Prospect Profile: James McDonald
James McDonald was drafted by the Dodgers in the 11th round in 2002, out of Poly High School in Long Beach, California. He was a first baseman when drafted, but didn't sign right away and went to junior college at Golden West JC. He signed in '03, moved to the mound full-time and posted a 3.33 ERA with a 47/15 K/BB in 48 innings of rookie ball, very credible performance and enough to get him a Grade C rating.
However, a sore arm put his pitching future in enough doubt that the Dodgers moved him to the outfield in 2004. He didn't hit well, just .224/.291/.256 in rookie ball. He followed that with a .229/.312/.289 mark in the Pioneer League in 2005, prompting a return to pitching in '06.
He had mixed results for Columbus in the Sally League in 2006, going 5-10, but with a 3.98 ERA and a 146/65 K/BB in 142 innings, just 119 hits allowed. The K/IP and H/IP were positives. His walk rate was high, but given his pitching inexperience this was understandable. I gave him a Grade C entering 2007, noting his need for better command but also pointing out the posiitve components.
McDonald began 2007 at Inland Empire in the California League, going 6-7, 3.95 but with a 104/21 K/BB in just 82 innings. Promoted to Double-A Jacksonville, he went 7-2, 1.71 with a 64/16 K/BB in 53 innings. Again, very impressive K/IP marks, but with improving command. I gave him a Grade B+ in the book this year and rated him as the Number 13 pitching prospect in baseball. This seems to be a higher ranking than other sources are giving him. He is off to a great start this year: 2.92 ERA with a 15/4 K/BB in his first 12.1 innings, 10 hits allowed.
Here is what I like about McDonald.
Stat-wise, I like the improving ratios. His K/IP has always been impressive, but his walk rate has gone down even while pitching at higher levels, a clear marker that he is making a clean transition from thrower to pitcher. The fact that his K/IP remains strong in Double-A is another positive sign. The trendlines are good, in other words.
Scout-wise, he was throwing 86-89 in the Sally League in '06 according to the reports I have, but was throwing 87-93 last year, continuing a gradual bump up in velocity. His curveball and changeup are very good, and adding the three pitches together with sharper command makes a nice package. I also like his athleticism, a key factor I look for in any pitcher. He hasn't shown any arm problems since his initial bout with trouble back in 2003, and perhaps the fact that he backed off pitching then and essentially rested his arm for two years may prevent a recurrance.
McDonald still isn't getting as much attention as he deserves. While he may not be a number one starter type, if he stays healthy I think he's got a good chance to emerge as a fine number three guy, not bad for a guy who was a complete unknown two years ago.
0 recs |
9
comments
Comments
mcdonald or
I have him on my fantasy team. Would folks prefer him or Scherzer (he looks awesome), swarzak, cahill, hellickson, henry rodriguez…a lot of prospects already gone. Price, Kershaw, Wade Davis, Homer bailey, Masterson, some others, all taken.
by wobatus on Apr 18, 2008 5:33 PM EDT 0 recs
nice report John
i enjoy stuff like this, on guys who may be overlooked/forgotten… maybe you could do a series?
by daveh33 on Apr 18, 2008 6:02 PM EDT 0 recs
mcdonald goes today
At Montgomery. Kershaw, Chad, James as number 3 (well, maybe 2 if Chad doesn’t get with it), in LA. I like his chances. Wonder what he’s dialing it up to this year? I need the help, as Hughes and Parra have been rotten for me. Phil Franchise really wasn’t that bad yesterday. Lotta singles, infield single to A Rod scored one, then it was really an error, and hawkins let his runners in.
by wobatus on Apr 19, 2008 11:10 AM EDT 0 recs
McDonald
I saw his April 9th start versus Tennessee. The Smokies couldn’t do much with him, with only a couple of well-hit balls off him, but he only lasted 4 innings and seemed to struggle a little with his control in the 4th (I remember he walked Colvin on 4 straight pitches to lead off the inning, and Colvin is not the most disciplined hitter and has quite a strike zone). His velocity never dropped throughout the outing but also never topped 88 on the stadium gun. That was only his 2nd start of the season, so I suspect that he either was taking it a little easy or just not yet in mid-season form. His mix and command of his pitches was impressive, but if he doesn’t regain that punch on his fastball velocity, or if he has stamina issues, then he might not reach his full potential.
by daser on Apr 19, 2008 1:54 PM EDT 0 recs
track record
at what point does track record come into play? I am a supported of McDonald, but how does a prospect evaluator balance the lack of a history of success with a track record of continual improvement at higher levels?
Is it more gut feeling? Are you paying more attention to scouting reports with him?
by count sutton on Apr 19, 2008 5:06 PM EDT 0 recs
7-1 1.71 era?
That’s not a history of success count sutton?
by wobatus on Apr 20, 2008 12:28 AM EDT 0 recs
this season
This season’s stats are very nice and so were last season’s. My only concern is that those are his only dominant numbers. In 2006 he was walking 4 per 9 IP and threw 12 wild pitches. One full season of success does not spell an impressive track to me. Let me re-phrase: at what point do we KNOW that last season was not an aberration? The 1.71 ERA was over 52 innings in a pitchers park. His FIP was 3.18. Still very good, but it’s also just 52 innings.
by count sutton on
Apr 21, 2008 10:10 AM EDT
up
0 recs
So
A K rate over 9 in his career or a K to BB rate over 3 isn’t impressive? Whatever, you people were saying the same dumb things about Geovanny Soto this past offseason.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
by WayneCampbell08 on Apr 24, 2008 8:32 PM EDT 0 recs
Doh!
This was supposed to be a reply to Count Sutton above.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
by WayneCampbell08 on
Apr 24, 2008 8:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs









