Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

MLB Expansion Locations

Purely hypothetically speaking.. say baseball within the next 3 years decides to expand to have 2 more teams join MLB (to balance out the amount of teams in the AL and NL...  What two locations would you put the two new franchises?

My choices:

1) Montreal -- If they built a new stadium in Montreal, it would be the best place ever to see a ball game.. totally different vibe than any other city... it would be like baseball in Europe.  Even though EuroDisney wasn\t a success, baseball returning to Quebec would be phenomenal.

2)  Brooklyn -- There really needs to be a third team from New York to appease the masses, and really spread the wealth of the marketplace.  A team in Brooklyn would make everyone giddy with excitement.

Montreal_cityhall_place_jacquescartier_medium

Montreal -- Vive la baseball!!!   (via z.about.com) Brooklyn-bridge_medium

Brooklyn, NY -- It's just logical!  (via www.destination360.com)

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Northern New Jersey and Portland

But I don’t think MLB should expand for quite awhile.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Aug 30, 2008 3:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Please

no more expansion.

O Freunde, nicht diese Töne!
Sondern laßt uns angenehmere anstimmen,
und freudenvollere.

by t ball on Aug 30, 2008 3:32 PM EDT reply actions  

i think you missed the point

of the purely hypothetically, IF THEY DID… where would you want it to be?

by son.of.sourman on Aug 30, 2008 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again I say

no more. Poop on your hypothetical.

O Freunde, nicht diese Töne!
Sondern laßt uns angenehmere anstimmen,
und freudenvollere.

by t ball on Sep 2, 2008 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

One clearly should be in New York

Brooklyn has the history, so that seems logical…

After that, I’d say Portland is likely your best bet, but you could make a case for team #3 in Los Angeles too.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Aug 30, 2008 5:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Vegas & NJ

(Las) Vegas Aces or (Las) Vegas Kings

(New) Jersey Grays

http://yankeesmtom.blogspot.com/

by hallofamer2000 on Aug 30, 2008 5:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Charlotte

It’s in the middle of a bunch of smaller markets and it’s a popular place to expand to for other sports teams.

Plus, the South really only has the Braves and the Cardinals.

by David Tokarz on Aug 30, 2008 6:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Another team in the south makes sense

after all, it’s a baseball hotbed and the SEC teams get huge crowds at their games.

Nashville and Charlotte would be good options.

by deezle on Aug 30, 2008 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Louisville would be great

but it’s probably too close to Cinci.

Bonds stands alone.

Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal

by nostocksjustbonds on Aug 31, 2008 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hate San Antonio

but do you guys realize how many people live there?

by TexasHeat on Aug 30, 2008 6:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah ... not that many ...

ignore city population … look at metro population — 1.9 million, bigger only than KC and Milwaukee …

"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by devo on Aug 30, 2008 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love San Antonio

But I think they’re okay with the Missions for now. All they care about is the Spurs, anyway, or at least until they start a run of losing seasons.

by naropean on Aug 31, 2008 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

And you'd be competing with the Rangers and Astros

MLB does not like to cannibalize its markets

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Sep 1, 2008 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Montreal

Give this city a decent stadium and the team would thrive. Everyone badmouthed their attendance but at least when they won they drew fans. Whats the deal with the lousy Tampa fans?

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Aug 31, 2008 12:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Tampa fans

See- Tropicana Field.

(not sure if you were being sarcastic or no…)

by David Tokarz on Aug 31, 2008 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ummm..

The big Oh was a big piece of crap but when the Expos won, at least the fans showed up. 14,000 showing up to see a team this good in August is just embarassing.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Aug 31, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tampa's attendance is averaging over 5,000 people more per game than last season

and that’s going up. They’ve had over 30,000 the last 2 games and that number is likely to continue into next week with the Yankee’s coming to town they’ll likely have 5 straight games over 30,000. That’s not terrible. And typically, you don’t see a big spike in attendance until the year after a break-out season.

Tools Whore

Sign Bonds!

by Tyler on Aug 31, 2008 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bad idea

Having recently moved from Montreal after living there for four years, I can tell you there is pretty much zero chance of baseball ever returning to the city. There’s a lot of bitterness towards the sport in general, since the Expos were destroyed by Loria. In addition to that, the French really don’t like baseball, ultimately, and view it as a sport for the Anglophones. This wasn’t so much a problem when the Expos first came to Montreal, as Quebec’s draconian language laws weren’t yet in existence and Montreal’s English speaking population was much larger than it is today. After the imposition of the language laws in the ‘70s, however, there was a steady flow of Anglo migrants out of Quebec and into Toronto and southern Ontario. At this point, there’s pretty much zero support for a major league team.

Further compounding the problem is the fact that there’s always snow on the ground there until at least mid-April, and early October snow storms aren’t abnormal; any team going to Montreal would really need a dome. Moreover, it wasn’t just that Olympic Stadium was a piece of crap that kept people from going there – it is – but it’s also in a really inconvenient area, being in a fairly poor part of the city and close to an hour on the metro from downtown. Any new stadium would suffer from the same problems, as there isn’t a chance in hell that impoverished Montreal is going to be giving away any land to a baseball franchise.

To top it all off, it’s just a bad idea to have baseball teams in Canada, especially for a small market team. It’s really, really difficult to plan a payroll years in advance when your revenue stream could drop significantly just because Canadian currency is devalued.

by Fanon on Aug 31, 2008 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

That was an excellent response!

And thank you for the insight most of us would never have. Merci.

I've come to the conclusion that the two most important things in life are good friends and a good bullpen. - Bob Lemon, 1981

by Lyle on Sep 4, 2008 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

expansion question adds tension

….because it’s ruined the game, and because no one wants to see the game further weeded so the “okay” college player can make a 10 year living on the bench in the majors….

however, because of the damnations of economics, teams shuffling locations is likely to continue….one of the florida teams will likely be next….and if there weren’t plans for a new stadium in minnesota and a recently built one in milwaukee, those cities would be likely next on the axe list….

that said, i’d say the next relocation sites will likely be vegas and san jose….san jose has made a strong play for a team many times recently, but have not been able to close the deal….

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

by biggentleben on Aug 31, 2008 4:48 PM EDT reply actions  

There is zero chance of a third team being put in the Bay Area over LA, Chicago or New York

It would be patent idiocy to further subdivide the SMALLEST of the 2-team markets, particularly when one of those teams already doesn’t draw fans.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Aug 31, 2008 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to mention

There is a zero percent chance the Giants would agree to put a team right in their backyard, especially with the A’s supposedly moving right to their alloted border in Fremont, trying to steal fans from San Jose in their own right. Not going to happen.

Plus like you said, the Bay is just not big enough for three teams. I say, move the A’s to Sacramento. They would actually draw fans, and you already have a stadium you can add a second deck to that makes it perfect for the A’s right on the river. Just a short haul up the Amtrak, and Bay Area fans could get there…although I couldn’t imagine why they would do that since they don’t go the Coliseum, but still.

by thethrill22 on Aug 31, 2008 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

If I had to say

I guess I should answer the first question though, probably Las Vegas and Portland. You could put them both in the AL West and move the Rangers to the Central where they belong. You would have 16 in both leagues, perfect balance.

by thethrill22 on Aug 31, 2008 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

People said the same thing about the Giants back when they weren't drawing fans...

…but then, a new ballpark and they have an average attendance that ranks 11th in the majors despite arguably having one of the five worst teams in baseball.

I don’t doubt the Athletics would do more with a good stadium.

That said, I agree that San Jose is a pipe dream. Especially with the A’s moving to Fremont, there won’t be enough distance between them and San Jose by major league rules (only New York has been grandfathered into that rule). But then, one could argue a similar thing about an attempt at a Brooklyn team, and probably a Northern New Jersey team as well.

Put the new teams in new markets.

SFDugout.com is BACK! See the Top 50 Giants Prospects!

by BruteSentiment on Sep 1, 2008 7:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

If I had to suggest:

I’d say that Portland and Charlotte are the two most deserving cities of expansion. Charlotte for all the reasons listed above, and Portland is a growing area that has a lot of potential and a strong love for baseball since the days of the PCL.

Salt Lake is worth noting as well, partially as a growing metro area itself, and partially because the mountain states remain so underrepresented in baseball (and all sports). There’s a reason that some states, like Montana, don’t even sponsor baseball teams in their schools. For an entire fifth of the country, the chance of seeing major league baseball is not just a long drive, but at least a plane flight away.

SFDugout.com is BACK! See the Top 50 Giants Prospects!

by BruteSentiment on Sep 1, 2008 7:14 AM EDT reply actions  

However

Voting against publicly subsidizing a baseball stadium = FAIL

I know that minor league attendance probably shouldn’t matter much, but don’t Portland and Charlotte have pretty crappy attendance figures for their respective AAA teams?

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Sep 1, 2008 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Charlotte Knights

Stadium’s nice, but it’s located about 10 or 12 miles away from downtown, and about 25 or 30 miles away from where I live in the suburbs. Plus, they kinda suck… stupid White Sox and their crappy farm system…

by David Tokarz on Sep 1, 2008 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pittsburgh

Hey, Pittsburgh could use a team. They have a wonderful ballpark, but have not had a team since the early ’90’s.

by ByANose on Sep 1, 2008 8:10 AM EDT reply actions  

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/50814

SFDugout.com is BACK! See the Top 50 Giants Prospects!

by BruteSentiment on Sep 1, 2008 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Drat

I was going to make the same joke about KC.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Sep 1, 2008 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Moonachie and Rancho Cucamonga

Seriously.

Borowy . . .Sutcliffe . . .Harden?

by Josh Timmers on Sep 2, 2008 1:31 AM EDT reply actions  

The answer is

Anywhere that builds MLB a stadium for free.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Sep 2, 2008 11:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Catch-22: Is Travis D’Arnaud the ‘Next One?’
Bullpen_banter_logo_small
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects: 100-51
Hal2_small
AA and MLB hitting production by AA batters between 1995-2002

Recent FanPosts

Small
Community Pitching Prospect #62
Small
Community Positional Prospect #65
Small
Overall Community Prospect #93
Small
New Cubs Draft Strategy/Player Development
Small
Stride Length, release point, and Drag
Small
Community Pitching Prospect #61 RUNOFF
Small
Community Positional Prospect #64
Small
5 yrold Dynasty Fantasy League team openings
Ryan_pic_small
Super Sickels Keeper League has one more opening
Small
Overall Community Prospect #92

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter