Prospect Grades and What They Mean
What Grades Mean
I occasionally get questions from readers about what my grades mean. Here is a brief rundown.
Grade A prospects are the elite. They have a good chance of becoming stars or superstars. Almost all Grade A prospects develop into major league regulars, if injuries or other problems don’t intervene. Note that is a major “if” in some cases.
Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.
Grade C prospects are the most common type. These are guys who have something positive going for them, but who may have a question mark or three, or who are just too far away from the majors to get an accurate feel for. A few Grade C guys, especially at the lower levels, do develop into stars. Many end up as role players or bench guys. Some don’t make it at all.
A major point to remember is that grades for pitchers do NOT correspond directly to grades for hitters. Many Grade A pitching prospects fail to develop, often due to injuries. Some Grade C pitching prospects turn out much better than expected.
Also note that there is diversity within each category. I’m a tough grader; Grade C+ is actually good praise coming from me, and some C+ prospects turn out very well indeed.
Finally, keep in mind that all grades are just shorthand for the actual analysis of the player. A Grade C prospect in rookie ball could end up being very impressive, while a Grade C prospect in Triple-A is likely just a future role player.
2 recs |
8 comments
Comments
Always a good idea to post this. It’s become a yearly ritual around here.
by rdf8585 on Dec 3, 2008 7:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Just wondering...
where are the yanks in the sequence this year?
--Pablo Zevallos of yankeesfuture.wordpress.com
by Pablo Zevallos on Dec 3, 2008 9:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
And the A's
We’re doing a Community Prospect List on AthleticsNation, and it’d be interesting to compare our Top 20+, Sickle’s top 20 List, and BA’s Top 10 (which is already pretty different from our community poll).
facepalm.jpg
by Zonis on Dec 4, 2008 5:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd guess the top 5:
Jackson B+
Montero B+
Brackman B
Betances B
Romine B
And a lot of pitching depth.
by schmosterballs92 on Dec 4, 2008 10:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Whoa, nelly
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Dec 4, 2008 10:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
out of curiosity...
since sickles has been making his book, how many of his grade A players did not become stars? He’s often conservative in his rankings, so I’m guesing not many
by ScottAZ on Dec 4, 2008 1:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
pretty short list.
If you are talking about straight A players it is a pretty short list Looking just at hitters In 2000 (sorry if I ever had the 2001 book it seems to be lost) and between 2002 and 2005 (after which it is probably still too soon to make any kind of judgments):
Corey Patterson
Pat Burrell
Vernon Wells
Nick Johnson
Dee Brown
Hank Blalock
Sean Burroughs
Carlos Pena
Mark Teixeira
Joe Mauer (twice)
Victor Martinez
Brandon Phillips
Mike Cuddyer
Jose Reyes
Hee Seop choi
Bobby Crosby
Rickie Weeks
BJ Upton
Casey Kotchman
Justin Morneau
Andy Marte
Joel Guzman
Ian Stewart
Obviously, a bunch of very good players on this list but you would have to call Sean Burroughs and Dee Brown nearly complete busts, Hee-Seop Choi something pretty close to that and Andy Marte in some danger of falling into that group although its still too soon to say he won’t turn it around. On the other hand Teixeira, Mauer, Burrell and Morneau have pretty much cemented their status as at least being “stars”. Most of the rest have some chance to go down as stars and some chance to go down as something less than that. A good reminder that that even among the seemingly best prospects there is no such thing as an absolute sure thing.
by Dalman on Dec 5, 2008 1:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
thanks!
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on Dec 5, 2008 11:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs










