Post season predictions and other thoughts...
Well, we're pretty well for the playoffs. As far as the White Sox and Twins are concerned, the playoffs start tomorrow when the Sox play Detroit.
What happens now in NY after 2 straight choke jobs? Do they make MAJOR moves up to and including firing the GM? Or do they go through a fairly normal off-season and simply address needs in the OF and bullpen?
When do the wheels come off Sabathia? Quite an interesting year (rwperu where are you?) in the NL Central and the Cubs definately look to be the favorites along with the Angels in the AL.
So... here are my predictions:
Sox defeat Detroit, lose to the Twins.
Cubs defeat Dodgers in 4, Rays over Twins in 4, Milwaukee over Philly in 5, Angels over Boston in 5.
Cubs over Milwaukee in 6, Rays over Angels in 7
Cubs over Rays in 6.
0 recs |
61 comments
Comments
Predictions.
My logic says Rays… but my heart says, “BREWERS!!”
I'll warm up with you anytime
by ufoboy90 on Sep 28, 2008 8:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As long as
they don’t have to face the Cubs pitching and make Lilly look like Cy Young, they could do some damage.
by slurve on Sep 28, 2008 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Minaya
He just signed a 4 year extension last week so he isn’t going anywhere. I wouldn’t be suprised to see a new manager there next year though.
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Sep 28, 2008 8:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mets plans
I think you’re going to see the bullpen can destroyed. Maybe keep Smith, Stokes, and possibly Ayala. Everyone else could be gone. It reminds me of the main reasoning behind firing Willie: it’s not that the management in particular is a at fault, the Mets just needed a change. With the bullpen, the individual members have pretty talented people but asking them to shed this specter hanging above them is just impossible now. The Mets need a whole new group of people who don’t want it’s like to fall apart.
As far as everything else is concerned, Minaya is going to try like hell to get rid of Castillo, no matter what it takes. After that, Delgado will get resigned, and then he’ll kick the tires on a FA LF and 2B. Wouldn’t be surprised if O-Dogg comes to New York as rumor is he’s always been a Minaya favorite.
Mets still have a good core, a number of whom are just reaching their primes. They’ll keep Church in RF and see if he rebounds after missing so much time due to the concussions. They’ll either resign Perez or sign someone else for the rotation. Pedro is gone. I expect a rotation of Santana, Pelfrey, Maine, FA/Perez, Niese going into April.
by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 28, 2008 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Mets need to revamp their draft and promotion policies from the ground up
There’s no excuse for a team with their kind of payroll having to cross its fingers and pray that Moises Alou somehow survives a season uninjured. They can throw the big bucks around, but these days you need more than expensive hired guns to win at the highest levels.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Sep 28, 2008 9:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think their minors are fine
There’s a lot of disagreement on these boards, but their minor league system provided solid support (evans, murphy, PELFREY, joe smith…all of these guys were in the minors for a good portion of 07). There are a TON of great guys on the way (why don’t you check BA’s top minor league prospects…the Mets have more than their share of top guys at every level but AAA). I’d say the biggest problem is that Omar traded for peanuts a bunch of guys who were brought in by previous regimes (e.g. heath bell, matt lindstrom, etc.)…guys who could have made a huge difference down the stretch this year.
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then again
He got Santana for peanuts, so I guess it all works out in the end
www.loftylantern.com
by OldProspects on Sep 29, 2008 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Peanuts?
Don’t you think it is a little early to be judging the return on the Johan trade? Everybody knew that Gomez is a project who likely won’t be fairly judged for another 2 seasons. Mulvey, Humber, and Guerra could still turn out to be useful pitchers and we will need to wait at least a few more years before declaring the trade great in New York’s favour.
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Sep 29, 2008 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
I think already the trade worked out great in NY’s favor.
They got what they were trying to get… a Cy Young caliber ace.
The question now is whether it will work out in Minnesota’s favor as well… which is still an open question
by nms on Sep 29, 2008 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
My point is just that it isn’t fair to call Minnesota’s return “peanuts”. When that trade was made everyone knew it would take years to fairly judge it.
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Sep 29, 2008 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait
I thought Mike Pelfrey and John Maine were front of the rotation starters? Isnt that what the posts that were started every other week here told me?
by alskor on Sep 28, 2008 9:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ummmm....
What about them doesn’t look like #2 or #3 starters? Starting pitching wasn’t the reason the Mets didn’t make the postseason.
by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 28, 2008 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
maine was injured
I don’t think it was the SPs either, although Pelfrey wasn’t great his last few starts.
It qas the bullpen overall, but their hitting wasn’t good in the clutch late this year. I hate to say it, but they choked.
They aren’t too far off, a second basemen, maybe another slugging of, a coupe of relievers, maybe a starter. All that might not be avallable, but they will plug a few and be in contention.
by wobatus on Sep 29, 2008 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd definitely say it was the bullpen
Wagner went down
Heilman’s era was up by more than 2 runs
Feliciano’s era went up by 1 run for the second consecutive year
They didn’t have a single guy who’s ERA was below 2 (other than Wagner, who went down)
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're right
but your last point is odd…
How many bullpens DO have guys with an ERA below two…especially once you take out the closer(Wagner)?
by nms on Sep 29, 2008 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well that's kind of the point, isn't it? (but it was also an error on my part)
Taking out the closer meant that their best pitcher had a 3.something (I had meant 3, rather than 2….Wager’s era was below 2 and the next best guy was in their mid 3’s). Once you remove that person, everyone slots into a higher leverage situation. So yeah, maybe the closer should be the only guy with an ERA that low, but how many teams have a closer with a 3.4 era? and a setup man with a 3.5? and a lefty specialist with a 4? It was downright embarrassing, especially after Omar spent the first three years of his Mets career drafting closers with all of the early picks that he had (exception was Mike Pelfrey).
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 7:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More important than ERA....
What killed the Mets bullpen were a number of things:
1) Propensity towards the homerun ball.
2) Too many baserunners
3) Sudden inability for key members of the bullpen to get out both sides of the plate.
3 was the one that hurt them the most. Both Heilman and Feliciano suddenly lost their abilities to be effective against their counterparts despite having success against them their entire careers. That REALLY hurt the pen because it turned them into a collection of LOOGY’s and ROOGY’s. Duaner not fully recovering from all those surgeries didn’t help either I don’t think they expected THAT much out of him (but ended up having to rely on him because of Heilman’s failures).
by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 29, 2008 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what changes next year?
I was thinking Stokes, Smith, and Ayala stay. Bring up Kunz and move Parnell to the bullpen (maybe as a long reliever with Stokes. I also think we should keep Sanchez and let him establish himself early season, then sell high (before his velocity drops off again). What else? (should this be its own post?)
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bullpen changes
Those are the exact same three I’d keep. Stokes in long relief. Find two lefties, one of whom can get both sides out (Damasco Marte, if the Yanks decline the option). Keep Sanchez and see if a year removed gets him more consistency. I don’t want to see Show, Heilman, or Feliciano near the bullpen ever again. Closer? I dunno. I think Omar is going to make a PR move and go for K-Rod but I wouldn’t mind Fuentes.
by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 29, 2008 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Marte as well
I just want to see all of those relievers that Omar insisted on drafting on our roster, saving our butts.
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think drafting college relievers were the problem
Hes only had one draft that was overly heavy on the college reliever and that was 2007, and even with fast-moving college closers you can’t count on a 2007 pick to be ready for a pennant race 12 months later.
The one high-pick college reliever Minaya took in 2006 actually contributed 45ish IP on mid-3 ERA ball to the Mets this year
by nms on Sep 29, 2008 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, and Joe Smith is nice
But Omar did promise that these guys would move fast….I am pretty sure that’s part of why he picked them.
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pelfrey
I don’t think Pelfrey was all that bad. Essentially, his worst was 3 runs in 6 innings which you expect to win (I know it’s a 4.50 ERA but it’s also the definition of a quality start). Plus, there was a game he lost 1-0.
I personally think their hitting “wasn’t good in the clutch” because the offense was severely taxed by the continuous thought that a four or five run lead wasn’t safe. I was present at the last two games they played against the Nats. Both games they came out with big leads and EVERYONE in the park knew the lead was vulnerable. And that includes a Santana start where Johan left after 7 innings with a big lead. If I recall, the bullpen STILL allowed the Nats to get within two.
Fix this bullpen and, quite literally, this is a mid 90’s win team. Look at the blown saves they had compared to the league average. Wagner going down after the trade deadline was the most unlucky piece of crap to happen to a team this year.
by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 29, 2008 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mid 90's wins?
It might be more than that. Consider that even with the awful bullpen, Jerry Manuel managed this team to a 55-38 record. That by itself, would be a 95 win season over 162 games. And thats taking into account the fact that plenty went wrong this year (no billy, injured setup man, Church hurt for half the year and sucking for another month, no 2b, no Maine, etc.), the number could easily be upper 90’s or even triple digits.
This isn’t meant to imply that a manager makes a team better (or even that injuries are to blame); Willie Randolf made the team worse. His poor feel for the National League strategies and bad rapport with the players lead to an awful record, and I hope he feels that he is to blame for this wasted season.
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hitting wasnt good in the clutch?
Wright hit like .500 something over the last like 19 games. Its unfair to blame them for not hitting in the clutch. Delgado wasnt going to keep up that pace. Youre thinking of a handful of moments where the other team’s pitcher just exectuted better.
This team was pitching thin going into the year and it showed up in the pen badly and the rotation slightly. And Pelfrey and Maine are not #2 starters. Just like Perez wasnt. Mets fans would have had you believe going into this season that they had Santana, a #1, and four #2s. The trash talk about it was nonstop, even on here. We had like seven threads about who had the best pitching rotation, and if you’ll remember each one ended up in heated discussions about how the Mets had the best rotation by far.
by alskor on Sep 29, 2008 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So...
Angels? Beating the Sox?
That doesn’t happen, I can’t comprehend what that would mean.
by RedSoxFaithful on Sep 28, 2008 9:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Without thinking about it
I would think the Halos had better starters… but we’re going three man rotations(thanks to the Angels choice) and the matchups look like:
Lackey vs. Beckett
Santana vs. Dice K/Lester (Hasnt been announced)
Saunders vs. Dice K/ Lester
umm… I like the Sox in those matchups. Beckett has his question marks, but Lackey has been AWFUL for his last FIVE starts. Something is wrong there. Dice K matches up well with the Angels, who swing at everything. Lester is an unstoppable force right now.
Also, to look at the pyths:
Red Sox
RS – 841
RA – 691
Diff – +150
Angels
RS – 765
RA – 697
Diff – +68
The Sox scored substantially more runs than the Angels, who had a pedestrian offense (10th best in the AL). The Sox also allowed slightly less runs than the Halos. Why did LA exceed its pyth so much? Great pen and luck. The Sox have essentially been a better team than the Angels this year. The Tex addition helps, but this offense is still the kind that can get shut down in the playoffs – and Boston has the starters to do it.
by alskor on Sep 28, 2008 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beckett Is Injured
I had heard the Sox rotation announced earlier today to be Beckett, Lester and then Dice-K. But now there are reports tonight that Beckett has an oblique injury and they have him scheduled for game 3. No clue what the plan is if he can’t go. Byrd maybe? I was liking their chances a lot more when I thought Beckett and Lester would be the ones making two starts apiece if necessary.
Same guy, new name.
by stillredsoxfan on Sep 29, 2008 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
With the Yanks out
I have to be pulling for the White Sox now. Would be great to see Griffey get a ring.
by nyy601 on Sep 29, 2008 12:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Predictions
I’m curious as to who everyone thinks will be the AL MVP…seems like a really interesting year for this award. I think I would have voted for Quentin before he got hurt. After that it seems pretty wide open. Mauer? Morneau? Pedroria? Sizemore? I have no idea…
by Dfarth on Sep 29, 2008 12:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
that is the most wide-open race for me too.
Lots of solid candidates, but none is “OMG MVP” and they all seem to have different pluses and minuses.
by nms on Sep 29, 2008 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AL MVP
I agree completely with you. Honestly, even though he is a starting pitcher and was not on a serious contender, I think Cliff Lee has a decent shot to win the award because he was the most dominant player in the AL all season long. I could see writers giving him the award to make up for the fact that they may steal the Cy Young from him and give it to K-Rod (who does not deserve it. He isn’t even the best closer in the AL… but writers like numbers and records).
Every decent hitting MVP candidate did it pretty quietly though. Dye, Pedroia, Hamilton, Sizemore, A-Rod (always in the discussion), Miguel Cabrera, Morneau, and Braun. All of them have had great years, but none of them were so lights out that they were scary or dominant. Drew had a decent shot, as did Quentin, but injuries ruined their chances. I guess Milton Bradley has a decent shot too at the award.
"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile
by Boxkutter on Sep 29, 2008 3:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Has there ever been a pitcher
to win the MVP and not the Cy Young Award?
www.loftylantern.com
by OldProspects on Sep 29, 2008 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Figured it had never happened....
but I will never put anything by the Baseball Writers.
"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile
by Boxkutter on Sep 29, 2008 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There should be a stupidity contest
between them and the US House of Representatives
www.loftylantern.com
by OldProspects on Sep 29, 2008 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I decided not to be lazy
and actually check. I don’t think it’s ever happened since the Cy Young Award began in 1955 (did you realize, btw, that in 1968 both MVP awards were won by pitchers?). This doesn’t mean it won’t happen this time, but it’d be kind of surprising
www.loftylantern.com
by OldProspects on Sep 29, 2008 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lee
While I think he would be an interesting choice – the combination of giving it to a pitcher (which almost never happens) and giving it to a player that is on a non-contender (which rarely happens) would make this a huge surprise. If he had pitched for a team in the playoffs – I think it might happen…
by Dfarth on Sep 29, 2008 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is there any way that we can give it to Jeter?
I just don’t feel that his career will be complete until he has one.
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Prediction
Angels over Sox. Rays over like-it-matters. Rays over Angels.
Dodgers over Cubs. Brewers over Phillies. Brewers over Dodgers.
Brewers over Rays. And Fox executives cry.
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 1:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
why do you like Dodgers>Cubs
Not challenging it, just wondering
by nms on Sep 29, 2008 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a hunch?
I don’t like the Cubs’ pitching staff right now. Z looks like he’s about to fall apart. Harden had awful velocity in his last start, matched up against the New York Mess. I don’t like, nor have I ever liked Dempster or Lilly (my brother thinks I am an idiot for this). On the other hand, I think Billingsly-Lowe-Kuroda-Kershaw is a solid 1-4, and have been pitching pretty well recently. The Dodgers bullpen is pretty good, so long as they don’t need a middle reliver during the series. I guess it comes down to the fact that I think that the Dodgers matchup well against the Cubs in a short series.
But eh, neither team overwhelms me at the moment and I’ll probably change my mind tomorrow.
I’d also like to point out the fact that the West Coast postseason series wrecks teams, so I am not sure that the winner of this series will factor into the next round. For example, last season the Red Sox played the Angels in the first round, and lost the only 3 games that they lost that postseason in the next round. The previous season the Mets and the Tigers played the Dodgers and the A’s respectively, and both teams lost to an inferior Cardinals squad the next round (the Cardinals had played a West Coast team too, but had less travel distance than the Mets so it didn’t have as great of an effect). There is statistical evidence to show that the long trip has an effect on teams in the regular season, and if you look, the last team to play a west coast team in the first round and lose fewer than 3 games in the second round was the 2001 New York Yankees Oh, and that team had won 10 consecutive postseason series at the time..
by JayWise on Sep 29, 2008 7:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cubs...
Even though I am a Mariner fan, Cubs are my second favorite team (too many summer afternoons spent watching Harry Carey and the Cubs). It may be a homer pick, but I don’t care. I will be rooting for the same World Series I was in 2003…. Cubs v. Red Sox (Tampa is my second choice there).
How high would the ratings for a Cubs-BoSox Series have been in 2003? Both teams on epic WS dry spells. Both with nationwide fan bases and lots of bandwagon fans.
"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile
by Boxkutter on Sep 29, 2008 3:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
like a minor celtics-lakers
i’d reckon
by son.of.sourman on Sep 29, 2008 4:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My 2 cents
Angels over BoSox in 6
Rays over Twins/ChiSox in 5
Cubs over Dodgers in 5
Phillies over Brewers in 4
AL Pennant
Angels over Rays in 7
NL Pennant
Cubs over Phillies in 5
World Series
Cubs over Angels in 6
by MartyMcFly on Sep 29, 2008 12:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
It should be fun to see how the Angels beat the BoSox in game six of a five game series.
by alskor on Sep 29, 2008 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mine Too
Sox over Angels in 5
Rays over Twins in 5
Dodgers over Cubs in 5 (oh yeah I did it)
Brewers over Phillies in 4
AL Pennant
Sox over Rays in 6
Brewers over Dodgers in 7
World Series
Sox over Brewers in 6
by ChrisRef19 on Sep 30, 2008 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yovanni Gallardo
World Series MVP. He comes in Pedro-style, and pitches six shut-out innings from the bullpen, after the incredibly hard-worked CC can only go 2 innings in Game Six. He also hits a HR and 2B, equalling the output of Ryan Braun for the entire WS.
by ILuvDaBush on Sep 29, 2008 10:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My Mets Plans
I don’t think you can really call this season a choke job, considering the team fought back to having a lead in the first place, and did so without a single trustworthy arm in the pen.
Things that I would like to see from the Mets:
1) Give Heilman a shot in the rotation. Up until this season, I’d been saying that he was far too crucial to the bullpen to move him to the rotation, even if there is a solid starter in him. Considering how awful he was in the pen this year, especially in crucial situations, and the fact that the Mets have a couple of open rotation spots and John Maine coming back from injury, I would like to see Heilman and Niese battle it out for a rotation spot. I hear lots of talk about Heilman being traded in the offseason to a team that is willing to give him a shot as a starter, but his value is currently about as low as it’s going to go, and the Mets might as well give him a shot. Having been a good soldier in the pen the last couple years while Willie Scott Proctored his arm, I think he deserves a shot.
2) Give Parnell a shot in the pen. He’s got swing and miss stuff and gets grounders. I don’t think he’ll cut it as a starter, but in limited action he could be pretty solid.
3) Obviously, trade Castillo if at all possible. That said, I’m not sure that Orlando Hudson is the answer. He’s a great defender, but I’m really unsure how his bat will play at Shea, considering his road production has been very mediocre since he went to Arizona and found his bat. I’d prefer Grudz or Loretta in some combination with Easley, if possible. I’m pretty sure that any deal for Orlando Hudson is going to end up overpaying him for his Arizona production, though he’ll still be a better all around player than Castillo, and better fit the Mets needs. Another option would be Rafael Furcal, if he’s willing to move to second; he’d form a pretty scary top of the order in combination with Reyes, but Mets fans have been saying that for years.
4) Castillo really needs to go if the Mets decide to go with Dan Murphy and Nick Evans in left. Castillo’s sole utility to the team is his ability to hit for a bit of average, get on base, and the occasional steal. Murphy provides all these things with a bit of added pop, while taking up Castillo’s two spot in the lineup. With Murphy in the lineup, Castillo is relegated to batting eighth, where he’s really good at turning over the lineup but really awful at driving in runs. I realize that’s not the job of the 8 hitter, but he does come up with guys on base, and Castillo was about as unreliable as the pitcher in terms of getting runs in, considering his penchant for hitting the ball on the ground. Basically, Murphy’s presence makes Castillo expendable.
5) Bring Tatis back. He has the pedigree of a veteran player who has had everything fall apart, the fallen star, which is a good influence to have around on a team with some young stars. He provides insurance at the infield and outfield corners, and while I doubt he’ll put up an .850 OPS again, I think he can probably put up .780 with decent power and patience, pretty solid for a versatile fill-in.
6) Say no to K-Rod. With the years and money he’s looking for, they ought to look elsewhere for a closer. I realize that Fuentes is the only other halfway legitimate option and there’s going to be immense pressure on management to improve the bullpen after the crew that was around this year, K-Rod is going to be way overpaid, has a ton of mileage on his arm, and could cripple a bullpen with his salary if he gets hurt halfway through the deal.
7) Try to sign a semi-reliable setup guy such as Affeldt. I just looked through the list of potential closers, and he’s the only one who fits into that category that I can see.
I doubt most of this will happen, but these are the realistic things that I would like to see.
by Fanon on Sep 30, 2008 12:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Castillo contract: Worst position player contract of the century so far?
Discuss.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Oct 1, 2008 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s pretty bad. But there have been worse, just on the Mets for that matter (Mo Vaughn, Bobby Bonilla, Roger Cedeno).
Khalil Green is looking pretty bad too. Pat Meares with the Pirates.
by Lunkwill Fook on Oct 1, 2008 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not even the worst of that offseason
Silva, Carlos? Bueller?
See also: Bell, Derek
Mo Vaughn really wasn’t a bad contract, he had a couple lost years but produced somewhat on the whole.
by Fanon on Oct 1, 2008 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shoot
I may have to go Matthews… youre right. I mean, Andruw had question marks, and its somewhat defensible. It was a gamble, and Colletti did some creative contract structuring to make it work… it didnt work out, but it doesnt really compare to Pierre or Sarge in terms of team crippling effects.
OTOH, Jones provided absolutely no value whatsoever, while the other two at least brought something to the table. The other thing is that pretty much anyone with half a brain KNEW Pierre was Sarge would be terrible contracts. Like when Zito signed with the Giants. Every baseball fan in the country absolutely knew it was not going to workout. Its still a mystery to me how these GM talked themselves into those deals.
by alskor on Oct 2, 2008 1:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess I have to agree with that assessment
Pierre is worse than Castillo and signed for more money.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Oct 2, 2008 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Predictions
King Billy Predictions of DOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chisox over Rays
Boston over LA
Boston over Chisox
Brewers over Philly
LA over Cubs
LA over Brewers
Boston over LA
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Oct 1, 2008 12:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
...And the wheels
are officially off the CC train. Myers works a walk like a 10 time batting champ, he walks Rollins on 4 pitches and then Victorino hits the granny.
by slurve on Oct 2, 2008 6:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












