Which Team has the best prospects?
Best? Worst? Why?
2009 Prospect Draft
Team A: J. Heyward (Atl - OF), J. Montero (NYY - C), Y. Alonso (Cin - 1B)
Team B: P. Alvarez (Pit - 3B), T. Beckham (TB - SS), E. Hosmer (KC - 1B)
Team C: D. Jennings (TB - OF), M. Perez (Tex - SP), M. Taylor (Phi - OF)
Team D: K. Drabek (Phi - OF), J. Darnell (SD - 3B), N. Weglarz (Cle - OF)
Team E: L. Morrison (Fla - 1B), C. Friedrich (Col - SP), I. Davis (NYM - 1B)
Team F: C. Santana (Cle - C), R. Westmoreland (Bos - OF), C. Kelly (Bos - SP)
Team G: C. Kimbrel (Atl - RP), J. Arencibia (Tor - C), E. Beltre (Tex - OF)
Team H: S. Castro (ChC - SS), M. Moustakas (KC - 3B), T. Alderson (Pit - SP)
Team I: D. Brown (Phi - OF), F. Freeman (Atl - 1B), C. Cosby (Det - SP)
Team J: J. Mejia (NYM - SP), C. Carter (Oak - 1B), P. Venditte (NYY - P)
Team K: H. Rondon (Cle - SP), B. Lawrie (Mil - 2B), J. Vitters (ChC - 3B)
Team L: J. Smoak (Tex - 1B), M. Stanton (Fla - OF), G. Green (Oak - SS)
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
you can't tell?
best is obviously A
worst is obviously G
by daveh33 on Nov 13, 2009 2:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
A, C or L
All are very good.
Umm.. did someone seriously list Pat Venditte as one of their top 3 prospects…? Also, Team G is terrible.
by alskor on Nov 13, 2009 2:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
agreed with Alskor
Team F is also interesting, high ceiling/low floors with Westmoreland and Kelly
Somehow out of the 36 players listed, team G has 3 of the worst 5 (Alderson, Venditte are the other two).
by two fishsticks on Nov 13, 2009 2:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with this.
I also think Alvarez keeps Team B from being pretty terrible as well, but maybe that’s just because I don’t have a lot of faith in Beckham at this point.
by PhillyFriar on Nov 13, 2009 4:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
reminded me of an LSAT logic game at first
but poor team G…
by son.of.sourman on Nov 13, 2009 3:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
L, A, C and E
L and A are probably the best for high ceiling without too much risk. C I like for ceiling, but a bit more risk. E is just a bit less exciting, but I think will be a very productive group.
by acerimusdux on Nov 13, 2009 4:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This question is asked about fifty times a year on this blog, but we always seem to get the same subjective answers every time it appears.
The answer is, you don’t know until those prospects produce at the major league level.
by CoolCat23 on Nov 13, 2009 4:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
well let's close up shop then
since rating these guys is pointless until they have finished their major league careers.
Sorry, couldn’t resist.
by wobatus on Nov 13, 2009 5:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
let's just wait until they're retired
too risky to speculate earlier than that
by gogotabata on Nov 13, 2009 8:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
rabbble rabbble rabbbbble
im gonna copy and paste what the guy above me said cause i cant think for myself
by PHGold09 on Nov 13, 2009 9:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Easy as ABC
Well, actually, in this case, I’d say A, C, B. I and L are not bad either. And G is not bad. Oh, wait a minute, yes, it is. It is very bad indeed.
The wind is in the buffalo.
by journeymen on Nov 15, 2009 12:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 








