Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Shattered: Wisconsin's home winning streak ends

Should the nationals really break the bank?

 

I just read that David Price, the most highly rated pitching prospect in years, a lefty with a high 90's fastball and maturity beyond his years, hasn't made it out of the 6th inning in ANY start in the majors so far in 2009. 

This is the same David Price who came in at the end of 2008 to help seal the deal on the devil rays going to the playoffs.  In fact, I believe he pitched a prominant role in those playoffs, coming in for relief work. 

But he is no where near dominant so far in 2009. 

NOT

EVEN

CLOSE

Lets go over this one more time. 

Plays on a competitive team?  Yes.

Big time fast ball?  Yes.

Secondary pitches?  Yes. 

Considered a sure thing?  Yes.

But he isn't dominating.  In fact, he may very well be sent back to triple A when scotty kazmir comes off the dl (ahead of the steller andy sonnanstine who has a 7 era). 

All this leads me to ask "Should the Nationals really consider paying strokerberg much more than last years high water mark for drafted players (~ $6 million)?"

He is a pitcher, which is inherantly risky in regards to both health and production. 

He has faced only college level hitters (99.9 wont make it to the majors). 

He is being hyped by bor-ASS, which means a couple of things.  One, mega-bad PR move as he is now regarded as greedy because every bor-ASS client is painted with this brush.  Two, bor-ASS shall counsel him to wait until the very last minute to sign (thus, if signed, it is extremely dumb to have him pitch this year).  Finally, the most important point in regards to the upcoming contract battle:  bor-ASS is trying to negoiate as though strokemberg is a free agent, WHICH HE IS NOT.  In fact, I am thinking bor-ASS is attempting to use the drafted player as his new money grab.  Over the last couple of years, bor-ASS' scare tactics just don't seem as successful as yesteryear.  Manny didn't get his $100 million.  Varitek didn't get his $40 million.  Yes, he still swims in cash but he doesn't scare the owners any more (at least that is my preception)

Let bor-ASS use all his contacts in the media to sway the public but the fact is, the Nationals should do the following:  Publicly state our offer is $10 million.  It is $4 million more than last years top pick.  If you choose to not accept by this date (pick one), enjoy your winter, we'll be picking #1 and #2 next year.  I wish you luck and hope you don't turn into matt harrington, who now works at the home depot.

It would show the Washington fab base they made a very fair and generous offer.  If a player who hasn't pitched above college does not want to accept what is probably the best dollar deal ever offered to an in-coming drafted player, they won't look bad.  Management can smile and save the money for the top 2 picks next year. 

 

 



0 recs  |  Comment 45 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good luck negotiating with Bryce Harper

if they take that kind of attitude with Strasburg.

http://www.theyankeeuniverse.com

by lemonjello on Jun 17, 2009 1:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Price

I stopped reading after the 4th sentence. David Price has made four (4) major league starts this year. He has had control issues for sure, but he also has a K/9 of 12.32. To condemn him after 4 inefficient outings is ridiculous.

by jar75 on Jun 17, 2009 1:55 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Rolling over the top pick to next year ...

could very well be the Nats intention. Playing ball with Scott Boras is becoming an inevitablity. I don’t know that many people REALLY know what $50 million means, let alone as it pertains to baseball payroll. Relatively speaking, I think that spending that amount on a player like Strasburg makes more sense than spending it on, say, Gil Meche. My reasoning is this: Strasburg at least has the ability to be an eight-figure pitcher, which should be reserved for elite performers. Has Strasburg yet earned this level of distinction? No. Hence the reason it is easy to point to so many first-pick busts and hold it over his head. He has the ability to earn that level of distinction though. And that makes him — insofar as the modern market is concerned — worth the money. That doesn’t mean the Nats should, or are going to sign him though.

by StickRat on Jun 17, 2009 2:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If they don't sign him this year

They might have the #1 and #2 pick next year in the draft with Stephen Strasburg and Bryce Harper. And yes, I understand that if they don’t sign Strasburg, then Strasburg would have to agree to let them draft him again

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Jun 17, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep. And I think they are being very careful from a public-relations standpoint. If Drew Storen can make some kind of impact within the organization before Aug. 15, it gives the Nats a lot of P.R. collateral to say something like: “Hey, we are going to pass of Strasburg. We passed on Crow last year, and look how that worked out.” That puts a lot of pressure on Storen to perform, but hey, that’s what Stanford guys are for.

by StickRat on Jun 17, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gil Meche, huh?

That’s been a terrible contract.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on Jun 17, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

as a side note

I think a lot of people somehow haven’t picked up that Meche has gone from end of the rotation junk … with upside … with the Mariners to a solid 2/3 starter. At least, I think the general fan hasn’t picked up on that.

by toonsterwu on Jun 17, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yep

There are probably fifteen or more teams in the league that wish they’d signed him to that deal.

by Fanon on Jun 17, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Frankly, they should pay him what they want. The jersey sales and the attention the team will get strikes me as similar to paying the 50M bonus fee the Sox did to negotiate with Daisuke. I realize we’re not looking at a different country here, but a Strasburg start could legitimately put 5000-10000 more people in the stands than they are currently getting. It won’t take much of that before he’s looking like a bargain.

by WrenFGun on Jun 17, 2009 2:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Math

You know that 10,000 extra tickets sold at $20 a seat is only $200,000 right? He is going to have to pitch lights out to keep bringing in an additional 10K per start. So assuming he does that, over 30 starts in a season, you are still only looking at $6M. Odds are he doesn’t bring an additional 10K per start. Odds are that he won’t dominate completely either, at least not early on. Given that they are probably looking for at least 20M, the attendance boost doesn’t really offset much.

by dougdirt on Jun 17, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How many of those extra fans are going to buy $5+ beers, hot dogs, merchandise, etc? Theres more than just ticket sales that account into increased stadium revenue.

by metafour on Jun 17, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You do the math, then fail to realize the impact of your own calculation

$6 million a year in gratuitous added value would be enough to turn your typical Alex Cora-type bench jank into someone with the value of a league-average player.

You’re right that he won’t bring in that much, but that’s because that kind of added revenue only happens when the player is a national icon like Ichiro or chasing some kind of major record. Even if he brings in a fraction of that number, multiplied out over 6-7 years, it would (or at least should) make a significant impact on the size of his signing bonus.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Jun 17, 2009 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Breaking the Bank"

You keep mentioning it without defining what breaking the bank would be. As of right now, I don’t think anyone expects Strasburg to get the 50 million that’s been floated around. Around 20-25 million is probably more likely.

Is that too much? Well, I could delve into the messy side tangent of athletes are being paid too much anyways. Leaving all that aside, if it’s 25 million or less, yes, the Nationals should pay. First off, it isn’t only Boras hyping up Strasburg. Whether or not Strasburg pans out, only time will tell, but almost EVERYONE has been hyping up Strasburg.

a) Much as you propose that Strasburg would take a PR hit, so would the Nationals. This is a team that, due to the Lerner’s actions, has been viewed as cheap and dysfunctional. There is already low interest in the area – the little energy that the Strasburg pick brought is needed badly. The Storen pick was viewed as a signability pick. The team will have money clearing off the books in the next few years.

b) As lemonjello notes, this would impact the Bryce Harper negotiations. Lost amidst the idea of taking a pick next year is that it stands quite likely that Strasburg and Harper would be 1 and 2 next year. Harper would have much more leverage, pinning the Nationals in a corner for a variety of reasons but partly because the Nationals can’t keep rolling over picks.

c) A small reason, but If Strasburg is as good as anticipated, then Strasburg, Zimmerman, Detwiler gives them a very intriguing pitching trio, and they can find back of the rotation options. Short of it is, this team could turnover and be competitive much sooner than people anticipate (look, I’m not saying 2010, I’m thinking more 2012 to be competitive), and with the money freeing up, they can look to retool the lineup. For the franchise to survive, they need to get better quicker, and the Strasburg move (to pay him in the 20-25 mil range) would be very much in the same vein as the Meche move in FA for KC a few years ago, a “We’re in the game” move. Forget precedent and what not – the Nationals are teetering closer to the edge than most are probably willing to acknowledge. There is very little general interest in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, and I can easily see a scenario where things go from bad to horrible if they can’t spark some signs of life.

Make no mistake about it, but the Nationals need the Strasburg signing as much as Strasburg needs to sign this year to prevent the risk from not pitching a year. My guess? Kasten and Boras will play hardball, with Kasten perhaps starting with slot and Boras at a ridiculous number. They’ll work their way down and eventually be somewhere in that 18-25 mil.888888

by toonsterwu on Jun 17, 2009 2:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Um
He is being hyped by bor-ASS, which means a couple of things. One, mega-bad PR move as he is now regarded as greedy because every bor-ASS client is painted with this brush. Two, bor-ASS shall counsel him to wait until the very last minute to sign (thus, if signed, it is extremely dumb to have him pitch this year). Finally, the most important point in regards to the upcoming contract battle: bor-ASS is trying to negoiate as though strokemberg is a free agent, WHICH HE IS NOT. In fact, I am thinking bor-ASS is attempting to use the drafted player as his new money grab. Over the last couple of years, bor-ASS’ scare tactics just don’t seem as successful as yesteryear. Manny didn’t get his $100 million. Varitek didn’t get his $40 million. Yes, he still swims in cash but he doesn’t scare the owners any more (at least that is my preception)

This is the single stupidest paragraph I’ve ever read on this site.

First off, who paints every Boras client as greedy? Moronic fans who spell Boras’ name “bor-ASS”? And if so, who cares what they think? They’re moronic fans.

Secondly, the Nationals knew that they wouldn’t have Strasburg signed by August 17th when they drafted him. They aren’t stupid; they expected exactly what’s happening. What the hell does it matter if he pitches this season? The Nationals don’t need him to, and I’d suspect that they aren’t stupid enough to have him do so anyway. And thirdly, “strokemberg”? Grow the fuck up.

If you had any sort of sense, you’d see that, Boras’ negotiating tactics are as good as ever. He never planned on getting Manny $100M or getting Varitek $40M, and he sure as hell doesn’t plan on getting Strasburg $50M. By putting out a number that high, Boras probably understands that he’ll get his clients exactly what they want: A number slightly below the leaked “target value”, but still damn high.

Also, David Price is 22. He’s as close to a sure thing as any young pitcher in baseball. He hasn’t pitched a ton of innings so far because the Rays are trying to limit his season innings to 180, something that is known by anybody who has followed baseball this year. I should have had the sense to stop reading your awful post when I saw you trashing a 22-year old rookie SP for not being the leading candidate for the AL Cy Young. My mistake.

by RedSoxFaithful on Jun 17, 2009 4:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Guilty by association

If you are going to insult me and my thoughts, at least begin your arguement with a reasonable position and defending bor-ASS and his clients is not a reasonable position.

YES, players who use scott bor-ASS as their agent ARE deemed greedy. If you need proof, here it is: the same reference/arguement made over and over by the bor-ASS supporters is “if you want the most money, you hire bor-ASS”

Am I wrong? Did I pull this theory out of my ass? Of course not because I read it all the time…basic simple intellgence says if you are trying to get every last cent, then YES, you ARE greedy and you hire bor-ASS.

And I did not write the nationals have to have him signed by aug 17. I wrote “pick a date, tell him you aren’t paying over X amount of dollars and stick to it”. Why haggle if you already know what you are willing to give and if you are willing to give is FOUR MILLION MORE than last years top pick, this amount is incredibly generous.

You wrote bor-ASS didn’t expect to get $100 million for manny or $40 million for Varitek? I don’t even want to get into this discussion with YOU because you are proving to have selective memory and/or lack of intelligence. Do a search and you’ll see non-stop coverage regarding the mistake of varitek declining arbitrition because bor-ASS convinced varitek that he WOULD get posada money. Both manny and varitek contract demands are well documented so why post, um, thoughts that are so easily broken down?

Yes, David Price is 22 but that is apart of my point. It may take 3 or 5 or 10 years or maybe he’ll never become dominant. What guarantees do we have that Price IS going to be dominant? None. We use our best resources and our eyes and then give a guess. It is the same with strokemberg. He has succeeded against COLLEGE hitters. Why pay through the nose for a player who has NEVER succeeded against major leaguers or even professional hitters? Why pay him way more than established major leaguers receive(d), such as bobby abreu. HE IS NOT A FREAKIN FREE AGENT. If you need more proof that just because a prospect is a sure thing, it doesn’t guarantee stardom: Alex Gordon was suppose to be everything Evan Longoria is, wasn’t he?

Is strokemberg 4 times the prospect that pedro alvarez was when he was drafted last year? What is so wrong with offering 10 million dollars? I just don’t get why people think the kid deserves $25 million or $20 million or even $15 million.

Let him produce in the majors and when arbitration comes along, he’ll be paid hansomly, just ask ryan howard…

by tuna411 on Jun 17, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

personally....

i think players that dont sign with the agent who will get them the most money are stupid

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Jun 17, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Also

Who again cares whether a player is “deemed” greedy?

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Jun 17, 2009 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

an agent’s job is to negotiate the best contract possible for their client. They have a fiduciary obligation to act in their client’s best interest. Boras is good at his job. Are the front office negotiators who try to SAVE every last penny in the exact same negotiations “deemed greedy?” Why do we persist in blaming players (who oftentimes comes from absolutely nothing) and sparing the business moguls who own and operate teams at ridiculous profit margins in the court of public opinion?

by slamcactus on Jun 18, 2009 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK

Why haggle over a price? Because it’s called a negotiation. I see your logic of setting a price right now that it makes you look like your in charge, but the reality of the situation is that the Nationals are not in charge of these negotiations and never will be. Boras and Strasburg can command whatever they want out of the Nationals because it would be a complete nightmare if they didn’t sign him. Here is a franchise that is a complete mess right now, signing someone like Strasburg helps peak the interest in the fan base which in turn generates revenue (be it merchandise or concessions or ticket sales), not to mention the fact that he is the best prospect to EVER come out of college in the history of the draft. Now if the Nationals don’t sign Strasburg, this will be the second year in a row that they didn’t sign a top 10 pick. Losing Aaron Crow is one thing, but losing Strasburg is another. Ordinarily, the draft doesn’t reach the average fan, but Strasburg has generated so much hype that virtually everyone knows about. The repercussions of not signing someone like him would be devastating to a franchise in the position that the Nationals are in.

As for the signing bonus that Strasburg is likely to command, no he isn’t worth $25 million in your mind and probably most other people’s minds, but that is the market value for a player as talented as him coming out of college. The Nationals knew his price tag and they are obviously willing to pay overslot. Now you could counter that argument with the fact that it would have a PR disaster if they passed on him because of his price tag, but it would be sheer stupidity if they drafted him knowing his price tag and didn’t pay him. I personally think that they sign him for somewhere between $17-23 million.

No, we don’t know Price will develop, but he doesn’t have to be Johan Santana this year to be considered successful. Price is as close to a sure ace as you are going to get coming out of the minors. Big framed lefties that throw mid to upper 90s with a plus breaking ball and an average change don’t grow on trees. You can’t teach stuff which is something that Price has plenty of. Granted his command is lacking a little bit, but that is something that improves as pitchers throw more.

I think the point you are missing on is that club’s do know that no player is a sure thing. Strasburg is not a sure thing, neither is any other player in the draft. But the draft is a crapshoot anyway, and there are guys that get paid millions of dollars that may never sniff AA. But clubs continue to pay them because that is where the market is right now. You or I may not agree with the money these guys receive coming out of the amateur ranks, but that is the reality of the situation. Kids with the talent level of Strasburg are in line to receive a huge payday because that is what there value is in the DRAFT.

by parnz on Jun 17, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can not entirely agree

You make some exactly points.

We do agree these players are coming via a DRAFT.

bor-ASS can claim anything he wants but in the end, the Nationals won’t look cheap or out of touch if they do not give in to outragous demands…and I think anything over SEVEN million is outragous (but acknowldge this guy may be better or have a higher potential than the average #1 and concede to 10 million).

Because we both agree it is a crapshoot and there are exactly zero hof #1 pitchers since the inception of the draft, how can you surmise this player is actually worth 4 times last years #1 contract? It doesn’t make sense to me.

It is a fact the draft is set up in part to control salaries in the same way that free agency explodes salaries. Do established players like abreu or dunn or hudson or martinez want drafted players making MORE money without an inning of experience? Should average joe fan watch the unproven making more than the perrenial allstar?

Frankly, I find this arguement/discussion both amusing and interesting. Below, there is a response from a guy who is projecting strokemberg to be an all-star or what ever and this is exactly what I am arguing. He has done nothing! ZERO. This isn’t the nfl where a wide reciver steps right in at the pro level and can be an allstar. Strokerberg shall put in time in the minors, struggle for 40 or 60 starts or longer.

I just don’t see how it is good business to pay him like he has produced…

 

by tuna411 on Jun 17, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

really a side note

but you do realize that it is the exception where a WR can step in and become an all-star right away, right? Most people go by the 3 year rule for WR’s. RB is a position that you are more likely to see pro bowl rookies.

by toonsterwu on Jun 18, 2009 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he will NOT get 40 or 60 starts in the minors....

probably 15-20 at most…and more than likely, he will not struggle

and toonster below me…dont try to prove a point with facts

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Jun 18, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you are missing the point

You are right, the Nationals won’t look cheap if they decide to pass on the $50 million he wants, but they will look pretty stupid. They knew what they were getting when they took him and if they don’t sign it shows how ignorant they really are. If they wanted to draft someone that would sign for $5 million or less then they should have taken someone like Wheeler, Hobgood, or another guy where signability wasn’t an issue.

I think the money these guys get paid out of the amateur ranks is outrageous as well, but as I said that is what agents and teams have set their value at. The draft and the free agent market are two very different things. In free agency you are paying for what you know the guy can do and in the draft you are buying on potential and other factors such as buying a guy out of a college commitment or another year of school. I don’t think major leaguers want unproven players getting paid the way they do, but that is how business is done. It has become cliche, but baseball is a business. If $5 million is what it takes to sign a top draft pick, then you pay it because you need the talent and there really is not other option besides not signing your top pick every year because you think the system is unfair. If you don’t want to pay the money in the draft then you will ultimately see the consequences down the road when you have no young talent to help out at the major league level.

I know you acknowledge the Strasburg may be better than the average #1 overall pick, but you fail to realize that this is the best pitching prospect in the history of the draft. This is someone who has the ideal pitcher’s body, the work ethic, the makeup, and the stuff to be successful. Now, lets break down his stuff. He has a fastball that sits in the mid to upper 90s with life and the ability to command it virtually everywhere he wants to. Usually with amateurs, if they have the ability to throw that hard they can’t command and/or it is straight as an arrow. On the other hand, if guys can command the fastball and it has life, then they only throw in the 80s or low 90s. That right there is the definition of a plus-plus fastball, an 80 right now on the 20-80 scale. There are only a handful of guys in the majors that can claim to have an 80 fastball. As for his breaking pitch, it is also plus-plus. It sits in the low 80s with depth, plenty of action, and a tight spin. His breaking ball would be considered one of the better breaking balls in the majors right now. As for his changeup, he hasn’t had to use it as much as his other pitches, but it too has been pretty good. Likely a major league average pitch right now with the potential to get better. That combination of his fastball, breaking ball, changeup, and command would put him in the upper tier of major league pitchers right now. Now this is not saying that he is guaranteed to be great because by all means he’s not, but this is saying that there has never been a pitcher to come out of college or high school that can match his stuff and command of that stuff. Yes he still has things to learn, but I have full confidence that he will start maybe 10-15 games in the minors before he is knocking on the door for a promotion to the big leagues.

Now does this make him 4 times as worth as Tim Beckham or Price, maybe maybe not, but that is what it is going to take to get him to sign. If I am the Nationals, I need to get this done to spark fan interest and bring nearly major league ready talent into the system.

You can’t say that Strasburg has done nothing. He has absolutely dominated in college (albeit not in the SEC, ACC, or PAC 10) and was the ONLY college pitcher on the US Olympic roster last year. Even being the only college player, he was the best pitcher on the team and was called upon to start in a big game for them (drawing a blank on what game). I think what you are trying to say is that he hasn’t done anything in the majors yet which is true, but by spring time next year he will be in a very young Nationals rotation.

by parnz on Jun 18, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't even know how to respond

You are just coming off as such a tool. His name is Scott Boras. Maybe the “bor-ASS” pun was clever the first time somebody said it, but it’s old now. Drop it, and grow up.

Four million more than last year’s top pick is incredibly generous? Strasburg is a guy that is being touted as the best prospect in the history of the draft. I have a suspicion that you’re just trolling, because nobody could be so dumb as to overlook this. Whether or not he delivers on the hype is a different story, but he has the best likelihood out of any pitching prospect in recent memory to become an ace. Period.

And no, genius, I do not have a selective memory. I understand full well that Boras publicly said he wanted $100 million for Manny and $40 million for Varitek. I also understand that he had absolutely no intentions of actually getting that much. Boras is not a stupid man; much smarter than me, and much much smarter than you. When he talks contracts with clubs, it’s a negotiation, and by starting with a number higher than he actually expects, he is able to get his clients top possible dollar. It’s a pretty simple bargaining concept, if you ask me.

As for price, open your damn eyes. The guy is 22-years old, and is not only holding his own in the AL East, but is actually pitching extremely well. Very few pitchers come out of the gate with Cy Young-worthy seasons, and to panic because Price “only” has a 3.46 ERA and K/9 over 10 is just moronic. There’s no other way to put it. It’s a stupid stance to take.

You ask if Strasburg is “4 times the prospect that pedro alvarez was”? Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. He is arguably the single best pitching prospect in the history of the modern draft. What don’t you understand about this? People are already naming him the #1 overall prospect without even seeing him pitch a professional inning. Where was that when Alvarez was drafted? It was non-existant, because Stephen Strasburg is one of the best prospects ever, while Alvarez was merely an elite one.

And I don’t know how well you understand baseball financials, but Strasburg doesn’t really even have to do much to warrant a $25 million bonus. That’s just over $4M/year over 6 years, and even if you are pessimistic about Strasburg, that’s worth the chance that he becomes an ace. Consider this: His downside, at this point, is a #4 starter, and there are plenty of those being paid more than $4M a year.

Calling Strasburg “strokemberg” is pretty much the end of the rope for me, and really backs up every accusation and name I’ve thrown your way. You are representative of the lowest common denominator of fans. It’s really a shame that you found your way to this site.

by RedSoxFaithful on Jun 18, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So a player is a bust if they don't immediately produce?

You get 6 team-controlled seasons.

If you could give negative recs, I would give one to this post.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Jun 17, 2009 4:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd say he's worth about a $20 million signing bonus

I don’t think fans care that much about what players’ ask for in salary so long as they produce. The Nats will come off looking very cheap, which will hurt particularly after they suck so bad and the city just spent millions on a new stadium for them. The Nats are already hurting after the Aaron Crow fiasco, the bonus skimming scandal, the firing of Bowden the dangling of Manny Acta and the plain suckitude of the team.

I think Strasburg has an enormous amount of leverage here. The Nats really cannot afford not to sign him.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 17, 2009 6:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Strasburg and Harper

Definately break the bank on these 2 studs! They could be the best P-C tandem in the majors for 10-15 years! Worth the risk, it’s not our money.

by Patriotreign3 on Jun 17, 2009 6:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think we all want more money, no?

If I could get more money from my job, I would. Does that make me greedy? Possibly. Would this instance of greed be looked down upon? I should hope not.

How is Strasburg any different than you or I in looking for the most money he can? This is ignoring utility from your work, since I’m assuming you’d have the same employer and situation, just a different wage.

by QuinnTheEzkamo on Jun 17, 2009 6:42 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It does not make you greedy...

…if you are trying to increase your pay from $78,000 to, say $95,000.

However, when we are talking about the difference between a total contract value of $85 million and $81 million, then yes, we are talking greed.

by tuna411 on Jun 17, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it makes no difference what the figure is....

everyone wants to maximize their income….be it a guy asking for a raise at Mc’ds or Alex Rodriguez

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Jun 17, 2009 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

-1

There are major mental flaws if you are more concerned about 1 or 3 or 5 million dollars when your contract is paying you 80 or 100 million dollars rather than being concerned about happiness.

Absolutely no comparison between ronald mcdonald and alex rodriguez.

by tuna411 on Jun 19, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why...

is the player any more guilty than the team’s contract negotiators? Aren’t they trying to maximize profits that run in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars by lowering players’ asking prices as much as possible? How is trying to shave an extra few million dollars off of a player’s asking price so you can add it to the team’s bottom line any less greedy than wanting the most money you can get out of your abilities?

It’s the abilities of the baseball players who sign these contracts that make the team money. If the money wasn’t there, teams wouldn’t offer it under any circumstances. Why shouldn’t they get as big a cut as possible of the profits they produce?

by slamcactus on Jun 18, 2009 2:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Postulate: Steven Strasburg's current value is in the neighborhood of 10 WAR to the team that signs him.

Justification: Strasburg has a wide range of outcomes, ranging anywhere from 6 WAR (persistent Cy Young candidate) to 0 WAR (flameout due to injury or ineffectiveness). Most likely scenario appears to be that he becomes a very good pitcher, but let’s offer a range of scenarios:

Ace— 35 WAR (10%)

  1. starter— 30 WAR (10%)
  2. starter— 20 WAR (20%)
  3. starter— 15 WAR (20%)
    Disappointment— 10 WAR (10%)
    Injury— 0 WAR (20%)
    Flameout— 0 WAR (10%)

Postulate: One WAR is worth about $4M in today’s market.

Postulate: Over the course of a player’s pre-free agent career, his expected salary is approximately the same as he would receive in two seasons as a free agent.

Justification: He makes almost no money until his arbitration years, then is paid approximately 40% of free agent wages in his first year, 60% in his second year and 80% in his third year of arbitration.

Therefore: Each of the numbers above should be adjusted down by about 30% to account for salaries he’ll receive.

Ace: 24.5 Value Added Wins (VAW)

  1. Starter: 21 VAW
  2. Starter: 14 VAW
  3. Starter: 10.5 VAW
    Disappointment: 7 VAW
    Flameout/Injury: 0 VAW

Conclusion: Steven Strasburg has a current average value of somewhere in the neighborhood of 10 Value Added Wins, or $40,000,000. Because the draft system limits the leverage of a minor leaguer, the Nationals should expect to turn a significant profit on the transaction. A signing bonus of $20-30M is in the “reasonable” range.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Jun 17, 2009 8:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Worthy topic, unworthy protagonist. Sort of kills the whole thing.

Prospective parent of new pick, Zack Wheeler. Projectable Righty stolen from the braves. Of course, I stalk my son's myspace: http://www.myspace.com/zackwheelerbaseball

"Obviously I’m not doing things like going toe-to-toe with a ninja. Find me a ninja, for one."--Brian Wilson

by haverecords on Jun 18, 2009 6:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Signing Bonus v. Total Contract

Not the same thing. I’m not an expert on MLB collective bargaining, but I consider myself an informed fan.

Signing bonus is upfront money paid soon after the signing is officially recognized. If a drafted player signs a standard minor league contract—as 99% of them do—the entire bonus is payable up front. If a player signs a major league contract—Pedro Alvarez’s final one, for instance—the signing bonus can be spread (both in actual payout and for accounting purposes) out over a number of years.

Some examples:
Matt Wieters signed a minor league contract with a then-record $6m bonus. Thus he received the $6m upon signing in August 2007. He didn’t play for the Orioles farm system until the 2008 season during which he earned whatever (relatively) meager salary that Hi-A and AA players receive (probably in the neighborhood of $30,000). He continued to earn whatever minor leaguers earn during 2009 until the O’s called him up on 5/29. From that point forward he will collect the prorated portion of the major league minimum salary (~$400k). (fwiw, Buster Posey has the current record bonus of $6.2m)

Mark Prior signed a major league contract of 5 years $10.5m, a record which stands until Strasburg signs. It included a $4m signing bonus and base salaries of
$250k,
$650k,
$1.6m,
$2m,
$2m.
(with escalators and incentives based on performance)
Which means regardless of whether he was in the majors or minors he would collect those salaries. Ultimately he was called up in 2002 anyway, so it was mostly a moot point because $250k was about the major league minimum at the time. The benefit is that Prior was guaranteed to earn 3x more than the major league minimum beginning in his second year, and escalating from there. It meant that the team could not jerk him around and simply renew his contract like they do with many pre-arbitration players.
To be fair, some contracts include specific clauses for (lesser) minor league salaries—see david price. My guess is Strasburg’s won’t.

My point is simply that included in the final number of a major league contract are many millions of dollars that the player was likely to be paid anyway.

Which bring us to Strasburg. Let’s assume the Strasburg contract is in the $25m neighborhood. This will be a 5 or 6 year deal, and include a bonus somewhere around $6-10m. So the salaries will look something like:

2010: $500k
2011: $1m
2012: $3m
2013: $5m
2014: $7m
(i’ve assumed he doesn’t sign until the deadline thus begins his career in 2010)

This structure is hardly preposterous. It’s certainly unprecedented since it blows Prior’s contract out of the water, but again hardly preposterous. To me, all the team needs to do to protect itself is to include a clause that prevents Strasburg from opting out of the contract for arbitration. Since the team is taking a huge risk by giving a record contract, it should not then also be on the hook for a Ryan Howard-like arbitration award beginning in year 3. Put differently, the team should be able to reap the benefits of its risky investment in the form of relatively modest base salaries if Strasburg turns into a top-level pitcher.

by kazuokev on Jun 18, 2009 9:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

IF strokemberg turns into a top level pitcher

Your last sentence includes the key word “if” and is the primary basis of my position.

As nice as his mechanics look.

As hard as he throws.

As much consistency against college players as he has had.

I still ask “why break the bank (record)?”

The draft is an avenue to control cost of incoming, unproven talent.

John Olerud had the sweetest swing and didn’t have a single at bat in the minors and yet, other than 1993, he was nothing more than league average. If he were a prospect today, he would have the same hype as strokemberg. Would a league average career justify a record breaking contract?

As good as all you experts say he is, I still don’t see the economic reward of paying him $15 million (50% more) for his first signiture.

by tuna411 on Jun 19, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

God, just shut up.

And John Olerud = League average?

Olerud AVERAGED FOR HIS CAREER a .295/.398/.465 line. Over his entire career, from when he broke in at 20 all the way through his decline years, he was better than a league average 1B overall. In his peak he was one of the better hitters in baseball, and was a tremendous defensive player, even in his late-30s.

Of course I realize I’ve just wasted my time. You can’t squeeze water from a rock, and you can’t make an idiot learn.

by PissedMick on Jun 19, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

WTF? Olerud was an excellent player, and undervalued by the standards of most of the years he played.

by Fanon on Jun 19, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This could have been a decent discussion

If the original post hadn’t been so godawful.

by Fanon on Jun 18, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

After reading all this shit again

I’m 300% certain he was just trolling.

by RedSoxFaithful on Jun 20, 2009 12:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Community Prospect #52
Small
Community Prospect #51
Small
Community Prospect #50
Small
PP Top 50
Small
Top 10 according to me

Recent FanPosts

Background_small
Draft Preview - Houston Astros
Jed_bird_small
2010 Top 75 NL Prospects
Small
Derek Holland
Small
Minor League Chat
Small
Montero vs Jennings vs Heyward
Background_small
Draft Preview - Cleveland Indians
Small
Looking for 2 Dynasty League Managers
Small
Looking for Dynasty fantasy owner
Small
Dynasty trade offer

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Carew_small John Sickels


Site Meter