where is moustakas
mike moustakas has not played since the 6th. is he hurt or what? i have looked all over internet and cannot find anything about him. thank you in advance for any information you can provide
on a side note, im a bit worried by his low avg. hes hitting for solid power, but i really would be disappointed if he turned out to be another adam dunn. id rather have a 30 hr hitter with a .280-.300 avg than a 40 hr hitter with a .240 avg
0 recs |
100 comments
Comments
oblique
Should be back any day now.
Without looking, I think his average has been pretty decent since his disastrous April.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Jul 11, 2008 10:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you'd be disappointed if he turned into adam dunn....400 obp and 40+ homers?
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 12:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
if it werent for walks
his OBP would be disastrous. that is all he does to get on base, walk and hit hr’s. i would be pissed if the rangers got him. thats for sure. but i guess home runs sell tickets and helps fantasy owners. never mind the fact that he strikes out more times than most other guys get hits, or the fact that he is a liability on the basepaths. nope, id rather have a guy that doesnt go up to the plate with an all or nothing attitude, because more times than not, that attitude costs teams games
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 12:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah...if it werent for singles....ichiros obp would be disastrous....
if it werent for homers, Mark McGwire wouldve been one of the worst players ever…you cant just discount important things…like, you know, getting on base. you’d be more comfortable if all those walks were bloop singles?
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: singles
You can drive a runner in from 2nd or 3rd with a single. You can also advance a runner from 1st to 3rd on a single. The old adage a walk is as good as a hit holds true when the bases are empty. A hit is still almost always better when runners are on. That said, your less likely to get a hit if the pitcher is just serving up junk outside the zone – so if he’s begging to give you the walk it’s good to take it.
by fourthandeye on Jul 12, 2008 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
But why exactly wouldnt you want a player that has a .260 average with a .400 OBP and 40 homers like the original poster described? And bloop singles (which I interpret to mean infield hits or junk that falls in) could be good luck or bad fielding at a low level. The walks show he’s got a good eye. Give the contact a while.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont have a problem with the walks
what i have a problem with is the home run or nothing mentaility that he has. as billybeingbilly stated, a single can drive in runs. a strikeout, however, cannot, and as i said before, dunn strikes out more than 90% of the league gets hits, and that is why dunn will fail more than he will succeed when the game is on the line
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
except when he puts one in the seats
They’re different skillsets that are equally valuable.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And doesn't everyone fail more than they succeed in baseball?
Aren’t you considered good if you have a BA of .300? By my calculations, that means you fail 70 percent of the time.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
Only fans and fantasy baseball players like home runs. Real baseball players prefer sacrifice flies
www.loftylantern.com
by OldProspects on Jul 12, 2008 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And because it's coming
Please put all your flaming over the Dunn issue under this argument.
Adam Dunn’s most valuable skill is not making outs. Not driving in runs, not hitting jacks, not doing anything else. Adam Dunn is a very good home run hitter and he drives in quite a few runs per season. The value of these things are arguable and slightly subjective. What is not subjective, however, is that Adam Dunn does not make an out roughly 40% of the time. Let’s take a look at players with a better ability to not make outs.
This page shows the best career OBP’s of active players:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/OBP_active.shtml
Adam Dunn is 20th.
This season, Adam Dunn is 28th in OBP (min 300 PA)
This makes Adam Dunn a valuable player. He is 28th this season at not making outs and he is 20th in active players in not making outs in his career. Factor in the 40 bombs and you have a very, very good player.
Furthermore, Adam Dunn’s BABIP is currently sitting at .240, versus his career BABIP of .288. That suggests he’s due to gain a few points in BA, meaning that he’s a player that puts up a line of roughly .260/.400/.550.
If you don’t want him, can I have him?
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 4:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ya you can have him
because in a game where your team is down by 1 run, in the bottom of the ninth, with runners on first and second with two outs, i want to have a guy come up to the plate that i have confidence will put the ball safely in play, not a guy who is either A. going to strike out or B. hit a hr(extremely low percentage play). yep give me ichiro and a solid crack at one of his perennial 200+ hits. a player such as ichiro will actually WIN a game for his team much more often than a player like adam dunn, and by winning a game, i mean doing it at a time when the game rides on that at bat, not a hr in the 3rd inning that turns out to be the winning hit, because that hit being the winning hit is subjective to the 6 innings and 36(sometimes 33) outs that take place after that. that being said, and i am sure i will start a whole new debate with this one, is that id rather have dunn on my team than arod. one thing i have learned from watching him over the years is guy truly does choke when handed a glorious opportunity to win games for his teams. he pads his stats in blow outs. he damn near got booed out of new york last year for this exact reason. it was the same when he was with the rangers. its extremeley ironic when the team loses a player like arod, the stat sheet actually gets worse, and yet the team actually wins more games. ya, you can have arod too. my whole point with dunn is that all or nothing players are fun to watch- when youre getting the all- and very painful to watch when you get the nothing, which happens a whole lot more often than the all. id rather have a player in between that gives you a better balance
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or
He reaches base (like he does 40% of the time, 20th best career active) and you have one of your more well rounded players behind him who swats him in. This helps when your team is behind by more than one run in the bottom of the 9th.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
like who?
encarnacion? cuz hes doing so much better. griffey? who. but, that is beside the point because i understand what you are saying. walks help too, and i have not argued against that. but as a fan, i want to be able to say “a hit right here could win it” as opposed to “i sure hope he walks or we’re screwed”. the only thing worse than adam dunn is a player with a pathetic average that strikes out just as much, but doesnt draw any walks. but then again, those players dont make it to the bigs, and if they do, they become journeymen. i still have yet to hear anybody explain his pathetic numbers with runners in scoring position. alfonso soriano got toasted for having better numbers
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um
You’re talking about a guy who will keep the game going or win the game in 40 percent of his plate appearances. There’s maybe 27 guys better than him at doing that.
And you clearly don’t have a friggin clue as to what I’m taking about. In a situation in which you have 2 outs and 2 men on, you want to keep the inning alive. Dunn does that 40% of the time. That’s the most important thing about Dunn.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and how can you so easily ignore
that dunn has one of the worst strike zone judgements in the league? and i dont mean in terms of swinging at bad pitches, i mean the fact that he is among the worst when it comes to watching called strikes. what does that tell you? hes waiting for the perfect pitch to drive out of the park. ya, theres a percentage play buddy
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude
If he walks 100 times a year, it means he’s got a great eye. I don’t want some idiot who swings at bad pitches just because he could. There’s a reason Dunn walks so much and grounds in to so few DP’s.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe if you have adam dunn instead of david eckstein or whoever the hell you want....
then you’re ahead by a run instead of down by 1
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why is that?
because ecstein doesnt hit hr? why does that mean the team has to be down by 1 run instead. at least eckstein being on base adds speed. if dunn gets on base, hes a liability. my grandmother could run the bases faster than dunn could
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
b/c david eckstein sucks and doesnt put up numbers at any time....
which means the team will score alot less runs
oh…and Adam Dunn’s 2 out RiSP OPS…868….RISP 880
Eckstein 707 and 747.
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
numbers bloated by home runs
dunn has a athetic average and strikes out an incredible 30+% of the time. whats even more hilarious is that we are even having this portion of the debate. ecstein is not known for his bat, at all. he has a job in the majors because hes a good fielder. ill tell you what, why dont we go ahead and start drawing up comparisons between dunn and poey reese
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok
In 2008, numbers with RISP
Dunn: .213 /.361/ .480 /.841 (clearly inflated by both SLG and OBP, and a small sample size b/c of how few men get on ahead of him)
Captain Spectacular: ..310 /.381 /.429 /.810
Or maybe you want a corner OF.
Here’s Abreu: .290 /.339 /.449 /.788
Carl Crawford: .284 /.301 /.446 /.747
Jason Bay: .209 /.349 /.343 /.692
Here’s the mighty Ichiro to finally shut you up
.219/ .402 /.250 /.652 (Ironically, its his walking that makes these stats any good)
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
USING 3 MONTHS WORTH OF STATS IS STUPID
that is in now way a true comparison. guys have slumps, it happens. how can anybody say one player is better than another based on 3 months worth of stats??
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok
So we’re supposed to compare a very good player in Adam Dunn to a Hall of Famer, generational talent like Ichiro? Fine, you win. Ichiro is better than Adam Dunn.
Now:
Dunn, Career with RISP: .222 /.411 /.469 /.880
He continues the game in over 40% of PA. Find me a player that’s better.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
dunn continues the game
by not failing. he does not continue the game by actually WINNING the game. anybody can take a walk. can you honextly say youd rather have guy come to the plate where your best hope is that he walks, over the guy you were discussing that actually comes in AFTER dunn and actually gets the hit that wins?
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anybody can take a walk?
Then how come only 19 active players can do it better than Adam Dunn?
I want the guy that will give me the best chance of preventing a loss, by either walking or getting a hit and winning the game. There are 19 guys I would prefer over Dunn as far as their career goes. This year, there are 26.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i see what you are talking about
but you wont even consider what I am taling about. ok , so only 19 guys that walk more. but at the same time, you are ignoring that only 5 guys strike out more than him. to be honest, im surprised that adam dunn sees enough at bats where does not strike out to lead the league in walks. truly an amazing feat in and of itself, but not one id be proud of
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strikeouts are irrelevent
They’re just another type of out. Adam Dunn avoids making outs 40% of the time, which is really good and really important. I dont give a flying expletive how he makes his outs as long as he has a high OBP.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we're not going to win this....
he’s one of ‘those guys’ who likes batting average, thinks K’s for hitters are important, probably hugely overvalues the RBI, etc
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
irrelevant
how high of a percentage is there that a run scores on a strikeout. or even for anothe rbaserunner to actually advance? do not write off strikeouts
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you mean like you write off walks?
oh wait…except theres a huge difference b/w walks and outs…which you’d make it seem like there isnt
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how many times
do i have to say that i think walks are good before you finally catch on? ill tell you what though, lets take a look balls put in play. ichiro puts the ball in play over 90% of the time. dunn-barely 70%, and that is after taking into account walks. it does not tae a genious to realize ichiro gives the team a better chance at the plate than dunn does
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what does putting the ball in play mean?
thats a completely useless stat
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One that results in not only errors but double plays
And Adam Dunn has the lowest amount of GIDP’s out of anyone in baseball (thank you Baseball Prospectus).
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
again, you ignore the importance of balls put in play
for your own convenience. a player striing out cannot score a runner, o reven advance one. even a ground out can at least advance a runner to mae it easier for the next guy to bring him in
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he also cannot be the cause of two outs at once...
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought there were 2 outs in your example
In which case, wouldn’t a ground out end the game? I’m so confused.
www.loftylantern.com
by OldProspects on Jul 12, 2008 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep
give me ichiro. that guy that hits singles, has a better OPS in all respects, and strikes a mere 10-15% of the time. not only does he put the bat on the ball, he can actually hit it safely…without hitting a HR. yup, gimme ichiro
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
a better OPS in all respects?
Find me ONE respect where ICHIRO has a better OPS than Dunn. He’s at a freaking 102 this year….barely above average. I hope the people actually running the rangers dont think the same way as you do, or it will be the longest rebuilding period ever
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what the hell are talking about? 102?
and come on man, time for you to make up your damn mind on the stats were going to use. are we using career stats, like you brought up with dunn’s numbers, or are we going to use 3 months worth of stats to argue the better player? seriously man, i cant keep with how you keep going back and forth. and is it even possible to have an OPS of 102? i mean maybe if they were batting with an average of about .150 with all singles, and drew no walks. i dunno
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's talking OPS+
I’m talking OPS
Either way:
Ichiro, 2008 OPS+: 102
Dimm, 2008 OPS+:133 (
Ichiro, 2008 slash stats with RISP: 219/ .402 /.250 /.652
Dunn, 2008 slash stats with RISP: 213 /.361/ .480 /.841
funny how you’re pointing how much Dunn sucks in his down year while complaining that we’re comparing him to another player in a down year)
As for Career, Ichiro wins. I concede that the HOF’er Ichiro is better than Adam Dunn. Big freakin deal.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
please see above post
i am not the one tryign to compare JUST 2008 stats. and please let him defend himself
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, billy and I agree
I’m going to defend our points. If you can’t take it, concede.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
were you talking about
his .402 OBP? im assuming that was a typo on your part. thing is, if you cant tell the difference between OBP and OPS, you need to stop taing place in this converstaion, like NOW
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was talking OPS+
And that .402 OBP only helps boost our points
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how does that .402 OBP boost your point??
?
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um, OBP = life
If you want Ichiro in that situation, he’s walking more than Adam Dunn and hitting less. So you acknowledge that continuing the game is the most important thing.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry got cut off
that .402 OBP we are talking about is ichiro’s OBP with RISP this year, which is higher than dunn’s. so no, that .40 does not boost your point, although i have already said i do not lie discuss 3 months worth of stats
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you agree OBP is life.
