Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Brett Wallace vs Josh Bell


Who do you believe is the better 3B prospect?

 

Brett Wallace (born 1986):  .293/.367/.455/.822, 116 K, 47 BB (AA/AAA)

Joshua Bell (born 1986):  .295/.376/.516/.892,  98 K, 61 BB (AA/AAA)

 

I guess the obvious question is whether both of these kids will actually be 3B in the majors.  For now, Wallace is still a 3B in the Athletics organization and Bell has been getting good reviews on the improvements he has made defensively.  Offensively, Wallace and Bell appear very similar.  Bell is technically a switch-hitter, although he struggles mightily against lefties.  Unless he gets better, he might have to give up switch-hitting.  Wallace was probably the best pure hitter coming out of the 2008 Draft and really hasn't disappointed since.  The bat was never really questioned, just the defense.

 

Personally, I prefer Josh Bell right now.  I think he has a higher power potential, and otherwise similar and perhaps better K & BB rates than Brett Wallace.  Factor in defense, and I think Bell definitely gets the edge.

 

What are your thoughts?  Who do you like more?

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Bell's defense

I watched Bell closely on defense at the AFL (saw him play 3B five times in seven days) and he really impressed me.

Initially I was looking for reasons why he may not be able to stick at third. By the end of the week, I was looking for reasons why he may not be an above-average defensive 3B. He didn’t give me any.

AdamWFoster on Twitter
Projectprospect.com Founder

by Adam Foster on Dec 10, 2009 2:15 PM EST reply actions  

Callis on both

James (Chicago)

Brett Wallace or Josh Bell? Wallace seems to get all the hype but Bell has had better power and plate discipline through the minors. Bell seems underrated.
Jim Callis
  (2:42 PM)

I’d still take Wallace, but Bell is somewhat overrated.

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 10, 2009 2:38 PM EST reply actions  

He meant underrated

Mr. SKIA (MrSportsKnowItAll.com)

Jim, in last week’s chat, a questioner asked for your preference of Wallace vs. Bell, and said that he thought Bell was underrated. You said, “Wallace, but Bell is overrated.” I think this was a typo, but it created a stir and even had people asking KLaw about it in his chat. You did mean ‘underrated’ right?

Jim Callis
(2:37 PM)

Did I do that? I meant Bell is underrated. My mistake. Didn’t realize I could so easily cause some furor.

by cowboy4eva on Dec 10, 2009 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

The answer for me is Bell

b/c I have absolutely no respect for Wallace’s ability to play 3B.

I would definitely take Chisenhall above both, but I am confidence in Wallace’s bat. When he eventually moves to 1B, is Wallace much different from Logan Morrison, for instance? Obviously not a perfect comp, but you get the idea. Guy who will hit for high AVG, walk a good amount, very good approach at the plate, but somewhat questionable power.

On Chisenhall over Bell – Bell is solid all around, but not really an impact bat for me. He was underrated previously – and it seems like everyone just realized he’s a pretty good prospect. He should not be confused with an elite prospect. He’s good but its almost as if he’s getting overrated now. I think Chisenhall will have him beat skills and tools across the board, other than perhaps patience… which while not elite, I wouldnt rank as a problem at all for Chisenhall. Its just a particular strength for Bell.

by alskor on Dec 10, 2009 2:39 PM EST reply actions  

Bob Geren agrees with you

Though I bet Beane types up a script for him to memorize before every interview

He expects Wallace to move to 1b eventually.
So how would you handle a 1b logjam eventually with Wallace, Barton, Doolittle, Fox, Carter, etc. All have interesting bats, but defensive issues
Would you trade or move around anyone else to other positions?

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 10, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, If Im writing a book Im probably not asking him for quotes to put on the jacket.

Do you disagree with my take, though? I do find the situation somewhat puzzling…

by alskor on Dec 10, 2009 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure

I hear so many mixed things on Wallace’s defense that I have no idea what to think of him. I don’t really question his power though. I was excited the A’s got Wallace, but I’m much more excited about Carter and and Barton in 2010 (I want to see Carter destroy the PCL, and I still believe Barton will be an above average 1B).

And, to be honest, I don’t know enough about all the other guys to weigh in on some sort of ranking.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Dec 11, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I hear so many mixed things on Wallace’s defense

Where have you heard good things about Wallace’s defense…?

by alskor on Dec 11, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

well

“Mixed things” doesn’t necessarily have to be good defense vs. bad defense, it could be the range between “he would be adequate for a few years while his bat makes up for it” and “he’d be a walking abortion”.

by jibs on Dec 11, 2009 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

This

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Dec 12, 2009 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

True

Only thing I have ever heard is that Wallace fields pretty much everything he gets to. Problem is he doesn’t get to much of anything that is not hit directly at him.

by guru4u on Dec 12, 2009 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, you can always play Wallace some at 3B and live with bad defense. He’s not a butcher – he’s surehanded and has a nice arm. He just has no range at all. So, for a year or two you can leave him there and live with it, using a late innings defensive replacement. I don’t think I buy it, though. Oakland values defense too highly for that. Still, they have been starving for offense, so its certainly possible they go that route… Im not confident enough in Wallace the rookie’s bat to live with subpar defense over there, though.

I was under the impression Doolittle can probably play LF. I also still think Carter can handle the OF – and it might even be a better fit for him than 1B.

Thing is, take Wallace out of the equation and there is still a big logjam, so its not like playing Wallace at 3B solves all the problems anyway. As you note, there are at least five guys who could help the major league team whose best position is probably 1B/DH.

Fox, I don’t see as much of an asset or really in their plans. He’s a platoon/super sub they can use in a few spots and live with what he brings. Maybe his primary job description is backup catcher, too.

