Prospect Profile: Luke Hochevar
The Luke Hochevar story is well-known, here is the stream-of-conciousness summary: University of Tennessee ace, drafted by the Dodgers in the supplemental round in '05 due to scary bonus demands, Scott Boras, acrimonious negotiations, re-enters '06 draft pool and goes first overall in '06.
There is nothing wrong with Hochevar's stuff: 91-95 fastball, curveball, slider, changeup, complete arsenal. His command is fine, or actually I shouldl say that his control is fine: he usually throws strikes. Sometimes his command within the strike zone is an issue, missing high and leaving pitches elevated too much, leading to homers. He throws strikes, but they aren't always quality strikes, at least this is the problem I saw with him at Wichita and Omaha last year.
Ah, yes, Hochevar's pro performance: it's been mixed, certainly not quite what the Royals were hoping for. 4.69 ERA with 94/26 K/BB in 94 innings, 110 hits allowed for Wichita. Then 5.12 ERA with 44/21 K/BB in 58 innings for Omaha, 53 hits allowed. He gave up 24 homers in the minors last year. He was better at Omaha this year, with a 2.60 mark in three starts and a 12/6 K/BB in 17.1 innings. And of course he's up in the majors now, with mixed results in his two starts for the Royals.
Watching Hochevar pitch last year, there was a sense of the whole being less than the sum of the parts: his stuff was usually really good, but he'd get hit harder than you'd expect. Part of it was probably substandard defense behind him, but there was also a sense that he was still feeling his way around the strike zone, as I said he was throwing strikes but not always good strikes. He's looked a bit better in that regard this year.
PECOTA comps are interesting: Kris Benson, Jason Young, Chris Bootcheck, dewon Brazelton, Bryan Bullington, Gavin Floyd, Greg Gohr, Kyle Abbott, Justin Verlander, Brett Myers are the top ten. Others include Carlton Loewer, Adam Wainright, Justin Wayne, Jon Garland, and Roger Salkeld...mixture of busts and successes.
Hochevar turns 25 in September. I think he'll be a good pitcher, with some very good seasons at times, but I will be surprised if he develops into a real rotation-anchor type ace. Baseball Prospectus put it well this year: "Hochevar should settle in as a consistent, if homer-prone, number three starter. The Royals could have done worse, but they should have done better" in the sense of having selected him first overall.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
"....they should have done better"
I have a problem with this statement. When you consider the sheer numbers of busts from the #1 pick over the last two decades, why should they have been expected to do much better than a top/middle rotation starer? It’s a crapshoot, and considering the other top ten picks, it looks like they did pretty well outside of passing on Lincecum like everyone else did. All the talking heads railed on KC for passing on the almighty Andrew Miller, and he is looking like more of a bust with each start.
I don’t know, I just don’t know why KC or any team should be “expected” to draft a HOF player considering all the different factors involved.
by deezle on Apr 29, 2008 12:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Should have
They should have drafted Tim Lincecum. :) Evan Longoria or Clayton Kershaw wouldn’t have been bad, either.
by sharksrog on Apr 29, 2008 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
si
Timmy or Longoria probably looks better now. Would not have been a fan of taking a HS pitcher #1 overall, although it doesn’t look too bad now.
I think Luke can be a Tim Hudson type with a decent but not eye popping strike rate, but very good ground ball numbers. I doubt he has Hudson’s peak numbers, but a career 3.75-4.00 ERA is absolutely not out of the question. And quite frankly, like deezle said, that’s pretty good considering the crappiness of former #1 overall picks in general.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Apr 29, 2008 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pitches taken away
I’ll admit that Hochevar’s professional debut has been a bit of a disappointment to Royals fans, but what people always forget to mention is that the Royals took away his out pitches last year to help him learn to use his fastball and changeup more effectively. The fact that he put up an ERA of under 5 using just two pitches with neither one of those being an out pitch, then I think he actually did pretty well considering. I think he has ace potential, but will ultimately be a #3 guy.
If I had a rocket ship, I'd never want to land.
by dman126 on Apr 29, 2008 12:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sinker
Nasty.
That is all.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Apr 29, 2008 1:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Throwing out a name
He Reminds me a bit of Brett Tomko in the sense that his stuff is pretty damn good but he doesn’t throw quality strikes and he may end up just infuriating and confusing pitching coaches and fans for years.
by Keenlow on Apr 29, 2008 4:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not really
Hochevar’s fastball is far and away better than Tomko’s in terms of movement, and it’s not far off in velocity.
He may be like Tomko, but I highly doubt it.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Apr 29, 2008 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
tomko wasn't so bad
..disappointing, sure, due to the gopherball tendencies, but never terrible.
As for Hochevar: I’d have picked him, just not #1. 2006 wasn’t a weak year: Longoria, Kershaw, Lincecum and Scherzer all went in the next ten picks, and all likely would have been better bets for the Royals even at the time.
by wcw on Apr 29, 2008 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mark Gubicza
When I saw his picture I immediately thought of the sinker baller who had a few nice seasons for the Royals before injuries hurt his career.
"You're thinking too much. Just have fun." -- Bennie "The Jet" Rodriguez in Sandlot
by cmathewson on Apr 30, 2008 8:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs










