MOD White Sox
Ok, so the White Sox have 5 picks in the first three rounds of this years draft thanks in part to Orlando Cabrera's departure and also Kenny Williams' inability to sign FA's who might actually help this team. The picks are (per BA):
#23
#38
#61
#71
#102
My mentality would be to draft almost exclusively college players with the first couple of picks and that is because this system, despite great imporvements over the last year or so, still ranks in the lower third (maybe mid-pack at best) among the 30 farm systems and I don't think they're in a position to take unnecessary risks on high schoolers. As for positions to target the main area of need in my opinion is front end pitching. The White Sox are loaded with those mediocre 5th starter/long releiver types, so I will be targeting pitching early. I will also be looking at catchers, the collegiate catching class appears quite weak which may force me down the prep catching route despite that contradicting my earlier point, but that's something I'll have to assess later on.
As for names that I'm focusing on at this early point a few that stand out are left handers Rex Brothers and James Paxton, as well as catcher Tony Sanchez. Paxton's command worries me a little and obviously if this was real world the White Sox would never take him due to him being a Boras client, I however don't have to restrict myself so moronically. Sanchez maybe a little limited on the upside, I don't think he has that elite level power or defense to make him a star, he also doesn't walk quite enough for my liking but he appears to be the top college catcher so that has him on my radar. Brothers doesn't exactly have what you would call a projectable frame, but I don't consider that a red flag, not for a pitcher. From what I've read Brothers doesn't have as much movement on his FB as you might like and his change up needs work also.
Right, so there's some early thoughts from me, let's hear what everyone else thinks.
1 recs |
5 comments
Comments
I agree and disagree
I agree that they need more high-upside pitching. However, trying to get college pitchers with high upside at those spots is pretty tough. I think you’d be better off taking high upside HS pitchers.
by joltinjoe on May 13, 2009 5:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree w/Joltinjoe
High Upside pitching should be a priority, and should not be limited to college. Picking towards the back of the first round and limiting to college pitching might make pickings slim.
by HB3RV23 on May 14, 2009 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
aaron poreda was picked 25th overall.
i don’t think it’s that hard.
White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry
by larry on May 16, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto
Upside is always to be found in the draft. The big question is just how much risk comes with that upside. And certainly there are plenty of college pitchers who have their share of both and will be available for a while, even given this year’s crop.
by mrkupe on May 18, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Overall strategy
I think the Sox farm system has been hurt from 2005-2007 due to the philosophy of taking “less risky”, lower upside college players vs. riskier, higher upside high school players. I agree with your comments that the overall system is in the lower third, and I think the focus should be on bringing in higher upside talent – period.
Pitching wise, maybe Chad James is worth looking into. I have not followed Stoffel from Arizona, but remembered him being considered as a late first round talent this fall.
I think an area where the system is weak overall is 1B/OF power – outside of Brandon Allen – and he’s no guarantee, there doesn’t appear to be much. With 61 or 71 I would consider a bat like Ben Paulsen from Clemson.
by HB3RV23 on May 14, 2009 10:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 









