Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UEFA Champions League 2012: Chelsea Wins on Penalties

Draft Preview - Los Angeles Dodgers

Here is the second part in my series, this time focusing on the Los Angeles Dodgers and their scouting director Logan White.

Owner: Frank McCourt, bought club in 2004
General Manager: Ned Colletti, first season was 2006
Scouting Director: Logan White, first draft was 2002

Looking Back

2002 Draft: Unknown Budget

1. James Loney, 1B, Elkins HS (TX), #19 overall: Loney was widely considered an overdraft, maybe even by a full round.  Quite a few teams preferred Loney as a pitcher, but White tabbed Loney as a first baseman.  The Dodgers were forced to pay good money to sign Loney away from a Baylor scholarship.  All in all, a little strange first overall pick by Logan White.  Signing bonus: $1.5 million.
2. Greg Miller, LHP, Esperanza HS (CA), #31 overall: Miller was one of the those prep lefties that always sneaks up on teams during his senior year.  This is right about the slot people expected Miller to go, and this was considered a solid pick by White.  Tall, projectable lefties are nice, and Miller was signed away from a commitment to Cal.  Signing bonus: $1.2 million.
3. Zach Hammes, RHP, Iowa City HS (IA), #51 overall: Hammes, a 6'7'', 230 lb. prep righty was considered one of the most projectable arms in the entire 2002 draft.  Before the draft, he was considered in the same talent range as both Loney and Miller, meaning White was using a good mix and getting the players he wanted.  They signed him away from an Iowa commitment.  Signing bonus: $750,000.
4. Jonathan Broxton, RHP, Burke County HS (GA), #60 overall: In case you're wondering, Jon Broxton profiled as a closer even back in 2002 when he was drafted.  Scouts had concerns about his body, as he weighed 260 pounds his senior year.  However, he was still a nice prospect, and White signed him away from a Georgia Southern commitment.  Signing bonus: $685,000.
5. Mike Nixon, C, Sunnyslope HS (AZ), #91 overall: Sorry if this upsets people, but this ranks up there as one of Logan White's worst picks.  Nixon was considered possibly the most athletic catcher in the 2002 class, but was also only ranked the 25th-best catcher by BA coming into the draft.  Huge overdraft.  Nixon was commited to play football at UCLA, signed with the Dodgers, retired after 2005, then played linebacker at Arizona State.  Nice pick.  Signing bonus: $1 million.
Other Notable Picks: 2B Delwyn Young (4th), Santa Barbara CC (CA); RHP James McDonald (11th), Poly HS (CA), draft and follow, $150K bonus; LHP Eric Stults (15th), Bethel HS (IN); 3B Russell Martin (17th), Chipola College (FL), $40K bonus

 

2003 Draft: $3.4 Million Budget

1. Chad Billingsley, RHP, Defiance HS (OH), #24 overall: Billingsley was a second straight overdraft in the first round.  As you can see, that doesn't mean the player won't turn into a solid Major League option.  Billingsley was one of the best Ohio prep players ever, but was expected to be a supplemental or early second round pick.  They signed him away from a South Carolina commitment.  Signing bonus: $1.375 million.
2. Chuck Tiffany, LHP, Charter Oak HS (CA), #61 overall: Tiffany was rated more highly in most draft previews than Billingsley leading up to the draft.  However, Logan White was able to nab Tiffany 37 picks after Billingsley.  As you can see, White was showing nice skill at reading who would be available.  This was a solid pick at the time.  Tiffany was commited to Cal State Fullerton.  Signing bonus: $1.1 million.
3. Cory Van Allen, LHP, Clements School (TX), #91 overall: This was about where most expected Van Allen to go.  He was a pitchability lefty, meaning most teams weren't expecting him to turn into a top of the rotation option.  However, his Baylor commitment was going to require a nice bonus.  He didn't sign.  Bad pick.
4. Xavier Paul, OF, Slidell HS (LA), #121 overall: This was a fairly nice pick by the Dodgers, as Paul was considered a borderline second/third round talent.  A couple years before the draft, most thought he'd be a first rounder.  However, he fell, and the Dodgers signed him away from a Tulane commitment.  Signing bonus: $270,000.
5. Jordan Pratt, RHP, Central (OR), #151 overall: Pratt was another player that was projected to go about a round higher.  He was conisidered one of the most projectable arms in the 2003 draft, some saying he would be a first rounder in 2006 if he honored his Washington State commitment.  However, the Dodgers signed him.  Quality fifth round pick.  Signing bonus: $175,000.
Other Notable Picks: OF Matt Kemp (6th), Midwest City HS (OK), $130K bonus; LHP Wesley Wright (7th), Goshen HS (AL), $120K bonus; C Lucas May (8th), Parkway West HS (MO), $100K bonus; C AJ Ellis (18th), Austin Peay; SS Andy LaRoche (39th), Grayson CC (TX), draft and follow, $1 million bonus

 

2004 Draft: $5.6 Million Budget

1. Scott Elbert, LHP, Seneca HS (MO), #17 overall: Unlike his first two drafts, White went after a consenus first rounder in Elbert in the 2004 draft.  The best prep lefty in the entire class, Elbert dominated his senior year, making him questionable to even fall to the Dodgers at seventeenth.  However, he did fall, and the Dodgers signed him.  Great pick.  Signing bonus: $1.575 million.
2. Blake DeWitt, SS, Sikeston HS (MO), #28 overall: DeWitt was much more of an overdraft for the Dodgers at #28.  Considered a fairly polished prep hitter, most teams didn't expect him to hit for much power in the pros.  However, he was a highly-regarded prospect, just not a true first rounder.  It's worked out quite well, though.  Signing bonus: $1.2 million.
3. Justin Orenduff, RHP, Virginia Commonwealth, #33 overall: Orenduff's polish and arsenal made him a first round possibility coming in, and he fell to the Dodgers in the supplemental first round.  This was going against White's known modus operandi at the time, but was a fairly unquestioned pick.  I personally witnessed one of the many injuries he's had.  Started the game at 90-91, ended around 78.  No joke.  Signing bonus: $1 million.
4. Blake Johnson, RHP, Parkview Baptist HS (LA), #58 overall: This was considered a solid second round pick by most of the industry experts, as Johnson was mixing it up with Matt Walker for the best prep pitcher in the state of Louisiana.  The Dodgers had to sign him away from an LSU commitment.  Signing bonus: $600,000.
5. Cory Dunlap, 1B, Contra Costa JC (CA), #88 overall: This was a huge, huge overdraft by Logan White in the third round.  Dunlap was a solid JUCO hitter from Northern California, but was considered mid-round material coming into the draft.  This was simply a bad pick.  Signing bonus: $430,000.
Other Notable Picks: RHP Cory Wade (10th), Kentucky Wesleyan College, $45K bonus; OF Justin Ruggiano (25th), Texas A&M

 

2005 Draft: $2.2 Million Budget

1. Luke Hochevar, RHP, Tennessee, #40 overall: Hochevar was considered by the Diamondbacks for the top pick before they picked Justin Upton.  His Scott Boras connection caused him to fall this far, and Logan White gambled by taking him.  He didn't sign with the Dodgers, opting for Indy Ball, and he became the #1 overall pick in 2006.  Reasonable gamble, bad result.
2. Ivan DeJesus, SS, Puerto Rico Baseball Academy, #51 overall: DeJesus was considered a solid pick here, a very signable alternative to their first pick Hochevar.  He was the top prospect period in Puerto Rico in the 2005 class, and he hasn't disappointed in the pros.  Interesting, solid pick by White.  Signing bonus: $675,000.
3. Josh Wall, RHP, Central Private HS (LA), #74 overall: Another Louisiana draftee, Wall was once again considered one of the most projectable prep arms in the 2005 class.  He garnered first round consideration for awhile, showing that White got good value with this pick.  Signing bonus: $480,000.
4. Sergio Pedroza, OF, Cal State Fullerton, #106 overall: Pedroza was considered a bit of a reach at this slot, as his lack of size and projectability meant most teams thought he was a mid-round pick.  However, considering they knew Hochevar would take nice chunk of change to sign, this is minorly defensible.  Signing bonus: $325,000.
5. Josh Bell, 3B, Santaluces HS (FL), #136 overall: One of two Josh Bells in the 2005 draft class, this Bell was the prep version who profiled to have plus power with time.  He was a disappointment as a senior in high school, dropping to the Dodgers here in the fourth round.  He was signed away from Florida Atlantic.  Signing bonus: $212,000.
Other Notable Picks: RHP Jon Meloan (5th), Arizona, $155K bonus

 

2006 Draft: $5.5 Million Budget

1. Clayton Kershaw, LHP, Highland Park HS (TX), #7 overall: Kershaw was the best prep lefty in the 2006 class without a doubt, and the Tigers were supposedly in on him for the #6 pick before going with Andrew Miller.  This was obviously one of the best picks in the entire draft.  Signing bonus: $2.3 million.
2. Bryan Morris, RHP, Motlow State CC (TN), #26 overall: After failing to sign with the Rays out of high school, reportedly due to new Rays management not following through on a $1 million bonus promise, Morris climbed into a solid first rounder.  This was a solid pick by White and was right in line with where he was expected to go.  Signing bonus: $1.325 million bonus.
3. Preston Mattingly, SS, Evansville Central HS (IN), #31 overall: This has got to be one of the worst stains on White's draft record.  Mattingly surprised a lot of teams by jumping up draft boards late, but this was still considered an overdraft.  He was more of a 3-5 round guy.  He has proved why.  Signing bonus: $1 million.
4. Kyle Orr, 1B, Lambrick Park HS (BC), #113 overall: After 3 quick picks, the Dodgers didn't have a pick in the second and third rounds.  However, their fourth round pick was a beauty by most standards.  Orr was considered the best Canadian prospect and possibly a first rounder entering June.  White tabbed him with great skill, knowing he would fall.  He hasn't panned out, but this is great draft strategy.  Signing bonus: $435,000.
5. Kyle Smit, RHP, Spanish Springs (NV), #143 overall: Smit was one of the better Nevada prospects in the 2006 class, and he flashed plus stuff during his senior season.  He wasn't commited to any college, so he was a signable prep option.  Signing bonus: $175,000.
Other Notable Picks: None.

 

2007 Draft: $3.3 Million Budget

1. Chris Withrow, RHP, Midland HS (TX), #20 overall: Withrow was a bit of an overdraft, a throwback to White's earliest drafts.  However, no one doubted Withrow's potential as a top of the rotation starter.  This was a prototypical Logan White pick.  Withrow was commited to Baylor.  Signing bonus: $1.35 million.
2. James Adkins, LHP, Tennessee, #39 overall: BA thought of Adkins as a second or third round pick and labeled him as a potential 5th starter leading up to the draft.  However, White popped the college starter in the supplemental first round, again bucking popular consensus.  This was maybe a signability pick.  Signing bonus: $787,500.
3. Michael Watt, LHP, Capistrano Valley HS (CA), #86 overall: 2009 draft prospect Tyler Matzek pitched with Watt at Capistrano Valley, where Watt was considered a fairly raw lefty.  Committed to Long Beach State, the Dodgers took him and signed him away.  This was a questionable pick, being an overdraft, but it's Logan White's style.  Signing bonus: $389,000.
4. Austin Gallagher, 3B, Manheim Township HS (PA), #116 overall: Another slight overdraft by Logan White, Gallagher was considered a fairly raw hitter entering the draft.  He had a fairly strong South Carolina commitment, but the Dodgers made sure to tab him in a round where he'd sign for slot.  Signing bonus: $252,000.
5. Andrew Lambo, 1B/OF, Newbury Park HS (CA), #146 overall: A solid pick for his talent, this pick was questioned a little due to Lambo's makeup problems in high school.  Getting kicked out of a high school tends to do that.  However, White took a chance on Lambo that is looking smarter every day.  Signing bonus: $164, 250.
Other Notable Picks: RHP Justin Miller (6th), Johnson CC (KS), $120K bonus; RHP Danny Danielson (7th), Russell County HS (AL), $119,500 bonus

 

2008 Draft: $4.4 Million Budget

1. Ethan Martin, RHP, Stephens County HS (GA), #15 overall: Martin was a solid two-way prospect that was projected to go somewhere in the middle of the first round.  Turns out he went right in the middle.  This was considered a good pick, and there's no reason to think otherwise right now.  Signing bonus: $1.73 million.
2. Josh Lindblom, RHP, Purdue, #61 overall: Lindblom was considered a second round prospect after becoming a reliever late in his junior season at Purdue.  Despite shying away from college pitchers in early rounds in his previous drafts, Logan White tabbed Lindblom, and the Dodgers have turned him into a starter.  Great pick.  Signing bonus: $663,000.
3. Kyle Russell, OF, Texas, #93 overall: Russell made a bad decision to return to school for his junior season after the Cardinals tabbed him as a draft-eligible sophomore in 2007.  However, the Dodgers reaped the reward, once again going against the usual convention to sign a college player.  Signing bonus: $410,000.
4. Devaris Gordon, SS, Seminole CC (FL), #127 overall: After being ineligible for his JUCO's spring slate, Gordon, Tom Gordon's son, impressed scouts in workouts leading up to the draft.  However, this was still a slight overdraft, as most teams shied away from the issues surrounding players that can't maintain eligibility at a junior college.  Gordon's had a nice pro debut.  Signing bonus: $250,000.
5. Jon Michael Redding, RHP, Florida CC-Jacksonville, #157 overall: Another possible overdraft, Redding was a strikethrower in junior college.  He was heading to LSU before the Dodgers signed him away.  This is yet another pick I would never have guessed.  Signing bonus: $178,000.
Other Notable Picks: SS Tony Delmonico (6th), Florida State, $150K bonus; 1B Steven Caseres (9th), James Madison, $250K bonus; RHP Nathan Eovaldi, Alvin HS (TX), $250K bonus

 

That's all seven drafts that Logan White has run since becoming the scouting director of the Dodgers.  I know it's a lot to take in, but take a few minutes to look at some trends.  Here's some I see:

Trend #1: High school pitchers are always a good bet.  Logan White loves a good mix of projectable pitchers and developed ones, usually from the more developed baseball states.  Louisiana is the exception, but they're no slouch in terms of baseball development.

Trend #2: Logan White's not afraid to draft players before they're expected to go.  That means projecting future picks is one tough chore.  He's gotten a bit more predictable in recent years, but there's still some curveballs thrown in.  At first I thought it was due to White's inexperience at the beginning, but the trend has continued.

Trend #3: With older age, White has developed more of a penchant for older players.  At the beginning, White was almost purely into high school players, but recently he's mixed in good numbers of JUCO and college players.  Last year's draft was the latest development.  Ethan Martin was the only high school player in the top five rounds.  You have no idea how hard that makes it for me in my mock drafts.

 

Money-wise, the Dodgers have been a little unpredictable, but it seems that White has whatever he needs to sign a good number of solid players.  He continually is unable to sign players who turn into top prospects at college programs, but I don't really think that is White's fault.  Most of the players have already decided to go to school, and White's just willing to pick them a round or two higher than other teams.  This year's draft will include righty Alex White and Maryland outfielder AJ Casario, both 2006 Dodger draft picks.  Just something to remember.

Finally, it's time for my predictions as to what direction White goes in the 2009 draft.  The Dodgers' first pick is at #36 overall in the supplemental first round, followed by the #56 pick, #65, #96, and #127.  The Dodgers pick every 30 picks from there.  For some reason, I think White takes advantage of the deep prep catching class and nabs a catcher sometime within the first 3 rounds.  I have Austin Maddox going to them in my current mock, though that will change this week.  In addition, I see a prep righty with one of the first 3 picks and a college player.  Don't be surprised to see a little-known JUCO player pop up, too.  I'll have some names of interest later on closer to the draft.

All bonus information came from BA, and writeups on draft status going into the draft were a mixture of BA and PG.  Go to their sites for draft coverage.  They're awesome.

What do you guys think?  What do the Dodgers do?

Poll
Should I continue with these draft previews?
Yes
141 votes
No
2 votes

143 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 21 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

WOW

Great analysis. I do not follow the MLB draft as much as I do minor league performance in general, but this is a pretty cool outlook and comments on the players selected. Good indicator for who and where for the 2009 Draft.

by ChalupaCabrera on May 4, 2009 6:53 AM EDT reply actions  

I could be mis-reading you

But it seems sometimes like you’re judging the picks by whether they made sense to an outside observer then, rather than if it has since worked. White’s pick of Loney, for example, seems like an example of a terrific pick to me, where despite other people not seeing his value, he did.

Otherwise, really interesting!

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on May 4, 2009 8:28 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm judging it by both the talent they got and where they got them.

I judge Loney a little harshly, because they could have gotten him at #31, maybe even #51. If you can add an arm or player better than Greg Miller at #19, then get Loney later, you can have a stronger overall draft. That’s the criticism I have of that pick. It’s not the player, it’s the slotting. And I’m far from alone on that criticism, as pretty much every place I’ve read has mentioned some sort of shock that Loney was taken that high. Good pick in terms of talent, but I think he misread Loney’s draft stock.

You have to step out of the “where did they go from there” mentality when judging how a guy plans and executes his draft. We all know Loney has turned out to be a Major League first baseman now, but when making that pick, you have to look at the skillset and perceived outcome of what he was thought to be then. I think from looking at these drafts, we all know Logan White picks players that largely turn into something very good. However, that doesn’t mean much to me when putting these together, as I’m using them to gauge where White could go this year.

And yeah, I do think White made a good pick with Loney as of now, but reading the value of a player and where he is on other teams’ boards is just as important when drafting. There were lots of quality players between Loney and Miller that White could have jumped on instead of going with Loney that early. Looking at prep pitchers, Matt Cain went #25 to the Giants. Imagine if White went with Cain at #19, which was right around where his draft stock was, and Loney at #31. We’d be looking at that draft a little differently. That’s my only criticism with White really.

by Andy Seiler on May 4, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Love these previews

I think a big part of the Dodgers philosophy is that they are a big market team that likes developing players, so they’ve been able to sign a lot of their picks straight out of high school and have been willing to reach a bit on some players because they have the signing power to make up for mistakes down the line, something a lot of teams don’t have the luxury with.

I get the feeling that the Dodgers have shifted a bit towards drafting more college kids recently because their core talent from prior drafts have now formed a talented core in the majors (Loney, Kemp, Martin, Broxton, Billingsley, Kershaw, etc.) and perhaps drafting college kids, who are likely to contribute sooner, is now the focus (while of course picking up high ceiling high school players that fall into their laps)

by blinkshot on May 4, 2009 2:08 PM EDT reply actions  

You could be on to something there

Take high upside if you can find it. Take role fillers who could move fast into those roles when you can find those as well.

by ofsticksandbats on May 4, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Josh Lindblom is a perfect example of that.

They knew he was the most valuable pick when they were up last year, and instead of thinking just in terms of long-term development, it was obvious they also wanted someone who could move quickly. When teams start thinking like that, it’s a little dangerous, but it’s also interesting, because it could be opening a door to a draft philosophy that is all-inclusive and capable of finding value absolutely anywhere. That’s valuable in its own way.

by Andy Seiler on May 4, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting

Especially considering they’ve still gone with HS players in the 1st round, even in the last few drafts, it’s perhaps even more interesting that their later rounds picks are leaning more college

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on May 4, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well

I’m beginning to think that this shift is definitely occurring as we speak because the Dodgers do have some high upside guys just entering their prime on the field (Kemp, Loney, Martin, Ethier are just beginning to enter their prime years), and some guys who are there or almost there on the mound (Billingsley and Broxton are absolute studs right now, Kershaw has shown flashes of brilliance and is still way young for the league).

Now with that solid core of players already there, they’ll still draft big time potential when its available, but also look at guys that can hit the bigs sooner and contribute, for instance out of the pen, to a team already filled with young guys so they can maximize their time together in their primes. Add in the fact that kids drafted out of college today are not going to differ in age too much from guys drafted out of HS a few years ago (heck, most of those picked out of college in 08 are probably older than Kershaw already) and you’ve got another core of young guys close in age following the first group which can create a large window for that talent to flourish in.

by blinkshot on May 4, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another approach

Would be to look at their position on the draft board and what type of value could be expected from that position. And then the question would be, at the time of drafting, did the player taken reasonably project to offer the kind of value expected from that slot? So when the Pirates tabbed Bryan Bullington at 1-1 and said that he should become a nice #3 starter, did that seem like good value at 1-1? Definitely not. So, even knowing what they knew then, that would be a bad pick. If Strasburg hurts his arm, or otherwise flops as a pro (TINSTAAP) would that make the Nationals pick a flop? Yes, but not really, as Strasburg is seen by all and sundry as the consensus best available player.

by ofsticksandbats on May 4, 2009 2:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Exactly.

That’s the best way to view a draft class. Getting the greatest number of players with the most total amount of talent is the most important factor of all. It’s very, very hard to gauge whether a player will reach their potential, as so many factors are involved in them doing that. Of course, you have to do your homework and estimate the percentage chance that they’ll reach their potential, but the overall talent lineup is most important.

by Andy Seiler on May 4, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the vote says it all

This is a tremendous write-up and one of the most interesting things I’ve ever read on this site.

by Birdfan01 on May 4, 2009 3:07 PM EDT reply actions  

one thing i would suggest

at the end you mention if it was a good pick based on draft ranking, however history is the best indicator as to whether or not the pick was good. While its good to know if it was a reach or good pick at the time, if you really want to go all out on these, I would add how the player is currently doing, especially for the non-first rounders.

All in all great stuff and a really interesting read.

Charter member of the Dutch bandwagon

by rchawk12 on May 5, 2009 1:53 AM EDT reply actions  

History shows your evaluation skills and player development department.

It doesn’t show how well you put a draft package together. Getting the most total raw talent from day one in terms of getting the most value at every pick is important, too. Draft method matters.

by Andy Seiler on May 6, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

did i miss your Rangers preview?

Come on, Seiler. You’re a Rangers fan. We should have priority dibs on a draft preview.

But besides that, great analysis.

What is this, Horseville? Because I'm surrounded by naysayers.

by clark on May 6, 2009 12:04 PM EDT reply actions  

i really like the concept

one thing though: if you’re going to do the evaluations done by “who they COULD have drafted if they waited for the appropriate place to make the pick,” you should list the best people who were drafted (in terms of current results) in between where the team drafted the player in reality, and where you think the team could have gotten the player.

this will tell you if there’s at least a chance if the GM made a strategic error.

because, if some of the best players (judged in hindsight) were still available in the round when people who were good but (in your opinion) overdrafted should have actually gone, then it says that that GM just didn’t recognize the talent of that player. and, although that may be worse in terms of outlook of that GM (in the sense that he didn’t recognize talent), it also tells you that it didn’t matter that that GM didn’t hold off on the player he thought was the best available.

by bleedjaxblue on May 10, 2009 4:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/20
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/19
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/18
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/17
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/16

Recent FanPosts

Henrik-lundqvist-crossed-pads_small
MOD: Mets #4 (2012 Round 2 Picks)
Zeuswins-sox-72x72_small
Alex Castellanos status?? ETA?
Small
Tony Cingrani - Fastball & ???
Small
MOD #4 Rangers (Pick 53)
Robinson_logo_small
Drew Hutchison's MLB trial
Small
Blue Jays MOD #4
Small
Kerry Wood Retires
Small
Phillies MOD #3

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Editors

Small Craig Goldstein

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter