Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The 2009-2010 Card Chronicle Big East basketball preview

Community Prospect List: #67

After 223 votes the winner of the poll is Carlos Carrasco with 15% of the vote.  Christopher Perez, Todd Frazier, and Dellin Betances are being removed from the poll due to a lack of support defined by having less than 5% of the vote. Daniel Cortes, Adam Miller, Kila Ka'aihue, and Angel Salome will be added to the poll.

 

1. MATT WIETERS - C (Baltimore)
2. DAVID PRICE - SP (Tampa Bay)
3. JASON HEYWARD - OF (Atlanta)
4. TRAVIS SNIDER - OF (Toronto)
5. MADISON BUMGARNER - SP (San Francisco)
6. COLBY RASMUS - OF (St. Louis)
7. CAMERON MAYBIN - OF (Florida)
8. TREVOR CAHILL - SP (Oakland)
9. NEFTALI FELIZ - SP (Texas)
10. MATT LAPORTA -  1B/OF/DH (Cleveland)
11. MIKE MOUSTAKAS - 3B (Kansas City)
12. TIM ALDERSON - SP (San Francisco)
13. PEDRO ALVAREZ - 3B (Pittsburgh)
14. RICK PORCELLO - SP (Detroit)
15. DEXTER FOWLER - OF (Colorado)
16. BRETT ANDERSON - SP (Oakland)*
17. DEREK HOLLAND - SP (Texas)
18. ANDREW McCUTCHEN - OF (Pittsburgh)
19. BUSTER POSEY - C (San Francisco)
20. CHRIS TILLMAN - SP (Baltimore)
21. LARS ANDERSON - 1B (Boston)
22. JUSTIN SMOAK - 1B (Texas)
23. THOMAS HANSON - SP (Atlanta)
24. ELVIS ANDRUS - SS (Texas)
25. ANGEL VILLALONA - 1B (San Francisco)
26. JHOULYS CHACIN - SP (Colorado)
27. BRIAN MATUSZ - SP (Baltimore)
28. ERIC HOSMER - 1B (Kansas City)
29. TIM BECKHAM - SS (Tampa Bay)
30. MAX RAMIREZ - C/1B (Texas)
31. JARROD PARKER - SP (Arizona)
32. MICHAEL STANTON - OF (Florida)
33. MAT GAMEL - 3B (Milwaukee)
34. JESUS MONTERO - C (New York-AL)
35. BRETT WALLACE - 3B (St. Louis)
36. JORDAN SCHAFER - OF (Atlanta)
37. WADE DAVIS - SP (Tampa Bay)
38. LOGAN MORRISON - 1B (Florida)
39. CARLOS SANTANA - C (Cleveland)
40. FERNANDO MARTINEZ - OF (New York-NL)
41. JAMES McDONALD - SP (Los Angeles-NL)
42. JEREMY HELLICKSON - SP (Tampa Bay)
43. JOSH VITTERS - 3B (Chicago-NL)
44. YONDER ALONSO - 1B (Cincinnati)
45. TAYLOR TEAGARDEN - C (Texas)
46. FREDDIE FREEMAN - 1B (Atlanta)
47. GORDON BECKHAM - SS (Chicago-AL)
48. BRETT CECIL - SP (Toronto)
49. ALCIDES ESCOBAR - SS (Milwaukee)
50. JORDAN ZIMMERMANN - SP (Washington)

51. CHRIS CARTER - 1B/DH (Oakland)
52. CARLOS TRIUNFEL - SS (Seattle)
53. AUSTIN JACKSON - OF (New York-AL)
54. BEN REVERE - OF (Minnesota)
55. MICHAEL BOWDEN - SP (Boston)
56. TYLER FLOWERS - C (Atlanta)
57. ADRIAN CARDENAS - SS (Oakland)
58. REID BRIGNAC - SS (Tampa Bay)
59. JAKE ARRIETA - SP (Baltimore)
60. JORDAN WALDEN - SP (Los Angeles-AL)
61. MICHAEL MAIN - SP (Texas)
62. WILMER FLORES - SS (New York-NL)
63. MATT DOMINGUEZ - 3B (Florida)
64. MICHAEL SAUNDERS - OF (Seattle)
65. DESMOND JENNINGS - OF (Tampa Bay)

66. CARLOS CARRASCO - SP (Philadelphia)

 

CANDIDATES -   Jeff Samardzija, J.P. Arencibia, Aaron Cunningham, Gio Gonzalez, Nick Weglarz, Phillippe Aumont, Jose Tabata, Jeremy Jeffress, Daniel Cortes, Adam Miller, Kila Ka'aihue, Angel Salome

TESTERS -  Jason Donald(60-1%), Kyle Blanks(62-3%), Michel Inoa(62-4%), Martin Perez(62-4%), Daryl Jones(62-2%), Andrew Lambo(63-4%), Greg Halman(63-2%), Jeff Niemann(63-0%),David Cooper(63-0%), Nick Noonan (64 - 3%), Beau Mills (64 - 3%), Jacob McGee (63 - 4%), Aaron Poreda (64 - 2%), Aaron Hicks(65-4%), Michael Burgess(65-3%) & Christopher Marrero(65-1%), Christopher Perez (66-4%), Todd Frazier (66-3%), Dellin Betances (66-2%), Ivan DeJesus, Neftali Soto, Gorkys Hernandez, Michael Taylor, Vincent Mazzaro, Scott Elbert

NOTE: I have listed by each tester the last time they were on a poll and the percentage of votes they obtained. This should help us with selecting who should be placed back on the poll etc

Poll
Who is Community Prospect #67?
Jeff Samardzija
41 votes
J.P. Arencibia
74 votes
Aaron Cunningham
77 votes
Gio Gonzalez
33 votes
Nick Weglarz
30 votes
Phillippe Aumont
47 votes
Jose Tabata
23 votes
Jeremy Jeffress
29 votes
Daniel Cortes
28 votes
Adam Miller
15 votes
Kila Ka'aihue
15 votes
Angel Salome
25 votes

437 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 149 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Question:

Why is Neftali Feliz listed as a tester?