And you agree that the most important thing to do in that situation is to continue the game. And Adam Dunn does that at a career rate better than all but 19 active players and all but 26 players this season. Ergo, you concede that the better player is the one with the better OBP.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i would concede, if the difference is actually relevant
the difference between dunn and ichiro is .003. so ya, id take ichiro, who i can really on to get a hit to eep the game from ending, as opposed to dunn, where im praying for a walk in order to eep the game from ending
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
Ichiro was batting .204 in that limited sample, whereas Dunn was batting .213. You still lose.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what?1
those are career stats man. ichiro career OBP+ .378. dunn career OBP= .381
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What?
Now you’re not making sense. And again, I’d rather have the HOF Ichiro over the maybe HOF Dunn. Try again.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, there are two aspects to an offensive player's value
Getting on base and moving people over. As you note, in terms of getting on base, Dunn and Ichiro are roughly equal. In terms of moving people over, has significantly better power while Suzuki steals many more bases. If we’re dealing strictly with comparing them at the plate, there are virtually no situations where one would rather have Ichiro than Dunn – Ichiro is more likely to get a single, but Dunn is equally like to get on base, and significantly more likely to hit an extra base hit (an 87 point difference in slugging percentage)
The best stat I know of to compare steals with power is secondary average. Basically, it sums up everything a player does except for batting average. Considering a very small amount of Dunn’s value is summed up in batting average, he has a significant advantage in secondary average, but it might still be interesting. Over his career, Suzuki has a secondary average of .202 (with a batting average of .331). Dunn, on the other hand, has a ludicrously high secondary average of .488 (for context, Lou Gehrig’s career average of .493 and Mantle’s of .492 are 3rd and 4th respectively. They are, of course, much more valuable than Dunn because their batting averages of .340 and .298 respectively are so much higher than Dunn’s .247)
www.loftylantern.com
by OldProspects on Jul 12, 2008 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not a strong argument...
how many times a year does a player come up with runners on in the bottom of the ninth with runners on? Three times? In that limited situation, I think I would rather have Ichiro (who is a unique talent, anyway).
What about nobody on with two outs and the game tied or down one? What about a runner at first? Dunn is more likely to win or tie the game and has a very good chance of extending it to the next batter.
In any event, the point is moot—you don’t value players based on rare situations.
by DenverBears on Jul 13, 2008 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
With 2 outs maybe
but with one out your contact hitter is more likely to hit into a double play. Dunn is likely to continue the inning with a walk, hit a big home run or only cost 1 out with a K.
by brentash on Jul 14, 2008 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't this supposed to be about Mike Moustakas?
Funny how it turned into an Adam Dunn flamewar…
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
b/c someone...i believe the same guy....said he'd be disappointed if Moose turned into
Adam Dunn….950 OPS 40+ HR 3b….
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boy, I wish I had those concerns
I just want my favorite team’s best position prospect to turn into a regular… Go Jeff Larish?
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i actually said
id rather he have a few less hr’s and and higher AVG and NOT be flirting with the mendoza line at the same time
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
50 points above the mendoza is flirting now?
then hell, Pujols is flirting with 400 now….chipper with like 430…
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
dunn is hitting .213
which is why i said that, but he has had seasons before where he has actually flirted with it, which is the main reason i said that. dunn truly is the type of player that legitimately can flirt with the mendoza line over the course of an entire season
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you said you dont talk about 3 bad months...
so i throw you his 250ish career average….and thats not what you’re looking for either….you either want 3 months of stats or you want career stats…
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and that is why
i made the reference to other FULL SEASON stats, and clarified my remark in the fashion that i did. i will never argue that walks are not important, but you two seem to think that actually makes the difference between a player being good, and the same player being bad
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he had one not full season where he hit 215...other than that....
he’s always been at 234 or higher which isnt even close, with most of them at or above 250 otherwise.
what you dont understand, is that as a hitter, by far the most important stat is OBP…which Dunn excels at
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
wow. .234 or higher. yep, thats a hall of famer for sure….
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
its possible...
but his 400 obp makes him one of the best players in baseball right now. his skillset likely wont age well, but for now and the last 5 or so years, he’s been one of the top hitters in baseball….which yes, i’d love for moustakas to be
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i just think
youre putting too much stoc in his OBP. you write off my view of importance in AVG, but seem to think OBP makes someone a great hitter. in terms of making contact, he is exactly the opposite. i still have not read where either of you have responded to where i said that dunn actually has one of the worst strie zone judgements in the league
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that is not worthy of a response.
he has great strike zone judgement which is why he walks as much as he does. He strikes out alot b/c he swings extremely hard, knowing his value is in hitting HRs, but more often than not, he is swinging at strikes.
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i disagree
there are multiple reasons why a player can have numerous walks. barry bonds got pitched around out of respect for his power. milton bradley, on the other hand, has a freaish ability to tell the difference between balls and strikes. adam dunn looks at 30% of called strikes, one of the highest in the league, and also whiffs at nearly 30% of the strikes he swings at, again one of the highest in the league. the conclusion that comes from that, a si said once before, is adam dunn sits and waits for the perfect pitch to hit out of the park. he walks alot because he doesnt see a lot of strikes because pitchers flat out pitch around him. why pitch to a 40 hr hitter when the guy behind him is hitting under .250??
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
give me the link for the looking at called strikes percentages....
id guess that its a list of pretty solid hitters
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
look up
pitch f/x stats, and you should find it. this link is isolated to just the reds, but it shows dunn’s stats. i read somewhere earlier that provided information about dunn’s stats as compared to the rest of the league, but i cant find it. im sure after this debate is over ill prob find it, but for now i cant, sorry
http://www.redreporter.com/2008/4/30/470357/what-are-they-swinging-at
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well...it took about 12 seconds for me to find the stat that proves...
that dunn has good strike zone judgement…he swings at 13% of pitches out of the zone…2nd on the team
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
as i have already stated
he waits FOR THE PERFECT PITCH to hit a hr. he also watches 30% of strikes go by
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
pujols watches 27% of strikes go by
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that 30% isnt that far from the norm....
ichiro is at 27 as well….so apparently all of them are waiting for the home run pitch as well…
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and the difference again
these guys dont let those called strikes result in strike outs. dunn does. strike outs accomplish nothing. that is a statement i have made half a dozen times now, and you have yet to present an argument against that
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
same with chase utley
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
again, your point?
are catching the drift on these numbers? pujols have high averages to go along with the percentages, meaning they can actually put the ball in play safely without hitting a home run
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
whats the point of doing that....
and risking someone making a great play to take away a hit when someone will give you a base
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
are you serious
did you really truly just ask me why it would be worth putting the ball in play so that maybe someone can make a great play? haha wow. with that statement, that is my cue to leave, but ill do it with this one last statement. if you loo for the walk every time, you lead the league in strike outs, doing nothing for your team when that happens. or i suppose you should not even swinging the bat for the slim chance that a player might make a great play. ill tell you what. dont go to work on monday. you could get in a car accident on the way there. haha, wow, i never thought id hear someone imply that a hitter shouldnt even ris swinging the bat because a fielder might make a great play in the field
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
its like driving a car to work....
when you could be teleported….thats like putting the ball in play hoping to get a single when you can be guaranteed a walk by not swinging at balls.
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, how about this
Average is important to driving in runs. But OBP is important to not making outs, which is the primary job of an offensive player at the Major League level. Ergo, someone who hits .000, but has an OBP of .500 would be incredibly valuable.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and still, you have not listened to what i am saying
dunn, by your accounts, and one that i DO AGREE with, is one of the best hitters at NOT MAKING AN OUT. however, he certainly is nowhere near the top in terms of physically winning a game for somebody. please answer this question truthfully. if you had the choice between these two players which would you take?
Player A: very good chance of NOT ENDING a game, but a below average chance at actually WINNING the game
Player B: also a good chance of NOT ENDING the game, also has a good chance or better at actually WINNING the game
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Player B
As I’ve said before, player A is good, player B is going into the hall of fame on the first ballot. Ichiro is a generational talent, Dunn is just a very good talent. Just because player B is better doesn’t mean player A sucks.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh...and dunn is hitting 225
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this conversation has gone from respectable to ridiculous
so i am leaving this conversation. i respect, although i disagree with, most of what you guys have said. you debated without making it personal, which is always fun, but when someone implies a hitter should not even swing the bat due to the risk a fielder might make a good play, that is my cue to leave. you gentle enjoy your evening, and heres to hoping dunn does not end up with the rangers and that moustakas succeeds where dunn has failed. good evening gentlement
by rangersfan24 on Jul 12, 2008 8:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ha ha...yep...dunn is such a failure
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 12, 2008 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boy, he sure failed with that homer off of Gagne tonight
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 12, 2008 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so...
I hear Moustakas is recovering from an oblique but had a setback when his feelings were hurt from neglect in this thread
Hey fish, leave those kids alone!
by The Congo Hammer on Jul 12, 2008 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
re:so...
Hahahaha, that’s hilarious. I find it amusing how a Moustakas thread went so far off topic.
But since it did, I just wanted to address two little things.
One: for those who said that Dunn is a border line HOFer, I have to ask if you’ve ever seen him play defense? You take away his power (as prodigious as it is) and he’s one of the worst players in the game. As a fantasy baseball player, I appreciate what he does, but in terms of real life baseball the guy has some serious flaws. Just consider how many teams would seem to be a good fit for Dunn, yet have shown no interest. Maybe it’s just me, but if GM’s around baseball don’t want him, that indicates he’s not exactly a great baseball player.
Two: rumor has it he doesn’t even like to play baseball :)
by joltinjoe on Jul 13, 2008 12:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
take away the prodigious power and he's brian giles....who's a very good baseball player...
without the home runs….he’s still got the 400 OBP. and honestly, to say, take away (this tool) about anyone, and they’re gonna be significantly less of a player….take away arods homers and he’s just another good player rather than possibly the best of all time
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 13, 2008 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Giles????
Not even close. Giles’ lowest batting average season ever was a 263 in 2006. Dunn has only ever broken 260 twice in his career (not including his first half season). Giles is a career 293 hitter, Dunn is a career 247 hitter. Giles has averaged 105 walks and 74 strikeouts a season over the course of his career. Dunn averages 181 strikeouts a season and 113 walks. The highest ever strikeout total for a hitter in one season is 199… Dunn’s career average is only 18 below that.
"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile
by Boxkutter on Jul 13, 2008 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
taking away dunn's power
While I understand that when you say “take away his power/speed/3 bad starts” can significantly skew a players value, the point I was making about Dunn is that OVERALL he’s not a very good baseball player. He reaches base at a high rate and hits home runs. That’s great for fantasy baseball and does create runs for the Reds.
However, his ridiculously terrible defense costs the Reds runs on a regular basis. And as for his run production, I wouldn’t be surprised if he puts up a good percentage of those runs in games where his team is either far ahead or far behind.
While I have no evidence to support that last sentence (and I’d be very interested if anyone could contest or support it), I do base it on a very basic baseball concept.
When a team is ahead by quite a bit, it is common for that team’s starting pitcher to aggressively attack the zone. The last thing that pitcher wants is to walk anyone and tried to force the other team to put the ball in play. Consequently, that pitcher will often allow a solo shot or two.
From personal experience, I have witnessed a handfull of Dunn homers in exactly that scenerio. And if you look at Dunn’s numbers, the one thing that always jumps out at me is how few RBI’s he has relative to his high number of homers.
Over the last four years (excluding this half season to date for simplicity sake), the dude has 126 homers (avg 41.5) and 401 RBI (avg 100.25). I’m sorry but anyone who hits 40+ homers every year should be emberrased to have 106 RBI as a career high.
I’m sure someone will say “RBI’s are as bad a measure of player value as W’s for a pitcher” and are largely a function of players team. Well, the Reds problem the few years has been pitching, not hitting. This lack of pitching has also created a slew of blowout games for Dunn to hit his meaningless solo shots. (for his career he has 148 solo shots and 116 with men on base as of 7/12/08)
I’d argue that Dunn is a player who puts up empty numbers year after year for a losing team. His numbers look impressive after the year is over, but how many games did he really help win for his team? Too often he’s pading his stats in meaningless games when the outcome is all ready decided and meanwhile he’s killing his team’s chances in close games by missing a fly ball or misplaying a ball at him.
Now I’m not saying he doesn’t have value and his power and runs created do win some games for the Reds. To say otherwise would be asinine. And I’ll take him any day in a fantasy league, but when it comes to real baseball he’s just not that good.
He’s a terrible defender and an unrelieable hitter, especially with RISP.
Don’t believe me, check out his numbers. Or ask Reds announcer Marty Brennamen.
Brennamen (hated by all those drunken Cubs fans) has said on air that Dunn is a very good POWER HITTER but not a good hitter. Not saying he’s the ultimate authority, but coming from a paid Reds employee who’s seen every Dunn AB in his career, I’d say that speaks volumes.
by joltinjoe on Jul 13, 2008 4:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
his OPS when his team is either leading or trailing by 4 or more runs is 834....which is far lower than his
overall OPS….all other situations, its around 900
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Jul 13, 2008 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How many Reds have gotten on base ahead of him
That could explain his low RBI total. If he’s got to expect Corey Patterson and Jerry Harriston (think that’s the right one) to get on base ahead of him, I can understand the low RBI totals.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Jul 13, 2008 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 









