2009 Amateur Draft Mock #2 Round One
I thought I'd do this every couple weeks, but I've seen over and over that every weekend counts at this juncture in the draft scouting process. Teams will be shifting their boards from here on out, and all it takes is one great or horrible outing to stick a prospect in a certain range. As a result, I've felt like putting out a new mock every week (that I can) is a good idea, if only to help everyone familiarize themselves with the top prospects. My second first round mock goes as follows:
1. Washington - Steven Strasburg, RHP, San Diego State - Obviously no changes here. One more dominant outing added to the pile. Previously: #1.
2. Seattle - Dustin Ackley, 1B-CF, North Carolina - I've become convinced that Ackley is the best prospect behind Strasburg in this draft. He really solidified his spot here with a good weekend against Miami, a quality team with quality pitching. It's gotten to the point where I'm about 90% sure this is where Ackley will line up come draft day. A major slump or injury would be the only things that could pull him out of the top three. Previously: #2.
3. San Diego - Alex White, RHP, North Carolina - Like I said, all it takes is one great outing to convince teams that your talent is legit. After being simply good, but not great, for most of the season, White turned in a stud performance against Miami on Friday. He's solidified a top five spot, and I think he'll be too tempting for the Pads to pass him up. Previously: #4.
4. Pittsburgh - Grant Green, SS, USC - Even though concerns still linger about his power, plate discipline, and defense, Green is still a top draft prospect. His hitting is becoming a tad more consistent, and without a stellar pitching prospect left on the board, Pittsburgh would take him. Previously: #6.
5. Baltimore - Aaron Crow, RHP, Ft. Worth Cats - No changes here, either. Crow begins his season next month, and he could travel either direction from here. He makes a lot of sense for Baltimore here, but this is the most fluid spot in the top ten. Previously: #5.
6. San Francisco - Tyler Matzek, LHP, Capistrano Valley HS (CA) - Matzek didn't really do anything to make himself fall, but White and Green had good weekends, and I don't see Baltimore taking him. He's come back from his blister ordeal, which was less than minor, and should stay in the top ten range from here on out. Previously: #3.
7. Atlanta - Zack Wheeler, RHP, East Paulding HS (GA) - Apparently BA and I were both mistaken when we put Wheeler in the last half of the first round. They mentioned that scouts have Wheeler much higher, and both their staff and Keith Law have connected Wheeler with his local Atlanta Braves. It makes too much sense. Previously: #18.
8. Cincinnati - Kyle Gibson, RHP, Missouri - Same as last time. Gibson's not really deserving of a spot above any of the players above here, and he makes a lot of sense for Cincinnati, so that's why he's here. You can argue he's better than Crow, but if Crow comes back and has a good season in Indy ball, he'll go higher. Previously: #8.
9. Detroit - Donovan Tate, OF, Cartersville HS (GA) - This is where it gets confusing. Having Wheeler moving up means Tate is the likeliest to drop. In a few ways, Tate reminds of a Cameron Maybin, and that's maybe not doing him complete justice. He could move as quickly as Maybin with a few adjustments, and the Tigers could have a franchise center fielder to pair with current center fielder Curtis Granderson. Previously: #7.
10. Washington - Rich Poythress, 1B, Georgia - Same as last time. He's starting to even earn this spot, too. Regardless, this is a slot pick, and Poythress can step up to be a solid regular at first for the Nationals, who seem to have plenty of average guys there. I expect most of those guys to be somewhere else by the time Poythress is ready. Previously: #10.
11. Colorado - Mike Leake, RHP, Arizona State - Talk about someone who has earned the big bucks with a great junior year. Leake continues to simply overmatch good Pac 10 hitters this year, and he's becoming a surefire top 15 pick. Good match for Colorado. Previously: #19.
12. Kansas City - Shelby Miller, RHP, Brownwood HS (TX) - Miller also suffers as a result of Wheeler's rise. Still considered the best starting pitcher in terms of pure talent available in this year's draft, Miller will fluctuate ten picks in either direction based on his finish. Previously: #9.
13. Oakland - Rex Brothers, LHP, Lipscomb - I was reluctant last time to place Brothers in the first round, and as a result dropped him too low. My bad. I don't mind when a good player overplays my expecatations. Keith Law calls Brothers' slider a comfortable 60-65 on the scale. Wow. Previously: #52.
14. Texas - Matt Purke, LHP, Klein HS (TX) - Yet another Wheeler casualty, Purke might actually fall to his home state Texas Rangers. However, it seems to me that he's going to quietly sneak up someone's board and might be popped before anyone expects it. Previously: #11.
15. Cleveland - Tanner Scheppers, RHP, St. Paul Saints - Scheppers, like Crow, has a lot riding on his Indy ball season. He's thrown in front of scouts already according to BP's Kevin Goldstein, and he sat in the low 90s, reaching 94. Positive reactions abound. Previously: #13.
16. Arizona - Luke Bailey, C, LaGrange HS (GA) - Still considered the best prep catcher in this draft, Bailey will go anywhere from 12-20. Arizona doesn't have anyone that would block his way, and his overall polish is impressive. Gotta like the possibilities. Previously: #12.
17. Arizona - Mike Minor, LHP, Vanderbilt - Having clawed his way back into the first round, Minor makes sense here as an economical pick. He has decent upside, though not a lot, and he could contribute as a back end rotation cog as early as Opening Day 2011. Previously: #33.
18. Florida - Jacob Turner, RHP, Westminster Christian Academy (MO) - Poor Marlins. They lost Zack Wheeler to a division rival in the span of just a week. However, they'll have no problem taking UNC commit Jacob Turner, an impressive specimen of his own. Previously: #22.
19. St. Louis - Max Stassi, C, Yuba City HS (CA) - Say goodbye to Yadier Molina. The Cardinals are going to have a catcher who can hit. Spare me the Tony LaRussa comments, as no one is dumb enough to pass up on a premier talent like Stassi if he sticks around this long. Previously: #14.
20. Toronto - Andy Oliver, LHP, Oklahoma State - How long his pure upside will hold him up only God knows. Oliver is quickly becoming the most disappointing college pitchers in recent memory, throwing out those who have come down with an injury. Toronto has time and a track record with college pitchers, so here's a nice fit. For now. Previously: #16.
21. Houston - Mychal Givens, RHP, Plant HS (FL) - Givens' talent is spectacular, but I keep seeing too many warning signs that point to him falling more than expected. Plus fastballs are great, but he needs some work. Bobby Heck usually likes a little more polish from his high school arms, but I'm sure he loves Givens' arm just as much. Previously: #15.
22. Minnesota - Matt Davidson, 3B, Yucaipa HS (CA) - Davidson would form a very nice offensive trio with first round picks Ben Revere and Aaron Hicks from the previous two years. Having had tons of trouble locking that spot down, I'd be very surprised if they didn't take Davidson if he's available this far down in June. Previously: #17.
23. Chicago (AL) - James Paxton, LHP, Kentucky - If his knee is fine, this is where I expect Paxton to land. He rivals Rex Brothers with the fastball, but he's just not quite there. I like him, but he's unpredictable right now. Previously: #39.
24. Los Angeles (AL) - Tyler Skaggs, LHP, Santa Monica HS (CA) - The Angels would probably love to be able to tab Skaggs with their first pick. The local product is comparable with any high schooler above him, so this would be a great value pick. Previously: #20.
25. Los Angeles (AL) - Mike Trout, OF, Millville HS (NJ) - While Brian Goodwin is still a quality player, all the hype is building around Trout. He's athletic, hits with authority, and apparently gets along well with scouts (so says BA). He'd be a great hitting complement to Skaggs. Previously: #47.
26. Milwaukee - Jason Stoffel, RHP, Arizona - There's really two choices here if I'm Milwaukee. Stoffel or Madison Younginer. Will Younginer sign for an affordable price? Probably not. Alright, there's your decision. Milwaukee has some closing prospects, but no one as good as Stoffel. Previously: #24.
27. Seattle - Madison Younginer, RHP, Mauldin HS (SC) - I think Jack Z will win out on this one and will convince ownership to give Younginer an above-slot bonus late in the first round. Imagine a Dustin Ackley-Madison Younginer combo with your first two picks. That's too good to pass up. Previously: #29.
28. Boston - Tim Wheeler, OF, Sacramento State - I didn't think I'd have anyone in the same spot this far down, but Wheeler just fits well into this spot. He's good at everything, spectacular at nothing, and will be a nice addition for the Sox. Previously: #28.
29. New York (AL) - Brian Goodwin, OF, Rocky Mount HS (NC) - I think the Yankees will be looking prep here, and Goodwin's a nice young outfielder. After having suffered with a fairly aging group out there recently, an Austin Jackson-Brian Goodwin influx would be greatly appreciated. Previously: #25.
30. Tampa Bay - Tommy Joseph, C, Horizon HS (AZ) - I started to ask myself what would hold Tampa Bay back from getting who could end up being the best prep catcher in a strong crop. I ended up answering nothing. This kid can hit a ball as far as anyone in the entire draft. Previously: #36.
31. Chicago (NL) - Kyle Heckathorn, RHP, Kennesaw State - The Cubs like their hard throwers and Heckathorn is just that. I fully expect him to go anywhere from 25-32 in the draft, as no one at the end of the round will want to pass up a great arm like Heckathorn's. Previously: #27.
32. Colorado - Kendal Volz, RHP, Baylor - Volz continues to hurt his draft stock by flashing stuff that's below where it was a year ago. That's never a good sign. If he's available here, I think Colorado would want to take a chance that they could fix him, as his arm is still one the best in the drat. Taking Leake earlier wouldn't influence that decision. Previously: #21.
There you have it. This week's installment of my amateur mock draft. Anything stand out? Who should be moved? Who should be added?
Dropped from last week's 1st round mock: OF Jared Mitchell, C Austin Maddox, SS Jiovanni Mier, OF AJ Pollock, 3B Bobby Borchering
Comments on draft philosophy are welcome, as I hope I can nail down at least the options most teams will be looking at come June. As you can see, one player moving affects everyone else greatly, so try and think how it must feel to be in the war room on the day of. Must be one heck of a rush.
42 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I like it, I like this one even better than your previous mock
I think Kansas City would have to be thrilled with Shelby Miller
and the Braves getting Wheeler
I’m a bit surprised you have OF – J. Mitchell out of the first round altogether.
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Apr 21, 2009 5:02 PM EDT reply actions
As a KC fan,
I would be thrilled to get Miller. He would join a gaggle of good young pitchers in the Royals system.
+1 on Miller
KC should be looking at best pitcher in that spot and Miller has great upside. Love the Texas HSer. Leake would be a good pick.
Still looking for Atlanta to go with Tate if he is available but the comments made in BA about Wheeler not getting out of top 10 surely lead us to believe Braves go with GA prospect. Pushes one more quality arm to KC at 12.
Totally agree with Nats going cheaper on #10. If they thought Crow was too expensive then what kind of squealing will be done with Strasburg and the #10. Signability is the key for them at 10.
Agree
I think continuing to add elite pitchers to our system is the best strategy to give the Royals the best chance for continued success in the future. Miller seems like he has a great combination of size, stuff, and projection.
Founder of the Rowdy Hardy Fan Club
Mitchell's struggles in conference play can't be ignored.
I’m a huge Mitchell fan, and I might have reached by a few spots in the last mock. He’s #34 to the Rockies in my supplemental round mock coming out tomorrow.
I'm a big Purke fan
but if the choice is between a healthy Tanner Scheppers and Matt Purke, don’t you think the Rangers would tap the more-ready Scheppers?
"Hustle doesn't cost a dime and it looks good." - Pete Rose as Channeled by Marcus Lemon
Depends a lot on Scheppers' stuff come June.
Shoulder injuries aren’t to be taken lightly, but Purke’s mechanics aren’t perfect.
Rex Brothers
saw him his first start of the year v. a good hitting team in GA Tech. Numbers were misleading, he dominated them for 4 innings. Extremely impressive slider and changeup. He also beat UGA last year in the regionals if I am not mistaken?
Matzek
I really haven’t done any research on the guy. I did look at one video and his mechanics scare me a little bit. Has there been any talk about his mechanics?
by LinceCainGarnerSon on Apr 21, 2009 6:26 PM EDT reply actions
RE
what dont you like about his mechanics moreso than any other HS pitcher? Purke is the guy to worry about.
From what I have seen of Wheeler, I would be very happy for the Braves to take him with all the college arms being lack luster.
Yeah, Matzek's of less concern than most at that level.
And less than Purke. That’s the real difference between the two.
Donovan Tate
How far remains to be seen, but since he has the football scholarship to UNC, he could fall below where his talent would place him.
http://mvn.com/milb-yankees/
To give you a little shock...
Grant Green. Boras client. Maybe Andy Oliver, another Boras client, though he deserves to be farther down.
The high schooler would be Jacob Turner, who’s a UNC commit as well as a Boras client. Bad, bad combo, and I could see him going the way of Matt Harvey.
Is there a chance that Mike Leake is still available for the Indians you think? Also, how’s Scheppers’ health?
I don't know if you have a BP subscription...
If you don’t, I’ll post just one sentence. I hope that’s ok with those at BP…
“He sat at 92 mph, got up to 94, it was free and easy, the secondary stuff was there… the word I’d use is ‘intoxicating.’”
That’s a quote from a “front-office official” in Goldstein’s writeup today. Those velo readings are from a Scheppers private workout this spring.
As for Leake, he’s going to make decisions tough for any team starting there at #11 if he’s still on the board when their turn rolls around. He’s used a solid fastball and good offspeed stuff to dominate the Pac 10 for 3 years now, and he’s peaking at the right time. I’m telling you, this guy has probably made himself over a million dollars extra with this year’s performance.
Jays
While I am prone to agreeing that they will take a college arm, barring a big turn-around from Oliver (all reports I’ve read have him pitching quite poorly lately), I think the Jays would take Paxton (Canadian) or Heckathorn. I could also see them taking a guy like Trout – the Jays have been known to pop athletic high schoolers without major signability issues early (see recent picks like Ahrens, K. Wilson, J. Jackson). Basically, I think you;’re on the right track, but wrong guy – Oliver is trending down. I look forward to your continued posts.
by ofsticksandbats on Apr 21, 2009 11:37 PM EDT reply actions
Oliver's trending down, but not as quickly as others.
College pitchers coming off what Oliver has gone through do trend down, but since the talent is still in there, they trend down far less quickly than others. Oliver is still in the second half of the first round, and that’s helped by the struggles of others. Paxton hasn’t done much at all to push himself above Oliver, especially with his knee issues, and Heckathorn would probably be a reach that high. Trout is also a possibility there too, but he also needs to do a bit more to move up those 5 spots.
Question...
Andy, since you seem to be the most vocal and knowledgeable college/prep ball fan here, I was wondering if you have heard anything about or know anything about this kid who just threw his fourth consecutive no-hitter in Florida. Apparently he has a scholarship offer from the Gators, but with his recent success he may look to go pro instead.
Patrick Schuster is his name. Article at ESPN said he throws in the low 90s and has a decent curve and slider. Any clue as to his upside or where he might get drafted this year (I figure even if he does go to the Gators, some team will draft him later in the draft for the hell of it).
"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile
He's a late 2nd rounder at best from what I've read.
I think it was Kevin Goldstein who said today he was more 4-8 round material. Keith Law says he dominates due to a unique arm slot, and his upper 80s fastball plays up as a result. He’s got good talent, but he’s not a great prospect yet. I’d expect him to go to Florida at this point unless he gains a couple ticks on his fastball and rises into the early part of the first day of the draft.
As a Braves fan
I would hate getting Wheeler over Miller or Purke. I’ve seen Wheeler pitch and he’s not worth a top 20 pick IMO.
I personally would take Miller over him, but not Purke.
But it’s the connections and great praise of Wheeler that seem to be really pushing him up quickly. He went from not even being in the conversation for best high school arm to being right there as the best righty available. He’s got great talent, great pitchability, and whoever gets him will be very happy with his advanced pitch mix.
Matt Purke
If If Matt Purke is still available when the A’s pick I would hope that they would snap him up. We don’t pick again until the 90th pick and so need to get maximum value out of this pick even if it means going a bit overslot. Although we haven’t taken a high schooler in the first round for a while but by all accounts they were prepared to take Aaron Hicks there last year if he was prepared to go to the mound full time.
Also I thought that the Braves would only take Wheeler if Tate had already gone by the 7th pick?
Thanks alot for doing all of this.
X
The A’s will be going best available as usual, so it would be a tough decision if things fall like this come June. The A’s seem to be okay with funky mechanics, and though Purke doesn’t qualify as funky, his mechanics will need some work. On the other hand, Brothers seems to have every bit the natural talent that Purke does, but with extra polish. Brothers’ slider is great, and without any mechanical issues that I know of. That’s why I went Brothers with that pick.
Donovan Tate
Tate is going to go higher than #9. I actually expect him to end up going to Seattle at #2. The athleticism and tools he brings to the table are rarely seen in a prospect, and I feel he’ll be considered a J. Upton/Griffey Jr. type of talent by June.
Once he focuses 100% on baseball he is going to take his game to another level. The phrase “oozes tools” gets thrown around often, but Tate really has it all and will be a legit 5 tool player if he can improve his contact rate with experience.
Founder of the Rowdy Hardy Fan Club
Depends in part on his demands...
Since he has the option of going to UNC for football and baseball I’m guessing he’ll be looking for an overslot deal from whoever takes him. That alone could push him down draft boards a good bit.
Honestly, when I hear Tate described he sounds a lot like George Lombard circa 1994. Great athlete with a ton of tools, but heavily reliant on the “once he finally focuses on baseball…” argument. Personally I hope the Braves steer clear of him in the draft.
Would you rather....
For Fantasy Purposes:
Have Steven Strasburg (1)
or
Donovan Tate (5) and Miller at (7B [so 8 really])
I have the 5th and 7B (failure to sign Crow) in a dynasty league and am considering trading 5 and 7B for 1.
What do you think?
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
Cardinals
You must not watch a lot of Cardinal baseball because there is very little wrong with Yadier Molina outside of his running speed. He is only 26 years old, he is fantastic defensively and is proving he is a legit .300 hitter.
With that said, I could certainly see Max Stassi, Austin Maddox or Luke Bailey being the Cardinals pick. However, it wouldn’t quite be to replace Molina when his contract is up after 2012 unless he is asking for a monster extension. It would be to get the best value out of the 19th pick and put a great bat/trading chip into the system. I wouldn’t mind the pick at all although I’d rather get Tyler Skaggs as the Cardinals desperately need a potential mid rotation starter in their system.
Hopefully Turner falls another spot and the Cardinals get him.
Molina's not horrible, but he's not that good.
First, the .300 he hit last year (.304) was one of the most empty .300 seasons possible. He still only managed to slug .392, and his power has regressed slightly every year for 3 straight years. His main strength is simply not striking out. And there aren’t many people who project him to ever hit .300 again. Marcel is the highest projection for him as far as batting average this year at .274. That’s not a legit .300 hitter. He’s not bad, but he’s not that good. When I say “a catcher that can hit,” I mean a catcher that is a great hitter.
Molina
There might not have been many who projected him to hit .300 ever again but he is currently hitting .348 with 10 RBIs and 8 BBs to 3 Ks. Those people are wrong so far.
He doesn’t have much pop, but being a 6-7 hitter, if he can get those key singles with runners in scoring position, I’ll take it. Molina hit .340 with runners in scoring position last year and is currently hitting .368 in similar situations.
If you watch the Cardinals a lot like I do, you know the best word to describe Molina at the plate is “clutch.” The guy came through with a lot of big hits last year and is doing it at an even more impressive rate this year(and he did it in the 2006 NLCS as well).
I’ll also add that he is probably a pain in the rear end. Molina knows how to waste good pitches. I think he’s already had like three, 9-10 pitch ABs that turned into RBI hits.
Gold glove caliber defensive catchers with solid offensive skills are rare. I hope Molina is behind the plate for the Cardinals for awhile.
Again, though, I’d take Bailey, Stassi or Maddox at 19. That is good value and its possible one of them becomes a very good defender themselves down the road.
cardinals
looking at this draft, give me skaggs
Cardinals
Looking at this draft, give me the best high school starter available. Of course they are inacapable of taking a risk like that, so I expect Rich “the bear” Poythress.
Probably won't take a HS Pitcher
But who knows, in spite of the organizational tendency, Mozeliak seems to be more open to that than Jock was. I just don’t see anyone past 18 in this mock that is a no brainer for me. Oliver is probably the best fit. Proijectable college lefty.
In what St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa called a "big day" for his club, starter Chris Carpenter took the mound for his first session of live batting practice and promptly buzzed the fuzz on catcher Jason LaRue’s chin with an errant fastball.
"Sorry," Carpenter called from the mound.
"Don’t say you’re sorry," LaRue barked back.
"He said it," pitching coach Dave Duncan said from the side of the cage, "but he didn’t mean it."
~ DG
Green
I don’t think the Padres can pass on Green even though they just traded away their former Greene as they have weak organizational depth at SS.
If they pick him there, it's because they think he's the best player.
Organizational depth has no place that high in the draft.
by Andy Seiler on Apr 27, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Well...
It might if they think he’ll move quickly ala Evan Longoria and I think he’s the closest to Longoria in the year’s draft.
But
Thinking a player can move quickly has nothing to do with organizational strength – that would be something they would simply factor into what makes a player the BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE (copyright). Among the myriad things factored into the discussion, is the comparison of readiness with potential ceiling. Teams are often willing to trade some potential upside for a measure of current ability or near-readiness. But the trade off would not be too large. For example, would you trade a potential future ace for a ready-now 4th starter? If that 4th starter was seen as the difference between October baseball and October golf, maybe. At the trade-deadline, anyway. In the draft, no. For reference, see the Pirates decision to draft Bryan Bullington as the #1,1 a few years back, saying that he could be a good #3 starter in short order. Forget the fact that he flamed out and it’s still a horrible decision making process.
by ofsticksandbats on Apr 28, 2009 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions

by 












