the revival of the screwball
This pitch has been extinct from the arsenal of pitchers for awhile now due to violent consequences and risk of injury. a marginal 24th rd lefty from texas tech became a decent prospect due to that one pitch, zoomed through the minors, then got injured. he was forced to dump the pitch due to further injury risks. now if you were a pitcher would you sacrifice throwing a screwball a handful of times if its the difference between solid mlb pitcher and AAA/bullpen filler? i ask this because dallas braden is attempting to do this, since his screwball has been rated as a true out pitch before. but has had mixed results on the AAA/mlb shuttle the last 2 yrs. would you take that risk if it meant solidfying an mlb roster spot ? already beaten the odds as a 24th rd pick, having played 1 season of div 1 college baseball, and playing for his mlb hometown area team. would you tempt fate?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/15/SPRF15UO4S.DTL
That pitch earned him notice in the minor leagues but after surgery in 2006 to remove scar tissue encircling his biceps tendon and a humeral defect that left the top of his arm with an unusual hollow, the A's asked him to stop throwing the scroogie.
"It's something I'm going to kind of petition for," he said. "That's the pitch that put me on their radar, but they wanted me to back off it because my injuries were so abnormal and they weren't sure what caused that. Then I bounced back so quickly they didn't want to stir anything up."
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
another story
http://natnotes.com/2008/03/19/mystery-solved-where-did-dallas-bradens-screwball-go/
Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.
by knockoutking on Feb 16, 2009 4:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think I would chance it...
but I would wait. If I started to lose my grip on an MLB Roster spot, I would bring it back to try to keep me in the majors and making more money. Or, I would wait until my fourth year and unveil it again, hoping to get great numbers and increase my Arb number. The career of many pitchers is short, so you have to make as much money as you can. If the screwball takes 5 years off the end of your career, but you can make twice as much while you are pitching, then it is worth it I think (as long as there aren’t any permanent damages that will affect you for the next 50 years of life). MLB teams take out insurance policies on their players, so they are covered… unfortunately as a player, your only coverage is a guaranteed contract. So guarantee all you can!
"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile
by Boxkutter on Feb 17, 2009 2:24 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
pitcher contracts are pretty much uninsurable...
and the injury expert guy (drawing a blank on the name) at BP said something like 20% of MLB long term contracts are insured…so, just going with the blanket, ‘ah, fuck it, he’s insured’ assumption probably isnt a good one.
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 17, 2009 6:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Given
the depth of pitching the A’s have both on the current roster in guys like Outman and Gonzalez and coming rapidly up through the system in Simmons, Cahill, Mazzaro and Anderson, I’d go ahead and let Braden chance it. He’s a league average pitcher at best without the pitch. If it could boost him up a notch or two, why not? He’s really not a part of their long term plans anyhow – if he could improve his performance on the mound and increase the team’s chances of winning, if even just for a season or so, I’d let him do it. The depth makes him expendable.
by oakballnack on Feb 17, 2009 10:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 