Logjams often work themselves out until spring – which isnt fun for fans, but often makes the most sense. I would think they probably start the year with Barton and Fox in the majors and the other guys in the minors. Then again I never expected them to break camp with those kids last year, either. We’ll see who gets hurt, moved, etc… Fox, Barton and Doolittle don’t have a lot of trade value, but if Beane was motivated to move them its not like he would have a hard time doing it and getting something useful back. Long term, I think its Wallace and Carter at 1B/DH and Doolittle in the OF/bench. Alternatively, I would prefer Wallace at DH, Carter in the OF, Doolittle off the bench and pick up somebody for 1B (not like its hard). Brian Cashman had a great quote about DH’s – applies almost equally to 1B:

“You can turn left, you can turn right, you can look up and down and you’ve got a DH begging for a job,” Cashman said. “The DH market, you’ve got opportunity there. You should be able to take advantage of that if you’re a club.”

So, really, Wallace and Carter are the only guys I need to worry about in terms of long term plans. Everybody else is fungible. That’s not to say they’re worthless, but if they get stuck in a bad spot with lack of ABs I just live with it.

by alskor on Dec 10, 2009 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Sean Doolittle is an outfielder

Forget the fact that he once played first base. The odds of him ever playing 30 games in a season at 1B for the Athletics are essentially nil. Just forget about it.

Barton’s actually in position to have a breakout year next year IMO. Without much fanfare, he put up a .343 wOBA last year in limited time. He’s not even 25 yet— the guy isn’t chopped liver.

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 10, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree completely.

His rate stats are so excellent, I would be very surprised if he doesn’t put up quite good counting stats next year.

"Life is a horizontal fall" -Jean Cocteau

by King Richard on Dec 11, 2009 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm still a Barton fan, but he's destined to be underrated forever

Because he’ll be a 1B who doesn’t hit a lot of home runs. He can do everything else well (and I think he will), but a 1B who doesn’t hit homers is never going to be a star. This is actually perfect for the A’s.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Dec 12, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Video of Wallace on D

Here’s a video that I shot of Wallace taking grounders before a Triple-A game: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AomsDHb7WPo

He does have limited range but he’s pretty agile, has soft hands and his arm is good. A NL front office member told me he thinks Wallace could be an adequate defensive third baseman.

AdamWFoster on Twitter
Projectprospect.com Founder

by Adam Foster on Dec 10, 2009 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

i don't see it

with that body. . .i don’t like the short arm flip throwing action either, I don’t know if he has great arm strength or not, but he throws like a 2b. . . he should probably mix in a little slim fast

by SoCalSoxFan on Dec 11, 2009 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

“The answer for me is Bell b/c I have absolutely no respect for Wallace’s ability to play 3B.”

I’m on that train.

by PhillyFriar on Dec 10, 2009 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Josh Bell spent the entire season in AA

The OP mistakenly says that he split between AA/AAA.

by NRC on Dec 10, 2009 5:53 PM EST reply actions  

Bell

Love the defense

Check out my website, it has scouting reports for all the Orioles' top prospects and is updated daily. www.oriolesprospects.com

Follow me on twitter @orioleprospects

by Jordan Tuwiner on Dec 11, 2009 12:42 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

I like Bell more, though my opinion is biased. But, I really do like Wallace and his swing. I think I am more confident in Wallace’s bat though Bell is right behind him in that regard, and Bell gets the nod as far as raw power, discipline and his glove at 3B(and ability to stay there).

I do agree with the notion that Bell had been underrated for a while now, but he did have a break out season this year. He also improved his defense tremendously which builds his value quite a bit. At the end of the 09 season, I was thinking he would be somewhere around the 75th best prospect, but I am starting to think he may wind up well in the top 50 andpossibly somewhere in the 30’s……What do you guys think?Switch hitting 3B with plus raw power, possible above average defender with good discipline and a good bat….Only possible problem is his right handed hitting splits which he did improve in the AFL though the competition there is uneven at times. I wonder if him hitting well against LHP in the AFL has anything to do with his recent helium. I honestly never heard him mentioned as much until he showed off in the AFL this season.

by QBsIllest1 on Dec 11, 2009 11:15 AM EST reply actions  

KG commenting

on Withrow and Mejia. For those that were following on that debate.

Rhys26 (Kansas City): A debate’s been raging on another site, as to who is the better prospect, Chris Withrow or Jenry Mejia? I say both may wind-up in the pen, if they don’t develop better secondary offerings. Care to weigh in?

Kevin Goldstein: I think you’re first comment there is VERY accurate. I like them both quite a bit — there’s no slam dunk obviously better one.

by MightyMoose on Dec 11, 2009 2:40 PM EST reply actions  

Comparison

Both 23, Wallace older by a couple months
Bell drafted in 2005 out of HS- 4th full season
Wallace drafted out of college in 08- 1st full season
Bell spent all of his 09 season at AA level
Wallace had 620+ abs at AAA level
Comparable bats w/ Bell more power
Wallace defense seems to be the biggest issue against him.

by MagicMike23 on Dec 12, 2009 12:14 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Catch-22: Is Travis D’Arnaud the ‘Next One?’
Bullpen_banter_logo_small
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects: 100-51
Hal2_small
AA and MLB hitting production by AA batters between 1995-2002

Recent FanPosts

Small
Community Pitching Prospect #62
Small
Community Positional Prospect #65
Small
Overall Community Prospect #93
Small
New Cubs Draft Strategy/Player Development
Small
Stride Length, release point, and Drag
Small
Community Pitching Prospect #61 RUNOFF
Small
Community Positional Prospect #64
Small
5 yrold Dynasty Fantasy League team openings
Ryan_pic_small
Super Sickels Keeper League has one more opening
Small
Overall Community Prospect #92

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter