command stays sharp I think he’ll be ok, too many walks will be a big issue when compounded with his high HR rate.
RIP Nick Adenhart
by gatling on Jun 5, 2009 9:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
J.A. Happ, version II?
A lot of similarities, honestly (and not because they were both Phillies prospects). Happ throws a bit harder, but the knock was that he was a lefty with good-not-great stuff who would get exposed at the major league level — which sounds an awful lot like Maloney. For my money, sustained success at every stop in the minors means a reasonable chance to be a useful major league player.
I think there’s a larger point here: many people will knock guys like Maloney because the scouting reports don’t live up to the numbers, and even if everything goes right, they’re not top-end starters. But there’s nothing wrong with projecting as a solid #4/5, even if the ultimate upside isn’t there. With some of the retreads being recycled now (Chan Ho Park, Livan Hernandez, Mark Hendrickson), having a young, cost-controlled guy who can step in and do the job from Day 1 is a much more valuable asset than many people realize.
by PhillyFriar on Jun 5, 2009 9:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Love the prediction
I hope it comes true.
With the number of Reds young guys performing well this year, you cound do prospect retros all day. Hanigan and Masset could be coming soon.
by Dave from Louisville on Jun 6, 2009 9:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Masset already has expieriance against the cubs when he was with the White Sox
He was really good in his debut, but he wasn’t that good from then on. He might pitch better in the national league thoguh
Big Numbers
by homerun013 on Jun 6, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes!
I have always followed this guy, and am happy to see him go to the Pros
Big Numbers
by homerun013 on Jun 6, 2009 11:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ridiculous
John’s prediction: 6 innings, 6 hits, 2 runs, one homer allowed, one walk, three strikeouts, victory.
Actual line was: 6 innings, 6 hits, 2 runs, 2 homers allowed, one walk, four strikeouts, no decision.
That is eerily accurate.
by mrkupe on Jun 6, 2009 10:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
He did the same thing with another pitcher (forget who right now) last week. Kudos
by ofsticksandbats on Jun 7, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs