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 8:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sure...

that this is supposed to be Neftali Soto.

by rhd on Nov 22, 2008 10:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bingo

I had a brain cramp.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Nov 22, 2008 10:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No clue...

I don’t know much about him.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Nov 22, 2008 11:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here is the majority of his BP write up

in the Reds Top 11.

The Good: Soto has plenty of raw power (including to the opposite field), and already displays it in game situations, with one scout noting, “the ball just comes off his bat differently.” His quick, easy swing should also make for a consistently high batting average, as it produces natural loft and backspin without the need for an uppercut or over-swing. He has good hands at third base and a cannon for an arm.
The Bad: Soto has far less athleticism than one would expect considering his youth and frame. He’s a slow, almost ugly runner who flails around the basepaths. He needs to improve his footwork and his range to his left in order to stay at third base, and some scouts have noted his awkward throwing mechanics, which include him cocking his wrist behind his head and releasing from his ear.
Fun Fact: During his brief stint in the Pioneer League, Soto torched lefties by going 10-for-18 with four doubles and three home runs.
Perfect World Projection: He becomes a good-average, high-power third baseman with enough defense to stay there.
Glass Half Empty: Soto probably develops into an outfielder with a good arm, lots of power, and bad plate discipline. Hey, isn’t that Jose Guillen?

So it sounds like he has work to do to stay at 3B, but may probably end up in an OF corner.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Nov 22, 2008 11:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Soto's defense

He has some work to do over at third. He needs to work on his footwork and his arm is only average over there. That said, he doesn’t really project to move off the position any time soon.

by dougdirt on Nov 23, 2008 12:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jeffress or Arencibia?

I could go either way at this point, anybody bored and want to try and convince me one way or the other?

by DiegoAsFan on Nov 22, 2008 6:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

thanks for that

i really dont know why arencicbia has so much support here… Skipworth and Salome are much better options to me.

by daveh33 on Nov 23, 2008 2:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Salome?

Who’s the last guy who hit in the majors at 5’7"? I hope he proves me wrong, but I really don’t see it happening.

by slamcactus on Nov 23, 2008 11:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Umm...
Who’s the last guy who hit in the majors at 5’7"?

This year’s AL MVP…?

by alskor on Nov 23, 2008 12:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pedroia

is 5’ 9" 180. Salome is 5’ 7" 190.

But why would that make him incapable of hitting? He won’t be a star and I don’t think he should be top 100, but I think he’ll probably hit .270/.350/.400 and from a catcher that’s pretty decent.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 23, 2008 12:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pedroia is definitely shorter than 5'9"

Definitely. Seen him in person. 5’9" is a lie.

I agree with your point generally though… and Pedroia obviously is not a good comp for… well, anyone… ever…

by alskor on Nov 23, 2008 12:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

...

Last year’s NL MVP?

by supermets on Nov 23, 2008 1:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Some short guys decent at hitting

Tim Raines
Joe Morgan
Ivan Rodriguez
Kirby Puckett

by siddfynch on Nov 23, 2008 6:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So...

Gio had a relatively disappointing season. I don’t see how this equates to a drop from 37 last year to not even being on at 67 this year.

I know I can’t expect continuity on a community prospect list from year to year, but a lot of the voters are the same, and I can say this is a bit of SNTS.

I’d take Gio over these guys.

by Daniel Plainview on Nov 22, 2008 7:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think the main thing is....

He has shown very poor control this year and looked terrible in his major league stint. I am not saying that I agree with him being judged so harshly due to his major league showing (small sample size) but I would guess those are the two primary factors.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Nov 22, 2008 7:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

it's more than that

you say he had a poor showing THIS year, but that is in comparison to the “good” season he had last year while REPEATING AA, something I was not impressed with at all, so he shouldn’t have been ranked that high last year and is what he is, which is NOT what people thought he was last year

by IHateMitchMustain on Nov 23, 2008 3:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cunningham

For reasons previously elaborated.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 7:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Is a 4th OF better than a #3 SP?

It seems we only have 20 pitchers in our top 66, and people are bringing up relatively low ceiling position guys at this point. I would maybe have Vince Mazzaro ahead of Cunningham in the Oakland system.

by acerimusdux on Nov 22, 2008 7:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

-1

"With 16-year-old Dominican righty Michel Inoa in tow, Gio Gonzalez improving at Triple-A and lefty Brett Anderson carving up Double-Abatters along with Simmons and Trevor Cahill, Oakland’s pitching depthis officially the envy of baseball." - BaseballAmerica.com

by Syphon on Nov 22, 2008 7:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cunningham isn't a 4th OF

I see a Markakis-lite upside. Every guy we put on doesn’t need to have the ceiling of the unholy hybrid of Joe DiMaggio and the Buddha. Sometimes it’s worth considering risk profiles and floors as well, and that’s why people are pushing for Cunningham.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 8:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Voted Cunningham

but I disagree with Markakis-lite sort of. Cunningham has the fielding ability, the power ability, the speed and plate discipline to be Markakis period. The only question is the BA, and even that won’t be too much less.

by METSMETSMETS on Nov 22, 2008 11:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry that was a mistype

Was supposed to say Markakis-like.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 11:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Defensive ability?

Not saying this to knock Cunningham, but Markakis is the best defensive rightfielder in baseball. Cunningham isn’t at that level.

by aap212 on Nov 23, 2008 12:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brian Giles begs to differ

Also, he’s projected as barely above average by CHONE’s fielding projections.

Franklin Gutierrez is projected at 22 runs above average. Which is insane. I’m going to say he’s the better outfielder too. Denard Span easily beats him out if he’s in right. Etc. Markakis isn’t close to tops; in fact, the (highly unreliable, mind you) projection for Aaron Cunningham is actually better than Markakis’s.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 2:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One guy has a consistent track record of raking everywhere he's been

The other has had one good season out of three.

This really isn’t a tough call.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 3:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cunningham until he's on

At worst, he’s Kevin Mench. That’s good for #67.

I wasn’t pushing for him earlier like others were, but it’s time.

by aap212 on Nov 22, 2008 7:29 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Jeffress

I voted for Samardzija here, but Jeffress is another high ceiling guy I’d like to see on there at this point. His numbers aren’t great but he’s got at least 2 plus pitches, was only 20 this year, and has the upside to be one of those top 50 guys next year.

by acerimusdux on Nov 22, 2008 7:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Well it looks like Cunningham's gonna take this one

…Jeffress and Weglarz feel like big bargains here.

I just looked up the stats, because I had forgotten how impressive Weglarz’s BB:SO ratio was at 70:76… he also hit for decent power in a tough league at the age of 20… I think he should be getting more votes here.

.275/.399/.437 .836

with 35 xbh in 371 AB….

by daveh33 on Nov 22, 2008 7:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The left handed Nick Evans

I like him. I’d like to get some more pitching on, then maybe Hallman and Hicks. But I’ll probably be voting for Weglarz soon.
 

by acerimusdux on Nov 22, 2008 7:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Halman

Needs some love. I know his plate discipline is frightening, but he’s got legit tools – CF-caliber speed, great power. Upside of Alfonso Soriano with better outfield defense?

Probably not until the mid-70s, but still. I want him and Kyle Blanks on. The only argument against Blanks is that he’s fat.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 8:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

Plate discipline is important, but the guy was only 20 this year, and those were some monster numbers in A+ ball (and he handled AA after being promoted.) I tend to worry about guys with poor plate discipline struggling against better pitching, but for being only 20 and already putting up an .813 OPS in AA, that can’t be too much of a concern at this point. The guy was hitting 1 xbh per 8.5 PA this year, and 29 of those xbh were HR.

by acerimusdux on Nov 22, 2008 8:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Add my name...

to those campaigning for Halman. Plate discipline still is bad, but it actually improved this year (from horrendous!), and, as you said, he’s still very young. I dont know of another guy w his power/speed combo in the entire minors. Right here is a good spot for him.

by rhd on Nov 22, 2008 10:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Voted Cortes here

Arencibia does not walk at all which is extremely worrying to say the least. Cunningham has a very limited upside in my opinion. Jeffress is pretty wild right now though he does have that great fastball, unfortunately this combination makes it a good chance he will end up in the bullpen soon enough. Weglarz has a very good approach at the plate for his age but he plays a corner OF position meaning he needs to hit for more power to be more than a backup OF.

I really like Aumont, but right now he is too far off and very raw right now. Samardzja is likewise very raw for a college pitcher but has excellent stuff. However, I have two issues with him right now. First, his K/9 has been really unflattering except for a small sample at AAA this year, which is really worrying considering the stuff he has. Second, I fear due to his contract, he is being rushed and this could really hurt the development of such a raw player(his BB/9 went up 2/9 this year and maintained that despite bullpen use in MLB).

by tdot mariner fan on Nov 22, 2008 8:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Time for some pitching

after Cunningham wins this one, I’m voting Cortes, Samardzija, Jeffress, Aumont in some kind of order. Cortes should come next though.

by DrunkIrish on Nov 23, 2008 2:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Arencibia is my choice

but if you want a igh ceiling pitcher i’d go Aumont next. He has as high of a ceiling as anyone on this list.

I heard Tim Lincecum will win 1 Cy Young & 11 Tim Lincecums. Question is, how many Cole Hamels will he win?

by the pinstripes on Nov 22, 2008 8:24 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Aumont

is a far better prospect that Arencibia.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 10:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But, but...

home runs! And, he plays catcher!

by DrunkIrish on Nov 23, 2008 2:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

trust me

if he has that plate discipline above AA, he WONT be hitting that many homeruns

by IHateMitchMustain on Nov 23, 2008 3:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

After watching the AFL championship game today..

got me to thinking where people think Josh Donaldson should fall. If he can stay behind the plate he could provide a pretty good bat for the position. Thoughts?

"With 16-year-old Dominican righty Michel Inoa in tow, Gio Gonzalez improving at Triple-A and lefty Brett Anderson carving up Double-Abatters along with Simmons and Trevor Cahill, Oakland’s pitching depthis officially the envy of baseball." - BaseballAmerica.com

by Syphon on Nov 22, 2008 9:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

keith law on donaldson

puts him in his 09 top 50, mainly due to his positional value

though has been playing mainly 1b in AFL…didnt play much C/3b as i wouldve expected

by Asfan4ever723 on Nov 23, 2008 12:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He wasn't a "priority" prospect

They sent him there to squeeze some ABs in.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 3:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and the less time he spends behind the plate in the post-post season, the better

best not to wear out a prospects legs too early in his career if you don’t have to, especially when its his bat that will carry him.

facepalm.jpg

by Zonis on Nov 23, 2008 3:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Testers

Testers for Austin Romine (BA NYY #4) or Zach McAllister (BA NYY #6)? If anything at least Romine here, no?

--Pablo Zevallos of yankeesfuture.wordpress.com

by Pablo Zevallos on Nov 22, 2008 9:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ugh

No. -1,000,000

by alskor on Nov 22, 2008 9:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why?

Per project prospect, he’s a better prospect than arencibia, and romine ranks 4th while arencibia ranks 2nd when the yanks have a better system. put hype aside and think about it.

--Pablo Zevallos of yankeesfuture.wordpress.com

by Pablo Zevallos on Nov 22, 2008 9:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Uhhh

Yankees don’t have a better system than the Blue Jays. Travis Snider and Brett Cecil both outclass anything in the Yankees pipeline. The speciality of the Yankees system right now is pitchers with good potential but insufficient data.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 9:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

See

a system isn’t just about high-end talent. the depth in the yankees system outclasses the depth of the jays’ system

--Pablo Zevallos of yankeesfuture.wordpress.com

by Pablo Zevallos on Nov 22, 2008 10:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Tim Collins says hi

The Yankees do have a lot of guys like McAllister, Betances, Brackman, Sanchez, but their position player depth is abysmal. They traded a substantial amount of their depth in the Nady/Marte and Swisher deals. The Jays have 2 great prospects, 1 decent, and a lot of filler…the Yankees have 2 prospects (Jackson/Montero) and a lot of filler. I tend to think in terms of impact players, and the Jays right now have more of those.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 10:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think Brackman qualifies as filler. And do you really think Marquez serves as depth? He would never have made it to the majors with the Yankees. Never, unless a million people went down. Jhonny Nunez isn’t a prospect, and Ross Ohlendorf is borderline. That means we basically traded Tabata and McCutchen, so we didn’t trade much depth, right?

--Pablo Zevallos of yankeesfuture.wordpress.com

by Pablo Zevallos on Nov 22, 2008 10:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brackman

is an enigma, and I’m ultra-cautious about hyping him until we actually see some results. That said, he’s a physical freak on par with Ryan Anderson…though that comp isn’t all that friendly for Brackman. Marquez I could see getting a stint as a long man out of the pen somewhere….

The Yankees graduated a lot of their best prospects in the past couple of years and need to restock.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 10:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

a physical freak on par with Ryan Anderson

You mean he’ll post 21 and 10 a game in a tough-as-nails Pac-10?

I wish he had come back this year; Cal would have been the outright favorites in their conference.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 3:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ryan Anderson

the Mariners’ messiah a few years back?

by OccamsRazor on Nov 23, 2008 12:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, I know

I just seize on any opportunity to mention how ridiculous the basketball Ryan Anderson’s 07-08 season was. He was the best player no one had ever heard of.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 2:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He's half the prospect Arencibia is.

And I dont think Arencibia even belongs on the list yet.

If anyone is the product of hype its Romine, not Arencibia.

by alskor on Nov 22, 2008 10:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As I said

just a tester

--Pablo Zevallos of yankeesfuture.wordpress.com

by Pablo Zevallos on Nov 22, 2008 10:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

"put the hype aside and think about it"

Sorry but that coming from a Yankees fan in regards to their farm system is just kind of funny.

by Kenan and Kel on Nov 22, 2008 10:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not before

Angel Salome and Josh Donaldson….and only Salome even sniffs top 100. I’m a Yankees fan and very high on Romine, but I can’t reasonably put him anywhere near this point in the prospect list.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 22, 2008 9:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that's why

he’d be a tester, not a real candidate per se

--Pablo Zevallos of yankeesfuture.wordpress.com

by Pablo Zevallos on Nov 22, 2008 9:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Testers should be real candidates

We’re not trying to create a list of every prospect we like at all.

by aap212 on Nov 22, 2008 10:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Romine/McAllister

Both top 100 prospects, just not quite this early I think.

by mrkupe on Nov 22, 2008 10:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

sounds good

--Pablo Zevallos of yankeesfuture.wordpress.com

by Pablo Zevallos on Nov 22, 2008 10:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Neither...

are anywhere close to top 100 prospects.

by rhd on Nov 22, 2008 10:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Uh huh

I’m not huge on McAllister, but he does a lot of the things you like to see out of a young pitcher.

I am, however, very big on Austin Romine. Very promising bat with a good chance to stick at catcher.

by mrkupe on Nov 22, 2008 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Id say McAllister is going to be borderline (90-100) on most lists

Romine will be off of most lists.

I think the inclusion of McAllister will be a mistake, fwiw…

by alskor on Nov 22, 2008 11:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

More Romine/McAllister

On Romine – you’re probably right. But he’s definitely on mine.

McAllister, I’m not quite sure what to think. His stuff seems solid enough and he throws plenty of strikes. He’s a little too hittable at this point but he’s young enough to develop his repertoire and improve on that. If somebody could look into the future and tell me that he ends up as a mid-rotation innings eater with a solid-but-not-spectacular career, it wouldn’t shock me. I think he’s probably in those last 5-10 guys, but that’s okay.

by mrkupe on Nov 23, 2008 12:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

McAllister

Good (though not great) fastball, no real swing and miss secondary stuff at this point, but good mechanics and command. I think he could be in the mix in the back end of the top 100 a year from now if things go right and his repertoire continues to improve (he only learned the CB fairly recently).

I think there are probably too many similar ceiling guys at higher levels who are farther along right now for him to make it this year. Guy like Aaron Poreda, Daryl Thompson, Vince Mazzaro, Shairon Martis, etc.

by acerimusdux on Nov 23, 2008 12:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Eh

It’s going to be close, I think. Poreda is definitely on, no doubter. Mazzaro is going to get on to, I really like him. The other two are iffy – concerned about Thompson’s health, and Martis doesn’t excite me.

by mrkupe on Nov 23, 2008 1:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As a very skeptical A's fan

what exactly do you like about Mazzaro to warrant putting him in the top 100? I wouldn’t personally have him in there, but I’m curious to hear your thoughts.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Nov 23, 2008 1:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Marrazo

3.63 MLE FIP per minorleaguesplits.com, 50.4 GB%, was only 21 this year. He came a bit out of nowhere this year, and isn’t as high ceiling as those other A’s guys. But he’s a legit back to mid rotation candidate.

I like Poreda and Niese next as far as upper level mid-rotation guys, but I don’t really want to get into them until we get Jeffress, Aumont, and Samardzija up there.

by acerimusdux on Nov 23, 2008 3:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just from the tester lists

I’d rather have Jeffress, Shark, Poreda, Gio, Niemann, and Cortes for sure over Mazzaro, not to mention guys like Niese, West, Tucker, McGee, Aumont(not a huge fan) that I might prefer to Mazzaro. I don’t see the mid rotation level as really something he’s likely to reach. He just seems like a 5th starter to me, and while that certainly has value, there are plenty of guys I’d rather have than him, especially from now until we get to 100.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Nov 23, 2008 3:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Eh... I'd say Mazzaro easily has a shot at being Joe Blanton

and Blanton definitely isn’t a 5th starter.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 3:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Blanton

posted lower walk rates and much better K rates in the minors than Mazzaro has. I can buy Blanton as Mazzaro’s absolute best case scenario, but I think the odds of him reaching that level are pretty low.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Nov 23, 2008 3:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd say

that James Simmons easily has a shot at being Joe Blanton, but the potential to be better than that. Mazzaro has the potential to be Joe Blanton, but will likely fall short of that.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Nov 23, 2008 3:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting comparison

Both pitchers are the same age and at the same level. Mazzaro struggled in his age 19/20 seasons at A-/A+ while Simmons dominated his age 19/20 seasons in the Big West. As 21 y/o’s in AA both pitchers had good seasons with Simmons K’ing a few more but Mazzaro used his sinker to limit hits and HR’s better.

I’m interested in why you think Simmons will easily reach Blanton-level performance but Mazzaro will likely fall short?

by DiegoAsFan on Nov 23, 2008 2:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Simmons

has better stuff. Simmons to me is Kevin Slowey with better stuff, at least from what I’ve read comparing scouting reports. Unless it’s really changed, Slowey doesn’t a real plus pitch, but Simmons’ CU is plus, and his fastball I think is close to plus.

Mazzaro hasn’t ever pitched this well before, and while I can totally buy the fact that he may have improved, I’m not sure there is much more room for improvement for him. I see him posting a K/9 of 5 or so, with around a 2.5-3BB/9 rate. He’s gonna get groundballs and that’s important, but I don’t know that he has a true major league out pitch, which is why I think his K rate is going to be low.

I could be all wet on this and Mazzaro could turn out better, but this year was so different from his track record, I’m just not ready to buy into it yet. If he can do this again in 2009, put me on the bandwagon, but not before that.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Nov 23, 2008 3:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I mostly agree with you.

Mazzaro had an impressive year for AA ball, but the average SO rate (around 6.9) with the low walk rate (2.25) likely means he’s more of a #4-5 if those ratios fall off at all as he moves up. But I think the same applies to Poreda (6.6 so9, 2.24 bb9).

I mostly brought him up as a good wishful thinking future comp for McAllister (6.85 SO9, 1.25 BB9, but in A ball), who might not be top 150 at this point, and will be lucky if he can get into the discussion in another year. These other guys with similar modest upside at least have proven something at higher levels at this point. A couple are good rotation candidates for 2009. McAllister can only hope he does as well at passing the AA test.

And to clarify, I didn’t mean Poreda and Niese next after Mazzaro, I meant the higher ceiling guys (Jeffress, Samardzija, Aumont) first (and props for mentioning West, he deserves a tester too), and that Niese and Poreda would be the next polished #3-4 types (I’ll maybe add Gio to that), that I’d put up.

But Mazzaro is close enough to be in the discussion at the very tail end here. I don’t think McAllister is yet.

by acerimusdux on Nov 23, 2008 5:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pitchers and stuff

Aumont comes in towards the end for me, although I like him – just a little concerned about a raw guy with arm issues, even if they’re overstated to an (unknown) extent. Jeffress I’ve already said my piece on – he’s one of the best pitching prospects in the minors and would already be woefully underrated if he won this poll. Poreda is impressing for a relatively raw guy – a plus fastball with command out of a lefty goes a long way.

Mazzaro is a bit of a sleeper, but he’s a sinkerballer and they do take some time to refine their craft. Good solid repertoire . . .I see no reason why he can’t eat plenty of innings and do it at a high-quality level. Note the BA Texas League Top 20, where Mazzaro came in at No. 4. Also note some of the names above and below him on that list and reference their placement there with where they are here. Not that BA is the be-all and end-all, but if the guys in the Texas League think his stuff for real, the performance is certainly solidifying his slot in prospectdom.

by mrkupe on Nov 23, 2008 3:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jeffress has poor command of both his pitches and his actions

Not a particularly good combination. He’s insanely high-risk. At least with Dukes and Young, you could be pretty confident that they’d be good if they got on the field.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 2:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Overstated

Poor command of his actions? The kid smoked pot, to which I say big deal. People in their late teens/early 20s do it all the time and grow out of it. He’s not sending threatening messages to people, he’s not pulling guns on people, he’s not even getting behind the wheel after boozing it up. If this serves as a gateway to more destructive behavior or it interferes with his work, then I have an issue. But at his age, I’m inclined to believe it’s just a kid trying to cope with life in general, fame and the pressure it brings.

I’m not thrilled to see it, but I don’t think he’s going to toke himself into oblivion.

His command is a work in progress, but he’s not easy to hit and strikes out tons of guys – I’d put it more at “adequate for his age” than “poor”. Poor to me would be getting hit around start after start despite having really good pitches.

by mrkupe on Nov 23, 2008 7:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

McAllister

is lightyears away from the Top 100, IMO. He’s like a diet-Samardzjia but obviously further from the bigs, and Samardzjia himself probably won’t even crack the Top 75.

by METSMETSMETS on Nov 22, 2008 11:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Samardzija?

I don’t see very much of Samardzija in McAllister. McAllister is relatively polished and throws tons of strikes, maybe too many of them for his own good. Samardzija is just an all-out power pitcher who, when he’s fortunate enough to be spotting his fastball, just mows through hitters.

I haven’t decided about Samardzija yet. The raw stuff and athleticism says top 25-30 prospect. His flaws push him down a bit, but just how far?

by mrkupe on Nov 23, 2008 12:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Julio Borbon.

"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract

by tyd3311 on Nov 22, 2008 10:00 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

i can see him anywhere from

now to 80…

Same exact stats that Ellsbury had at the same age and level except for his BB rate that showed improvement in the AFL (which isn’t worth much).

Ellsbury ranked 33 after that list. Being that his walks are an issue and hes a Ranger not a Red Sox, probably add 40 spots. So I see 73….

by laxtonto on Nov 22, 2008 10:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hmm

i guess he could go somewhere in here, im really not that sure how he fits in with the rest of the prospects on the board. Martin Perez might be another guy to consider, but probably is guy out of the top 75 or so.

by blalock84 on Nov 22, 2008 11:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Perez

Im guessing most national lists won’t have him or at the most will put him in the 90s. Even though I believe most Ranger fans will put him ahead of Borbon I doubt hes viewed that way nationally simply due to how far away he is and how young he is.

I would put Borbon on the ballot about here. I think he is a 65-75 prospect. Perez is closer to 90-100 prospect.

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Nov 23, 2008 12:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well...

When I looked at the poll about 1 hour ago, Cunningham had a comfortable lead, and Arencibia was aobut tied w Aumont for 2nd. Now, Arencibia has almost caught Cunningham:

Who is Community Prospect #67?
8% Jeff Samardzija 18 votes
15% J.P. Arencibia 32 votes
17% Aaron Cunningham 36 votes
7% Gio Gonzalez 16 votes
6% Nick Weglarz 13 votes
10% Phillippe Aumont 22 votes
4% Jose Tabata 10 votes
8% Jeremy Jeffress 17 votes
9% Daniel Cortes 19 votes
2% Adam Miller 6 votes
2% Kila Ka’aihue 5 votes
5% Angel Salome 11 votes
205 votes

by rhd on Nov 22, 2008 10:59 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Actually

the vote differential (4) hasn’t changed

--Pablo Zevallos of yankeesfuture.wordpress.com

by Pablo Zevallos on Nov 22, 2008 11:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The list I posted...

was at the time of my post, 10:59 PM. An hour before, it was quite different.

by rhd on Nov 22, 2008 11:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i definatley agree,,,

thought the same thing.. Some how Cunningham has gotten a huge boost the last several hours.

by laxtonto on Nov 23, 2008 1:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You mean Arencibia

Cunningham has been ahead the whole time and Arencibia keeps catching up despite a complete lack of support in the comments. I call shenanigans.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 23, 2008 1:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I voted for Arencibia

and I think he’s pulled pretty solid numbers for a few polls now, finishing top 3 in the last three polls. I don’t think it’s really odd at all. Pinstripes has made the case for him many times, does he have to rehash it every poll? Plenty of Arencibia debate the last few polls.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Nov 23, 2008 1:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

"Made the case"

that phrase suggests something he certainly hasn’t done.

by DrunkIrish on Nov 23, 2008 2:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

"made the case"

well, i certainly made a case as to why i like him at this spot. the problem is that he has a serious plate discipline issue that you along w/ many others feel he can’t or won’t overcome. i, for one, feel that he can. i’m not oblivious to the fact that this is a real issue and that it exists. i haven’t tried to avoid the issue in fact i’ve said many times he needs to improve.

this subject has been beat dead. i guess we’ll agree to disagree.

I heard Tim Lincecum will win 1 Cy Young & 11 Tim Lincecums. Question is, how many Cole Hamels will he win?

by the pinstripes on Nov 24, 2008 9:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nonsense

I’ve been watching the whole time, never saw much of a lead.

Not long after someone posted “it looks like Cunningham’s gonna take this one” above, Cunningham was at around 18 votes, and a lead of maybe 5, and there were a couple of the pitchers tied at 10 as well, and I thought it was way premature to make such a comment.

Cunningham’s has gotten as many surges as anyone, if you include the one early on.

I also don’t see that much difference in support in the comments, and I’ve debated a bit against both.

by acerimusdux on Nov 23, 2008 2:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

sucks?

.400/.532 oba and slugging at age 22 in AA and AAA not doing it for you, huh?

by wobatus on Nov 23, 2008 12:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm going to repeat my challenge

Find me a hitter (or better, more than one, since there can be weird outliers at any level) who has done what he’s done, at his age, who turned out to suck as a hitter in MLB.

Even Andy Marte had worse hitting numbers in the minors, though he plays a scarcer position.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 3:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comp

I’m beating on this one pretty hard because it only dawned on me today, but I think Cunningham’s downside is becoming Kevin Mench. That’s a really good downside to have.

by aap212 on Nov 23, 2008 3:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ruben Mateo?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 23, 2008 5:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ruben Rivera?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 23, 2008 5:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How does he profile similarly to either of those players?

Those guys were both tools busts that were promoted very aggressively by their organizations.

by aap212 on Nov 23, 2008 8:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.983 OPS in the PCL (Okla City) at age 21

Actually a year ahead of Cunningham.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 23, 2008 9:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And?

They’re not similar players. Also, Rivera is widely regarded as a guy whose tools were so great, it took extraordinarily bad makeup among other things for him to not be able to perform at the big league level.

by aap212 on Nov 23, 2008 12:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's a fair answer to the challenge, but even those players have lower minors OPSes than Cunningham did

It’s quite possible, given that, that they simply had a couple of fluky good years in the minors that fooled people into thinking they were better than they really were. Or maybe it was mental makeup, who knows.

They seem like better comparisons for Wladimir Balentien, who I have also been known to express desire to obtain… maybe I’ll tone that down a bit…

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 2:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

To be fair...

Wladimir Balentien will almost certainly never steal Derek Jeter’s glove and sell it.

by aap212 on Nov 23, 2008 2:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe he'll steal Ichiro's glove instead

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 2:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jose Tabata on this list is laughable.

"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract

by tyd3311 on Nov 22, 2008 11:59 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Laughable

Going into 2008 Callis had Tabata at #22. John had him at #25 among hitting prospects. The list could go on and on. Were those rankings laughable?

by Dalman on Nov 23, 2008 12:21 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Honestly?

I think they were to a certain extent. His success at A/A+ and in AA after the trade this year was a result of inflated BABIPs. .363 at A, .360 at A+, and a ridiculous .412 in Altoona.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 23, 2008 1:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Is it really inflated

if he was able to repeatedly able to put up a high BABIP over several years? I think people get too caught up in looking at BABIP in a vacuum and not realizing that it might be a repeatable skill. It’s certainly useful in looking for fluctuations, which would indicate that his Altoona stats are likely to come down, but I don’t think we can say that the .360+ BABIP’s were the result of luck given Tabata’s track record.

http://mvn.com/milb-yankees/

by lemonjello on Nov 23, 2008 12:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We can, given his LD%

LD% plus .120 should = BABIP, roughly. Think of it as an eyeball tool to figure out true talent BABIP, basically.

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/data-erratum-etcetera/

So:

2007: .109 + .120 = .229
2008: .133 LD% + .120 = .253

Conclusion? He hasnt really hit the ball that hard outside of 06 (18% LD% – 05 was 6%). His BABIP’s are luck driven. He’s not hitting line drives – he’s hitting flyballs and groundballs. Unless you can show me some special skill he has to explain how he is able to turn flyballs (in play) and groundballs into hits at a MUCH better rate than every other player… well, I think Tabata is crap, frankly.. and I always have.

But I mean… unless a guy is super fast (Ellsbury/Ichiro/Rickey Henderson style) or hits the ball really hard (Big Papi, Adam Vlad, etc…) they really arent capable of regularly posting BABIPs that high.

by alskor on Nov 23, 2008 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LD% + .120 is for the major leagues

I’m not sure you can use it to analyze minor league BABIP’s, given that the quality of defense is probably much lower. While I can’t point to a “special skill”, the fact that he has been able to post a high BABIP with consistency over his career would seem to suggest that he has whatever skill that is.

http://mvn.com/milb-yankees/

by lemonjello on Nov 23, 2008 1:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

2 things

1. LD rate plus 120 is a rough rule of thumb at best for the majors, and does not not not not not not NOT work in the minor leagues. Ever. Don’t do it, people. The scoring there is screwy and does not map to statistical studies done on MLB hitters.

2. Jose Tabata, who has gimpy power at best to this point, is unlikely to post a high BABIP in MLB.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 2:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I realize it doesnt translate completely

but as a rule of thumb I think it illustrates the problem with Tabata – he doesnt hit enough line drives to regularly hit for those types of BABIPs at any level.

by alskor on Nov 23, 2008 4:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Daryl Jones

Surprised he didn’t get more love when he was on the poll. He’s got game.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Nov 23, 2008 12:29 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Jones

the lefty aaron cunningam

by wobatus on Nov 23, 2008 12:56 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What's the argument for either Jones or Cunningham -- who are likely to be pretty good but not

outstanding hitters over Salome or Arencibia, or for that matter DeJesus or Coghlan who are likely to be pretty good hitters at more premium defensive positions? Is the Cunningham/Jones skill set really that rare?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 23, 2008 2:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's partially

a matter of how “likely” these people are to be “pretty good hitters.” There’s a much higher degree of confidence with Cunningham and Jones than Arencibia or DeJesus, who both have mixed track records and huge holes in their games. Certainly upside matters, but it’s not ALL that matters.

by OccamsRazor on Nov 23, 2008 3:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Argument for Jones or Cunningham

I said it earlier with Cunningham, but I think his worst case scenario (not counting injuries, etc.) is Kevin Mench. That’s a pretty good downside. Jones probably has a lower downside and a higher upside than Cunningham, but I would put both ahead of Arencibia. Arencibia has such poor plate discipline that I think his upside is limited (especially considering how many superior young backstops have jobs secured in the majors right now), and his downside is ugly. Like I said before, one of his better outcomes is to be Rod Barajas, and that ain’t pretty.

by aap212 on Nov 23, 2008 3:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well

DeJesus isn’t “likely” to be a pretty good hitter. When you have a guy with an IsoP that tops out at .099, you don’t have someone likely to be a good hitter. Especially when DeJesus is running off of one year with a good BA. The only thing you can count on Ivan doing in the majors is having good plate discipline, and if he pans out a .280/.360/.360 line with 10 SB. I doubt he’ll even crack the .800 OPS mark in his entire career.

Arencibia has yet to walk over 20 times in a season. You can’t be a good MLB player without taking some pitches. Even Juan Pierre walked 40 to 50 times a year when he was doing well. The only good player I’ve seen with no discipline is Alfonso Soriano, who luckily has incredible pop and speed.

There is an argument for Salome, albeit not an incredible if you look at Cunningham’s numbers.

As for Coghlan, Cunningham has put up similar OBPs with a much higher SLG, is a year younger and closer to the MLB. THe only thing Coghlan has on Cunningham is some speed, which in most cases is the least valuable of any offensive tool.

by METSMETSMETS on Nov 23, 2008 11:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

Hicks certainly deserves to be on the candidate list at this stage

by Rotobronco on Nov 23, 2008 8:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Antonelli

He’ll prove you haters wrong

by prestonb1291 on Nov 23, 2008 9:51 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

well the burden is certainly on him

Accidentally not thedude925 anymore. I do hate this new name.

by wildthang on Nov 23, 2008 3:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Weglarz

Voted for Weglarz. He just has so much potential as a slugger with a high OBP. He wasn’t overmatched at all in high A as a 20-year old — he improved his K rate will maintaining his walk rate. His ISOP went down a bit, but he was playing in more of a pitchers league and he seemed to adjust after the all star break putting up a .858 OPS.

by JP_Frost on Nov 23, 2008 11:29 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

sulentic, why doesnt this guy get more attention?

did very well in cal league at 20 yrs old before getting injured
does his horrible 07 temper the enthusiasm about his upside or lack of it?
i know his defensive position was an issue..maybe hype but his coaches said he improved..could "play in the big leagues now as an outfielder

 is the main drawback the power?

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?n=Matthew%20Sulentic&pos=CF&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=501991

by Asfan4ever723 on Nov 23, 2008 12:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

To many questions for Sulentic

I don’t really consider Sulentic even a competitor for top 100 prospects. There is some ability there and he could have a nice career, but right now he is a corner outfielder with no power and a very inconsistent performance history. It’s not just that he had 1 poor year, it’s that 1 year constitutes 40% of his pro career, and even when he was good he hasn’t shown the power to be succeed as a corner outfielder.

by DiegoAsFan on Nov 23, 2008 2:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow...seriously?

Seems not impressive at all to me. Going to have to do better than .849 OPS in the CAL to be a top prospect…

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Nov 23, 2008 2:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cannot see how anyone has him in front of Sean Doolittle

His best case scenario is to become Dustin Pedroia in the outfield. That sounds great but a. a lot of Pedroia’s value is tied up in being a plus defender at second, b. a lot of his hitting value comes from the fact that his bat plays well in Fenway, and c. he’s overrated in any event.

Sulentic needs to make massive improvements in his game to become even a league-average corner outfielder. He’s young enough that it’s not impossible, especially if power comes, but he’s just not top 100 material at this point.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2008 2:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

POLL IS OVER

Runoff poll coming soon.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Nov 23, 2008 2:55 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Top-10 Prospects of the Last 20 years: Hitters
Pose_small
SHS 'spect list continued....101-201
Hu_080227mag_uptonscover_small
daveh's top 111 prospects for 2010

Recent FanPosts

Small
last year's rookies, kickoff
Small
How about a package of Maine and Castillo for Zambrano?
Small
BA PHI TOP 10
Img587561916661595
Top 15 high school MLB draft prospects
Small
BP BAL Top 15
N16115505_31581383_8646_small
Rising Stars Chat
Small
Dexter Fowler and UZR
Small
Teahen to the White Sox....
Planetterror_small
Stephen Strasburg is out of the AFL Rising Stars Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Carew_small John Sickels


Site Meter