If Chris Davis was still a prospect....
Were would he rank on your top 50?
He is not a great defender and his position is still not known. Most say there is no chance he can play at 3B. He could probably stick at 1B, but many think he will end up a DH. Either way, he will never be a great defensive player.
With the bat, he looks like a future star. He showed amazing power in his time in the minors and half a season in the majors. He is almost a guarantee to hit 30+ homers a year and could even push 40 or 50+. The only question mark he has is plate discipline (88/20 SO/BB). Can he cut down on the strikeouts?
5 recs |
474 comments
Comments
I guess chicks do dig the longball
Davis has serious contact issues and looks like he is going to have no defensive value. .265/.315/.490 with 25 HRs is nice, but people are getting a little crazy about him.
He is almost a guarantee to hit 30+ homers a year and could even push 40 or 50+.
Based on what…? Groupthink? What people see him doing in their mind’s eye??
CHONE has him at 25. He’s going to be hard pressed to beat that by much since he strikes out about once a game. As a 23 year old rookie he is not a great bet to hit 30+ HRs. Not too many guys do that. Definitely a better fantasy option than real life. I see a poor man’s Adam Dunn for now… and maybe a full Adam Dunn redux in the future.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 5:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Based on
the fact that he hit 17 in less than half a season in the majors as a 22 year old, his track record in the minors, and the fact that he plays in one of the best hitters parks in baseball.
IMO power is not a question for him. He is a lock to hit for power. The only questions are how much his high strikeouts will affect his AVG/OBP and his defense.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 5:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
high SO rates haven't affected his
avg in the minors. He hit .285 in his half season with the rangers, and hit 378 in his final 10 games of the season. I say he maintains a .280 – .290 BA.
There are no gaurantees. I remember when Ensberg and others have had a big 2nd half and falter the coming season. Saying that, I think Chris Davis is going to have a big year. Another sleeper on the Rangers would be Nelson Cruz.
Next Year! We Swear!
by NothinG on Jan 19, 2009 6:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If he can keep his avg
around .280, he will become one of the best hitters in baseball.
I really think he is the perfect fit in Texas.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 6:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.378 in 10 games doesnt mean a blessed thing
its waaaay too small of a sample size.
also, a .285 average by a guy who pitchers havent figured out yet isn’t surprising. He’ll have to make adjustments before pitchers do, that’s all
"Sometimes Joe (morgan) doesn't like facts to get in the way of his opinions."- billy beane
"That was a great pick...if this was 2002" Me, to guy who selected Barry Zito in a fantasy draft
by harendaman365 on Jan 19, 2009 6:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He obviously will have adjustments to make
He’s also shown to be very good at that so far. I was very pessimistic that he would perform in the majors like he did, but he made that first adjustment very well.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 19, 2009 6:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So what
Adam Dunn had a career .304 Batting Average in the minors… that doesn’t mean anything in the majors…
by Ophidian on Jan 20, 2009 9:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
minor league BA doesn't mean anything?
by groundingout on Jan 20, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope.
Generally, minor league stats mean jack. Too many factors can contribute to statistical noise. There are ways to attempt to translate minor league stats into MLEs (major league equivalents), but they still are subject to certain flaws.
Analyze the skill sets based on what skills have been demonstrated and go with scouting / coaching reports that provide observational intelligence, then project future performance.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 2:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh
BB/K rates are a good indicator of plate discipline. Power and contact skills shown in their respective statistics are generally a decent indicator as well. I think you discount minor league stats entirely, and I’d disagree. They have their uses, especially at the higher levels.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jan 20, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Read again, please.
Analyze the skill sets based on what skills have been demonstrated
Things like walk rates, strike out rates, etc are all stats that show demonstrated skill sets. So, no, I’m not discounting those.
What I am discounting are the general line stats and other results stats. Even home runs require context for minor league numbers.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 3:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Home runs require context for major league numbers, too.
by thejd44 on Jan 20, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Correct, but...
I don’t see what your point is, aside from semantics.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 4:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In that case
A set of line stats shows demonstrated skills. So line stats do have a use, especially in the high minors.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jan 20, 2009 7:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How do you come to that conclusion from what I said.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 8:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Simple
We agree that walk rates and strikeout rates show a demonstrated skill set: plate discipline.
We agree that home runs (and, to a lesser extent, doubles and triples) show a demonstrated skill set: power.
It’s not much of a stretch to say that, in most cases, high average in the minor leagues correlates with good contact skills. It’s also not much of a stretch to say that stolen bases (and perhaps triples) are a reflection of a players speed and baserunning abilities.
So the following stats are useful
AVG 2B 3B HR K BB SB CS
Look familiar? It’s a stat line ;)
I don’t mean to belittle you (though I probably am, for which I apologize), but while I agree that minor league stats aren’t great in predicting player performance, when coupled with scouting reports, they are useful to a certain degree.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jan 22, 2009 1:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Certain degree is something I'll agree with.
But without context, all of those stats can also be misleading. High power numbers in the Cal League, for example, may not mean much. High averages could be more a result of the quality of opposing pitchers and defenses. Etc.
This is why there are MLEs, which take these numbers into a more neutral environment and try to translate them to a major league quality of opposing play. However, even then they’re not perfect. So, while a player who is highly regarded should destroy minor league hitting, it’s not an indication of true projectable talent levels.
I think we’re agreeing, just in different ways.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 22, 2009 10:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree he's a lock to hit for power
I just dont agree that he’s a lock to hit for 30+ HRs in his rookie season
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Again
Where did the poster confine his comments to Davis’ [second] season? He’s clearly talking about the course of his career.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 19, 2009 6:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im aware
MY POINT was that he is being overrated for the year ahead. People who expect him to continue at the rate he did in 08 are going to be severely disappointed.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the rate he hit home runs in 08
was similar, if not worse than his minors home run rates. i don’t think there’s any reason to think he’s not capable of keeping up that home run rate.
"True fact: In a global thermonuclear war, the only human who would survive would be David Eckstein" -PT
by travdog6 on Jan 19, 2009 10:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im confused...
You seem to be implying there is no difference in difficulty between the minor leagues and MLB. Howie Kendrick hit .360 in the minors – should I assume he will/can hit .360 in MLB…?
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 10:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
key word in my post: capable
i’m not saying he will. i think he’s more than capable of doing it.
"True fact: In a global thermonuclear war, the only human who would survive would be David Eckstein" -PT
by travdog6 on Jan 19, 2009 10:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I really wasnt talking about power if you re-read my post, anyway
I was talking AVG. I dont think he’ll be sustaining that AVG or BABIP.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 10:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bizarre comments
So you’re assumption is that he will always be worse than he was in 295 rookie ABs? He was .285/.331/.549 with 17 HR in 80 games, so 34 HR pace. Also, he’s just a 1B, but he actually showed quite a bit of potential there.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 19, 2009 6:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
your*
And I see no indication that the poster is inquiring about his second year only.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 19, 2009 6:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Those slash stats I put up are his CHONE projection.
and yes, my assumption would be that he will regularly perform worse than he did in 2008. I think that’s a pretty solid assumption if you actually look at his translated minor league stats, not just glare lovingly at the HR columns.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So you choose his CHONE projection and ignore all of the others that are much more optimistic? Marcel has him much higher.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 19, 2009 6:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was the only projection on fangraphs, ass
Can you lay off? Maybe you can get me an autograph from your cousin Chris?
Of course Marvel has him higher – Marcel is a base mathematical projection system that just regresses his existing MLB performance.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
dude
what the hell did Chris Davis to you? F*** your girlfriend, daughter, mother and sister?
by blalock84 on Jan 20, 2009 2:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As an impartial observer...
I’d say the idiot tally is about neck and neck.
by DrunkIrish on Jan 20, 2009 11:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
By making that comment
You voided your impartialness.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 4:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i find it pretty funny that the post is he replying to
Goes the “what is chris davis your _” route and you get so offended by someone sayin the same back to you.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 20, 2009 11:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I find it funny that you feel the need to protect Chris Davis like a mother hen from any sort of criticism whatsoever
by alskor on Jan 20, 2009 4:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, i need to act more rationally without the attitude
like you. the standard for us all.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 20, 2009 4:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually....
I think you two are arguing over a different guy.
http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=9272&position=1B/3B
Christopher Davis of the Rangers. (note, no CHONE projection)
http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=pa308028&position=C
Chris Davis of the Diamondbacks (note the CHONE projection).
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn
nice catch. Youre absolutely correct.
Okay, good point, zywica, you got me.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No, wait!
That IS his CHONE projection!!
http://www.baseballprojection.com/TEX2009.htm
Fangraphs has it under the wrong Chris Davis
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, I sit corrected.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Playing time has to be considered in projections
He is, after all, entering his second year and there may be some question as to where he’s playing in 2009 that might limit his playing time.
For the sake of argument, though, I get 31.67 home runs over 650 PAs.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There are no questions whatsoever about where he's playing
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 21, 2009 1:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I meant position wise.
His playing position could determine his playing time.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He is the first baseman,
period.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 21, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Considering it's the AL.
Putting a “period” on that while there’s still the DH as a positional possibility seems weird to me. If you say he’ll get a majority of his play time at first then I’ll have to bow to your superior knowledge. I don’t follow the Rangers enough to know what their plans are for which players.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He will play 1B
90% of the time in all likelihood.
"He will not coddle them. Nolan Ryan doesn’t coddle." - Jeff Passan
by Dirk Diggler on Jan 21, 2009 2:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No, he is the 1B.
Sure, Blalock might get some starts there ( if he’s not traded), but Chris Davis is the starting 1B for the Rangers. When Smoak comes up that will change, but for 2009 Chris Davis will get the vast majority of his at bats as the starting 1B. That’s what the team officials have been saying, and now with Young moving over to 3B there is even less reason to think otherwise.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 21, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shows how much I pay attention to Texas.
I didn’t even know the Rangers picked up Blalock’s option.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 8:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
heh
putting your user name to the test
(that was a joke btw)
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 22, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm used to it.
The name is supposed to be sarcastic irony, but there are times…
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 22, 2009 10:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if he doesnt
get 550 PA at the very least then he’s probably lost a limb
by blalock84 on Jan 21, 2009 2:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Injuries can happen.
Generally projection systems wont do that unless the player has a history of injuries. In this case, CHONE is just using trends with other first or second year players to determine the possible playing time of Davis in 2009.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
295 ABs are a small sample size to try to establish a "pace"
Besides, you’re not accounting for league adjustment. While Bill James’ projection system has him hitting 40 bombs next season, that should demonstrate to you the general flaw of BJ’s system.
Marcel, which is a little pessimistic, has him at 16 next season. I don’t see a CHONE for him yet.
Is it possible for him to ever hit 40? Sure, especially in that stupid Texas stadium. But like so many lefty hitters, he’s going to have to prove he can do more then mash a righty.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd prefer it if you didn't
tell me what I’m not accounting for. I’m pretty sure I’ve studied him and watched him quite a bit more than you.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 19, 2009 6:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Irrelevant.
We’re doing stat analysis here, which doesn’t require your personal observation touch.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
When you tell me that I’m not accounting for league adjustment in whatever conclusion you think I’m making (the only thing I’ve said is that alaskor’s projection of a career line around CHONE’s projection is pessimistic) you are mistaken.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 19, 2009 6:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, irrelevant.
There’s no CHONE projection for Christopher Davis to begin with.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I sit corrected.
It’s not up on Fangraphs.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So I’m not accounting correctly for league adjustment AND I’m making an irrelevant point because the fact that I wasn’t accounting correctly for league adjustment in your opinion didn’t even apply to the player I’m commenting on. Okay.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 19, 2009 6:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No.
You were arguing over alskor’s false projection. The whole argument has become irrelevant.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"false projection"
I have no clue what you two are talking about with this! What did I project? All I did was round off his CHONE numbers for 09 and hold it up as a good projection for 09.
As for his career, what I said was this:
my assumption would be that he will regularly perform worse than he did in 2008.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I just meant that since the argument was based on
a misunderstanding of which player was being discussed, the whole thing is kind of pointless now.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
alskor’s projection of a career line around CHONE’s projection is pessimistic) you are mistaken.
That is ABSOLUTELY NOT what I said.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
x
“he’s going to have to prove he can do more then mash a righty.” look at his splits dude:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=davisch02
"No... JD has been exposed as a kid who trades his remote-controlled helicopters for paper airplanes, then fails to consider the feelings of the paper airplane when he refolded it into a hat." -Telegraph.
by Kinslerhomer on Jan 19, 2009 6:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, too small a sample.
A reverse split for a line drive hitter is unlikely.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You know his minor league splits
also don’t support your little theory. He’s a lifetime .935 OPS hitter against lefties and .955 OPS against righties in the minors
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 20, 2009 1:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
273 PA
Still too small. OBP higher then vs. righties, slugging lower, BABIP higher… too much room here for random noise. That, and we have to, again, adjust for superior opponents.
Then again, I’m curious about the numbers I’m seeing here on Minorleaguesplits.com since it has him at only a 14.7% line drive rate. A 14.7% line drive rate can’t possibly sustain a .350+ BABIP.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 1:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Whats your sample size for saying he has only mashed righties?
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 20, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I never said he "only" mashed righties.
Throughout baseball’s history batters will hit opposing handed pitchers better then same handed. The general assumption is that Davis will fit into that same mold. What he has to do is demonstrate that he can also hit the same handed pitcher and at the major league level. His minor league stats seem to imply he can, but they’re not a large enough sample nor are they worth enough value to be used as serious analysis.
Even if he manages only 75% of his production against lefties, that’s good enough to demonstrate he can handle all facets of hitting. Carlos Pena and Raul Ibanez are both righty mashers who suck against lefties. They’re both still very valuable hitters, but they’re not amongst the elite.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Throughout baseball's history
there have been plenty of batters who have overcome that same-handed problem. Assuming Davis is not one of them because most hitters don’t is ridiculous. All he has done throughout his pro career has been mash against lefties and righties. Yeah, its not a huge sample size, but its still big enough to hold some water here.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 21, 2009 1:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It really isn't.
He’ll have plenty of oportunity to see if he can do it or not. The point of the concern isn’t to rail on him but to temper the enthusiasm with realistic caution.
Also, overcoming same-handedness is only going to be common with right handed hitters. One of the few lefties who has a measurable and consistent reverse-platoon split that I’ve seen in the last dozen or so years is Ichiro Suzuki.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 12:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't need to be a huge reverse platoon split
The issue though is will Davis struggle against lefties because he is a lefty hitter. Lets say he puts up a .950 OPS against righties and a .900 OPS against lefties. Is he really struggling against lefties? Sure he hits them worse, but you are still looking at a great line vs. them. That is what Davis’ entire pro career has shown that he is capable of doing.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 22, 2009 12:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I said somewhere in this thread that...
…if he was 75% as productive against lefties as he was righties then any platoon split he’d have would be unimportant. I distrust minor league split numbers due to the inferiority of opposing play. A major league team with it’s scouting resources and lefty specialists are going to be the things he needs to beat. Not many lefty hitters can do it but the elites can.
Basically the measure of his true eliteness will be in his ability to hit lefty pitching as effectively as righty pitching.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 22, 2009 11:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
For the 370837107th time, approximately,
minor league LD rates are not evidence of anything. They are not calculated consistently with major league LD rates, because the definition varies from league to league.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 20, 2009 8:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
Which is why I said that I find it curious. I’m going to need a scouting report on him because it appears the batted ball data is flawed.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 8:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ask Zwyica for a scouting report idiot
by Goyogringo on Jan 21, 2009 1:29 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pardon me but...
Who?
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Zywica
is a poster over at LSB and he is as knowledgable as anyone about prospects in general, and certainly about Rangers players. I would trust his reports over just about anyone who’s not a pro scout.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 21, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also.....?
OMG. Is this entire thread for real or is is it a giant practical joke or something?
He’s also the poster he replied to in this very exact thread at least 3 or 4 times already. So he’s either one of two things here. I’ll let you draw that conclusion for yourself.
Same guy, new name.
by stillredsoxfan on Jan 21, 2009 5:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll be honest.
I didn’t notice he was posting in this thread and that I had replied to him until just now. I know the names are right there, but I’ve been in conversation now with several different folks and generally only look at what they’re saying, not who’s saying it.
To Zywica, I know I said earlier your personal observation isn’t important, but now that we’ve hit a snag with pure statistical analysis, any scouting data you have would be appreciated. If nothing else, it will at least confirm whether or not the minor league numbers we have are inaccurate.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 9:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Zywica is for real
There are some LSB posters who post stupid, reactionary things here, wildly defending their favorite prospects. Zywica posts very little here and usually stays out of hissy fights like the one this thread developed into. I’m not sure what you’re implying, but if you had to pick one LSB poster to pay attention to here it would be Zywica.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 22, 2009 12:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Subject
I guess my post was a little too cryptic for you. If you reread my post again you’ll see I was referring to The Typical Idiot Fan’s question of who Zywica is. Get it now?
Same guy, new name.
by stillredsoxfan on Jan 22, 2009 1:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotcha.
Only talked to a few folks over at LSB. I tend to avoid it because the people who post there have drawn a bad rep.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 8:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How so?
Because people like Paul Thomas flame bait us?
Give me Sheets or give me Offseason Blues Part III.
by Chase Irwin on Jan 25, 2009 12:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because we contaminate the polls!
Sinister behavior like that can’t be accepted. It clearly means we are all trash.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 25, 2009 7:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Second hand info.
Like I said, I tend not to go there because the posters have drawn a bad rep. This is mostly the opinion of the Lookout Landing crew.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 25, 2009 7:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What a coincidence, according to LSB lookout landing's commentators have a bad rep.
Judge for yourself
If you read lookoutlanding, lonestarball is made up of people with an average IQ of 45 who type in internet speak with a texas accent and think Michael Young is a hall of famer today.
Of course, noone seemed to think that until Jeff decided to say it in some post, and since then its become fact over there.
If you read lonestarball, the opinion of lookout landing might not be much better.
Obviously Im a LSB commentator, but LSB has plenty of good baseball discussion and is one of the more heavily trafficked sbnation sites. With that comes various off topic discussions (not that thats any different from lookout landing), but the baseball is there. I’m not going to try to say its the best baseball discussion on the internet, but its certainly not the dregs LL would have you believe.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 25, 2009 9:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, like I said...
Second hand info. I don’t stand by it, but will admit it’s one reason I don’t go there. The other is I don’t care about the Rangers.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 26, 2009 2:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We weep your loss.
Give me Sheets or give me Offseason Blues Part III.
by Chase Irwin on Jan 26, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Uh
CHONE has him at 25
Mildly misleading; that is in 480 at-bats, 126 games. Over a full season that is… 30+.
You sir, are a hater.
by aCone419 on Jan 20, 2009 9:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Poor attitude
You should appreciate being corrected. We are all in search of truth.
by aCone419 on Jan 20, 2009 9:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
When Im actually corrected I will appreciate
Playing time is factored into these projections in a specific way. There is a reason Chris Davis is projected for that amount of ABs. Its not random.
by alskor on Jan 20, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Then why does Chone...
project Evan Longoria to hit 22 HR in ~450 ABs?
Chone must think Evan will split time with someone this year.
Or, maybe, you’re wrong.
by DrunkIrish on Jan 20, 2009 4:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
thats a perfectly reasonable difference to point out for gods sake.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 20, 2009 11:20 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 20, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No its not
Its part of his projection for a reason.
by alskor on Jan 20, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I dont think you people know a whole lot about how these projection systems work.
by alskor on Jan 20, 2009 4:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you know much about anything
projection systems included. Because he is projected to hit something in a pre-determined amount of playing time (in this case, based on very little), he’s all of a sudden a guaranteed bust and should never be considered a top prospect (if he was still eligible)?
You’re an idiot.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 21, 2009 1:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he’s all of a sudden a guaranteed bust and should never be considered a top prospect
I never said anything like this at all. I never said I thought he would be a bust – in fact, I think he’s going to be a good MLB player.
Good to see the Rangers fansite people have come out, though.
by alskor on Jan 21, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hes obviously exaggerating
But are you going to deny that you’ve been placing far too much emphasis on the 25 HR chone projection for his first full year in limited at bats?
I like how you have only been replying to the personal remarks now and ignoring any counter arguments. Is there something wrong with my post below?
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 21, 2009 3:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Show me where I did that
You keep reading subtext into what Im saying that is simply not there. You’re connecting dotted lines that don’t actually exist.
This is what I said:
CHONE has him at 25. He’s going to be hard pressed to beat that by much since he strikes out about once a game. As a 23 year old rookie he is not a great bet to hit 30+ HRs. Not too many guys do that.
Why in your opinion am I mistaken in putting stock in this projection anyway?
On the other issue, I find your attempts to discredit me personally as a way to counter my arguments very insulting and immature. Stop already. Im willing to discuss this with you but not if youre going to take a scorched earth/attack on all fronts posture.
by alskor on Jan 21, 2009 10:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thats completely laughable
I made no attempt to discredit you personally aside from responding to someone calling me a moron and saying I should be banned. I have every right to respond to that, an said reply was accurate. I also called you biased in response to you calling me a tool.
Making it even more ridiculous is how often you bring up people being ranger fans, trying to discredit me personally rather than any points I’ve made, and implying several times that I don’t understand various projections and such.
There are at least 4 posts in this thread where you either did not reply to a fair counter point that had no personal attacks, or replied only to say something unrelated.
As for putting too much emphasis on a projection for a players first full year with a 25 hr projeciton as if it were some kind of career projection…
“.265/.315/.490 with 25 HRs is nice, but people are getting a little nuts”
“Apparently if I dont have a .265 25HR 1B in my top 20 prospects I must be some sort of monster”
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 22, 2009 7:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oh and as for why you are mistaken for putting so much stock in it
What was any star 1b or power hitters projection after having only half a mlb season? I doubt they were as high as that players peak years, and isn’t that what we really care about for prospects.. their career potential?
And again, you used in response to someone saying he looks like a future star with the bat that could push 40 or 50 HRs. Quoting a 25 HR projection that would be over 30 with full playing time in his first full year is not evidence against that. If anything it supports it, if he can do that at 23 as a median projection, is pushing 40 in his prime an unreasonable conclusion?
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 22, 2009 8:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
".265/.315/.490 with 25 HRs is nice, but people are getting a little nuts"
"Apparently if I dont have a .265 25HR 1B in my top 20 prospects I must be some sort of monster"
I stand by these statements and they do not at all contradict my point. That’s a good player – but the threshold for a good MLB 1B is very, very high. This is why many prospectors discount 1B prospects strongly. Even if they end up hitting .270/.340/.450 – well, that would be well below average for a MLB 1B, but at every other position would be a success.
What was any star 1b or power hitters projection after having only half a mlb season? I doubt they were as high as that players peak years, and isn’t that what we really care about for prospects.. their career potential?
This may be the source of your confusion, then. Initially I was talking about his 09 season, as youe aware. Then people asked me about his career and also about his fantasy potential/value. I responded to each in turn and the answer is not the same to each. This is what has been angering me, as you keep taking quotes of mine completely out of context.
And again, you used in response to someone saying he looks like a future star with the bat that could push 40 or 50 HRs. Quoting a 25 HR projection that would be over 30 with full playing time in his first full year is not evidence against that. If anything it supports it, if he can do that at 23 as a median projection, is pushing 40 in his prime an unreasonable conclusion?
Yes, I think it is. First of all, there is a big, BIG difference between 30 and 50. Just look at the amount of players who have hit 30 then look up the amount who hit 50. Its extremely hard to do so. It would easily be the franchise record for most franchise. But again, I initially took exception to this:
He is almost a guarantee to hit 30+ homers a year
That’s kind of a ridiculous statement. No way is he “almost a guarantee.” Lets say you expand his CHONE or other projection to a full season’s ABs – that still would be looked at as more of an “over/under” (in the words of the people who make these systems themselves). Also, as Ive discussed previously there is a reason projection systems only project young guys for less than a full season of ABs. Young players have an inherent element of risk that this is trying to quantify… so I dont agree with the methodology to expand the ABs to 550 or so. This wasnt a mistake to give him 450, it was a decision for a good reason. Either way, to say the guy was a guarantee for 30 is taking it much too far even if his straight projection was 30.
Secondly, my issues with his contact skills are why I dont think he will be able to much exceed 25 HRs at first. I really think his AVG will be around .260 in 2009. He’s still transitioning to the majors. The frequency with which he struck out and walked i the minors concerns me a great deal. I think he’s going to have some trouble hitting for a high AVG against MLB pitching, and if he does MLB pitchers are going to be able to avoid serving up HRs a bit. Basically, he has holes in his swing that I feel MLB pitchers can exploit. He got away with these in the minors and in his debut but the way he struck out in the minors and the lack of walks indicates to me that MLB pitchers are going to get a book on this guy pretty soon.
Despite that I think he will be a very good player. These arent damning flaws or anything. I just see some of you projecting “Arod” and I see more of “Adam Dunn” in him. Im basically talking about 2009, though. Im not comfortable predicting much beyond that right now.
by alskor on Jan 22, 2009 12:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you clinically thick?
Throwing straw man arguments around doesn’t make you look like a good debater, it makes you look like a jackass. No one, ever, anywhere, has stated the position that Davis is a guaranteed bust.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2009 4:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry Paul
but you have the market cornered on looking like a jackass.
Hyperbole. Look it up.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 22, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hyperbole means exaggeration of a truth
not making something up when there’s no truth to begin with.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 22, 2009 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This thread
is the hyper-bowl.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 22, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you cited the 25 hr projection
in response to someone saying he will hit 40+ homeruns a year.
I think its completely obvious that the guy saying that is going off a full season of at bats and throughout his career not just for 09, making the HR total of the projection relative to his prediction off a bit.
He didnt say it was completely irrelevant, he said it was mildly misleading.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 20, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Davis is a beast
Im a little tired of the whole K rate question with Davis. Its the only thing people used against him when he was a prospect, cause his numbers were unreal but he was never considered elite . Then he comes up and hits 17 homers in less then half a season and were still on the Krate. He strikes out alot, most big time power hitters do. I agree hes not Albert Pujols but if he were a prospect still how would you rank Travis Snider above em? Davis will hit 35 bombs , 100 rbis and hell k over 100 times . Id take em on my team also.
by tulolince on Jan 19, 2009 5:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
two words:
Kevin Maas
"Sometimes Joe (morgan) doesn't like facts to get in the way of his opinions."- billy beane
"That was a great pick...if this was 2002" Me, to guy who selected Barry Zito in a fantasy draft
by harendaman365 on Jan 19, 2009 6:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mass was 25 when he made his major league debut
3 years older than Davis was this season.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 6:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
fair point
but the K-Rate issue still remains. As impressive as 17 home runs in that short amount of time is, he’ll be figured out in a hurry by major league pitchers if he doesnt make adjustments. That said, he is still an impressive propspect. He could be a home run champ in a few years, or a small flash in the pan. There are precedents each way
"Sometimes Joe (morgan) doesn't like facts to get in the way of his opinions."- billy beane
"That was a great pick...if this was 2002" Me, to guy who selected Barry Zito in a fantasy draft
by harendaman365 on Jan 19, 2009 6:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i know k rates aren't meaningless
but guys succeeding with high k-rates is not unheard of, and i expect that he will make some adjustments as pitchers do the same.
"True fact: In a global thermonuclear war, the only human who would survive would be David Eckstein" -PT
by travdog6 on Jan 19, 2009 10:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay
I have harendaman354 marked down for Chris Davis = Kevin Maas.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 19, 2009 6:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
im not saying
equals. im saying Maas and davis could have the same issues, in a a guy with power and a high k-rate who doesnt adjust to major league pitching. He could be Kevin Maas, but he could also adjust and be an all star.
o, and its 365 at the end
"Sometimes Joe (morgan) doesn't like facts to get in the way of his opinions."- billy beane
"That was a great pick...if this was 2002" Me, to guy who selected Barry Zito in a fantasy draft
by harendaman365 on Jan 19, 2009 6:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The K rate is a major issue
If he was striking out at that rate in the majors, sure…. but striking out that much in the minors means he’s likely to K at an even higher rate in MLB – and its approaching a level where he will be incapable of hitting for a high AVG because of it. I think he’s likely to adjust, but its no lock.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the problem is that he'll strike out
even more than Adam Dunn and Ryan Howard. Do you really think he’s a lock to be as good as either of them? Sure, Davis might hit 35 bombs and 100 rbis, but the fact that he plays in a huge hitters park and that he’s in the middle of one of the best lineups in baseball will inflate his stats quite a bit. And Travis Snider’s already broke the majors at the age of 20. He’s a better average hitter and has decent power that looks like it’ll develop more as he gets older. He does strike out a ton, but again, he’s still 20 and much younger than most of his competition. Yes, I’d have him above Chris Davis.
by boonitez on Jan 19, 2009 10:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Snider
I think you’d rank Snider above him because he’s almost 3 years younger and only has about 200 less major league at bats? I think people are considering him as a bust candidate is because he’s similar to the Josh Phelps profile, except Phelps had an even better first half season.
Rios is the next Juan Gonzales, thats right, I said it.
by KaoticKlown on Jan 26, 2009 3:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
False
because he’s almost 3 years younger
Davis is less than 2 years older than Snider.
by aCone419 on Jan 26, 2009 3:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Typo
Typo, sorry. But in the 20-22 age range, 2 years is quite a big deal no?
Rios is the next Juan Gonzales, thats right, I said it.
by KaoticKlown on Jan 29, 2009 10:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Age is an important factor
But once you get to the majors and are productive, it isn’t as much. Nevertheless, that is obviously an advantage that Snider has.
But how you get from there to “Josh Phelps profile” makes me think you don’t really know what you are talking about.
by aCone419 on Jan 30, 2009 9:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Could be good, could be Mike Jacobs
Hard to say which at this point.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jan 19, 2009 6:29 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
yeah, i was trying to think of a better bad-case scenario comp
Jacobs is a good one
"Sometimes Joe (morgan) doesn't like facts to get in the way of his opinions."- billy beane
"That was a great pick...if this was 2002" Me, to guy who selected Barry Zito in a fantasy draft
by harendaman365 on Jan 19, 2009 6:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that's the case.
A larger sample size is definitely needed, but a .353 BABIP is legit when you have a 25% line drive rate. Basically his contact rates are a concern (68% overall), but when he does get a hold of one, it’s drilled hard.
If he walked more, I’d proclaim him the next Jack Cust.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You are aware that Jack Cust is a career .239 hitter, right...?
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Very much.
In the minors, his BABIP and Line Drive rate mirroed Davis’. Cust enjoyed some major success when he first came up, then the league figured him out a bit, and he’s been only good ever since. Unlike Davis, Cust keeps up the wOBA with walks.
Power, line drive stroke, high BABIP, bad contact rates (Cust is worse, admittedly). Works for me.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok...
that makes sense. Your comment above seemed to start arguing the other way…
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah yes, I see what you saw now.
Statistically speaking, Cust is a better comp then Jacobs. Jacobs had better contact rates but less power and even less patience then Davis.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
For the record, Jack Cust without walks would suck ass
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jan 19, 2009 6:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm balancing it out with Davis' superior contact rates.
They’re very similar skill sets.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jack Cust without walks would be...Mike Jacobs.
Never, Never, NEVER give up
by hero66 on Jan 19, 2009 11:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jacobs' doesn't strikeout at Cust's alarming rate.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If Cust wasn't walking, he probably wouldn't be striking out as much either
by thejd44 on Jan 20, 2009 4:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry, I don't get what you're saying.
Less walks = less strikeouts?
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cust walks (and Ks) so much because he takes so many pitches.
by DrunkIrish on Jan 20, 2009 4:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think the evidence supports that conclusion.
Players with poor walk rates can still strikeout a ton and those with good walk rates can avoid strike outs. In the case of Cust, I’d say his 65% contact rate has more to do with his strikeouts.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 5:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see.
Well, the top four guys in baseball in P/PA were Nick Swisher, Jack Cust, Adam Dunn, and Jason Giambi. Cust, Swisher, and Dunn were 4th, 5th, and 6th in baseball in lowest swing percentage. So…no. Cust DOES walk and strike out so much because he takes so many pitches. There are many like him.
Those stats took me two minutes to look up, tops. And they kept me from looking like I don’t know what I’m talking about.
by DrunkIrish on Jan 20, 2009 5:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Every single one of those guys
is a 3TO player and they all have the same skill set. Naturally they’re going to be right in line with each other.
The other guys you neglected to mention on low swing percentage and SO rate (walk rate for emphasis):
Bobby Abreu – 17.9% (10.7)
Joe Mauer – 9.3 (13.5)
Chone Figgins – 17.7 (12.0)
Curtis Granderson – 20.1 (11.4)
Jason Bay – 23.7 (12.3)
Troy Glaus – 19.1 (13.8)
Jimmy Rollins – 9.9 (9.4)
Mark Teixeira – 16.2 (14.5%)
Your theory holds no water.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 8:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What is your point?
Of course not EVERY player with a low swing percentage has a high strikeout rate. That in no way says anything about what we’re arguing, whether Cust would strikeout less if he walked less.
The guys with a low Swing% and a high K% walk A LOT, almost universally. If you want to rebut what hero66 said above, show me how that’s not true.
If you want to know what the difference between Mike Jacobs and Jack Cust is, it’s that Jacobs swings a lot more. Jacobs swung at 34% of pitches outside the zone last year (to Cust’s 15.3) and 75.2 of pitches in the zone (to Cust’s 62.8%). They were both terrible at making contact when they did swing.
So yeah. Getting Cust to strike out less means making him swing more. Making him swing more makes him Mike Jacobs. No thanks.
by DrunkIrish on Jan 20, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me clarify.
I’m not saying the theory that looking at more pitches results in more strikeouts is 100% bunk, what I am saying is that it’s not a certainty. If he’s staring at more called strikes then those pitches aren’t ones out of the zone (providing for some margins of error made by umpires). He wouldn’t have to do more out of zone swinging, just more in zone swinging. As you pointed out, they’re terrible contact guys, so it doesn’t really matter if they’re watching a pitch or swinging at it and missing, it’s still a strikeout.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Precisely
Cust takes a lot of strikes that he could hit somewhere (probably not very well). He gets into a lot of 3-2 counts. It’s logical that if he were swinging at strikes earlier in the count, he’d be hitting more balls in play and wouldn’t be going 3-2 so often.
by thejd44 on Jan 21, 2009 12:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jacobs is a good comparison
but again his minor league track record is no where near what Davis did. Davis has crushed the ball at every level.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 6:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, obviously
If he had Jacobs’s minor league track record, I’d be saying Jacobs was his upside, not his downside.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jan 19, 2009 6:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would take any player
that had Jacobs as his downside
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 6:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure why...
Mike Jacobs is basically worthless. He’s like half a win above replacement.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jan 19, 2009 6:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If that was his floor, though...
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's like his 30th percentile outcome
Up to you what you define “floor” as.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jan 19, 2009 6:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actual floor is something like Mike Hessman
But that almost certainly assumes he takes a couple steps back. It is hard to imagine him ending up any worse than that barring extremely unlikely events, and him becoming like Hessman is already very unlikely.
by tdot mariner fan on Jan 19, 2009 7:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I'd say that's more like a 10th percentile outcome
though Hessman’s barely played in the majors (in fact, Chris Davis has more career MLB games than Hessman does). Let’s call his 10th percentile Chris Shelton.
And of course, that is, by definition, unlikely (only a 1 in 10 chance that he’s that bad).
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 20, 2009 2:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not if he's on the Royals or Twins.....
Teams that rank so low in homerun totals
he’d be more worth like 1 or 2 wins.
Just saying.
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Jan 27, 2009 12:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me be clear
I would definitely “take” Chris Davis – I like him a lot.
I just think he’s being overrated in many quarters…
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gay
OK, sorry, immature and unnecessary. But I couldn’t resist
by Bravenewworld on Jan 19, 2009 9:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
MockDraftCentral has Davis going something like #72 overall in most fantasy drafts. He is a good player, but I just do not see him being THAT good. Batters with contact rate issues typically have some struggles despite awesome small sample size results until they learn how to not swing at the pitch in the dirt or in their eyes (see Francoeur, Jeff).
Davis is most definitely being overrated right now.
by guru4u on Jan 20, 2009 10:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Avg
Why are people killing his ability to hit for average? If BABIP is a skill for hitters, and most people think so, then why isn’t a .280 average sustainable?
Career minor league BABIP: .354
Career major league BABIP: .353
He’s also been in the .380s for most of the last two years in the minors. Chris Davis had zero problems being an excellent hitter while striking out so much.
by threesixteen on Jan 19, 2009 6:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
His minor league career contact rate was 72. Presumably, he will have a harder time making contact off MLB pitcher than off minor leaguers. If his contact rate is below 70 he’s going to have a hell of a time hitting for a decent AVG. His walk rates are not great, either, so we’re looking at a guy who isnt a very selective hitter. This is exactly the profile of a hitter who gets exposed when he reaches the majors even if he mauls minor league pitching.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He was at 70 last year and posted a .285/.331/.549 line in the majors. If he goes to 69 or 68 he’s still hitting over .260, which is still certainly ‘decent’. Do you think his contact rate is going to go to below 68? Do you have any evidence of why you would expect this (studies, previous players, etc)?
by threesixteen on Jan 19, 2009 6:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That line required a .353 BABIP
He’s not going to repeat that over a full season.
What we saw in 08 was a lucky AVG. The power we saw is very much for real, however.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you think he won’t repeat it? His minor league track record says otherwise.
by threesixteen on Jan 19, 2009 6:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He simply cant regularly hit for a BABIP of .353 while striking out 30% of the time.
As Paul Thomas said below, it is extremely unlikely Chris Davis will regularly lead the majors in BABIP, which is what you would seem to be expecting…
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 6:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why is it unlikely that he would finish in the Top 5 in BABIP? Can you show examples of hitters who have posted a >.350 in over 1,000 MilB ABs and then not maintained it in the minors? I’m genuinely curious.
by threesixteen on Jan 19, 2009 6:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm curious as well
For guys like Bruce or Upton they are projected to get better. But for some reason most people see Davis getting worse?
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 7:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is tougher to do then you'd think.
More batted ball data is needed to effectively see if the BABIP is the result of good hitting or luck. BABIP, depending on the skill set of the player, can be influenced in a variety of ways. BABIP by itself is a bad indication of talent.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 7:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
BABIP
I don’t think his BABIP will be as high, but I also think he will be able to slightly cut down on strikouts and increase his walks. If he stays in Texas I see him hitting .270 with 35 homers a year. That’s a very, very good player.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 7:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Valueable, to be sure.
Assuming he’s not going to be DHing, then the sum of the value has to take into account his glove as well. A ~.370 ish wOBA is a 3 win player (adjusted for position) and is good enough to make up for some loss with the glove. Unless he’s a -15 run player with the leather, he’ll still be quite valuable.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He is actually an OK 1B
the only way he might move to DH would be Smoak. Even then I could see him playing a few games at 1B and maybe 3B every once in a while.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 7:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Assuming the Rangers don't trade Young and
convince him to move to third, I don’t see why you’d put him there ever. At 235 pounds, he doesn’t seem like a good candidate for long term defensive prowess at third.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 7:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not talking about next season
I’m talking about in a couple seasons if Smoak takes his spot at 1B moving him to DH. Young will be in his mid 30s by then.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 7:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, it sucks for the Rangers to have this "problem".
I think that, either way, Davis is destined for DH-hood.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 1:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, should have said 3 to 3.5 win player.
That’s assuming a first base position and a neutral glove (0 runs added or subtracted).
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 7:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, and Davis is not particularly outstanding on the positive-BABIP indicators
The guys with the best BABIP are fast ground ball hitters, preferably lefthanded, who nonetheless possess good power when they hit the ball in the air. Davis is a slow lefthanded hitter with good power who hits more flies than grounders. Given that, I’d expect his BABIP to be pretty average in the long run.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 20, 2009 2:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Huh? Haven't you often proclaimed that power is the one true indicator of a high BABIP?
In the past you have stated things such as:
I recall you saying this consistently:
I have formed the conclusion, based on looking at the guys who have it
that high BABIP has little to do with speed and much to do with line drive rate and the force with which a player hits the ball. (See the Chris Carter thread for more on this.) Fred Lewis has league-average line drive skills and sub-average power. I don’t see any reason why I should believe that his BABIP is any kind of legitimate skill.
Here is another statement you have made regarding BABIP:
You would expect a much better than .296 BABIP from a slugger
David Ortiz is no one’s idea of a speedster and hits into the shift to boot, and his career BABIP is .311. Jack Cust’s career BABIP is .340. Ryan Howard’s is .332.
Most guys who consistently post BABIPs above league average are power hitters, not Ichiro-type speedsters. The current leaderboard goes Bradley, C. Jones, Manny, Berkman, Holliday, Fred Lewis, Kemp, Nady, Pujols, Hawpe. There are a few outliers having fluke seasons (hello, Fred Lewis) but most of those guys are mashers.
I find it odd that Davis (a power hitter) will not hit for a good BABIP in your opinion considering that he has met your criteria. Personally, I am beginning to see your A’s bias
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 20, 2009 1:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You're just now beginning to see it?
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 20, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL!!!!!!!
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 20, 2009 2:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, and since then a major regression analysis was published outlining causative factors in BABIP
which has allowed us, by which I apparently just mean me, to talk much more precisely about the factors which project strong BABIP skills.
Since I actually care about being accurate, and not just about making myself look good (or others look bad, which appears to be your purpose in life, given your constant personal attacks on me), I’ve changed my position (to some extent— let’s not exaggerate here) on what the most important causative factors for high BABIP are. HR/FB is still a critical factor (and one which Davis scores well on). However, he scores somewhat poorly on several other factors which pull him down into the average range.
Speaking of Chris Carter, his skills pretty much match Davis’s (except that he walks more, which is a predictor of slightly better BABIP). Anyone think he’s due to have a .350 BABIP in MLB? Didn’t think so. .310, more like— and it wouldn’t surprise me if Davis was .310 or so too.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 20, 2009 8:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Source?
Do you have a link to this BABIP analysis you refer to? I would like to give it a read. Sounds interesting.
Same guy, new name.
by stillredsoxfan on Jan 21, 2009 1:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's extremely interesting
and with Hit F/X supposedly around the corner, soon we’ll be able to take it even further.
It can be found here.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow PT
I never knew you were so sensitive. I am sorry if I hurt your feelings. I will remember in the future to try to ease up when pointing out the contradictions you make when trying to selectively use statistics to support your argument.
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 21, 2009 1:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd prefer you didn't
Fake civility does nothing for me.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2009 5:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL PT
Stop getting your panties in a bunch. To take things personally on an online message board is sad and disturbing. Why do let the opinions of others, who you have never met, effect you so much?
Also if you are going to state “Since I actually care about being accurate, and not just about making myself look good (or others look bad, which appears to be your purpose in life, given your constant personal attacks on me)” then perhaps you should not then post in the same fanpost “Are you clinically thick? Throwing straw man arguments around doesn’t make you look like a good debater, it makes you look like a jackass.” It just makes you look extremely hypocritical and only weakens the extemely low regard that the vast majority of the community holds you in. Hope my advice/counselling helps!!!
Love,
King Billy Royal
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 21, 2009 11:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, since apparently I wasn't clear enough:
Go fuck yourself.
Love,
Paul
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 22, 2009 3:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hahaha...
Since I actually care about being accurate, and not just about making myself look good (or others look bad, which appears to be your purpose in life,
Too funny. Attempting to make yourself look good / others bad is the very essence of your existence on this board. Once again you get painted into a corner and your ass handed to you with incontrovertible facts and your reaction is to go all 6th grade on someone. Bravo!
KBR, you are my hero…
by slurve on Jan 22, 2009 8:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Thanks!!!!!!! To be fair, PT makes it too easy!!!!!!!!!!!
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 22, 2009 12:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
See, you're wrong
The only thing I care about on this board— really, the only thing— is getting (and giving) information about prospects. I certainly don’t come here for the company.
So I really don’t give a shit if I bruise someone’s ego (and plainly no one gives a shit if they bruise mine, which I have no problem with).
You guys actively seek to anger and hurt other people. That’s an entirely different level of scumminess.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 22, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, too funny
Denial fever. Catch it!
by slurve on Jan 22, 2009 7:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
You guys actively seek to anger and hurt other people.
Are you really going to make me go through this fanpost and point out all your personal attacks and attempts to ‘anger and hurt other people’?
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 22, 2009 7:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice try
But now are you not only a whiny little girl (no offense to little girls!!!!!!), but you are also a joke stealer!!!!!!!!!!
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 22, 2009 12:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You are an idiot KBR
You come off as very petty.
Everytime you use RBI as anything other than an indicator of where a guy is hitting in his team's lineup, another cute snuggly animal dies a horrible death.
- PT
by LBDirtbags on Jan 26, 2009 8:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
heh, LOL.
"No... JD has been exposed as a kid who trades his remote-controlled helicopters for paper airplanes, then fails to consider the feelings of the paper airplane when he refolded it into a hat." -Telegraph.
by Kinslerhomer on Jan 26, 2009 9:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Coming from an A’s fan I take this as a compliment!!!!!
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 27, 2009 12:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
An A’s fan with PT in his sig too!
"No... JD has been exposed as a kid who trades his remote-controlled helicopters for paper airplanes, then fails to consider the feelings of the paper airplane when he refolded it into a hat." -Telegraph.
by Kinslerhomer on Jan 27, 2009 9:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh...
I think you’re backwards. BABIP fluctuates wildly for ground ball hitters. Chone Figgins, for example, has lived and died by groundballs finding holes. Lots of other ground ball hitters have the same problem. They either get hits, or they don’t. You’ll probably find that the speedier guys with high ground ball rates CAN have higher BABIPs then most other people, but they aren’t consistent. Ichiro is one of the more consistent ground ball hitting lefties with his BABIP, but even he fluctuates.
Back when Vidro was in his prime, he was the sort of guy you’re referring to: relatively fast, ground ball hitter, some decent pop in the bat, but when he lost his legs he lost his speed and his pop and everything went south. He still managed to smoke and mirrors his way into a decent average in 2007 with an unsustainable BABIP.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And even if Davis regresses to something like .320 on balls in play he’s still a .260 hitter, which is surely ‘decent’ and, along with his power, in fact excellent for a 23-year-old in his second big league season.
by threesixteen on Jan 19, 2009 7:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good
because I said I thought .265 was a fair projection for 08 and I could certainly see him settle a little below league averagish with a few years above. Again, I dont see anyone arguing this kid wont be a good major league player… that’s not the issue here at all.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 10:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure
Adam Dunn’s career MiLB BABIP was .347
Jim Thome’s career MiLB BABIP was .372!
Ryan Howard’s career MiLB BABIP was .382!!
Minor league BABIPs dont mean s*** – ballparks and defenses are too variable. Chris Davis’s minor league BABIP doesnt mean much to me at all and people need to stop pointing to it. The ability to hit for a high BABIP in the minors doesnt mean anything and is useless untranslated anyway.
Davis’s component factors should worry you about his ability to make contact, especially his K rate.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 10:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
MLB BABIPs and AVGs
Dunn: .290 BABIP, .247 AVG
Thome: .327 BABIP, .279 AVG
Howard: .334 BABIP, .279 AVG
In all honesty those are the first three guys I looked up. Obviously i looked them up because they fit Davis’s profile of a power hitter without exceptional contact skills… but Im sure if a study was made you would find the same results on a larger scale. Untranslated minor league BABIPs have a poor correlation to MLB contact ability/AVGs.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Further
Davis’s career minor league LD% was 14.5% – which is a far cry from the 25.5% he put up in 08 in the majors.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you
on some kind of crusade? Calm down.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 19, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Seems to me he's just trying to argue the poitns people refuse to accept as very real
by thejd44 on Jan 20, 2009 4:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm fine with arguing
it’s the vehemence I find amusing.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 20, 2009 9:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LD% has been consistently inflated at Arlington too
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/what-i-hate-about-line-drives/
“In Arlington, a batter is 18% more likely to have a batted ball coded as a LD”
by jibs on Jan 20, 2009 10:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know where to see LD% with home/away splits
but for what very little its worth, I just want to throw out that davis was as good/better away from arlington.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 20, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, small sample.
Larger data sample needed to make this conclusion. It would surprise me, honestly if this were true. That has nothing to do with Davis and everything to do with Arlington.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 2:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
25% line drive rate sustains a .353 BABIP rather easily.
The question is whether he’ll continue to post 25% line drive rates. My gut says “no”.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's definitely a skill, but it's not THAT much of a skill
In the last three calendar years, there are four players in all of baseball with a .354 BABIP. I suppose Davis could be the next Chipper, Holliday, Ichiro or Jeter, but it strikes me as unlikely.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jan 19, 2009 6:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Davis Comparison??
Most of the comparisons in the thread (Cust, Maas, Jacobs) are a little off due to age and minor league performance.
Can someone find a 22 year old power hitter who crushed every level of the minors, then had a great rookie year, and turned out to be a bust?
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 6:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
"Bust" is too limiting a term.
The expectations, especially from some of the posters above, are quite high. Your original post was a comment of where he’d fit on the prospect list and seemed to be hinting that you believe he’s a top 20 talent (with only one option for 20+). These are some lofty hopes put onto one player.
Do I think he’s going to be a fine player? Sure and in his prime he’ll probably be really really good. But I’m not expecting him to do more then a .265 / .320 / .550 line with the skillsets he’s demonstrating.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 19, 2009 6:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I honestly couldn't see
someone not putting Davis in the top 20.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 7:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fantasy or real life?
I agree that he probably can play 1B decently, but if he’s going to have no defensive value in someone’s opinion he probably wouldnt belong top 20 on a real life based list.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 10:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Both
I would love to see a list of 20 prospects you would take over him.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 10:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
1) I said I would have him top 20
2) An argument could certainly be made for lots of guys if you think Davis is a DH only, as I said.
Wieters, Price, Heyward, Snider, Cahill, Anderson, Bumgarner, Maybin, Rasmus, Feliz, LaPorta, Andrus, Moustakas, Smoak, Alvarez, Lars, Fowler, Holland, McCutchen, Tillman, Hanson, Beckham – that’s 22 guys just quick who I really countdnt object if someone took them over Davis if they saw Davis as a DH or a bad 1B(which I dont). Im sure youre going to ignore the fact I said I wouldnt do this and start to break these guys down without reading, but most of these guys will definitely be worth more wins than Davis every year based on the extra defensive value, and the others are better defenders or better bats.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ranking some of those over Davis is ridiculous
Davis has a higher ceiling and is closer to reaching that ceiling than almost everyone on that list.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 11:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No I understand what you tried to say
But there is no arguement for some of those guys over Davis.
Picking Lars Anderson over Davis would be like a picking Joey Votto over Miguel Cabrera.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 11:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh you understood all right, and you only asked so you could rip it.
Lars Anderson should DEFINITELY be over Davis on a real life list. Lars actually projects to hit for the AVG you think Davis will and Lars is actually a good defensive 1B. Lars walks a ton more than Davis as well. There is every reason in the world to believe Lars Anderson is going to be a more valuable player than Chris Davis.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes just totally ignore anything that Davis has done
project him to get worse and project Anderson to get better. Completely ignore the fact that that Davis has much more power potential than Lars and the fact that he has never hit below .277 at any level. Forget the fact that he was athletic enought to play 3B and OF and he is actually an ok 1B/ And only then is Lars a better prospect.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 11:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Power does not equal "better"
he has never hit below .277 at any level.
Lars has never hit below .288 at any level – Youre constantly talking out of your a**!
Lars walks a ton more than Davis and OBP is 3 times as valuable as SLG… very good chance Lars is the better minor leaguer.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:56 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I was saying that to you agruement that
Davis won’t hit for average. He has always had a pretty good average. There is no reason to say he doesn’t project to hit for average and then say Lars Anderson does.
You can take you less athletic AA 1B who has put up good minor league stats. I will go with the guy who has destroyed pitching everywhere he has gone and has already proved he can hit in the mahors.
by nyy601 on Jan 20, 2009 12:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
SECONDLY
Joey Votto was worth 3.5 wins this year while Miggy was only worth 3.1.
It might be time for you to reevaluate what wins baseball games.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I mean really
was that serious?
Which 1B would you take?
A: .297/.368/.506, +7.5 UZR
B: .292/.349/.537 , -4.7 UZR
I mean – were you really serious?? Player A is Votto. Player B is Cabrera.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im pretty sure Miguel Cabrera existed before 2008.
And that the vast majority of baseball professionals would take him over votto for 2009.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 19, 2009 11:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
so you like to look at the numbers when it is in your favor?
But when it come to Davis you just ignore numbers.
One bad half doesn’t change the fact that Miguel Cabrera is one of the best players in baseball. Just totally ignore his career .300+ AVG, .540+ SLG and 175 HR.
by nyy601 on Jan 19, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
For the last time
My argument is not that Chris Davis will be a bust or a bad player – I think he will be a very good ballplayer.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
then
why are you trying everything to prove otherwise?
by blalock84 on Jan 20, 2009 2:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im done with you tools
I never tried to prove otherwise. I just pointed out the obvious – he’s a .265 hitter – but apparently not admitting Chris Davis is the second coming of Jesus requires a friggin fatwa against me from fantasy owners and Rangers fans. Apparently if I dont have a .265 25HR 1B in my top 20 prospects I must be some sort of monster. Stay classy.
by alskor on Jan 20, 2009 2:24 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
You've lost it
Now you say hes not in your top 20 and give him a ridiculously pessimistic 25 HR projection (im assuming you mean for a prime year as obviously judging a prospect by his 1st full year’s projections is just silly).
Rather you were biased about him to start, you’ve clearly gone down that route now.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 20, 2009 11:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
bye
douch
"For those booing me. Take that, beeep." - Ramon Vazquez
by 8legs2fangs on Jan 20, 2009 12:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I just don't get it
I mean seriously, he turned 22 right before the season and AA/AAA went for a 1.029 ops, 23 homeruns and 75 rbi in just 73 games. Had a .945 ops with 36/118 the year before. Then backed it up in the mlb for half a season.
Babip, contact %, K/BB… they are useful tools to be used in evaluation and legitimate knocks on him, but step back for a second and look at what hes produced. You don’t have to believe he is going to be an all star like his less sabermetric stats could suggest, but there arn’t 20 Wieters level superprospects out there to put in front of him.
And zero defensive value is a stretch, hes only been talked about at DH because smoak is so close behind. Theres no reason he cant be a solid 1b.
He was fine defensively at first by watching him, and the only stats available thus far have him as only ever so slightly (uzr -.8/150) below average at 1b. Remember that he switched positions just this year, theres no reason he cant improve from there, he isn’t unathletic.
I would be very interested to see your top 20.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 19, 2009 11:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Read it again
I said he would be in my top 20.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So
I suppose the post I replied to is supposed to be a hypothetical for someone who thinks hes worse defensively than you…
Well, even then I don’t see it. There is no reason anyone should suggest he could be anything worse than a somewhat below average defensive 1b.. and even in that hypothetical I still think its out there not to have him top 20. Its not a big enough difference in value, noone is factoring gold glove +25 run defense in or anything.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 19, 2009 11:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The point of my hypothetical is that
it is a perfectly reasonable position to take that he is outside your top 20, regardless of what I feel.
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Which I clearly outline and responded to.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 19, 2009 11:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, let me put it this way
If we dont adjust for position and account for defense then we could easily have a top 20 of all 1B prospects. Obviously that wouldnt be a desirable result. How many 1B prospects project for .260/.315/.475?
If davis puts up a .288/.345/.518 line(his Marcel projection for 09) that would be 10.6 wRAA – or a little over a win with the bat. Even if he’s an average defensive 1B do you know how very easy it would be for a SS like Andrus to beat that?
by alskor on Jan 20, 2009 12:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
,,,in his age 23 first mlb full season.
Since when is that the standard for prospects?
Everyone agrees Bill James’s projection is too high for 2009, but for his prime years? That season’s wRAA is 29.2.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 20, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oh look, a reasonable counterpoint gets ignored
and you’ve resorted to insults for others.
and at the same time you take the “everyone else is a fanboy, i’m using logic!” stance. amazing!
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 20, 2009 11:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry but
using a computer projection to find a wRAA (which is a totally bullshit and made up stat) is absurd
by nyy601 on Jan 20, 2009 12:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok I get
You both heart Chris Davis really much and dont want to hear a bad word about him. I get it.
wRAA (which is a totally bullshit and made up stat)
Ha.
by alskor on Jan 20, 2009 12:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It is impossible to calculate how many wins a player is worth
using any stat to try to find out how many wins a player is worth is bullshit
by nyy601 on Jan 20, 2009 12:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
*arched eyebrow*
You don’t apparently follow sabermetrics.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hrmm...
Actually, I do find myself sometimes wondering about the relative accuracy of win values. baserunning remains far from quantified and defensive statistics are still specious at best. I think we have an idea right now, but it’s still far from an accurate one.
Until replacement level has been calculated for each postion, in regards to baserunning/defense/hitting, I’ll refrain from using WAR as anything more than a passing stat.
Per curiousity, you wouldn’t happen to know if say, Fangraphs’ Win Values are leverage adjusted? My inclination is to say no, in which case we’re even further from how many wins a player actually added over the course of the prior season.
And in case you haven’t guessed, yes, I am an utterly massive WPA whore.
by GuyinNY on Jan 21, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
WPA is a good retrospective stat, but WAR is vastly more consistent as a projection stat
which should be all we care about here, unless you’re a fan of the RiverCats or the Bats or whatever. Performance in high leverage situations (vis a vis performance in all situations) is not a skill.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2009 5:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Performance
No, PT, I was not referring to Chris Davis in any way. I was discussing the validity of WAR stats, and their relative lack of understanding of the holistic value of a player’s performance. They are fuzzy, and while that’s better than nothing, I will not put a ton of stock in them just yet.
By the way, I think a player’s contextual performance IS vital to understanding and evaluating his past performance. And yes, clutch is a skill and has been proven as such. There is simply a question of to what extent it can be measure, and how much it makes a difference. There’s no need to rehash this argument.
by GuyinNY on Jan 21, 2009 11:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Please link me to the post which proves clutch is a skill
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Jan 22, 2009 3:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Amongst others
I’m really referring to Dolphin’s article in The Book, but in the meantime:
by GuyinNY on Jan 22, 2009 8:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was the worst part of The Book
Their methods were terribly lacking. They don’t even define clutch to any satisfying degree, much less prove it exists as a skill.
by thejd44 on Jan 22, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fangraphs
I can’t say if they are, to be honest, leverage adjusted. I know that they have fiddled around with leverage indexes and WPA as it relates to WAR, but I think their overall conclusion is that whatever the result was it was fairly close to WAR enough that it didn’t matter.
I’ll look into that, though.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 8:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
I do wonder about this, as I think contextual performance would be highly instructive in figuring out, say, an MVP award. Studeman’s latest article on Pennant Probability Added is a great read, and I really, really, really hope to see PPA as a new stat on fangraphs at some point.
I do find it somewhat comforting that WPA tracks with WAR.
by GuyinNY on Jan 21, 2009 11:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sabermetrics
I actually love using sabermetrics….on stats that can actually be calculated (AVG, OBP, SLG, BABIP, LD, SO %, BB, etc).
There is no way you can ever determine how many wins a player is worth. The only way to do it would be if every at bat were equal. And that is just not the case. Going 0-4 in a one run game is not the same as going 0-4 in a ten run game.
by nyy601 on Jan 21, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Leverage index / WPA is different from WAR
But as in my reply to GuyinNY there above, I recall there being a comment made that the difference between the two in determining win value was minimal.
So, really, 0-4 is 0-4.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 21, 2009 8:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And by the way
You did not say hes in your top 20 in any post I see, though theres so many that perhaps I missed it. The hypothetical of a case he is probably out is not you saying hes in, especially after tearing apart every piece of his game that you can. Obviously you say he has great power, but thats simply undeniable.
And of course, there would be the fact that you voted “outside top 20”.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 19, 2009 11:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It is TEN POSTS above yours!
1) I said I would have him top 20
by alskor on Jan 19, 2009 11:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, is it.
My post:
Jan 19, 2009 8:11 PM PST
That post
Jan 19, 2009 8:10 PM PST
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 19, 2009 11:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well i screwed that up.
Other way around. My post was earlier.
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 19, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Be very careful.
Babip, contact %, K/BB… they are useful tools to be used in evaluation and legitimate knocks on him, but step back for a second and look at what hes produced.
Results based analysis is a flawed approach when trying to project future value. The analysis of skill sets and scouting reports will give us more valuable information on how to figure out what he will do. All results tell us is what he already did, without context.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 20, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jeff Francoeur
Different position, and Frenchy has way more defensive value, but he CRUSHED MLB pitching his rookie year. He is not necessarily a true bust yet (still has plenty of time to improve), but his contact rate sure has hindered his progress dramatically thus far.
by guru4u on Jan 20, 2009 10:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That and his
.277 BABIP and 6.5% HR/FB ratio last season. He actually struck out less last season than he did in his first 3 years in the league and had a higher LD% than either of his last 3 seasons.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 20, 2009 1:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Josh Phelps
Also Jason Lane seems to fit that profile, if I remember correctly. Although I think he was older than 22.
Rios is the next Juan Gonzales, thats right, I said it.
by KaoticKlown on Jan 26, 2009 3:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not at all
Neither of them fit the criteria of “great rookie year at 22”. Phelps was a 24 year old rookie. Lane was 27 before even getting 100 atbats.

by 