Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Once A Metro covering Red Bull New York!

Community Prospect List: #70

After 302 votes the winner is Gio Gonzalez with 19% of the vote. Phillippe Aumont placed second with 16%. Jason Donald, Nick Weglarz & Kyle Blanks are being removed from the poll due to a lack of support defined by having less than 5% of the vote. Jason Donald, Kyle Blanks, Martin Perez, and Gorkys Hernandez will be added to the poll.

 

1. MATT WIETERS - C (Baltimore)
2. DAVID PRICE - SP (Tampa Bay)
3. JASON HEYWARD - OF (Atlanta)
4. TRAVIS SNIDER - OF (Toronto)
5. MADISON BUMGARNER - SP (San Francisco)
6. COLBY RASMUS - OF (St. Louis)
7. CAMERON MAYBIN - OF (Florida)
8. TREVOR CAHILL - SP (Oakland)
9. NEFTALI FELIZ - SP (Texas)
10. MATT LAPORTA -  1B/OF/DH (Cleveland)
11. MIKE MOUSTAKAS - 3B (Kansas City)
12. TIM ALDERSON - SP (San Francisco)
13. PEDRO ALVAREZ - 3B (Pittsburgh)
14. RICK PORCELLO - SP (Detroit)
15. DEXTER FOWLER - OF (Colorado)
16. BRETT ANDERSON - SP (Oakland)*
17. DEREK HOLLAND - SP (Texas)
18. ANDREW McCUTCHEN - OF (Pittsburgh)
19. BUSTER POSEY - C (San Francisco)
20. CHRIS TILLMAN - SP (Baltimore)
21. LARS ANDERSON - 1B (Boston)
22. JUSTIN SMOAK - 1B (Texas)
23. THOMAS HANSON - SP (Atlanta)
24. ELVIS ANDRUS - SS (Texas)
25. ANGEL VILLALONA - 1B (San Francisco)
26. JHOULYS CHACIN - SP (Colorado)
27. BRIAN MATUSZ - SP (Baltimore)
28. ERIC HOSMER - 1B (Kansas City)
29. TIM BECKHAM - SS (Tampa Bay)
30. MAX RAMIREZ - C/1B (Texas)
31. JARROD PARKER - SP (Arizona)
32. MICHAEL STANTON - OF (Florida)
33. MAT GAMEL - 3B (Milwaukee)
34. JESUS MONTERO - C (New York-AL)
35. BRETT WALLACE - 3B (St. Louis)
36. JORDAN SCHAFER - OF (Atlanta)
37. WADE DAVIS - SP (Tampa Bay)
38. LOGAN MORRISON - 1B (Florida)
39. CARLOS SANTANA - C (Cleveland)
40. FERNANDO MARTINEZ - OF (New York-NL)
41. JAMES McDONALD - SP (Los Angeles-NL)
42. JEREMY HELLICKSON - SP (Tampa Bay)
43. JOSH VITTERS - 3B (Chicago-NL)
44. YONDER ALONSO - 1B (Cincinnati)
45. TAYLOR TEAGARDEN - C (Texas)
46. FREDDIE FREEMAN - 1B (Atlanta)
47. GORDON BECKHAM - SS (Chicago-AL)
48. BRETT CECIL - SP (Toronto)
49. ALCIDES ESCOBAR - SS (Milwaukee)
50. JORDAN ZIMMERMANN - SP (Washington)

51. CHRIS CARTER - 1B/DH (Oakland)
52. CARLOS TRIUNFEL - SS (Seattle)
53. AUSTIN JACKSON - OF (New York-AL)
54. BEN REVERE - OF (Minnesota)
55. MICHAEL BOWDEN - SP (Boston)
56. TYLER FLOWERS - C (Atlanta)
57. ADRIAN CARDENAS - SS (Oakland)
58. REID BRIGNAC - SS (Tampa Bay)
59. JAKE ARRIETA - SP (Baltimore)
60. JORDAN WALDEN - SP (Los Angeles-AL)
61. MICHAEL MAIN - SP (Texas)
62. WILMER FLORES - SS (New York-NL)
63. MATT DOMINGUEZ - 3B (Florida)
64. MICHAEL SAUNDERS - OF (Seattle)
65. DESMOND JENNINGS - OF (Tampa Bay)
66. CARLOS CARRASCO - SP (Philadelphia)
67. AARON CUNNINGHAM - OF (Oakland)
68. J.P. ARENCIBIA - C (Toronto)
69. GIO GONZALEZ - SP (Oakland)

 

CANDIDATES -   Jeff Samardzija, Martin Perez, Phillippe Aumont, Jose Tabata, Jeremy Jeffress, Daniel Cortes, Angel Salome, Gorkys Hernandez, Michael Inoa, Andrew Lambo, Greg Halman & Beau Mills

TESTERS -   Daryl Jones(62-2%), Jeff Niemann(63-0%),David Cooper(63-0%), Nick Noonan(64-3%), Jacob McGee(63-4%), Aaron Poreda(64-2%), Aaron Hicks(65-4%), Michael Burgess(65-3%) & Christopher Marrero(65-1%), Christopher Perez (66-4%), Todd Frazier (66-3%), Dellin Betances (66-2%), Adam Miller (67-3%), Kila Ka'aihue (67-3%), Ivan DeJesus, Neftali Soto,  Michael Taylor, Vincent Mazzaro, Jason Donald(69-4%), Nick Weglarz(69-4%), Kyle Blanks(69-4%), Jonathan Niese, Matt Moore & Scott Elbert

NOTE: I have listed by each tester the last time they were on a poll and the percentage of votes they obtained. This should help us with selecting who should be placed back on the poll etc

Poll
Who is Community Prospect #70?
Michael Inoa
27 votes
Andrew Lambo
15 votes
Greg Halman
22 votes
Beau Mills
10 votes
Phillippe Aumont
77 votes
Jeff Samardzija
52 votes
Jeremy Jeffress
27 votes
Jose Tabata
21 votes
Daniel Cortes
22 votes
Angel Salome
22 votes
Martin Perez
21 votes
Gorkys Hernandez
29 votes

345 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 96 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Phillippe Aumont gets my vote

At 6’7" and already throwing in the mid 90’s projection remains to further advance that to the high 90’s. He’s also shown decent command in an albeit injury plagued season along with a plus curveball and developing changeup.

As Jim Callis notes

“Shutting him down was more a precaution than a red flag. Aumont’s potential ranks with just about any pitcher’s in the minors—he has that much upside.”

I heard Tim Lincecum will win 1 Cy Young & 11 Tim Lincecums. Question is, how many Cole Hamels will he win?

by the pinstripes on Nov 24, 2008 9:50 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Samardzija

Shark not being on this list already is getting to be a bit comical.

by slurve on Nov 24, 2008 9:52 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Halman....

272/326/528 with 29 doubles, 29 homers, and 31 steals while playing above average defense in CF as a 20 year old in A+ and AA. His upside is there. His current production is there. It’s getting a little sad that he isn’t on the list yet. He, like most prospects has a strike against him (his strikeouts), but he has more upside and production than almost every prospect left… and many that already made the list. Like Fernando Martinez being a Top 40 prospect. He is only a year younger than Halman at the same level, and can’t even dream about having a season as good as Halman’s. Ridiculous.

"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile

by Boxkutter on Nov 24, 2008 10:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

More than that

His lack of walks speaks much louder than his K’s – guys that don’t walk just don’t progress well. You can still strike out at a good clip, but if you can take a free pass…

by slurve on Nov 24, 2008 10:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The precedent for ignoring this...

was already set with Arencibia. Didn’t you get the memo? Walks don’t matter.

by DrunkIrish on Nov 24, 2008 11:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No...

walks aren’t the ONLY thing that matters. There’s a big difference.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 12:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Nov 24, 2008 2:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So....

how does that explain Martinez? Halman had 32 walks in 492ab. Martinez had 27 in 366. Expand that out to to same number of at bats as Halman, and he only walks 4 more times. But you lose 100 points of SLG, you lose 25 stolen bases, and you move from CF to a corner OF spot (which Martinez will likely have to play). It’s not like Halman was 23 when doing this… he is only 13 months older than Martinez while putting up FAR superior numbers while still having great upside.

Personally, I feel Halman should be in the Top 50 and Martinez should be getting onto the polls right now.

"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile

by Boxkutter on Nov 24, 2008 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

2 Wrongs don't make a right

I’ve never been a fan of Martinez. Nor did I say anything about where he placed o this list. I’ve seen this line used many times but here goes: If you have Halman in your top 50, I have an opening in my fantasy league.

by slurve on Nov 24, 2008 11:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You're under rating Fernando Martinez a bit

In the first place, a year can be a pretty big difference at ages 19-20. In the second, A+ to AA is a very big difference. I think you are minimizing both of those. If you just compare numbers in AA, Halman didn’t outhit Martinez.

Also, compare MLEs for the full season per minorleaguesplits.com (which they adjust for park and league differences):

Avg OBP SLG OPS BABIP LD%
.207 .260 .357 .617 .269 14.6 Greg Halman
.222 .278 .328 .606 .269 18.1 Fernando Martinez

In truth, the bats are nearly identical, and Fernando is a year younger.

I know a lot of people would prefer that Fernando were at a lower level putting up those pretty numbers like Halman was, but that’s not necessarily the best development strategy. Putting him in AA forces him to make the adjustments he has to make vs. better pitching, which right now means less big HR swings and more contact.

I think you can still make a decent case for Halman based on tools and defensive potential.

This year:
RF9 Pos lvl
2.71 CF A+ Halman
2.55 CF AA Halman
2.52 CF AA Martinez

Fernando is better in CF than some think. He will likely eventually move to a corner, but right now he’s good in CF, and not that much worse than Halman there. Halman has more speed though, so a better chance to be above average there and stay in CF even if he slows down some as he ages (and he will likely slow some at that size).

With that, I think there’s a decent case for Halman over Martinez, but Martinez is up there simply because he’s been on the map longer. Fernando put himself on the map with his performance as a 17 year old in full season A ball. Halman didn’t get to full season A ball until the end of his age 19 season, and then struggled there. So Halman’s break out is really this season.

I bet you will see Halman up there on some end of season lists.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 3:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

re

I see him being a Soriano type. I know they are a rare breed, but Its been 8 years since Soriano came up so another power/speed/no walks guy comes out

by ScottAZ on Nov 24, 2008 12:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

vs another M's OF prospect

How is Halman’s batting approach different from Wladimir Balentien?

The Dodgers won't win a playoff series until the Cool-a-Coo returns.

by mckeeno on Nov 24, 2008 10:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Halman...

is significantly better than Balentien at age 20, but Balentien’s approach improved by leaps and bounds since then.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 10:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I vote Balentien, personally

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2008 1:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

-1

Halman’s ceiling is way higher, and likelihood of reaching it about even. They have a very similar offensive package, but Halman adds plus CF defense, while Balentien struggles to be average in a corner. Big difference.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 1:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Considering Balentien spent some considerable time in CF last year...

I would be suprised if he “struggle[d] to be average in a corner.”

by DrunkIrish on Nov 24, 2008 2:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You...

didn’t watch 100+ Mariners games last year, either.

He’s a bad defender.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 2:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

because...

Ichiro whined his way out of playing centerfield anymore. The Mariners have been pretty obviously pointing out for a while now that Ichiro is the only player they have capable of playing there everyday right now. If Ichiro demands to play rightfield, and you want Balentien in the lineup, where else are you supposed to put him?

by ajake57 on Nov 24, 2008 2:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep.

Their other CF options were Jeremy Reed and Willie Bloomquist. Balentien was the only hitter with an even moderate chance of being productive on the roster. A bad roster construction strategy and an even worse managerial decision (putting Ichiro back in RF) don’t make Balentien a good defender.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 3:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

the official reason was because he made the corner OF lazy because he was “too good”

Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.

by knockoutking on Nov 24, 2008 8:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think his likelihood of reaching it is remotely close to even

I think it’s maybe 1/5 that of Balentien. Balentien walks more and strikes out less. Huge, huge difference.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2008 4:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He's...

also 4 years older and when he was 20 his BB/K was similar and he was hitting for less power in the Midwest League.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 4:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't matter

He’s already made the adjustment. Halman hasn’t. If Halman makes the adjustment, you can give him credit for it then. Most players never make that adjustment.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2008 4:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Halman...

needs to do a lot less than Balentien to become an above average player. As a CF, the bar’s much, much lower.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 4:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Halman and Samardzija

I see these two as similar.

In that, even if the flaws prevent them from ever reaching their potential, the FLOOR even with the flaws is still higher than most of the remaining players on the list. Even is Samardzija ends up in the bullpen, he’s still probably as valuable a player there (probably a good setup man) as Cunningham, Arencibia, or Gonzalez is likely to be. Even if Halman ends up being Chris Young without walks, that’s still as valueable a player as Cunningham, Arencibia, or Gonzalez is likely to be.

On the other hand, the CEILING for these guys is as high as anyone on the list.

This isn’t the same as a high ceiling all tools player with performance question marks in short season ball. These are guys who have already shown something at AA or AAA. The first class of guys often do get over valued. Their are lots of guys with potential in the Appy League. The high ceiling guys who have already passed the AA test, though, the guys with the high ceiling but also the high floor: these are the most valuable commodities in the prospect world.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 11:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree on Samardzija...

not on Halman (and I’m a huge fan). His floor is that he never adjusts enough to be able to hit above the Mendoza line in the majors.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 11:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thing about ceiling

with Halman is that hios likelyhood of ever sniffing it is quite dim given his lack of walks.

by slurve on Nov 24, 2008 12:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah...

On the other hand, he’s been rushed by an organization that preaches aggressiveness at every turn, and that organization has recently been overhauled. I’m hoping he repeats Double-A this year and focuses specifically on making more contact, even if it comes at the expense of his power. It worked for Balentien in 2006.

If I’m Zdiurencik, I’m hiring a roving hitting instructor to work specifically on patience with about 15 of the Mariners’ top position prospects.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 12:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree to a point

but until he actually SHOWS some decent discipline, I’m not a fan at all. If you ask scouts/managers, one of the hardest things to learn are those which should be inate. Batting eye is one of the things they always point to as something that is “either you have it or you don’t.” I know there are examples of guys getting better… and it usually is in a case like you point out where someone has been rushed and/or is young for his league. From what I’ve seen, not too many are impressed with his batting eye / chances of improving in this area. We’ll see, but until then…

by slurve on Nov 24, 2008 12:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also...

He’s still only 20. Well, 21 to start next year. He’s got some time.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 12:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why is Samardzija's ceiling so high?

He’s a guy with a mid-90s FB who showed good control for half a season. Even if that control is real, then he might be a good starter, but he certainly doesn’t have the ceiling of a Bumgarner or hell, Martin Perez

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Nov 24, 2008 1:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The slider is improving and the splitter is a nice third pitch

The guy was very raw when drafted, mainly a football player, there is still clear upside there in his secondary offerings. Maybe I shouldn’t have said ANYONE, but I think it’s as high as almost anyone.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 1:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also keep in mind

That the FB has plus-plus movement. Just looking at the velocity is deceptive. Samardzija’s fastball has so much late break on it that it’s one of the few fastballs out there that could turn into a true out pitch. That’s rare for a right handed pitcher.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Nov 24, 2008 3:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK

Corey Brown’s ceiling is Greg Halman, except with walks.

Where’s the clamor to put him on this list?

(Disclaimer: I don’t think he should be on the list… before someone accuses me of homerism)

Oh, also: I’d say Halman’s floor is .200/.240/.400 with mediocre CF defense. That’s way below replacement level.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2008 1:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Halman v. Brown

Polish: Brown >>>>>>> Halman
Raw Power: Halman >>>>>>>>>>>>> Brown
Speed: Halman >> Brown.
Age: Advantage Halman.

On upside, Halman wins out pretty significantly. I’d rate Halman slightly higher as a prospect overall, but I think it’s close.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 3:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Disagree

Brown has a hell of a lot of raw power, hitting 30 bombs this year in less than 500 AB; the difference between the two on this point is marginal. The upside of the two is similar, but Halman’s great advantage in ARL separates the two.

by aCone419 on Nov 24, 2008 4:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clarify

That is 30 bombs in under 500 AB, while striking out 170 times. That’s a pretty good ratio of balls in play to HRs. When he hits the ball, it goes a ways.

by aCone419 on Nov 24, 2008 4:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brown is about as polished as the bottom of my shoe

and I’m not seeing where the power deal is coming from, given that he hit 30 home runs this year.

Brown’s very fast… BA had him as the best athlete in the A’s system last season… I dunno, it could be that Halman is faster, so I won’t duel you on that.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2008 4:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm also...

of the opinion that Halman doesn’t belong this high, but isn’t as bad as the detractors here are saying.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 3:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Please be serious

A 22 year old who spent most of the season in low A ball, put up an .855 OPS with 16 steals and bad defense? (Then to top it went on to hit .216 in Hawaii).

Please. The Mets aren’t the deepest system and they have about 15 guys I’d take over Corey Brown.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 3:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ceiling

None of that has anything to do with “ceiling,” which is what Paul is talking about. Brown has plenty of tools, though he also has a penchant for missing baseballs with his bat.

And there are definitely not 15 Mets’ prospects I’d take over Brown.

by aCone419 on Nov 24, 2008 4:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you

I’m using him to make a point about the utility of ceiling as a concept, not arguing for him to be on the list.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2008 4:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's a very abstract notion of ceiling

There are probably 1000 guys out there somewhere who are great athletes but bad baseball players.

Guys like Halman and Martinez may not be ready for the majors yet, but they’ve already proven to be good players. I don’t see how anyone can say you don’t know the difference between a guy in low A ball at 22 and guys who are performing respectably in AA at 19 or 20, who have better projection.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 4:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ceiling is an abstract notion

I don’t know how else you would define it, other that “the best possible outcome for a player with a specific set of skills.” Brown and Halman have similar best possible outcomes.

Ceiling and ARL are two completely separate concepts. And no one said they “don’t know the difference between” the two players. It was a comment about using “ceiling” as a basis for a ranking.

by aCone419 on Nov 24, 2008 4:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK, then I agree, it's not all about ceiling

But what was the point then?

The post he was responding to said this:

“This isn’t the same as a high ceiling all tools player with performance question marks in short season ball. These are guys who have already shown something at AA or AAA. The first class of guys often do get over valued. Their are lots of guys with potential in the Appy League.”

So I think I was making it pretty clear there are such distinctions being made.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 4:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But 'cept

Brown wasn’t in short-season ball, and doesn’t really have “performance question marks” in any meaningful way that would separate him from Halman.

by aCone419 on Nov 24, 2008 5:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So low A ball

He spent most of the season in A ball, one level up from short-season, and only 49 games in the end in A+. And the performance question marks would include striking out 72 times in those 49 games.

This is a guy who is 2 years older than Halman, striking out at a noticcably higher rate (1 per 2.97 PA) in A+ ball than Halman (1 per 3.88 PA) in AA .

Frankly, even if you think there’s really some logic in ignoring a 2 year age difference on top of a difference in level of competition, lets just compare their ratios of strikeouts and extra base hits this year for the full season:

(SOr=PA/SO; XBHr=PA/XBH)

PA SO XBH SOr XBHr
565 168 59 3.36 9.58 Corey Brown
538 142 63 3.79 8.38 Greg Halman

Halman was clearly better. If Brown were doing that as a 20 year old, maybe he wouldn’t be too far behind, though I think still not top 100 unless he were a level higher. As a 22 year old, he’s really not top 200.

Age matter especially in discussing strikeout rates. In this case, you have to have more hope in the 20 year old who has risen through 4 levels in the last 2 years. There’s just a much better chance of his ratios improving.

by acerimusdux on Nov 25, 2008 12:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Let me put it this way:

I agree that Halman’s 50th percentile projection is better than Brown’s 50th percentile projection. The problem is that neither of those 50th percentiles is going to be an acceptable MLB player. Who cares if he’s .220/.250/.420 instead of .180/.250/.360? Neither of those are tenable as an MLB starter.

This is, somewhat ironically, the one point where I think looking at “ceilings” of non-rookie ball players IS useful— for comparing high risk/high reward guys with low chances of being useful players. There’s no point in comparing their average values, because the average value is “zero.” And Brown’s ceiling is much higher because he draws walks. The modest (and questionable) advantage Halman has in basestealing and defense doesn’t nearly close that gap.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 25, 2008 2:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Depends

Carlos Gomez was .258/.296/.360 this year, and was a solid MLB starter. According to total value, +21.3 runs, according to BP, +6.0 WARP3. And he was only 22 as well.

If Halman’s peak ends up being at age 20, then you will be right. I don’t see that as his 50th percentile though. He’d come close to those numbers right now.

I see his 50th percentile being much higher than that.

And Brown isn’t drawing so many walks either. He only had 17 walks in 214 PA in A+ ball; If Halman draws 4 more walks he has the same rate in AA. That difference doesn’t make his ceiling much higher. The guy who’s ceiling is much higher in this case is the guy with better tools who is 2 years younger and performing a level higher.

by acerimusdux on Nov 25, 2008 12:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's 20

Fernando Martinez
Wilmer Flores
Jon Niese
Brad Holt
Nick Evans
Bobby Parnell
Dillon Gee
Reese Havens
Mike Carp
Jefry Marte
Jenrry Mejia
Eddie Kunz
Ezequiel Carrera
Scott Moviel
Josh Thole
Ike Davis
Francisco Pena
Brant Rustich
Scott Shaw
Maikel Cleto

Where would you rank him here? Really only the last few are debatable for me. But maybe you guys are valuing this abstract ceiling stuff more than I am.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 4:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Meh

The only guys I would definitely take over Brown are:

1. Martinez
2. Flores
3. Niese
4. Holt
5. Evans
6. Havens
7. Carp

I probably underrate some Mets’ guys as a Braves partisan, but you are either systematically overrating your own guys or are pretty unfamiliar with Brown.

by aCone419 on Nov 24, 2008 5:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well....

I see he was a 57th overall pick; which is OK but not that high. He’s supposed to have good tools, but 16 SB in A ball is unexceptional, and range factors look downright awful: 2.15 in Stockton and 2.11 in Kane County—that’s in CF, not a corner.

Unless I see something that says scouts are really wowed by this guy and he’s better than expected on draft day, I have a very hard time taking him over:

Dillon Gee: one of the best pitchers I saw this year and a guy who I think will be top 100 next year. No true plus pitch, but several MLB quality pitches; his overall stuff is as good as Helickson, and pitchability has clear upside (only added the CB this year, and showing a very promising new CU as well). Also, MLE FIP of 3.95 this season.

Jenry Mejia: 18 y.o. who sits in the mid 90’s with the FB and throw a plus breaking ball as well, makings of a decent CU, and showed solid command (1.15 WHIP) against much older players in the NYPL.

Jeff Marte: 17 y.o. who had a .930 OPS in the GCL. Sure, Brown is closer, but Marte is almost 6 years younger, and performing against age appropriate competition, and a reasonable SO rate as well.

Josh Thole: 21 y.o. catcher who hit .300/.382/.427 in the FSL, with more BB than SO, then went on to perform well in Arizona, named an all-star there. Good all around defender, though arm a bit below average.

Scot Moviel – big 20 y.o. pitching prospect with big league sinker, promising secondary offerings.

Francisco Pena – 18 y.o. catching prospect holding his own. His dad was a 5 time all start and 4 time gold glove winner at the position—and was physically a late bloomer (his dad wasn’t as good at the same age). I love the projection here.

Bobby Parnell – I don’t see him as a great SP prospect but he brings two plus pitches out of the pen, and has earned raving reviews in that role. I saw 2 independent sources identify him as the most impressive pitcher at the AA Eastern League all-star game, and also impressed in NY. Also turning some heads in arizona. The Mets need this guy in the pen next year.

I’ll consider if there’s really good reason to support it:

Ike Davis – 18th overall pick this year had a disappointing debut, but I still have to think there is as much upside potential there as the 57th overall pick from 2007.

Brant Rustich – has high ceiling stuff, and performed very well when healthy (3.80 MLE FIP), but has had too many injuries. Nothing involving the elbow or shoulder though, and he should be fine for 2009. He was drafted 36 spots behind Brown in 2007, so you can make a case for Brown if you think his stock has risen (or held up) more than Rustich.

Ezequiel Carrera – very similar to Gorkys Hernandez, but a bit less tools, but almost identical season and skills as Gorkys at the same age. Best defensive CF in the FSL this year per the coaches vote, and while he doesn’t have Brown’s power upside, he has better contact ability, steals more bases, was 19 months younger at the same level, and should develop some power.

Maikel Cleto – another guy who sits in the mid 90’s with the fastball at 19 y.o., but he hasn’t really shown signs of having the secondary stuff yet. Not sure if he’s more or less a risk than Brown.

Eddie Kunz – I listed him a bit high, mostly because that’s where he’s been listed. Drafted 15 spots ahead of Brown in 2007, but I don’t think it was a particularly good pick. Solid in AA, melted down in AFL, this year. I think he’ll end up a decent bullpen arm, but not special, and I’d probably deal for a guy like Brown if I could be convinced he really is likely to advance quickly.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 6:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Range factor? Are you f***ing serious?

Let me put it this way: Range factor is such a useless stat, I don’t even know what league average is, because I never wasted my time finding out.

Quickly eyeballing the list, there’s only about 5 guys who I’d immediately trade Brown for, with 3 or 4 more where I’d make the move if it helped the organization’s balance (i.e. I think they’re roughly at the same level give or take a bit).

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2008 9:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It works pretty well for CF

I don’t know anyone calculating UZR for A ball. Range factor for CF is generally pretty good though. Really no more flawed than OPS. League averages are going to be lower in the minors (probably from less guys driving the ball), but it still should be at least 2.4-2.5 for a decent defender in CF. And those numbers were consistent across 2 different leagues too. I guarantee he’s a terrible CF.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 11:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The solution for having no useful stats is not to take a useless stat and pretend that it's useful

There are so many factors wrong with it, I don’t even know where to begin:

1. Who the pitchers were
2. Who the other outfielders were
3. The ballparks
4. How many of those games were actually played in CF instead of a corner
5. Small sample size

Probably a few others, too.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2008 11:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Most of those aren't that important

1. Flyball rates for pitchers will have some impact, as will strikeout rates.
2. Who the other outfielders were tends to have a very small impact; it really only comes into play on a fairly lazy fly in the gap.
3. Ballparks really have very little impact on CF range factors
4. All of the games were in CF.; they have the breakdowns.
5. Small sample size is an issue (it’s an issue with hitting stats as well, but probably even more with RF.

For CF, generally, the two adjustments you want to make it really useful are for the team pitching staff’s strikeout rate and FB rate. Do those two things and CF RF is quite accurate, given a reasonable sample (say a season).

Now, obviously I didn’t go to that trouble, I just eyeballed it, and it looks like he was consistently bad across 2 teams this year and checking last year, then as well.

Looking now though, I see that while Kane’s SO rate was average, the Stockton staff had a very high SO rate (9.04 compared to 7.05 league average). That kind of discrepancy does have a large impact.
 
Figure 18 outs a game by the fielders rather than 20. So that 2.15 becomes about 2.15/.90= 2.38 if you assume a more average rate of balls in play.

With that, he looks a bit better. But unless that team also has a tremendous GB% as well, though I still doubt he’s above average (though he may have the tools to be—young players can take some time learning to improve jumps, positioning, etc.).

by acerimusdux on Nov 25, 2008 12:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The reason why the park is an issue

is that Stockton, in particular, is an extreme home run park. (Oddly, it’s not otherwise a hitter’s park— in fact, it may not even be a hitter’s park overall. It’s just very small.) Pitchers are going to make a lot of outs on the ground because a lot of the balls that are hit in the air are simply going to be unplayable for the outfielders.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 25, 2008 2:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Tester

Nick Adenhart – if Gio Gonzalez could have such a miserable year and still get on (which I think is right), then Adenhart, who was a more highly touted prospect and also had a miserable year, should also be getting a look by now.

by thudean on Nov 24, 2008 10:55 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I didn't vote for Gio, but his year in AAA was not miserable and leaps and bounds better than

Adenhart. Gio wasn’t really terrible until his third start in the majors.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 24, 2008 3:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Are people really voting to put

a guy who will slug under .400 (Gorkys) above a bunch of guys who project as actual above-average hitters?

I smell fishiness.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 24, 2008 10:57 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

As in

You must have been hit in the head with several large, heavy farm implements to vote for him?

by OccamsRazor on Nov 24, 2008 11:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

must be all those atlanta braves fans ballot stuffing

omg, cant mess up the “objectivity” of an internet poll!!!!!!!!

/sarcasm

Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.

by knockoutking on Nov 24, 2008 12:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't vote for Gorkys

…but I don’t see it as fishy that he would get 8% of the vote here. He is probably a top 100 guy and the difference between # 75 (where this poll might place him) and # 90 (maybe more reasonable, IMO) is not really that much.

Also, I am not sure that one can conlude that Gorkys will slug under .400 coming off of an injury-hampered season in Myrtle Beach at age 20.

by parish on Nov 24, 2008 5:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Being Major League Ready has to count in his favor.

Frankly, I’d like to see Brad Holt added to the list as well.

by adropofvenom on Nov 24, 2008 12:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

Still a few pitchers I like better:
Jeffress, Smardzija, Aumont, Martin Perez, Sean West, Inoa, and maybe Adam Miller (his injuries this year seemed fairly minor; I think maybe more bad luck than injury prone).

After that, maybe Poreda and Cortes, but those are very close.

So with all that, I’m probably not voting for him before around 80. But I still think he should get a tester soon.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 2:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I will try to remember to add him to the tester list tonight....if I forget please remind me in the next poll and I will do it then

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Nov 24, 2008 2:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jason Donald?

I guess he was not meant to be added as he was removed.

by parish on Nov 24, 2008 11:14 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Jonathon Niese

Tester please.

It’s gotten to where there are really only a handful of guys on the tester list I would take first.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 11:26 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Blanks

Wouldn’t have voted for him here but I thought he was supposed to be added. Also, at this point I really do think Borbon should be added to the mix as others have recently requested.

by Dalman on Nov 24, 2008 12:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Inoa...

I didn’t vote for him here, but I think he should stay on the poll. Goldstein (I think…might’ve been a BA guy) has already said he prefers Inoa to Philippe Aumont, and his ceiling is legitimately through the roof.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 12:07 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

#71

Sounds about right for Adam Miller.

by fartballs on Nov 24, 2008 12:22 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

went with aumont

very good arm
would have gone higher in draft had he been an american HS kid (even from the NE)

VERY high ceiling

Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.

by knockoutking on Nov 24, 2008 12:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

agreed

Went Aumont also

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Nov 24, 2008 2:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

salome

He’s a hit machine at catcher. I wouldn’t care if he was five foot nothing and had to crawl the ball to second.

Everyone needs a catcher. if you don’t have a catcher you get a lot of passed balls.

by wobatus on Nov 24, 2008 1:00 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Adam Miller is more important than a catcher. Without him, you have you have no team physician, no Strength and Conditioning Coach, no Physical Therapist, and no Massage Therapist. He’s a one man recession.

by fartballs on Nov 24, 2008 3:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

testers

If someone isn’t at least a tester by now, it’ll be tough to make the top 100. We’re just barely over 100 already if all the guys on the ballot plus the current testers get on.

by wobatus on Nov 24, 2008 3:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I don't know that they should

True, not many more will make it. But, I don’t know that all the current guys deserve to make it either. All it takes to get on as a tester is to be nominated. No extra points for nominating a guy 30 picks early.

I would encourage as many serious nominations as possible, just to make sure everyone gets fairly considered. At this point in the list, there really isn’t normally a big difference between player 100 and player 120 anyway.

by acerimusdux on Nov 24, 2008 3:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Uh, apparently it takes more than nomination...

seeing as how I’ve nominated Sean Doolittle 3 times, writing fairly extensively on the subject once, and he ain’t up there.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2008 4:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

true

shoulda said at this rate.

There are some players I think deserve consideration. Holt being one.

by wobatus on Nov 24, 2008 3:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Tester...

In the “get this guy into the rotation because he deserves to be a t-100” vein: Test Matt Moore. He put up Playstation stats this year and has the stuff to back it up.

by slamcactus on Nov 24, 2008 4:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

moore v Hellickson

BA actually rated him higher than hellickson. Hell, they had barnese over hellickson too and hellickson is 42 on the list.

by wobatus on Nov 25, 2008 12:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Remind me to put Moore on as a tester the next time I do the poll.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Nov 25, 2008 12:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think

that Hellickson belonged over both Moore and Barnese, but he’s the type of guy who is undervalued by BA because he’s not a flashy, highly projectable guy. He is what he is, a very polished pitcher with what appears to be a very high floor but without the ace type ceiling. That’s not a guy that gets alot of love from BA.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Nov 25, 2008 1:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

770insig_small
13 Prospect Lists, 1 Final Ranking

Recent FanPosts

41291692_small
Top 51 NL Central Prospects
Small
Community Prospect #82
Small
Porcello vs. Matusz Faceoff w/poll
Small
Sawyer Carroll, why no love?
Small
Posey in 2010
Small
Best curveball in the minors?
Small
Trayvon Robinson(LAD) Scouting Report
Small
will chapman make the reds opening day roster?
Small
Community Prospect #81
Batmanbaseball_small
Elijah Dukes Released!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Milwaukee Brewers third baseman Mat Gamel can't field a bunt by Chicago Cubs' Kosuke Fukudome, of Japan, during the first inning of a baseball game in Chicago, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2009.(AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)

Brewers Third Baseman Mat Gamel Diagnosed With 'Slightly' Torn Lat

Texas Rangers'  Nelson Cruz, left, and Chris Davis, center, are congratulated by Toby Hall, right, after they scored on a double by Elvis Andrus against the Colorado Rockies in the third inning of  a Cactus League spring baseball game in Tucson, Ariz., on Thursday, March 11, 2010. (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Texas Rangers, Dripping With Promise

In this photo taken on Sunday, Feb. 21, 2010, Colorado Rockies pitcher Huston Street throws from the mound during baseball spring training in Tucson, Ariz. Street has not worked out with the team in four days because of a sore shoulder. (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski) +1 updates

Rockies Closer Huston Street To Start Season On DL

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Carew_small John Sickels


Site Meter