Rookie Profile: Andrew Bailey
Rookie Profile: Andrew Bailey
Andrew Bailey was drafted by the Oakland Athletics in the sixth round in 2006, out of Wagner College in New York. He was successful in college but had missed most of 2005 following Tommy John surgery, which probably hurt his stock a bit on draft day although his actual performance in '06 was strong (2.03 ERA, 53/16 K/BB in 44 innings, 22 hits). He continued to pitch well in pro ball, posting a 2.02 ERA with a 53/20 K/BB in 58 innings for Vancouver in the Northwest League, with 39 hits allowed, drawing positive scouting reports with his 90-93 MPH fastball and good curve. I gave him a Grade C in the 2007 book, but wrote that he had upside, represented "good value" as a sixth round pick, and could rise quickly if his command held up.
Bailey began 2007 with Kane County in the Midwest League, posting a 3.35 ERA with a 74/22 K/BB in 51 innings, allowing 42 hits. Promoted to Class A Stockton, he continued to pitch well though with slight slippages in his ratios, posting a 3.82 ERA with a 72/31 K/BB in 66 innings, 56 hits allowed. He made one emergency start for Triple-A Sacramento, throwing eight strong innings, allowing one run with four strikeouts, one walk, and three hits allowed. He made progress adding a changeup to his repertoire, and I gave him a Grade B- in the 2008 book, writing that further command improvements could result in a rapid rise.
Beginning 2008 at Double-A Midland, Bailey was inconsistent early in the season but more effective after moving to the pen, posting a 0.92 ERA in relief but 6.18 as a starter. He threw harder more consistently in shorter stretches, adding some cutting action to the pitch, while continuing to use his curveball and changeup to give him a more diverse arsenal than many relievers. He finished with an overall line of 4.32 ERA with a 110/56 K/BB in 110 innings, allowing 99 hits. He was excellent in the Arizona Fall League, posting a 1.29 ERA with a 16/1 K/BB in 14 innings. I gave him a Grade C+ this year, but noting that if his command "sharpened up" that he could be a surprise in 2009.
I thought he might have a solid year as a middle reliever. I did not expect him to post a 1.84 ERA with a 91/24 K/BB in 83 innings, with just 49 hits allowed. I did not expect him to pick up 26 saves. His FIP was 2.56, still very impressive though it does show that the ERA had some good luck attached to it. His velocity charts show his speed picking up as the season progressed. He was at 88-94 early in the season, just like in the minors, but was getting up more consistently into the mid-90s as the summer progressed.
As for the future, Bailey may backslide a bit next year just due to luck, but as long as he remains healthy I don't see any particular reason why he can't be a bullpen force going forward.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
does anyone see
Joey Devine challenging for the closer spot in 2010? I think it could happen, but obviously have to see how his arm is by spring.
Beane seems to know just how to maximize the value of his closers, maybe he’s looking for another haul of prospects for one of his relievers.
by saltybiscuits on Oct 7, 2009 9:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't see how
Devine could really challenge Bailey for the closer’s role next year unless Bailey starts the season injured or completely unravels and experiences failure. Both scenarios seem unlikely, and coupled with the fact that Devine will only just have started pitching after a year off and surgery when the spring starts, I just don’t see it happening. Devine never had a lock on the closers role – he entered 2009 with the idea that he’d be splitting time with Ziegler in that spot. Bailey, however, locked down the role this year. It’s his spot to lose, and considering he was one of the top 5 relievers in baseball this year, I don’t think he’s going anywhere.
by oakballnack on Oct 7, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that said
I think Devine could be a great complimentary piece in a set up role for the A’s next year if he’s healthy.
by oakballnack on Oct 7, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think they consider trading wuertz
relievers are unpredictable, but enough depth
rhp:
bailey/ziegler/devine/gray/hrod/meloan/casilla, later carignan/demel/storey
lhp:
breslow/kilby/blevins/marshall
by Asfan4ever723 on Oct 7, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Starter
What are your thoughts on turning Bailey back into a starter?
He really showed good numbers as a starter in the low minors, except for that one stretch in AA, and he’s added a cutter and gotten important big league experience.
"Life is a horizontal fall" -Jean Cocteau
by King Richard on Oct 7, 2009 6:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
why?
The A’s are pretty set for now with regard to the rotation, and he’s been so successful and dominant as a closer, why mess around with it? When you catch lightening/Papelbon/Bailey in a bottle, you should hold onto it.
by oakballnack on Oct 8, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
starter
I’d leave him in the bullpen at least until we get him further past the injury nexus. Maybe he can convert to starting in 2012 or so, but for now I don’t see any reason to argue with success.
by John Sickels on Oct 8, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blevins
looked good down the stretch and might be another candidate for a set up role.
by Dalman on Oct 7, 2009 6:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Blevins is actually a good reliever; he just got squeezed off the roster this season
I really like him and Kilby as the left side of a pen. Breslow I can take or leave, but at least he’s a workhorse. I wouldn’t be averse to using all three of them next season.
Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving
by PaulThomas on Oct 7, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In another one of those "Bob Geren is completely and utterly fucking daft" situations
Breslow, for the first time in Geren’s tenure of bullpen handling inadequacy as manager, was acutally kinda used like a LOOGY. Or some kinda super LOOGY. The problem: Breslow was actually better against righties this year (and it’s a mere 50 point OPS different over the course of his career).
But I say that to actually agree with your point. Breslow has no (or a reverse) platoon split. Maybe he’s really good or not, I don’t know, but whatever he is he’s the same against both sides. I think you can afford to have three lefties in the pen if at least one of them can get righties out.
by thejd44 on Oct 7, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
50 points is actually a fairly normal platoon split
People usually exaggerate the effect of platoon splits because they don’t regress them to the mean enough. Frankly, I’d pay more attention to a pitcher’s arm slot than his career numbers unless he’s been pitching for a really long time.
Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving
by PaulThomas on Oct 8, 2009 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Career platoon splits, that is
Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving
by PaulThomas on Oct 8, 2009 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, then did Breslow change something this year/with the A's
Why such a drastic difference in split between his career numbers and this year’s? SSS?
by thejd44 on Oct 8, 2009 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reason for that is that Breslow's kill pitch this year has been his fastball
and not his slider, like in previous years.
The fastball has little platoon split, whereas sliders typically have large platoon splits.
"Life is a horizontal fall" -Jean Cocteau
by King Richard on Oct 8, 2009 3:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What are you basing this on?
Blevins has had such mixed results at the major league level, and though he hasn’t really gotten a chance to stick around for a prolonged period of time, he’s been anything but consistent up here. I realize he’s been dominant in the minors and that he has above average stuff, but that doesn’t necessarily translate into “a good reliever” at the major league level. I DO really like Kilby though. He attacks the zone, and that arm action is very deceptive. I agree that it wouldn’t be the worst thing to have 3 lefties in the pen, and Kilby is very versatile.
by oakballnack on Oct 8, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bailey
He was flat out dominant this year. His numbers are Riveraesque.
by yoda1 on Oct 8, 2009 12:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The A's bullpen seems to have been a strength for a while.
Along with Bailey, they have Wuertz, Ziegler, Devine coming back, Breslow, Kilby and Blevins. There is also Demel and Rodriguez coming through and Carignan coming back from injury.
by DeJay on Oct 8, 2009 5:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would love to see the A's trade some of their bullpen depth
Maybe go after BJ Upton and have Bailey or Wuertz as a second piece of a deal.
Or they could think of Bailey transitioning to the rotation. It’s risky, but Bailey actually was pretty good in that role before ‘08 (I hadn’t really realized this).
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
by vignette17 on Oct 11, 2009 6:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs












