Yankees/Pirates trade
Tabata, Ohlendorf, Phil Coke, and one other player to the Pirates for Nady and Marte.
Not very happy about this as a Yankee fan...
filler filler filler filler filler filler filler
filler filler filler filler filler filler filler
filler filler filler filler filler filler filler
filler filler filler filler filler filler filler
filler filler filler filler filler filler filler
filler filler filler filler filler filler filler
filler filler filler filler filler filler filler
filler filler filler filler filler filler filler
0 recs |
50 comments
Comments
are you kidding?
you just got a VERY underrated hitter and the lefty the yankees have been looking for since 2005 for absolutely nothing
unbelievable, the pirates got fleeced…just as bad as the phillies did for bobby abreu…
by robcast23 on Jul 25, 2008 8:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
absolutely nothing?!?!?!
Ohlendorf profiles as a top setup man, Tabata is a sell low candidate on someone who had been a top prospect before slumping this season. The Pirates completely robbed them blind.
by number_twentyone on Jul 25, 2008 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s buy low, not sell low.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Jul 25, 2008 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tabata
is borderline worthless. Be happy you got someone to give you two valuable MLB pieces for a guy whose only value to anyone is “he’s young”
by Galt on Jul 26, 2008 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he's worthless at all
we simply have no idea what kind of power he’ll show in the future. None. It’s 100% a crapshoot. I’d rather have that, than a Nady who will never be this good again.
by number_twentyone on Jul 26, 2008 5:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Come on
the guy’s 19 in AA ball—have you considered that maybe he is being a little rushed?
I give Tabata 3 years before he touches the majors, but I still believe in him—and he’ll still be 22 or 23 by then!
by METSMETSMETS on Jul 26, 2008 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yankees robbed them blind
Tabata is a FAT 19 year old with a slugging % below .300. Orendorf is worthless, coke is a relief pitcher and who knows who the other prospect is. If it’s McAllister then it’s an even trade.
by Bravesin07 on Jul 25, 2008 8:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Kontos
Is who i hear is the 4th player.
IMO its pretty even on both sides
by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 25, 2008 8:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not really,
The Yankees have been hurting in the bullpen and in the OF. It makes very good sense that they would do this…. Marte, Farnsworth, Ramirez, Rivera, among others makes for a solid bullpen with a bunch of power arms. Nady gives them a corner OF who could also play into the DH-1B rotation. With the injuries to Damon and Matsui and the need to keep Giambi fresh (he’s not young anymore) as well as adding a pinch hitter in the WS, it makes good sense.
"When Justin Upton faces Lincecum, I think Christ might appear in the heavens, and the world will end." -JakeFree
by JT12340 on Jul 25, 2008 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
really
it makes sense,
but i did not expect them to sell low on tabata, by any means.
by god allah star on Jul 25, 2008 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hurting in Bullpen?
I could actually argue that the Yankees have one of the best in baseball (even before the trade.)
Mariano Rivera: Possible MVP; perfect in saves
Jose Veras: 2.97 ERA in 32 games
Edwar Ramirez: 2.48 ERA in 32 games; hasn’t allowed a hit in over 9 innings; allowed only two runners in that span
David Robertson: dominated minors; 1.59 ERA in 10 games
Damaso Marte (now)
Kyle Farnsworth: 3.35 ERA; also hasn’t allowed a hit in over 9 innings
Dan Giese: laugh if you must, but their long reliever has only allowed one run in relief; 2.59 ERA for the 31 year old rookie
LaTroy Hawkins is likely gone (finally!)
Also…not to mention, the Yankees still have Chris Britton and a rehabbing Brian Bruney down in AAA.
http://yankeesmtom.blogspot.com/
by hallofamer2000 on Jul 25, 2008 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
re
You can never have too many quality arms in the pen though.
by SBcaptain2 on Jul 25, 2008 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree
But it’s the internet; hence I have to prove him wrong.
http://yankeesmtom.blogspot.com/
by hallofamer2000 on Jul 25, 2008 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yankees Bullpen
Britton and Bruney are there in AAA – but is everybody forgetting Melancon and Cox are almost ready?
Kontos/Coke or McCutchen/Karstens – the recent Yankees philosophy is bumping good arms into the system. They have guys in the lower level of the minors who profile as strong bullpen arms like Lance Pendleton and Jonathan Ortiz.
by gunkdog on Jul 26, 2008 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
41-1 when leading after 6...thats saying something about your bullpen
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 25, 2008 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
About equal.
