Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Missouri Crashes The Top Line After Kansas Win

Not A Rookie: Armando Galarraga

Armando_medium

Not a Rookie: Armando Galarraga

Armando Galarraga was signed by the Expos out of Venezuela in 1998. He didn't make his North American debut until 2001, when he went 1-3, 3.12 with a 24/15 K/BB in 35 innings in the Gulf Coast League at age 19, allowing 37 hits. He wasn't on the radar as a prospect at this point, and would rate as a basic anonymous Grade C lower-level prospect.

He made two starts in the GCL in 2002, then went down for Tommy John surgery. He made five starts in 2003, then went 5-5, 4.65 with a 94/31 K/BB in 110 innings for Class A Savannah in 2004, with 104 hits allowed. I did not put him in the 2005 book but would have rated him as a Grade C. His basic reputation at this point was as a pitcher with average stuff but decent control.

This changed in 2005: he made 14 starts for Class A Potomac in the Carolina League, going 3-4, 2.48 with a 79/23 K/BB ratio in 80 innings with 69 hits allowed. Promoted to Double-A, he went 3-4, 5.19 with a 58/21 K/BB in 76 innings with 80 hits allowed. He was traded to the Rangers that December as part of the Alfonso Soriano deal. Scouts reported boosted velocity during '05, up to 93-94 MPH, with a good slider but a below average changeup. He got some play in the press as a key component of the trade, but I was concerned about the deterioration in his ratios after his move to Double-A and gave him just a Grade C+.

More injuries dogged him in 2006: he had elbow and shoulder problems, spent much of the season rehabbing at the lower levels, and pitched poorly in Double-A (1-6, 5.71, with a nice 38/13 K/BB in 41 innings, but with 57 hits allowed). He looked horrible in one Double-A I start I saw, with below average velocity and command, granted it was just one start. I gave him a Grade C, noting that he seemed overhyped as a prospect to me.

Galarraga posted a 4.02 ERA with a 114/47 K/BB in 128 innings for Double-A Frisco in 2007, 4.74 with 21/22 K/BB in 25 innings for Triple-A Oklahoma, and 6.23 in 8.2 innings for the Rangers, rather undistinguished performance. But after watching him pitch a couple of times, I decided that I had been rather harsh on him in previous comments. I wrote "I think he needs more minor league time, but I do think he could end up being a decent number four/five starter, if he can improve his command." I also noticed the concern about injuries and durability problems hitting him again.

As you know, Galarraga was one of the most surprising rookies in 2008, going 13-7, 3.73 for the Tigers with a 126/61 K/BB ratio and 152 hits allowed in 179 innings. The better pitching environment in Detroit certainly helped. Is this sustainable? I think he is due for slippage. His H/IP was much better last year than in his minor league career, and while the better environment helps, I'd bet on an ERA closer to 5.00 than 3.84 again. If he stays healthy I think he can be decent pitcher, but I suspect 2008 was his career year.

Guess for 2009: nagging injury problems, 24 starts,139 innings,152 hits, 93/49 K/BB, 4.75 ERA.


Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Galarraga was one of the luckiest pitchers in baseball last year

While his ERA and record were very good, his FIP was well below league average. He had a 4.88 FIP which would put him in the class of such pitchers as Edwin Jackson, Tim Wakefield, Livan Hernandez and Tim Redding. Those pitchers all had ERA’s over 4. Galarraga was able to have such a low ERA by allowing a very low .246 BABIP which will almost certainly regress back to the norm of around .300. Especially with that shaky Tigers defense.

vivaelbeñsheets

by vivaelpujols on Feb 20, 2009 3:22 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah

I cant believe theyre relying on this guy to hold down a rotation spot.

by alskor on Feb 20, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

With

Adam Everett at short and Brandon Inge back at third, the Tigers’ defense won’t be as bad as it was last year. But Galarraga was still really lucky, and will probably not do very well this season, alas.

by Vaux on Feb 20, 2009 4:05 AM EST reply actions  

Post #1

is one of those odd ones that might be spam, but also might not.

by Vaux on Feb 20, 2009 4:06 AM EST reply actions  

I was wondering about that

It’s so bizarre that I can’t figure out if it is actually spam. And the card isn’t even that cool looking.

by thejd44 on Feb 21, 2009 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hal2_small
AA and MLB hitting production by AA batters between 1995-2002

Recent FanPosts

Small
Free Benchwarmer Baseball Teams Available
N41306733_31278203_7401_steve_golfin_small
My mlb mock draft
Small
Help me pick one for Fantasy
Small
Overall Community Prospect #88
Small
Community Pitching Prospect #59 RUNOFF
Small
Community Positional Prospect #62
Gorilla_small
The Congo Hammer's Top 50 AL Prospects
Matt-ryan-falcons_nc_small
Dynasty draft advice
Small
Overall Community Prospect #87
Power_small
Future Franchise Players

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter