1. The Ball Park- Dodger's Stadium isn't nearly as bad on pitchers as American is. I'll get the stats later
2. Team Defense- Looking down the road the Dodgers will have fantastic defense whereas the Reds currently have a poor OF defense
C No Plus Minus for Catchers, but Martin i believe is considered a great defender, don't think the same is said about Ross but i could be wrong.
1B Loney +2, Hatteburg -11 (I won't try and predict Votto but it should be him soon)
2B Kent -13, Phillips +11
3B Don't know for the Dodgers, Edwin Encarnacion -18
SS Furcal + 6, Gonzalez + 4
OF Kemp approx -1/Pierre +9 (CF), Dunn -28
OF Jones +22, Patterson +2/Freel -7/Bruce (wont predict him)
OF Ethier +16, Griffey -8

Defense isn't really all that close as a team the dodgers are +41 without a positive catcher and the Reds are - 55.

3. Bullpen, Beimel, Broxton, Saito is pretty stacked. Although the Reds have some nice arms in the pen i'll take the Dodgers hands down. (to hold leads for more wins obviously)

4. Offense, The Reds scored more runs last year but for the future you'll have regressions by Griffey, Dunn, Freel, Gonzalez, Hattenburg and maybe Ross(don't know much about him) You'll have progression from Edwin, Votto, Bruce but I don't think they add up to all that is sinking. Admittedly, Votto for Hattenburg and Bruce for Freel/Patterson will happen soon and be a nice change.

But the Dodgers should have at least a bounce back year from Jones who should have many more win shares then Pierre of 2007. Kemp, Ethier, Loney, Martin, and 3B will take big steps forward in their own preduction and give better preduction then the players who had majority of AB from their postions, (Gonzo, Garciapara)
Furcal, and Kent will take steps back but Abreu and Hu are going to take over, might be as good but will help defensively for sure.

In pitcher vs pitcher terms I think Kershaw has the more dominating stuff. We can't judge either of them solely on ST. Both were dominate.