I think Ohlendorf is a middle relief/long man type. I’m not all that impressed with Coke, who I think is a LOOGY at best. That said, I like Kontos as a late inning arm or a mid-end of the rotation type starter, and Tabata still holds enough interest. From a value perspective, I think it is about equal. I’m not sure Tabata was the right guy to build a trade around for the Bucs, though, but if he pans out, McCutchen/McLouth/Tabata in a couple years could be superb.
by toonsterwu on Jul 25, 2008 8:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My Thoughts on Trade:
I’m extremely happy as a Yankee fan:
Jose Tabata: even if he does turn out to be a good baseball player, he’s only 19, so it won’t happen in what? 3-4 years?
Phil Coke: 26 year old lefty in AA; back-of-the-rotation in NL starter at most likely; or a LOOGY
George Kontos: I do like this guy; he seems like he can be a solid starter
Ross Ohlendorf: Yankees are set with the pen, he got destroyed in the AL East; no problem with him gone
http://yankeesmtom.blogspot.com/
by hallofamer2000 on Jul 25, 2008 8:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Projectability
matters more than when a kid hits the majors.
Nady may well be on decline.
by METSMETSMETS on Jul 26, 2008 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nady
Is in the middle of a fluke year IMO.
by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 26, 2008 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Tabata
is highly over-rated and that if this deal was done with the 17 year old or 18 year old Tabata…I could understand the deal. But two years later Tabata has significant injury issues with his wrist and make-up issues to boot.
I think the Pirates really should have held out for Kennedy as well as Tabata. Making this trade makes no sense on the Pirates part, they could have waited another few days and this offer would still have been on the table.
Huntington has really disappointed me with this move.
"I got my pregnant wife (the Yankee fan) with me. Hoping my kid learns to kick her everytime the Mets score." -Schifftis-
by future on Jul 25, 2008 8:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As long as they sign Alvarez
Then at least they are on the right track.
It looks like they are committed to developing talent at least, and Pirates fans have McCuttchen and Alvarez + whatever Bay yields in a trade to look forward to at least. Which isn’t enough but its a good start.
by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 25, 2008 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As a Yankees fan, I like this deal
All of the Yankee prospects have question marks, although I do wonder when Nady will fall back to Earth.
by Scott Proctor Fan Club on Jul 25, 2008 9:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Are You Kidding?
The Pirates didn’t even get the extremely overrated Kennedy in return? I’ll tell you what, I don’t believe in “New York Hype” but these Yankee prospects are extremely overrated, and it worked here.
by Duece on Jul 25, 2008 9:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
They are?
Is Joba overrated?
What about Ellsbury, Brandon Wood, Adam Jones, they were certainly hyped to hell.
by number_twentyone on Jul 25, 2008 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Draft picks
How sure is it that Marte will be a type a or b free agent? And did Nady have any chance next year (assuming he returns to earth?)
by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 25, 2008 9:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
gone gone
good deal, sadly, for yanks
by gogotabata on Jul 25, 2008 9:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I really hate how
everyone, anytime any trade is made, has to find who “won” or “lost” a trade.. especially when phrased in a ridiculously hyperbolic manner.
That isn’t what MLB trades are about.
I think both teams got an even deal. The Pirates really weren’t giving up THAT much talent anyway, so to say they got “fleeced” is going really, really overboard. They gave up a solid OF and a good LOOGY who weren’t in their future plans anyway. The gave up no current superstars and no one who they needed down the road.
The value of .5 year of a solid LOOGY and 1.5 years of a solid OF are worth plenty more to the Yanks right now than the Pirates.
From the PIT perspective..
The Pirates got a talented but questionable 19 yo OF. That is a fine risk for them to take in a deal like this. If he works out, great, if not.. losing Nady/Marte isn’t anything the franchise is going to look back on and shed a tear about. They weren’t going to be pirates much longer anyway.
The Pirates got a 26 yo setup man with MLB stuff who isn’t currently getting the job done. Another risk they can easily take. They could get a very good pitcher out of Ohlendorf, worth a shot.
In Kontos they got a guy with some control issues but solid MLB stuff who could possibly be a solid starter.
I’ll admit I know nothing abot Coke other than his numbers. I would guess he is probably a fringe MLBer who could maybe pan out into a 5th starter or setup man.
From the Yanks perspective..
You got two guys who could definitely help you win right now.
The only one of the guys you gave up who is a potential star also has a world of problems right now. You can afford to part with that.
The other guys you gave up have potential but they aren’t guys who are irreplaceable.
by nms on Jul 25, 2008 11:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup
This whole winning and losing thing smacks of ESPN “analysts” who don’t have anything of value to say.
by RougeGorrila on Jul 26, 2008 2:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marte
according to the last Elias Rankings was very close to being an A type FA at the end of last season. Barring a really poor 50 games with the Yankees, he’s likely an A at the end of this season.
Nady might be an A also. When you calculate the fact that the Yankees might get more than one first round pick to add onto this trade…I think its lopsidedly in the Yankees favor.
"I got my pregnant wife (the Yankee fan) with me. Hoping my kid learns to kick her everytime the Mets score." -Schifftis-
by future on Jul 25, 2008 11:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
if they are both A's
then the yank’s will recover the prospects they lost. But the pirates got guys who are going to be able to help them sooner than draft picks.
On a side note…I really hate how a type A FA reliever is worth the same as a type a FA position player or starting pitcher. Marte won’t have a type A impact on any team, so why should a pretty good left handed reliever merit the same as Torii Hunter or a player of that caliber. It just seems so wrong.
by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 25, 2008 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
I think that’s just another sign of the system being broken. But it’s difficult to quantify what an irreplaceable part is. The Oakland A’s replaced a lot of their stars in the Moneyball era, and the Twins have done a pretty good job at replacing players out of their farm club.
You could argue, however, that while the current Elias type system hurts the teams that spend the money on these free agents, that’s a fair trade for equity in the system.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 26, 2008 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it was Billy Beane making the trade instead of Huntington
Everyone would say what a good trade it was for Beane. The Pirates are not going to be playoff contenders overnite.
by weasel1360 on Jul 26, 2008 10:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jesse James Cashman
Fantastic deal for the Yanks. They gave up nothing.
I heard Tim Lincecum will win 1 Cy Young & 11 Tim Lincecums. Question is, how many Cole Hamels will he win?
by the pinstripes on Jul 26, 2008 11:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
McCutchen and Karstens are sent to Pittsburgh
The NY Post is reporting that Daniel McCutchen and Jeff Karstens are being sent to Pittsburgh in this deal, not Coke and Kontos.
My opinion is that this makes the deal slightly better from Pittsburgh’s perspective, but doesn’t really change things much from the Yanks’ perspective (if that somehow makes sense).
by jibs on Jul 26, 2008 11:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
WFAN is reporting different prospects
Tabata and Ohlendorf are still in it, but rather than Kontos/Coke it is being reported that the Yankees are giving up Jeff Karstens and Daniel McCutchen (sp?). Makes the deal a little more even, but I would rather have Kontos than Karstens
by mtk52983 on Jul 26, 2008 11:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
not sure what to think if that's the case
McCutchen and Karstens are better as a tandem, but Kontos, IMO, has the best potential of the lot, and I think that makes the Kontos/Coke tandem more appealing, particularly if Coke can become a LOOGY.
by toonsterwu on Jul 26, 2008 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Organizational Change
Usually it takes a few more years to suggest it, but maybe part of getting Tabata is that by putting him in a more low-key environment where he doesn’t have to deal with NY Media wondering whats wrong with him, he may be able to become a better player.
Plus, I like Ohlendorf and think thats a good arm for Pirates that they can immediately plug into their bullpen.
McCutchen is having a solid season between AA/AAA and a switch to the NL may make him useful as a back of the end starter. Karstens is very similar.
I think the problem is that the Pirates were rumored to be looking for at least “one sure prospect” for each guy and got no sure big name prospect. But, if Karstens or McCutchen becomes a useable 4th/5th in the NL, if Ohlendorf can be the shut down reliever he’s capable of and Tabata becomes even close to fulfilling his potential, then the deal is dead even. You rarely can get the sure fire prospects anymore, they just aren’t traded (save a few exceptions)
by thudean on Jul 26, 2008 2:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Deal retooled
http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/07/26/breaking-news-trade-reconfigued/
LoHud Yankees blog reports it’s OF Jose Tabata, RHP Ross Ohlendorf, RHP Dan McCutchen and RHP Jeff Karstens.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 26, 2008 2:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Yankees ripped off the Pirates
IMHO, the Indians got more for Blake than the Pirates got for Nady (who is better than Blake) AND Marte. They really got rid of a lot of junk for a couple of players who fill big holes right now.
It’s incredible how much Yankees fans overvalue their own roster. They trade away Tabata, who has very little value right now (and as a fat, short corner outfielder with no pop, I doubt that’s going to change, even if he’s young relative to league), two marginal prospects who have struggled in the majors, and a guy who’s having his first good season this year with major baggage (i.e. has failed steroids tests in the past).
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Jul 26, 2008 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Blake vs. Nady
Career OPS:
Nady: .793
Blake .782
Nady isn’t very good defensively and in the past 3 years his OPS has dropped 100 points in the second half.
Also what if Marte accepts arbitration and you dont get any draft picks from him?
The Pirates got a guy with star potential (and some bullpen arms for the future) for a Journeyman outfielder having a career year and a LOOGY who could merit draft picks
by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 26, 2008 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
star potential?
there is nothing about tabata that hints at star potential. he’s a head case that can’t stay on the field along w/ the fact he has zero power. he should fit right in on pittsburgh.
I heard Tim Lincecum will win 1 Cy Young & 11 Tim Lincecums. Question is, how many Cole Hamels will he win?
by the pinstripes on Jul 26, 2008 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sickels #18 hitting prospect at the start of the year
He has definitely fallen a lot, but still, sickels said that he projected as a star at the beginning of the year and you dont just lose that potential. It is much less likely that he reaches that potential however.
by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 27, 2008 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marte
Why in the world would he accept arbitration? He would have to be the biggest idiot in the world.
http://yankeesmtom.blogspot.com/
by hallofamer2000 on Jul 26, 2008 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
teams value draft picks
He may like NY or if he doesn’t think that a team wants to give up a high draft pick and pay up (for a LOOGY), then arbitration might make sense.
Stranger things have happened.
by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 27, 2008 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In a straight trade for talent, I think it’s pretty close with the Yankees winning slightly only due to the low chance Tabata reaches his ceiling as a perenial all-star. When you factor in the value of Pittsburgh losing at least one draft pick this off-season and at least one next off season (and a pretty good chance at two each off season), the Yankees got a steal. Karstens, McCutchen, and Ohlendorf probably aren’t worth much over the next few years, besides being rotation fodder and bullpen arms. They’re better than what they’re replacing, but not collectively worth much more than 2-3 wins a year over what they’re replacing. And none of them will add much value to a future Pittsburgh contender. The guy who may is Tabata.
Gambling on him rather than four picks in the top 50 is rash, though I can understand Huntington’s interest in adding a high ceiling player to the organization. You won’t find a Tabata in the draft where they’d be picking, but I’d rather take my chances with 2-4 players than 1. Not that this was a bad trade. The Pirates save ~$7 million on Nady and Marte and gain some return for them. I’m just not so sure that they wouldn’t have been better off keeping Marte and getting the pick and dealing Nady alone. You have to imagine he could’ve pulled back Tabata at least.
The Yankees on the other hand made off like bandits. Nady replaces Matsui pretty well over the next 60 games and breaks up a righty heavy Yankees lineup. Controlling him for next season and his ability to play both corners and first base are bonuses. Marte gives the Yankees a legit lefty power arm to shut down Papi, Morneau, Thome, or Pena in a playoff battle. Add in the draft picks with the Yankees ability to spend well over slot and you have the best trade of the year.
by 17843 on Jul 27, 2008 1:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good analysis
However, a few quibbles:
First, not sure Nady would have pulled back Tabata on his own, especially if Pittsburgh wanted to get clear of his entire salary.
In addition, everyone has been talking about the draft pick(s) brought back by Marte at season’s end, however few note that this would “cost” Pitt approx. $5M…$1.5-$2.5MM to sign the high pick(s), $1.25M for Marte during the remainder of 08 plus 09 buyout, and bonuses (up to $750k) based on games finished in 08.
While I agree that IMO Pitt probably should have been able to get at least one other big talent player back from NYY, it’s hard to know exactly what was out there on the market, and failure to act would have cost them some money.
Formerly Uncle Charlie of Minor League Ball
by Yakker on Jul 28, 2008 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 









