Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Enjoy Lincecum while you can...

132 pitches August 27th, 127 on September 8, 138 last night.

Maybe he'll be fine, but they aren't in a pennant race or anything, why push it?

He did pitch a shutout last night.  I didn't see it, so maybe they weren't high effort pitches.  I'd like to go back and see how many pitches someone like Oswalt was allowed to throw as a young pitcher.  Just off the top of my head, also a smallish righty.

 

4 recs  |  Comment 116 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Dusty back in San Fran?

Unbelievable and irresponsible. For a pitcher who was still rumored this spring to be going to the bullpen at some point in the future due to durability concerns by the Giants brass, this is just incredible. It’s nothing more than trying to get the kid past Webb for the Cy Young this year, which is completely short-sighted on the Giants part.

by slurve on Sep 14, 2008 10:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ummm......

“still rumored this spring to be going to the bullpen at some point in the future due to durability concerns by the Giants brass” =-slurve

ok first please show me the link or the info you have. Why would they ever move a pitch to the bullpen that has taken the ball every start never had any arm injury let alone discomfort. Also why would they ever place a pitch whom is 17-3 (should be better) with a 2.43 era and 237 strikeouts is 207 and 2/3 innings? If this is just speculation on your part you my friend are a fool. also to everyone who has “durability” concerns fine I understand your following the stereoptyical “he’s small” “delivery to violent” however none of us are pitching coaches let alone pitched probably above high school so let’s not pretend to be.

by caincecum on Sep 14, 2008 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh

Wow. Got a bit of pent-up anger? Obviously you’re new here.

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2007/1/30/143915/357#2366572

by slurve on Sep 14, 2008 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

um thank you

you just resolved my question………1st off thats from a baseball writer not giants brass………..2nd of all he said he loved his delivery and said he thought he could dominate more as a reliever. So no member of the giants front office said that. #2 he didn’t see it as an injury risk

by caincecum on Sep 14, 2008 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right over your head

You missed the point of that link altogether. You’re preaching to the choir man – and making a jerk out of yourself while you’re at it. I’ve been on this site as one of Lincecum’s supporters for quite a long time, calling the size thing nonsense for a couple of years now. You show up here, get a user name and just start spouting off at me when you no idea. If it wasn’t for a few like sharksrog, DrB and few others, I’d probably win an election to be president of the minorleagueball Lincecum fan club.

1st off thats from a baseball writer not giants brass

That wasn’t a link attempting to provide some sort of evidence to my claim about the bullpen rumors. Again, please notice my employment of the word rumors. Rumors come from sports writers knucklehead. If the sportswriter has good inside sources, the rumor has more credibility. The rumors I heard over the last off-season were they were considering it. If you would have read my comments under that diary before coming back in here and flipping out, you may get the idea I’m quite the Lincecum proponent. That said, I thought any idea of putting him in bullpen was ludicrous when I heard them. Every bit as ludicrous as the Giants leaving him in games that long that often.

by slurve on Sep 14, 2008 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd say you look more like a jerk than him...

He wasn’t questioning your Lincecum fanhood; he was disproving your point. You said Giants brass was considering moving him to the pen. Yes, you said they were rumors, but you seemed to be regarding them as true. Caincecum said that was bs, which it was.

by boonitez on Sep 14, 2008 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ugh..

They were rumors I heard from a fairly credible source. How was I regarding them as true? I merely pointed out their existence. Say they’re BS all you want, that doesn’t really matter and is missing the point. I look more like a jerk than him? How so? I stated something that fanboy there didn’t like he gave me a post full of atitude. I responded in kind, but now nearly at the same level.

by slurve on Sep 14, 2008 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

CAT FIGHT!!!1!!

OMG cat fight.

Sometimes I wonder if this site is more about talking about baseball or about how much bigger your dick is than somebody elses.

I am Cameron Wood and this is my son and business partner CW Culberson.

by camwoody on Sep 14, 2008 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hahaha

Slurve it’s all good don’t worry I was misunderstood about your stance on Lincecum I was just pointing out that Will Carrol in no way reflects the Giants brass opinions

by caincecum on Sep 14, 2008 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Source

The source you quoted is from January 2007. Do you have anything from spring training 2008?

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 14, 2008 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

C'mon

Again, the diary I refer to was merely to show that he was preaching the the choir as the poster was insinuating I was in the “Lincecum is going to hurt because he’s too small” group and I’m clearly not. It wasn’t meant to substantiate what I had heard last off-season.

by slurve on Sep 14, 2008 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No worries

“For a pitcher who was still rumored this spring to be going to the bullpen at some point in the future due to durability concerns by the Giants brass, this is just incredible.”

All I am saying is that perhaps the Giants brass have changed their feelings since January 2007. Maybe after watching him last year, they have a different view on Timmy. As a result, I don’t recall hearing any rumors from spring training this year about him going to the pen. I am not saying that his pitch count shouldn’t be monitored, as it should. There is a big difference between what is going on here, and what happened with Prior. That difference is that the Cubbies only won the NL Central by one game. If they would have benched Prior they would likely have missed out on the playoffs. The Giants are overworking Timmy and the really stand nothing to gain.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 14, 2008 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FYI

From my reading, Giants brass was divided on what to do with Lincecum and how to proceed. I’ll bet that the ones who wanted to draft Lincecum wanted to start him and the ones who were like the other teams and would have passed on him, thought he should be a reliever/closer.

Obviously, Sabean and probably Tidrow were on the side of the ones who liked Lincecum. That would leave Magowan, Bobby Evans, Jack Hiatt, and Fred Stanley among those who could have been the one to express the opinion that he’s a closer. I haven’t heard this rumor in ages though, and I think if it appeared again, the reporter will think he’s a lousy source to believe in.

You and others say he’s overworked. I haven’t seen any proof that he’s overworked other than he’s pitched more than other pitchers have in a number of years and it goes against the theory that people have about pitch counts. But theories, particularly any about humans, have exceptions. And if the Giants and he believe that he’s an exception – his arm does not need icing after games, he long tosses the next day, has not had any injury history, his dad is still throwing 85 MPH in his late 50’s so his genetics seem pretty good – then why not stretch and extend him?

It’s not like the Giants have not been careful with him. People forgot but the Giants shut him down last year before the end of the season. They also limited his pitch count, made him warm up like regular pitchers, and basically did all they could to ease his way into the major leagues and starting pitching there. They just didn’t touch his pitching mechanics.

This year, after learning about him and developing a relationship where they feel they can trust what he says about his physical well being (a concern for Giants brass, I would hope, after Jesse Foppert and Jerome Williams wasn’t honest with the Giants about their physical condition), they have let the reins out more and more as the season has gone on. They have built up on his pitch count and presumably been monitoring him throughout. It’s not like they had him throwing over 120 pitches consistently from the start of the season, in his first 27 starts, before the 132, he only had 2 games throwing over 120 pitches. That’s 2 out of 27.

Since then, he has thrown over 120 pitches in 3 of 5 games, and 118 in one other, but here is his pitching line: 38 IP, 28 hits, 10 BB, 43 K, 2.37 ERA, .207/.272/.304/.576. That is better than what he did in his first 27 starts: 177.2 IP, 144 hits, 67 BB, 200 K, 2.48 ERA, .223/.299/.314/.613.

His K/BB was better, 4.3 vs. 3.0. His H/9 was better, 6.6 vs. 7.3. His K/9 was basically the same, 10.2 vs. 10.1, a very slight improvement there, which means his BB/9 was a big improvement, which it was, 2.4 vs. 3.4. Even his HR/9 was better, 0.24 vs. 0.46, even though he pitched in Colorado and Arizona for two of those five starts.

And if throwing too many long outings hurt a pitcher, then one would think that the Braves starting pitchers over their glory years should have shortened careers. Leo Mazzone had them throwing a lot more than any other team in the majors leagues (only Lincecum probably out-throws any Mazzone disciple in terms of out-of-game throwing) and Bobby Cox had been among the leaders in having his starting pitchers throw more long outings than other managers, but Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz are still throwing effectively into their late 30’s, early 40’s, albeit with some arm problems, but the main point is that they are still throwing effectively despite being at an age when pitchers have been retired for 5+ years already.

What we have to gain is a starter who can not only pitch effectively, but can do so into the 8th and 9th inning regularly, saving the bullpen and allowing them to be more effective overall, getting a night off for the most part regularly when he pitches. Somehow, all these pitchers got into the Hall of Fame with long careers, despite throwing a lot of innings. As long as his body does not appear to be stressed by the work – and it would show up as pain somewhere, requiring icing – and he is pitching effectively, I don’t see why the Giants can’t extend him and see how he reacts to it.

You and others might see this as risky, but that’s because you are on the outside. They have been working closely with Lincecum for nearly two seasons now, and they were very careful with him last season, so if they feel comfortable stretching him out, and don’t see if as risky, then I don’t see any reason why they can’t do so.

Just because everyone is saying the sky is falling, doesn’t make it so. There is no proof that I’m aware of that says that 130+ pitches is the straw that breaks a camel’s back. And the Giants at least acknowledged after the 132 pitch effort that they would take it easy on Lincecum with his next start.

And at what point is there no gain? If the playoffs is the litmus test, the Giants hasn’t had a realistic chance at the playoffs since almost day one. Should the Giants not started him after his first start or two?

OK, so you need him to pitch enough so that he’s prepared for the next season, but then what is the number, 180 IP so that he can make it up to 200-210 IP next season OK? Or 200 IP so that he can reach 225 IP, because he’s a fanastic starter who can be an anchor?

And what if that means shutting him down in late August, are you going to just sit him on the bench for the rest of the season? How many competitive ballplayers are going to stand for that one?

And why can’t a pitcher who can long toss the very next day not be able to throw more pitches in a game than regular people? Add in the fact that he doesn’t need to throw as many pitches as other pitchers in order to warm out, he could be saving 5-10 pitches from not doing it in warm-ups for use in the game, meaning his higher pitch count is not that much higher. That’s 150-300 pitches taken off his season total. Why can’t a pitcher with all of these unusual characteristics NOT be able to throw more pitches in a game than regular pitchers?

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin "Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Sep 22, 2008 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Congratulations

This is the longest post I have ever seen. Anywhere.

And I say this as someone who tends toward pretty long posts myself.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Sep 24, 2008 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

is he done?

i nodded off.is he done yet? send me an email when he get’s done

by brucyb on Sep 25, 2008 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

rationalizations

In a meaningless game it is pointless to take any chances at all.

And i wouldn’t think the effects would be shown now necessarily, so saying he pitched well in those contests is not relevant. He gave u a few runs last time out, but that isn’t the point either.

BTW, Santana threw 125 pitches the other day…the most he has ever thrown in a game in his entire career. In a pennant race.

by wobatus on Sep 25, 2008 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That quote is from January 2007

I’m not sure how it is relevant to spring training this year. I haven’t read any rumors from sprinng training 2008 regarding Timmy going to the pen.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 14, 2008 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

responses

This was the stupidest series of responses I’ve ever seen on a thread here. slurve making a comment, some guy not bothering to read it and yelling at him, slurve responding in a mostly polite way (the worst thing he called the responder was, what, a knucklehead?), and then more people come to yell at him, in the middle of which, the other guy apologizes!

Yeesh.

by mraver on Sep 14, 2008 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

funny

that was too funny

by brucyb on Sep 25, 2008 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oswalt

I understand that Oswalt is a smaller pitcher as well, but the comparison to Lincecum really ends there. Oswalt relies more on movement and location the Lincecum who tends to throw everything at or near his maximum effort. I would look at how someone like Pedro was treated if you want to a comparison. It was really unfair to hitters when Pedro was able to crank it up to the mid to high 90’s.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 14, 2008 11:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Lincecum deserves this

I have never seen a pitcher in my life that is as polished as Lincecum at his sophmore year. He is so capable of throwing 150 pitches, because he was always allowed 145 in college. Pitch count is overrated in Lincecum’s case. Bruce Bochy was correct to pitch him the distance last night.

by sign posey on Sep 14, 2008 12:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Lincecum doesn’t throw a lot of warmup pitches, so that cuts down on his work.

Bonds stands alone.

Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal

by nostocksjustbonds on Sep 19, 2008 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Generally speaking

that isn’t a good thing.
Maybe it works for him, I don’t know.

I know lots of pitching injuries are attributed to improper warming up, and lots of athletic injuries in general can be traced to that.. so if he can get 100% ready, safely, with needing lots of warmup tosses that is great but no way is that generally advisable.

by nms on Sep 19, 2008 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

i was primarily a reliever through legion ball before focusing purely on school sports (SD did not have HS baseball at the time, and still only has it very sparingly across the state), but i always took my time warming up, mainly because when i wasn’t pitching, i was at third base, so my arm may be loose or tight depending on what was hit my way previous to that in the game….the few games i did start, i started out doing long toss and worked my way in to the mound distance on flat ground before ever even stepping on the mound….then i started about 60% and worked up to about 80, then went to the mound and threw about 90 to finish warming up….never even had a sore arm in all my pitching….

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

by biggentleben on Sep 19, 2008 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FYI, neither has Lincecum had a sore arm

Since you talked about the routine of warming up, I have to ask you what you think about Lincecum being able to long-toss the day after a start and not having to ice his arm after a game (since you don’t have a sore arm, I assume you didn’t ice either, so I’m wondering how others who did reacted to you and if you noticed anything interesting between you and them).

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin "Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Sep 22, 2008 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's another debate.

To ice or not to ice?

There is a big move going on (or was) for pitchers NOT to ice after throwing. Thoughts?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Sep 25, 2008 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

didn't notice this earlier

so sorry for the few days before response….i never got ice the day of the game ever….and i would do a control workout every non-game day that involved hitting a 1 foot square over and over from various distances and with that square placed at various places on the building i threw against growing up….i usually would have to have 100 “hits” on that little board before i moved onto the next throwing spot, usually throwing 400 or 500 “hits” each day as i had 4-5 pitching spots each workout, but some days if my control was off, i would probably throw at least twice as many pitches as “hits”….anyway, after those workouts sometimes i would use some ice, but usually later that night as i relaxed with my family, not right after the workout….

from my experiences and research, the worst thing an athlete could ever do is ice immediately after strenous physical activity….the muscle is usually elongated right after a long game or workout, and putting ice on it will cause it to shrink abnormally fast and contract, which could quickly lead to ligament damage….i read a very interesting article not too long ago suggesting that icing right after pitching could be leading to much of the elbow ligament replacement that we are seeing now with young pitchers….i just know that i’ve never replaced one and that i never iced right after a game….stretching is what you should do right after a hard workout to use the elongation of the muscles at the time to increase flexibility in the joints and muscles….

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

by biggentleben on Sep 25, 2008 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for sharing that

I wasn’t a pitcher so I don’t know about such concerns, other than by inference or tangentially. And this is good to know for those pitchers out there reading this stuff.

That said, it should be noted that the Giants made him warm up like regular pitchers at the start of last season. It seems as they learned what they could do with him last season, they appeared to ease up on things as they learned to trust what he says about his physical condition and so forth. 2007 was an adjustment and learning period whereas 2008 appears to be the year they let out the reins on Lincecum.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin "Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Sep 22, 2008 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

This is stupidity. 138 pitches in a 7-0 rout? What’s the point? Just to get an extra shutout on his resume? I hope they at least give him on extra days rest before his next start.

by fourthandeye on Sep 14, 2008 12:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe Lincecum wanted it

Doesn’t he have a say in this?

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin "Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Sep 22, 2008 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

He shouldnt. At least not if you want to run a successful organization.

by alskor on Sep 22, 2008 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, he should, if you hope to keep him long-term

Things are not one-sided and even in losing seasons like this, players want to have some achievements that they can look upon after the season. A complete game shutout has to be chief among those good enough to contemplate it. If you don’t listen to your pitcher’s dreams and aspirations, then he’s not going to listen to you when it’s time to sign him long-term beyond his arbitration years.

Speaking of successful organizations, here’s how the Giants have done it: first of all, they drafted him when all the others passed on him. Most draft experts I read said that he would fall past the Giants and into the middle of the first round because of his issues.

Second of all, they didn’t mess with his mechanics. They left him alone there.

Third, while not messing with his mechanics, they did control other aspects. One that I’m aware of was his warm-up routine. He felt he could warm up very quickly and with less pitches than other pitchers. The Giants made him warm up like other pitchers last season. I’m sure they did other things with him last season while they learned what they had in their hands.

They also shut him down early last season, in the middle of September, when there was nothing to gain from starting him anymore and he was reaching his limits in terms of IP vs. previous seasons. I can’t even remember the last time I recall any team shutting down a young successful pitcher before the end of the season.

So the Giants have not just started “abusing” and “overworking” Lincecum in a vacuum, they have been working with him for over two seasons now and feel that he can be used in this way without hurting him. If they were doing this at the start of last season, I think these comments would be valid, but they have been very careful with him up to now and think he’s ready. I would trust that more than people sitting at their computer keyboard and talking about theories that haven’t been proven yet.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin "Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Sep 22, 2008 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Achievements he can look too?
Things are not one-sided and even in losing seasons like this, players want to have some achievements that they can look upon after the season. A complete game shutout has to be chief among those good enough to contemplate it. If you don’t listen to your pitcher’s dreams and aspirations, then he’s not going to listen to you when it’s time to sign him long-term beyond his arbitration years.

How about winning a championship? That should be the only goal. When youre out of the running for that your goal as a team for a young pitcher should be to make sure the kid doesnt get hurt – ergo you dont allow him to go for a complete game no matter how much he wants to if he has to throw 132 pitches to do it. If he really wants to throw a complete game that badly tell him he has to be more economical with his pitches. A complete game is really a pretty silly goal for him at this point in the season anyway, given the situation of his team. I dont care if he wants to do it, there is nothing substantial to be gained from taking this risk. If its that important he can go the distance another time when he doesnt have to throw an amount of pitches that statistically put him at increased risk for injury.

You want to re-sign him? Pay the man. That’s what ballplayers actually respect come contract time.

by alskor on Sep 22, 2008 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Long term

Money is what keeps players long term, not whether or not you let them throw whenever they damn please so as to blow their arm out. Look at Santana’s initial deal with Minnesota, where he signed to stay on despite the fact that Minny had him pitching in relief against his wishes early in his career.

by Fanon on Sep 23, 2008 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe pitch counts are what lead to injuries

maybe throwing a lot of pitches can strengthen the arm in order to throw over 225 innings a year. We didn’t really hear much about TJ or Labrums until after 1998 with Kerry Wood. These pitchers are babied too much these days and I wonder what the old timers think about this.

by Bravesin07 on Sep 14, 2008 12:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Mazzone

Mazzone is a big believer in making pitchers throw extra sessions. He believes that the extra work improves their arm strength (read ‘The Baseball Economist’ for more details). Looking at his track record and the fact that he had his 3 disciples pitch over 60 years in the majors, I have to believe there is some validity to his philosophy. I would agree that too many pitchers are babied these days. Many pitching coaches believe that it isn’t how many pitches you throw, it is how many pitches you throw when laboring that is the issue. Thus, if a pitcher is only using 15 pitches to get through an inning, he will likely be able to go 120 pitches. However, if a pitcher has a 40 pitch inning, he will only be able to go 100 pitches.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 14, 2008 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mazzone

Lets really look at his track record, and the extra work of young pitchers.
Glavine—fine, no problems, never on the DL until his 40’s. Unreal
Maddux—Leo didn’t get him until he was 27, so we can’t use him as an example of Mazzone’s beliefs .
Steve Avery—Star from age 21-23, went over 200IP all three years. Starting at age 24, injuries ruined him, he was never a star again.
Smoltz—-worked hard until hurt in ’94. Pitched over 200 innings in only 2 of the next 9 seasons due to injuries/going to the pen from fear of injury.

I’d say the jury is out on the validity of Leo’s philosophy.

by drwmsu1 on Sep 14, 2008 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Other Guys

Kevin Milwood – Has been remarkably durable throughout his career. Solid pitcher in Atlanta.
Jaret Wright – Actually remained healthy and GOOD under Leo. A miracle in itself.
Denny Neagle – Had his best 2 years under Leo. Remained healthy both years. Later beat up hookers.
John Burkett – Had a great age 36 season under Leo. This in itself may be the GREATEST ACHIEVEMENT in coaching history.

I am not saying that Leo’s philosophy is the only one, but I would take him over 95% of the pitching coaches today.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 14, 2008 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think the argument is that Mazzone somehow makes his starters throw better, the argument was that the extra throwing is detrimental to young arms. Two of the four guys he’s handled as young pitchers have had arm injuries. That’s not the best track record.

by 17843 on Sep 14, 2008 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two of four?

Avery may have had arm injuries but Smoltz, Milwood, and Glavine have all had lengthy careers.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 14, 2008 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Smoltz has missed 2.5 seasons due to arm injury and pitched another 3.5 out of the bullpen to save his arm. He lost something like 700 innings pitched because of those six years. Not every victim of overuse turns into a Steve Avery, some like Smoltz just lose a big chunk of their career.

Now, Lincecum following the John Smoltz career path would be phenomenal, but if you could prevent an arm injury by not riding him to irrelevant wins in September, wouldn’t you? That’s what I can’t understand; the Giants have everything to lose by pitching Lincecum nine innings when they’re facing the Padres. I could see the benefit to the team if it’s the Dodgers (rivalry, spoiler effect, etc.), but they not only are increasing the possibility that Lincecum injures himself, but they increase the probability that they will improve and lose draft position. The difference revenue/fan-wise between 73 wins and 71 wins is negligible, and they weren’t even in a position to lose anyway.

by 17843 on Sep 14, 2008 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

probably 90%

of the innings he missed came at age 33 and afterward. You can’t hold a pitching coach accountable for a 33 year old breaking down. That is so far down the line, in many ways it is gravy for any pitcher to still be going strong.

by nms on Sep 15, 2008 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Also, people should be more impressed with Mazzone’s handling of his young arms when you considering that Smoltz, Glavine, Maddux, Milwood, and company had to pitch into October every season for over a decade. When you take into account all the extra pitches on their arms, Mazzone deserves much more credit then he is getting.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 15, 2008 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mazzone

I like Mazzone, but I think you have to look at him in context. First off, give any pitching coach with Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz, and they’ll look like that.

But outside those three, I think his record is pretty straight-forward: he does a pretty good job with journeymen/veteran types, getting peak performances out of them. But when it comes to young pitchers, Millwood is the only real “success”, and there were more than a few top-teir pitching prospects come up through the Atlanta system.

If I’m a GM with a veteran club looking to take it to the next level and bring in some free agents (maybe a team like the Mets or the Astros), then he’s definitely a guy I want in my pen. If I’ve got a young club with a bunch of top prospects on the way up (Marlins, Rays), then I’d probably stay away.

by mraver on Sep 14, 2008 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

mazzone

close to my evaluation….but i wouldn’t say it’s necessarily just vet/journeyman types….mazzone just seemed to get more of those types….guys who just are willing to work are his meat and potatoes….he got more out of guys like kerry ligtenberg than anyone else every could because he saw a guy willing to listen and work….he’s gottena bad rep as being bad with young guys because of a few egotistical notorious underperformers in odalis perez and jason marquis….i’d honestly have loved to see what he could have done with a guy like jair jurrjens who, from all reports, wants to work his butt off and has the talent to be very good….

atlanta for years had a system that was much ballyhooed for pitching prospects, but what really was produced by that system after glavine and smoltz (who was one of the high-inning relievers in the league when he was relieving, so i don’t really see the comments about “losing” innings….the braves would have a couple more WS wins if they’d have had a smoltz closing behind their rotation over the years)? millwood i can see….but other than that, who? they had a system that produced hyped pitching prospects that were turned into july trade fodder before they’d blow up for another team….

oh, and on avery….that whole situation was not mazzone….avery was a kid who would not listen to anyone but his own father….he would not listen to mazzone in lieu of listening to his dad, and it killed his recovery as he was overpushed by his father in his return, and never regained his velocity and movement….mazzone reportedly even commented such when avery came back to atlanta as a spring training invite near the end of mazzone’s tenure, saying he wished he could have helped the kid when he still had his stuff….

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

by biggentleben on Sep 14, 2008 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Avery should never have been pitched 750 innings before his 24th birthday. Whether his lack of recovery was his fault is largely irrelevent; his usage was atrocious and Mazzone shares some blame.

Smoltz also definitely lost innings and value – he averaged 79 PRAR in his full seasons as a starter, he averaged 56 as a full season reliever. That’s something like 240 PRAR lost to injury or about 20-25 wins value to the Braves.

by 17843 on Sep 15, 2008 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Difference

Mazzone is not the manager. Bobby Cox is the guy who chooses when a pitcher stays or leaves a game. Also, the fact that Smoltz has been around for 20 years doesn’t impress you because he got hurt? Well guess what, pitchers get hurt. In support of Mazzone’s greatness let me give you some information.

In his book The Baseball Economist, J.C. Bradbury examines how good Mazzone is using statistical analysis. He analyzes whether Mazzone had a significant impact upon the pitchers that he coached. The sample is all pitchers who have pitched at least one year under Mazzone and one year under a different pitching coach. Bradbury found that Mazzone lowered the ERA of pitchers by an average of .64 points, and that after leaving Mazzone, pitchers’ ERA increased by an average of .78 points. The important thing to note is he removed Glavine, Maddux, and Smoltz from the analysis because he wanted to prove that it wasn’t just the big 3 who got him results.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 15, 2008 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mazzone’s skill in getting the best out of his pitchers preformance wise is not up for debate, however of the four guys he handled as young pitchers, two suffered serious arm injuries which cost the Braves a lot of wins.

And the idea that Bobby would’ve ignored Mazzone if he had said, hey, maybe we’re riding Steve Avery too hard, is flat out ridiculous.

The fact that Smoltz has accumulated all these years of pitching is a testament to his body’s ability to rehabilitate and his doctor’s abilities to fix the injuries overuse may have caused. That he has pitched for twenty years is largely irrelevant when the argument is about maximizing value of an asset; that the Braves lost ~20-25 wins that they could’ve gone a long ways towards preventing is very relevant.

by 17843 on Sep 15, 2008 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wtf?!

two of the four?! you’re seriously still sticking with that? you honestly have any inkling that he’s only EVER handled four young pitchers? you’ve officially dismissed yourself from this discussion for lack of intelligence….thanks for playing….or trying to

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

by biggentleben on Sep 15, 2008 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for remaining mature. Which pitchers has he handled throughout their development phase other than the four mentioned? Odalis Perez was there until for two seasons, Marquis for two full seasons. Anyone else that we’re missing to improve on a 2/6 preformance?

Again, arm damage tends to build up. I don’t think the high innings totals Smoltz accumulated as a young starter can be divorced from the arm injuries he suffered later in his career. Just because he broke down at 32 rather than 29 doesn’t mean workload wasn’t a factor.

by 17843 on Sep 18, 2008 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

just a partial list

pitchers who had seasons of 110+ ERA+ with mazzone in their 20s other than your four mentioned

Mike Stanton
Kent Merker
Mark Wohlers
Pete Smith
Greg McMichael
Brad Clontz
Pedro Borbon
Terrell Wade
Alan Embree
Chad Fox
Mike Cather
Joe Borowski
Kerry Ligtenberg
John Rocker
Rudy Seanez
Kevin McGlinchy
Bruce Chen
Steve Karsay
Jason Marquis
Damian Moss
Kevin Gryboski
Tim Spooneybarger
Ray King
Will Cunnane
Jaret Wright
Horacio Ramirez
Juan Cruz
Roman Colon
Blaine Boyer
Jorge Sosa
Kyle Farnsworth
Chuck James
Macay McBride
Tyler Yates
Oscar Villareal

oh, and Russ Ortiz, Tim Hudson, and Denny Neagle all came to Atlanta in their 20s and posted qualifying ERA+’s for this list, but i figured you wouldn’t want to include them

many of these guys had those seasons as starters, but there sure aren’t a lot of arm injuries in that bunch, and the way cox wears the hell out of a performing arm in the ‘pen, it’s a miracle that’s not true of more of the braves’ relievers…..

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

by biggentleben on Sep 18, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

btw

if you’d paid any attention to the braves at all over the years except on a stat sheet, you’d know that smoltz saved the team many more wins as a closer…the braves notoriously had poor bullpens in their run outside of the time that smoltz was anchoring that ‘pen….so not just as a closer, but as an influence on the whole bullpen….smoltz’s leadership and off-field qualities have been exalted for years….

the reason smoltz was moved back to the rotation? it was suggested that it would help his arm remain healthy….

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

by biggentleben on Sep 18, 2008 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not only

is 99% impossible to finger a guys pitching coach for injuries that didn’t show up until a decade later (since there is simply so much that has happened in between) but you are also thinking of injury prevention as the #1 goal.

Even if, for a moment, I accept your sketchy idea of blaming a guy a decade later ask yourself, for a moment, if maybe the “abuse” you claim was actually worth it.
Smoltz was a workhorse in his 20s for the Braves but not only did his “abuse” add tremendous value to the team but his workload also benefited him tremendously.
If there Braves held back his development all that value the team would miss receiving Smoltz himself wouldn’t receive in the form of paychecks and professional acclaim. He won a damn Cy Young.

I think if you asked Smoltz he’d rather become silly rich and super famous in his 20s – even if it meant blowing an arm at 32 – than be restrained to lesser workload and the resulting lesser acclaim, lesser salary and fewer team wins and division titles.

by nms on Sep 18, 2008 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but he didn't turn into a reliever

until his mid-late 30s. The fact that he was even pitching so well that long is already an added bonus

by nms on Sep 15, 2008 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Father figure?
oh, and on avery….that whole situation was not mazzone….avery was a kid who would not listen to anyone but his own father….he would not listen to mazzone in lieu of listening to his dad, and it killed his recovery as he was overpushed by his father in his return, and never regained his velocity and movement

Hmm… Lincecum’s young career is characterized by sticking to a “weird” motion his father came up with, followed by making sure no pitching coach tinkers with it at any level. We Giants fans are hoping the similarity to Avery is only superficial.

"[Greg] Vaughn is in a funk so deep, George Clinton wearing a miner's helmet couldn't find him."
- Jim Baker, ESPN.com, May 2002

by achiappanza on Sep 17, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's a difference between....

Throwing a lot of pitches and throwing extra sessions. While I agree that throwing extra sessions can help improve arm strength, throwing a lot of pitches probably leads to weaker arm strength in the short term when pitchers are not used to them. There has to be more arm strain when a pitcher is throwing 140 pitches at one time than if he throws 100 in his start and then 40 more in an additional throwing session a couple days later.

by Looneyt0on on Sep 15, 2008 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

went through a lengthy conversation about this a while back..

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2006/6/10/204833/451#2338106

by slurve on Sep 15, 2008 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

TJ/Labrums via Kerry Wood

How old are you again? Seriously, if you think Kerry Wood was the first real big case of a Tommy John Surgery or a torn labrum…. god, I don’t know. Ever read “Ball Four”?

by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 14, 2008 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was going to ask

if he had heard of Tommy John

www.loftylantern.com

by OldProspects on Sep 14, 2008 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

People have already appropriately pointed out the fallacy of the TJ/labrum comment

But here’s something else to consider. In the past you never heard about these things because destroying your labrum meant you didn’t play baseball anymore. Now it’s news because it’s “So and so is out for X amount of months and then he comes back.” We pay attention because we’re focusing on the recovery and return to pitching. I don’t have data to back this up, but I would put money on there being an equal rate of those types of injuries in 1950 as now, but in 1950 they were either diagnosed differently and/or they couldn’t fix the injuries to allow a player to pitch again. Guys still got hurt, but when they did they were immediately not relevant anymore. That has changed, and that’s why it seems more prevalent.

by thejd44 on Sep 15, 2008 2:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So what?

It was a 7 nothing lead indeed, but, so what? I don’t think that Bochy was only pitching him 9 because of injury chances. In fact, it had much more to do with Timmy’s heavy workload that he had already established in college. I mentioned he threw 145, but I meant to say 160. He threw 160 pitches in clollege without a problem. Tim Lincecum also has mentioned that he really enjoys pitching 9 innings. So I am glad that Boch did just that

by sign posey on Sep 14, 2008 12:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

college workload

I remember hearing he threw a lot of pitches in college, but I still don’t see how the coaches would let that happen (~150 several times, right?)

I know they’re trying to win games, but we’re talking about a college phenom with his whole career ahead of him. Even if we don’t see any effects now, I wonder if that extra wear and tear early in his career will hurt his longevity.

Less arm, more talk. Raisingcain is a GAMER.
Adopted Giant: Henry Sosa

by raisingcain on Sep 14, 2008 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

It is impossible to know if his workload has effected him yet. Give him some time (i.e. Prior looked great his first few years) before we judge whether he will remain durable for his career.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Sep 14, 2008 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure if it's good or bad

But it’s certainly ballsy on Bochy’s part. He doesn’t really stand to gain anything by doing it. San Francisco is obviously just playing out the string, they had a comfortable lead. I can’t find his pitch count by inning, but he averaged 15 pitches per inning last night. 7 innings would have put him at roughly 108. The scoreless 8th and 9th innings lowered his ERA from 2.46 to 2.43.

It just doesn’t seem worth it for all of the negative attention those 30 extra pitches will get. Right or wrong, if Lincecum gets injured in the next year, Bochy will bear the brunt of the blame, and possibly lose his job.

by El Duq of Hurl on Sep 14, 2008 12:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think the point is that it's pointless

Will it hurt him? Maybe not. But WHY take the risk at this point in the season?

Bochy has done this a lot with the Giants this year, and I’m wondering if he wants to be fired. Yeah, it’s a crazy thought, but there’s just no justifiable reason to overwork a kid like this regardless of his mechanics or talent or anything else.

by thejd44 on Sep 15, 2008 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's look at somewhat recent history

Before I begin, let me state I understand that this is just one example, is a small sample size, and should not be considered absolute proof of the pitch count vs. injury conundrum.

In 2000, Rany Jazayerli and Keith Woolner had an article on Baseball Prospectus about “Pitcher Abuse Points” for that season. If you want to know the formula for Pitcher Abuse Points, you can go to the BP website and look at the glossary, and subscribers can still read the original article here: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=622

Part of the article includes a section on pitchers under 25 with the highest PAP scores. Here’s that list (sorry about the formatting):

Name Team Age PAP

Livan Hernandez Florida 25 344
Randy Wolf Philadelphia 23 233
Sidney Ponson Baltimore 23 191
Kelvim Escobar Toronto 24 190
Jeff Suppan Kansas City 25 187
Kris Benson Pittsburgh 25 168
Ryan Dempster Florida 23 146
Matt Clement San Diego 25 107
Chris Carpenter Toronto 25 101
Octavio Dotel Houston 24 98

Each of those players on the list have had successful major league careers and were on MLB/MiLB rosters in 2008. With the exception of Livan , Ponson and Suppan, every other player on this list has suffered catastrophic arm/elbow/shoulder injuries that required major surgery and/or significant lost playing time.

Riding the shit out of Lincecum won’t guarantee injury, but as you can see there can be a strong correlation with “pitcher abuse” of young guys and further injuries down the road.

by jibs on Sep 14, 2008 1:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

I think this is the major point…. Lincecum may be more injury prone or he may not be…. but basically by pushing him at age 23,24 to this kind of limit is playing with fire in a season where its just not neccessary for any reason…. Even for poeple like me who think pitch counts are a little overdone these days…. there is no reason to consistently push him past 120 pitches.

Will it ultimatley affect him… who knows, but why take that chance?

The woolnder article basically said that pitchers who are constantly abused based on PAP^3 system have a 3 times greater chance of becoming injured then those who dont.

So will Lincecum get hurt… maybe, maybe not,but hes now 3 times more likely to become hurt if these pitch counts dont start to come down a bit.

Currently he and CC Sabathia are the only pitchers over 75,000 in PAP and he is over 168,000, CC is just over 100k in 1 more start then Tim is.

So again… will he get hurt, maybe, maybe not… but clearly he is being pushed to a level that no other pitcher in baseball is even close to in terms of workload.

Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics

by jbluestone on Sep 14, 2008 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Diamond Appraised

From what I’ve been able to determine, the seminal work on the subject was done by Craig Wright in “The Diamond Appraised”, published back in 1989. While it’s possible that the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction now (from where it was back then), I do think that it would be difficult for anyone to maintain the “throwing more pitches to strengthen the arm” theory for young pitchers after reading the chapters in that book on the subject.

My personal thinking is that people are overly reactionary to high-pitch outings by pitchers over the age of 25 now, but better safe than sorry. For a team like the Giants, which has many players on the roster who could benefit from extra AB (pinch hitting) or IP (relief), tempting fate with the organization’s best asset seems like a terrible risk to take.

by BobbyMac on Sep 14, 2008 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I seem to be getting this vibe that some people would be pleased if Lincecum injured himself.

Seems a little sick to me.

I am Cameron Wood and this is my son and business partner CW Culberson.

by camwoody on Sep 14, 2008 1:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No

I’d be much more pleased if Bochy was fired

by jibs on Sep 14, 2008 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

a few points

Lincecum is a different animal when it comes to this kind of stuff. Not because he’s some wunderkind immune to earthly physics but because of the way he throws. I wish I could find the links that Will Carroll of BP used in an article earlier this summer. Perhaps someone more enterprising can dig them out. Those links demonstrated a step by step history of how he pitches and why he pitches the way he does. Carroll called it the best thing he had ever read on pitching mechanics. In a nutshell he uses his entire body to throw, heavy emphasis on lower half, more so than a typical delivery. He practically propels his torso fwd off the rubber (usually push offs there are a no teach, kids just do it naturally). So despite his slight build there is actually less force on his arm/shoulder than most. If there is a young pitcher playing now that could get away with elevated pitch counts Lincecum is most likely it. He sort of reminds of me of early Pedro, esp.physically but that comp does a disservice to them both. Like Pedro I’m not sure he has a fair one.

 The overall count isn’t as important as pitching “tired”, that is the biggest abuse a mgr. can burden his hurler with. And this is where Prior screwed up w/ Baker, sometimes you have to admit you’re “done”. He wouldn’t. I’m not familiar w/ abuse points, does anyone know if that is listed in there? I’d like to see something that charts how many pitches were thrown after a “bad” inning, how many 3-1, 2-0 counts overall, things like that. Also think about how the game is going – is it cool out or hot as hell? Is he laboring, falling behind most every batter or is he ahead most of the time? How many pitches were thrown the last 3 innings compared to the first three innings or the middle three?

And someone referenced max effort, again this a bit of a misnomer, esp. re: Lincecum. All MLB pitchers are max effort. Josh Beckett looks like he’s flipping darts at a board 10 ft away but if you don’t think he is huffing & puffing on those pitches you’re not watching close enough. Smooth repeatable mechanics & big bodies i.e. a thick middle makes their efforts look less so but no one consistently throws strikes over 90 MPH effortlessly; the best obviously just make it seem that way.

Mulder: Babe Ruth was an alien? Arthur Dales: sure; all the great ones were aliens.

by dew on Sep 14, 2008 2:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Big Lincecum Fan

Admittedly, I haven’t always been and I still would tweak him in some areas.

That said, there is this prevailing fallacy that Lincecum’s mechanics are somewhat super human and he has discovered the Holy Grail. Lincecum’s mechanics are 99.99% similar to every other major league pitcher. He creates 80-85% of his velocity from the separation on his hips and shoulders and front foot strike. The other 10-15% comes from the linear energy he creates from his leg lift into his stride. (NPA, Velocity Study) It is absolutely false that “So despite his slight build there is actually less force on his arm/shoulder than most”. Lincecum is an extreme athlete with amazing functional strength, the combination of which allow him to repeat his delivery and allow him to complete his delivery in a “relatively” safe manner. The forces he creates at his joints, which are a result of the translation of energy through his body into the ball are no different than any other pitcher creates.

"He practically propels his torso fwd off the rubber (usually push offs there are a no teach, kids just do it naturally). "

No kids don’t and Lincecum doesn’t either. This is an old school pitching axiom, the “what we think we see” school of pitching. If Lincecum does push himself off the rubber wit the extreme force you talk about, you would agree that his back leg would go straight at some point, wouldn’t it? Find me that picture. What you’ll see is Lincecum’s back foot rolls over, off the rubber (in tune with his hip rotation) and then “drags” away from it.

Baseball Instructor - www.frozenropes.com

by HuskerBob on Sep 15, 2008 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As a high school baseball coach and D1 collegiate level pitcher

I can vouch for his assessment, and agree with everything he said…

Good post!

Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics

by jbluestone on Sep 15, 2008 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

found the link (actual reply farther down)

I meant the post at the bottom as a reply to this. Sorry for the confusion.

Mulder: Babe Ruth was an alien? Arthur Dales: sure; all the great ones were aliens.

by dew on Sep 15, 2008 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Surprised to see this is so controversial

Those pitch counts for Lincecum seem really unneccessary. Hard to believe the potential negatives don’t far outweigh the potential positives. Given that, the 120+ counts just seem foolish.

by siddfynch on Sep 14, 2008 6:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You all are speculating...

about Timmy with the assumption that he is mortal.

"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile

by Boxkutter on Sep 14, 2008 8:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe he is and maybe he isnt

But I sure as hell dont need to find out like this if he is. At least make it in a competitive game in a playoff race.

by alskor on Sep 14, 2008 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously. until it’s proven that he’s Bionic Man, why not at least make the pretense of protecting your asset. I mean, the Giants minor league system is stacked, they have a nice top three starters. They will be competitive sometime in the next five years when the 10 win presence Lincecum delivers will be critical to whether they make the playoffs or not. Possibly fritering away innings now that could be literally 100x more important in four years is the definition of stupidity.

by 17843 on Sep 14, 2008 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lincecum vs Avery

I remember watching Baseball Tonight back in, what, 91? 92? The story was Steve Avery and how his wonderful mechanics would keep him healthy and strong for his entire career. We all know how that ended.

The reason I mention this is looking at the comments by the Lincecum fanatics posting in this thread. Look, Lincecum is a great talent, deserves the Cy Young this year, and probably will win many more in the future. But there’s a huge difference between being extremely talented and being invicible. He’s young and young pitchers get hurt if they get used to much. It’s that simple.

by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 14, 2008 9:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

My 2/100 of a dollar

I think people hyperventilate over pitch counts way too much. The manager, who should be consulting with both the pitcher and the pitching coach, has a much better idea than any of us do when it comes to whether he needs to pull his pitcher or not.

That being said, no matter what you believe, you have to admit there is at least a chance that a pitcher can harm himself by pitching too much – there are mountains of evidence to support this thought.

Now, in this instance, you have
1. A young pitcher
2. Who already is one of the elites in the league
3. In a completely meaningless game
4. With a huge lead

Why take any chance, no matter how small? Is that one shutout really going to change anything for Lincecum? It certainly doesn’t matter to the Giants; they’re already out of it.

*

I hate this type of statement:

Smoltz has missed 2.5 seasons due to arm injury and pitched another 3.5 out of the bullpen to save his arm. He lost something like 700 innings pitched because of those six years.

If you add 700 IP to Smoltz’ career, that would give him almost 4100 IP, more than Randy Johnson, within spitting distance of Avery. He’s already #81 on the all-time list, and those IP would vault him to #38 (and to #3 active, behind only Maddux and Avery)

In other words, he’s already had a much longer career than the vast majority of pitchers, yet you seem certain that he could have been more “superhuman” than he already is? I think it’s just as likely that he probably had about 3400 IP in his arm (which, again, is a huge total), and his injuries spread them out over more years than otherwise.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Sep 15, 2008 10:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Interesting point

Looking at the list you provided, I can’t help but notice that for all the talk about how much more pitchers used to pitch, there are a number of contemporary pitchers on the most innings lists (8 of the top 100, by my count, including Maddux at #13). Could it be that pitchers didn’t used to pitch more, but rather more in single years, while modern pitchers keep on pitching until they’re 40 or more?

www.loftylantern.com

by OldProspects on Sep 15, 2008 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It could be 1000 reasons

Better training. Better medical attention for an injury (it isn’t called Tommy John surgery for nothing). Better rehab.

And you have a pretty narrow definition of “contemporary”. Eight of the top 95 are still “active” (though Shilling is probably done); however, Clemens, Brown, and Wells are also in the top 100, and a number of guys (Tanana, Morris, Blyleven, and Eckersley to name a few) pitched into the ’90s.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Sep 15, 2008 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Less narrow than lazy

I just looked for people listed as active. You are, of course, right. As for your reasons, I agree as well – I was less interested in why it was true, than that it was true.

www.loftylantern.com

by OldProspects on Sep 15, 2008 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even if he only had 3400 IP on his arm those innings could’ve been thrown when he was in his mid-thirties rather than his early fourties if he hadn’t gotten hurt.

And I dispute that there’s a mileage to an arm. If you throw a 22 year old 400 innings one year, 400 the next, and 400 the next, I strongly doubt he’ll last to pitch the next season even if he has more than 1200 innings on his arm. Usage patterns certainly matter.

I will agree that actual pitch counts are less important than we make them out to be. Many posters have said absolutely correctly that it’s high effort pitches that wear down a pitcher’s arm. There is a point where even 140 low to medium effort pitches start to build up some damage when they come at the end of a long season. Even if there was a 1% risk that pitches 120-140 could’ve damaged Lincecum’s arm, the risk was unwarranted. I’m not convinced the Giants derived any gain whatsoever from keeping Lincecum in the game at all.

by 17843 on Sep 15, 2008 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok.
Even if he only had 3400 IP on his arm those innings could’ve been thrown when he was in his mid-thirties rather than his early fourties if he hadn’t gotten hurt.

Over his last 4 seasons, Smoltz pitched 695 innings (awfully close to the 700 you claim he "lost"), with an ERA+ of about 135. The rest of his career, his ERA+ was 124. In other words, those IP at the end of his career were more, not less, valuable than if they’d been thrown during the seasons he was hurt.

And I dispute that there’s a mileage to an arm. If you throw a 22 year old 400 innings one year, 400 the next, and 400 the next, I strongly doubt he’ll last to pitch the next season even if he has more than 1200 innings on his arm. Usage patterns certainly matter.

First, that’s a ridiculous situation. It’s been 100 years since anyone has pitched 400 innings in even a single season the majors, let alone in consecutive years. Second, those two statements seem contradictory – if an arm doesn’t have a “mileage” limit, how can use at a young age (when it should be stronger and more limber) be bad?

Even if there was a 1% risk that pitches 120-140 could’ve damaged Lincecum’s arm, the risk was unwarranted. I’m not convinced the Giants derived any gain whatsoever from keeping Lincecum in the game at all.

I think this is exactly what I said in my original post.

Often wrong, never uncertain.

by sidnancy on Sep 15, 2008 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Consult numerous studies on the ’injury nexus". Young pitchers have to develop themselves up to handling large pitch/inning, pitch/game, and inning/season counts. Consider it like as an average person who starts weightlifting by attempting to bench 250; probably not going to make and probably would stand a good chance of hurting themself. Build up to that over months, years, then they can lift it.

by 17843 on Sep 18, 2008 1:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

bottom line

nobody knows for sure whether or not these high pitch counts will hurt him or not but why take that chance? it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

furthermore, if i were in charge of that team i’d definitely have a set of guidelines in place for him. after all, the yanks don’t want to sign him in 6 yrs only to have his arm land in row 2.

I heard Tim Lincecum will win 1 Cy Young & 11 Tim Lincecums. Question is, how many Cole Hamels will he win?

by the pinstripes on Sep 15, 2008 1:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

Except for the Yankees part, which made me smile.

by demondeaconsbaseball on Sep 15, 2008 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We don't know

I happen to think that Tim Lincecum can handle high pitch counts and even throw a little relief on the days he normally throws between starts — but what if I am wrong? There is really no reason to risk slaying the goose that lays the golden eggs IMO.

I do think that now that Tim has pitched his first complete game and shutout, the Giants will be rather prudent regarding his pitch count. In his first start after reaching a career high 132 pitches, I believe Tim threw only 92 pitches. That said, in the other three of his last four starts, he has AVERAGED 132 pitches.

If Tim wins his next start, he likely won’t be given an extra day’s rest as the regular rotation would dictate. Instead, he would likely start a week from tomorrow (Tuesday), putting him in position to pitch against the Dodgers in the final game of the season should he also win on Tuesday and amazingly actually have a shot at 20 wins with a team that is below .400 in games in which he hasn’t pitched or hasn’t had a decision this year.

Steve Carlton in 1972 is considered with his 27-10 record for a Phillies team that won only 59 games over the season to be the best pitcher compared to his team’s record. Steve’s .730 winning percentage that season was .461 higher than the Phillies’ winning percentage when he didn’t pitch or didn’t receive the decision. After his shutout win Saturday night, Tim’s winning percentage was .459 higher than the Giants’ winning percentage without him involved in the decision.

Steve won the Cy Young Award, of course, and Tim should now do so as well.

by sharksrog on Sep 15, 2008 2:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

found the link

a SI article of all things. Here it is : http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/tom_verducci/07/01/lincecum0707/1.html

After re-reading this I obviously did a piss poor job above of trying to explain what he does. It seems weird being called “old school” but I guess in some ways I am. Pushing 50 now, been coaching HS kids for last decade of it (got my 1st pro this past draft), played for less than that but I never was a pitcher. That might explain some things. I don’t tell my kids to push off they just do, but not always correctly (is what I should have said). Anyway Bob I have always enjoyed and learned some things from your posts, was hoping you would stop by on this and comment more if you like.

The link goes into detail on his extreme athleticism, longer than “normal” stride, but he does a few things differently than most or at least any that I have watched; one being his “ankle kick”, this is what I meant by saying he propels himself fwd. At the time of ball release his right foot is more than a ft in front of the rubber – who else does that? Just a bad description by me. I’ve watched Zach Greinke (among others) drag his back foot before release to change speed w/ their FBs but never seen anyone launch themselves off the rubber like that. I’ve always been a slow & deliberate guy on this stuff, I know plenty who advise “hurry up” but the younger players I work with have enough trouble without me rushing them. Older or bigger kids can speed up. Again perhaps I am missing something here but I have to slow’em down (and use video) to isolate certain problems.

Something else: As for the “step-over” move near the end of his stride, Lincecum explains, “That’s from my hips. I’m getting everything toward the target, and my hips want to go. My hips can’t just go and open up. I’m trying to create torque. That’s when everything kind of explodes. My body comes, and [my arm] is just kind of along for the ride.” What does he mean by step-over?

Regarding his long stride: “That just came naturally,” Tim says. “My dad always told me to sit down on my back leg as long as I could and push off as much as I could. I’m trying to get as much out of my body as possible. I’ve got to use my ankles, my legs, my hips, my back. . . . That’s why I’m so contorted and it looks like I’m giving it full effort when it’s not exactly full effort.”

I would worry that once he is older and less athletic just a slight change in his movements could spell big trouble. Also included in this article is a fascinating sidebar on Prior & his poor mechanics. Geez, I’ve been using that towel drill forever when i should have been putting a dollar on the ground …

Mulder: Babe Ruth was an alien? Arthur Dales: sure; all the great ones were aliens.

by dew on Sep 15, 2008 10:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Tomorrow

I’ll post a supplement I wrote to that SI article for my students. I don’t have it here at home. So much good stuff in there its amazing its in SI and 90% of baseball fans miss how much they were given.

“Something else: As for the "step-over" move near the end of his stride, Lincecum explains, "That’s from my hips. I’m getting everything toward the target, and my hips want to go. My hips can’t just go and open up. I’m trying to create torque. That’s when everything kind of explodes. My body comes, and [my arm] is just kind of along for the ride." What does he mean by step-over?”

This is an awesome paragraph and the point I was sold on him.. I posted it in my office. The “step over” is Lincecum’s way of being extremely aggressive with his hip rotation. VERY MUCH like Maddux, Lincecum carries hips closed until the last possible moment (Maddux is literally 2-3 inches off the ground before he starts to rotate), just before front foot strike and then absolutely explodes into that rotation with what he calls a “step over”. I think he uses this terminology because at some point in his development he didn’t get his hips maxed. This “step over” was his way of understanding what he needed to do. This is one of the most frustrating teaches for young athletes, the explosion of the hips into front foot strike. Most open too early, some never open.

“sit down on my back leg as long as I could and push off as much as I could”

I know that’s what Lincecum says, but that’s not what he does. Here’s a couple pics of Lincecum as he is just about to come off the rubber. Notice the bent back leg, not extending in a pushing off motion:

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1108/1267512223_ae82647cb3_m.jpg
http://www.sny.tv/images/2008/06/02/NcqKG3lt.jpg

Here’s a great video of Lincecum’s mechanics. Watch his back leg closely and also notice the dragline he gets off the rubber from his foot rotating off with his hips. (gotta dig the music too)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWPtIVEoomU&feature=related

“Geez, I’ve been using that towel drill forever when i should have been putting a dollar on the ground …”

The towel drill done correctly is a powerful teaching tool but not in the way most people use. The follow through is a non-teach, if everything is done correctly before, the follow through takes care of itself.

“but never seen anyone launch themselves off the rubber like that.”

Actually most do, Lincecum is of course at the extreme, which if he listened to me (haha) I would tell him his linear energy is not enough (percentage wise) of his velocity to risk the loss of dynamic balance (poor head tilt at release) he has. Here are a few pics of guys well off the rubber at release:

Jason Schmidt:
http://thediamondangle.com/archive/sep03/giants/schmidt3_big.jpg

Baseball Instructor - www.frozenropes.com

by HuskerBob on Sep 16, 2008 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Husker Bob!

Hey, Husker Bob. It’s great to see you here again.

As you know, I have wanted to go over some mechanics things with you and possibly get a dialog going with Chris Lincecum. Chris just sent me something on the subject of Tim’s pitching off a stiff front leg, so I’ll see if I can pass it on to you tomorrow.

I did want to go back to our discussion this past spring of whether Tim or Matt Cain would give up more home runs. You chose Matt; I chose Tim. Both have done pretty well in eliminating home runs this season, but IIRC Tim has yielded only 10 to Matt’s 16.

That doesn’t mean things won’t change down the line, but two of the reasons I chose Tim is that he’s a better pitcher and he’s more of a ground ball pitcher than Matt. Those things may not change.

Matt pitched very nice ball from late April through late August, but he has hit a snag recently. Maybe you could give us your take on Matt and whether he will ever become a true #1 starter.

As for Tim, are you among those who think he deserves the Cy Young Award? If not, I’ve got at least ten reasons I’d like to run by you! :)

by sharksrog on Sep 16, 2008 2:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe more amazing

I was wrong, flat out on Cain/Lincecum. I’ve come around. :) Lincecum has controlled his ratios much better this year (flipped only 7 times in 31 starts as opposed to 9 times last year in just 24 starts).

“Chris just sent me something on the subject of Tim’s pitching off a stiff front leg, so I’ll see if I can pass it on to you tomorrow.”

Would love to read it, thanks. A majority of power pitchers straighten that front leg as the lower back unloads into release. There are some who suggest this creates a “sudden stop” that can cause injury over time but I don’t have an opinion either way on that.

Baseball Instructor - www.frozenropes.com

by HuskerBob on Sep 16, 2008 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha

The “Maybe more amazing” headline wasn’t meant for that post. Didn’t mean to suggest me being wrong was amazing. LOL

Baseball Instructor - www.frozenropes.com

by HuskerBob on Sep 16, 2008 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I kind of liked it

I kind of liked the headline, Bob. I laughed a little. I was pleased to see you admit you were wrong. Few seem willing to do so.

I myself figure why be only a little wrong, when without any more effort at all I can be dead wrong? :)

I’m going to send an e-mail to huskerbob@frozenropes.com to see if you get it. If not, let me know where I should REALLY be sending it. You were nice enough to give me your e-mail back when the seasons started, but I was nice enough to lose track of it.

Why should I mess up only a LITTLE when with hardly any effort at all I can make a REALLY mess of things?

by sharksrog on Sep 16, 2008 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Better yet

rich.bishop@frozenropesnebraska.com

(I’m thinking they wouldn’t know who to direct an email to Huskerbob to)

Baseball Instructor - www.frozenropes.com

by HuskerBob on Sep 16, 2008 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Husker Bob Da Man

Husker Bob, some of you may recall, was the guy who early this season posted saying Hughes’ mechanics were off, and he was likely pitching with an unknown injury or would come down with one. Voila, cracked rib revealed a few days later. Pay attention to him re: mechanics.

by wobatus on Sep 17, 2008 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks Bob

I did notice the back foot dragging, most I’ve seen will do that to slow down their FB a bit. At least thats what I use it for. But not sure thats what he is doing. It looks like he kicks his back (right) ankle up after release, is that to slow down his follow through? The pic of his belt buckle facing the plate while his front shoulder remains closed is terrific, I’ve got a new teaching tool now… You’re right it doesn’t appear he pushes off very hard at all. Its hard to see him sitting on his back leg. See that is something I never mention to my guys. Again what I work with are mainly 14 to 16 y/o’s so I am trying to get them to stride more than the 2 ft they’ve been doing, and stay closed while doing so. Many coaches I have talked to tell me that once a kid does something for 10 yrs you can almost forget trying to make any major changes. All you can do is tweak, teach them some new grips/pitches. All of my guys are FB/CU and nothing else, maybe a few curves now & then. We just work on changing speeds w/ FBs and throwing CUs when behind in count.

Mulder: Babe Ruth was an alien? Arthur Dales: sure; all the great ones were aliens.

by dew on Sep 17, 2008 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very observant

Not sure how technical you are looking to get but…..

The back foot drag, or dragline, is an indication of late hip rotation and is a good thing (Lincecum is excellent). The longer and straighter it is the better. The key as an instructor is the end of that dragline tells you where the players is at release. After release, the foot comes off the ground (as you noted) If the end of the dragline is in line with the plate the pitcher is being as efficient as possible, energy directed towards the target.. Adjustments about placement on the rubber are made based on the end of the dragline. If you look closely on that Lincecum video you’ll see the end of his dragline is right at the middle of the rubber, in line with the plate. He accomplishes this efficiency by starting on the 1B side of the rubber. Placement on the rubber is different for every pitcher, based on their unique dragline.

Conversely, a pitcher whose foot pops off the rubber before release or has a very short dragline does not open his hips late enough or maybe hardly at all.

The dragline CAN be used to limit some linear energy on a pitch with a more forceful drag, although I’ve only seen it used on a changeup. The timing of the pitching sequence is such that after the hips rotate, after the shoulders rotate and the arm is layed back in external rotation, the lower back unloads from a flexed position into ball launch. Right as the lower back is unloading, a foot drag and limit some of this energy transfer. It takes excellent timing and coordination to do this without tipping pitches.

TOTALLY agree with how difficult it is to change bad habits. IMO, the worst part of kids pitching too soon is they spend all that early time developing bad habits because they lack the functional strength and coordination to complete the complex actions we are asking of them. Once they get to high school it is very difficult to break them.

IMO, there is no reason, if you are working with 14 to 16 yr olds that they can’t be learning the curveball. At that age should be able to reasonable repeat their delivery and pronate after release. I introduce at 13, make them work on it in practice that entire year to demonstrate to me they can repeat their mechanics and then let them use it in games at 14.

A little chest pounding for me, but one of my students was the State Championship game winning pitcher as a junior and led his team to the Legion World Series this summer. Like I said with your draftee, I’m as proud of them as I would be my own kids. A great feeling to see them accomplish their goals.

Baseball Instructor - www.frozenropes.com

by HuskerBob on Sep 18, 2008 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well...

who was your first pro?
Eager to hear about it.
Congrats.

Even getting the last pick of the last round is a hell of an accomplishment.

by nms on Sep 16, 2008 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Definitely!

Sorry I missed that in your post, dew. Something to be very proud of. I tell my wife I feel like the kids I work with are my own when they are playing.

Baseball Instructor - www.frozenropes.com

by HuskerBob on Sep 16, 2008 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chris Wilkes, taken in 22nd rd. by Padres, I can’t remember overall number, 675 I think or thereabouts. He has a scholarship to play QB at Ole Miss or most likely would have went much earlier. We all thought thats where he would go but as time went on I guess he wasn’t ready to leave baseball. His a perfect case of a wild kid settling down, working his ass off and taking advantage of the opportunity given to him. We’re all very proud of him in the DP baseball community. He got smacked around some his last start but other than that he’s put in a very solid season in rookie ball. They must have saw something they liked because I heard he is invited back for Instructs. I have a few position players in college, mostly Juco, one D1 at FSU. But this my 1st pitcher.

Splitting off a bit I have another pitcher who will definitely get picked next yr I believe, he too has a football scholarship (to a top 10 scholastic D1 Univ.). Which I personally think he would be crazy to pass on (nothing against Ole Miss). But heres the thing – he throws like a catcher, I’m sure you guys know what I mean. When he reaches back the ball barely gets past his head. He has done this since I have known him, around age 10. Never ever has a sore arm issue, not once, not even a “tired” arm. Throws hard, high 80s, can hit 90 on a good day. The 2 or 3 best hitters on an elite team can hit him but thats it. The rest of the lineup he just smokes. Big kid 6’5, maybe 220 lbs. Still filling in. Anytime we try to mess with him we lose the control. I leave him be he can paint the black on both sides. So naturally I’m hesitant to make any changes there. Any of your opinions or personal experiences welcome.

Mulder: Babe Ruth was an alien? Arthur Dales: sure; all the great ones were aliens.

by dew on Sep 17, 2008 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Arm Arc

No velocity is created in the arm arc. Personally I think arm arc is a non-teach. If that’s what he does I say leave it alone. Especially if he’s so efficient with it he doesn’t get much soreness. Its tough as a coach/teacher sometimes because we are trained to look for things that are wrong and fix it, but sometimes its best to leave a kid alone. I have to fight this urge all the time (see Lincecum). You’ve got Josh Beckett with a long arm arc and Keith Foulke with a “catcher’s arm arc”, both were very successful big leaguers who threw 90+.

Baseball Instructor - www.frozenropes.com

by HuskerBob on Sep 18, 2008 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leadoff hitters

Tim has pitched phenomenally against virtually all hitters this season except — hitters leading off innings. I wonder if he SHOULD throw more warm up pitches?

by sharksrog on Sep 21, 2008 2:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of Lincecum

Anyone catch that 2 rbi single by Tulo they ruled an error on Aurilla tonight? Such garbage. Lincecum ended up getting smacked around some more but still. Talk about your hometown ruling for the Cy Young award. All 6 should be earned. Assuming this runner he left on is stranded.

by Con on Sep 23, 2008 11:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ha

I do this for my video game players all the time.
I want them to win an away so I try to do a little too much with em and it backfires

by nms on Sep 24, 2008 1:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.....

Should have been 6 ER, oh well. If Webb wins his next start, and Lincecum loses his last one, I think Webb wins it.

by soccerman0 on Sep 24, 2008 3:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

6 ER

Looks like they did overturn the ‘error’ on Aurilla.

by Con on Sep 24, 2008 2:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

they did

6 er, and now Johan leads the NL in era.

Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics

by jbluestone on Sep 24, 2008 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Top-10 Prospects of the Last 20 years: Hitters
Pose_small
SHS 'spect list continued....101-201
Hu_080227mag_uptonscover_small
daveh's top 111 prospects for 2010

Recent FanPosts

Small
last year's rookies, kickoff
Small
How about a package of Maine and Castillo for Zambrano?
Small
BA PHI TOP 10
Img587561916661595
Top 15 high school MLB draft prospects
Small
BP BAL Top 15
N16115505_31581383_8646_small
Rising Stars Chat
Small
Dexter Fowler and UZR
Small
Teahen to the White Sox....
Planetterror_small
Stephen Strasburg is out of the AFL Rising Stars Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Carew_small John Sickels


Site Meter