Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Dead - Former NFL QB Shot and Killed


Arizona Diamondbacks Top 20 Prospects for 2008

Arizona Diamondbacks Top 20 Prospects for 2008

All grades are EXTREMELY PRELIMINARY and subject to change.

  1. Jarrod Parker, RHP, Grade B+
  2. Max Scherzer, RHP, Grade B+
  3. Gerardo Parra, OF, Grade B
  4. Billy Buckner, RHP, Grade B
  5. Wes Roemer, RHP, Grade B
  6. Brooks Brown, RHP, Grade B-
  7. Esmerling Vasquez, RHP, Grade B-
  8. Barry Enright, RHP, Grade B-
  9. Juan Gutierrez, RHP, Grade C+
  10. Emilio Bonifacio, INF, Grade C+
  11. Hector Ambriz, RHP, Grade C+
  12. Matt Torra, RHP, Grade C+ (look at his first half/second half splits)
  13. Cyle Hankerd, OF, Grade C+
  14. Ed Easley, C, Grade C+
  15. Dan Stange, RHP, Grade C+
  16. Jailen Peguero, RHP, Grade C
  17. Matt Green, RHP, Grade C
  18. Reynaldo Navarro, SS, Grade C (great tools but too raw to rank higher for me)
  19. Leo Rosales, RHP, Grade C (personal favorite, relief sleeper for '08)
  20. Sean Morgan, RHP, Grade C
Other Grade C guys include Tony Barnette, Javier Brito, Dallas Buck, Bryan Byrne, Wilkin Castillo, Pedro Ciriaco, Pete Clifford, Josh Collmenter, Clayton Conner, Jamie D'Antona, Evan Frey, Mark Hallberg, Brad Miller, Dan Perales, Connor Robertson, and Cesar Valdez.

The top of this system was lopped off by trades, but they have the ability to recharge quickly and some of these Grade C+ guys could end up being quite good.

Again, don't get all pissy about exact placement on this list. The grades are more important than someone being ranked 15th instead of 13th.

Of course, full statistics and reports on over 1,000 other players will be in the 2008 Baseball Prospect Book, now available for pre-order. Ships the first Monday in February!

1 recs | Comment 49 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Cyle Hankerd
Is too low

by Sabean2009 on Jan 5, 2008 2:00 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hankerd
I really liked him before this season. I thought he would hit a lot more than he did, especially in the California league. I am not ready to completely write him off, but after Jon Zeringue I am careful when judging D-Backs prospects.

by bl on Jan 5, 2008 2:32 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Drafted Well
I really like the way the DBacks draft.

by MHD on Jan 5, 2008 2:14 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1
Me too. I still can't believe Parker got to them. They have made many selections I have really like over the past few years. Brooks Brown and Dallas Buck were two of my favorite ones.

by bl on Jan 5, 2008 2:29 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Money
Being able to spend what the talent dictates helps.  But they have also done a good job in not making any bad picks.

by bheikoop on Jan 5, 2008 3:21 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Being Able to Spend
It looks like the Diamonbacks just budget more for the draft relative to their overall expenditures. It's not like they are a big market team. They just spend in the draft like one. Put another way, they are smart.

by rwperu34 on Jan 5, 2008 7:06 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No no...
That wasn't my point.

I was just suggesting that it helps when you aren't limited.

by bheikoop on Jan 6, 2008 1:44 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow
I really dont like that Buckner trade for KC.

by alskor on Jan 5, 2008 2:14 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Billy Buckner is a B
Trevor Cahill is a B-.

Interesting to see how John's deviations from the norm end up looking in 2-3 years.

by gogotabata on Jan 5, 2008 2:42 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Juan Gutierrez
Anyone know anything about him?  Came from the Astros, right?  Will he start or be in the pen?  Just looking for a little info on him.  Thanks!

by Sox Puppet on Jan 5, 2008 4:01 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Looks like
he gave up the jack in AAA Round Rock last year and walked a bit (3.63/9).  23 years old and did OK in 21 IP for Houston.  

by Sox Puppet on Jan 5, 2008 4:02 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Brooks Brown
I am glad to see some love given to Brown...seems some other sites dont have him in there top 10. Does he start at AAA or return to AA? anyone see Brown or Esmerling Vasquez in Arizona this year ?

by NYSOX on Jan 5, 2008 6:03 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

brooks
He gave up only 4 homers in 146 1/3 IP among the CAL and SOU leagues. His K rate is very acceptable too, so the biggest issue with him is his walks. A sleeper in my book.

by levski on Jan 6, 2008 2:03 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I was in the stands
The night he tore his labrum diving for a bunt in his last game in the AZFL. That sucked. I really like him too, and had my eye on him quite a bit during the season, and liked what little I saw in the fall league.  But that injury is probably going to set him back quite a bit. He's probably graded too high now because of it.

by shoewizard on Jan 5, 2008 9:06 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Missed that game . . .
but I saw several of his other AFL appearances.  I was extremely impressed with Esmerling's pitches.  They had a lot of movements.  In several appearances, he was shattering bats of good AFL hitters in key situations.  

Disappointed about the injury - I know that the D'back front office was really high on Vasquez - I think he was their organizations minor league pitcher of the year.  

by gunkdog on Jan 6, 2008 12:07 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What is Navarro's Upside
Elite SS, I guess he is considered a great fielder right now.

by Bravesin07 on Jan 5, 2008 8:11 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How far away is he?
I'm curious about him too.
I won't get married until the Red Sox win the World Series. AGAIN!!

by Shep on Jan 5, 2008 11:38 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

navarro on ba's list
BA lists Navarro among the dbacks top 10 prospects (#9), even before the Dbacks traded CarGo, Anderson, Carter and Cunningham. That would make Navarro the biggest "discrepancy" b/w BA's and John's lists... and I can see a valid argument for either placement, depending on how much emphasis you place on tools and "what-ifs". I personally am ambivalent on him, and would probably place him in between--in the 10th-12th range.  

by levski on Jan 6, 2008 2:01 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sean Morgan
Perhaps (well almost certainly) this is because I went to Tulane, but I think Sean Morgan could be a solid sleeper prospect.  He was considered a possible first rounder before his junior year, and though he lost his control late in the year, he continued to have an outstanding strikeout rate (more than 1 per inning in A- as well).  He's a big guy who is a legit 6'2/6'3, has a decent fastball (around 90 mph) and a real sharp slider.  

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/M/sean-morgan.shtml

by greenwave07 on Jan 5, 2008 8:37 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What a difference a year makes
8 of the top 9 D backs prospects are pitchers. Unfortunately no A's or A- in that crowd now. Dan Haren better deliver the goods.

The D backs need draft picks. It sure seems like the best route for this team is to just hold on to Hudson, Lyon, and Cruz for 2008 and let them all walk in free agency after the season and replace with what they have or trade as necessary.  As of right now, they would all be type A's I believe. The picks they would get could help toward a system replenishment right around 2010-2011 when it will really be needed.

 

by shoewizard on Jan 5, 2008 9:11 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Almost
Hudson & Cruz are type As but Lyon is a B.  Mahalo

Matt

Hudson  80.357  A
Cruz    71.600  A
Lyon    65.618  B
David Weathers is the lowest A relief pitcher at 70.213

I am one of the bad things that happen to good people.

by WayneCampbell05 on Jan 6, 2008 12:25 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

you're missing shoewizard's point
he's saying that hudson, cruz and lyon could all be type a free agents after the 2008 season. hudson and cruz are type a players right now, and very likely will remain type a unless they fall flat on their faces. lyon was type b but very close to being type a; if he has another solid season in 2008, he'll very likely become type a free agent.

by levski on Jan 6, 2008 1:52 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No
I know exactly what he, you missed it.  Here's the relevant clip from his post :

"As of right now, they would all be type A's I believe."

That can't be any more clear, can it?  Mahalo

Matt

I am one of the bad things that happen to good people.

by WayneCampbell05 on Jan 6, 2008 5:14 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, you are right
Thanks for the correction.

If Lyon gets the closers gig in 2008, then of course he probably ends up a type A.

In either case, two A's and a B, or if it becomes 3 A's, the D backs need the picks.

by shoewizard on Jan 6, 2008 8:42 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

obviously...
...you don't know that shoewizard lives in the future (may 2009, to be precise). he knows things you don't...

by levski on Jan 6, 2008 10:01 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the future
" Unfortunately no A's or A- in that crowd now. Dan Haren better deliver the goods."

I feel pretty good about the Haren deal. You never know what "prospects" will do in the future.

"What a difference a year makes"

What a difference two years make. To illustrate my point, below is a link to the 2006 list and the debate about CJ vs. Loney. Right now, who would you rather have on your roster?

http://www.minorleagueball.com/story/2006/2/20/103838/668

by foulpole on Jan 6, 2008 10:06 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

hi foulpole
I see you've found a new venue to continue your incessant CJ bashing. Carry on.

by levski on Jan 6, 2008 10:09 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I didn't have anything to say to
you. I was responding to shoe's post. But, it seems that you respond on behalf of shoe?  ( see above where you tried to justify the free agent types ).

Anyway, two years ago you seemed to berate any post regarding an argument that Loney was equal to if not greater than CJ.

So, would you rather have Loney or CJ on your squad right now?  How about two years from now?

FWIW, here's the link again.

http://www.minorleagueball.com/story/2006/2/20/103838/668

by foulpole on Jan 8, 2008 4:17 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

BTW,...
...here's a little bit of the text from that thread.

"I think Overbay is a decent comp for Jackson, I also think Dave Magadan is also.  

by Johnny Ruin"  

"jackson's comps
Fwiw, Jackson's PECOTA comp list includes David Ortiz and Gary Sheffield.

But I'm sure Jackson's Johnny Ruin comp list is much much better than PECOTA.
 by levski"

I think that Johnny Ruin was a heck of a lot closer to the comps than you or PECOTA where.

by foulpole on Jan 8, 2008 4:37 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

not that I care that much about what you say
but just to humor you for a sec

Jackson has consistently under-delivered on his talent and expectations during his first two years in the majors.

Loney has exceeded all projections in his first extended playing time in the majors... but as I pointed out, he's done so on the strength of .419 babip.

In case it wasn't obvious from my post, I still think Jackson will be the better hitter going forward, but accounting for defense/age, the two are probably equal bets.

The bigger point here is that two years ago you probably had no idea who James Loney is, and that you still don't know who James Loney is. Your post has nothing to do with Loney, it has everything to do with Jackson. As I wrote already, you've been trolling message boards for years talking crap about Jackson, and talking crap in general. Heck, you've been banned from boards for way too much crap in general.

Anyhow, carry on.

by levski on Jan 8, 2008 10:35 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

.419 BABIP?
where are you getting this from?

you've quoted it twice, but everywhere i've checked i'm seeing .352. am i looking in the wrong place?

anyway, i'm sure this guy is an a-hole, so i won't bother you much. but don't kid yourself with the CJ-Loney comparison from this point forward.

by bleedjaxblue on Jan 9, 2008 1:36 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ahhhh!!!!
figured it out!

you're confusing James Loney with Matt Kemp.

Matt Kemp's BABIP was indeed .419, and his production this past year is indeed unsustainable. hell of a raw athlete, and you have to love the results -- but yeah, don't expect it again unless he spent a lot of time in the batting cage over the off-season.

as for James Loney -- not so much.

by bleedjaxblue on Jan 9, 2008 1:41 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

loney's babip
Yes, you are correct. I was looking at Kemp's page. I had several players' pages from hardballtimes.com open up, and I copied the BABIP from Kemp's page. My apologies.

As you point out, Loney's babip was .350 according to hardballtimes.com. That makes him a more likely candidate than Kemp to come close to his 2007 performance in 2008.

by levski on Jan 9, 2008 11:04 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

also
Kemp, Loney, what's the difference? Two young punks mouthing off at proven winners like Jeff Kent and Luis Gonzalez...

(I kid, I kid)

by levski on Jan 9, 2008 11:05 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

make your judgement based
upon my posts. Not other peoples allegations and wild interpretation.

"anyway, i'm sure this guy is an a-hole,"

Compare and contrast the posts that I and others have made and ask your self a few questions.

a) Did I make any personal attacks against other posters?

b) Did I make a resonable statement regarding my posts?

c) Where my posts on topic?

d) Am I going to turn this site into a flame war?

I have not posted any vile remarks about anyone on this thread

"but don't kid yourself with the CJ-Loney comparison from this point forward."

This is a no brainer. I'd rather have Loney than CJ.

by foulpole on Jan 9, 2008 7:30 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

loney's babip in 07
... was .419. maybe he can sustain .419 babip over a full season in 2008. in that case, he'll be a fiend.  conor's babip was .292 in 07.

...also, fwiw, here are the chone projections for these two players for 2008

loney

574 pa, .284, .347, .431, 32 doubles, 13 home runs, 49 bb/83 k

jackson

501 pa, .287, .375, .465, 29 doubles, 15 home runs, 57 bb/56 k

by levski on Jan 6, 2008 10:20 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Holy random point batman !
I see you have not given up on your anti Conor Jackson Jihad.  Talk about going out of your way to make a point that has nothing to do with the thread, just so you can continue your CJ hate wherever and whenever they let you post.

Carry on, indeed.

by shoewizard on Jan 7, 2008 1:33 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

not so random
You wrote that "Dan Haren better deliver the goods." based upon the current "value" of the "prospects" that the D-Backs gave up for him.

I wrote that "I feel pretty good about the Haren deal. You never know what "prospects" will do in the future."

IMO, It's a crap shoot with "prospects".

You wrote "What a difference a year makes"

I wrote "What a difference two years make."

I supported my position regarding the uncertain nature of "prospects" by adding an example of how two "prospects" were rated two years ago.

These "prospects" were on a D-Backs thread. We are talikng about the D-Backs here, no?

Loney was in the "c" level and CJ was in the "A" level. There was a debate about both players rankings that showed many different opinions regarding their future.

I think that it's a pretty good example of how current rankings of prospects can not only differ but also be inacurate.

Prospects are like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're gonna get.

Haren has proven that he is a very effective pitcher at the ML level.

Nice trade, IMO.

by foulpole on Jan 8, 2008 12:31 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

pearls of wisdon
"I think that it's a pretty good example of how current rankings of prospects can not only differ but also be inacurate.

Prospects are like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're gonna get. "

captain obvious in da house.

by levski on Jan 8, 2008 10:36 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sounds very reasonable on the surface
You are preaching to the choir about Haren. I think he'll be fine. He's thrown 662 innings the last 3 years with a composite ERA of 3.64.  For me, for the NEXT 3 years, anything over 600 innings and under 4 ERA would be a success, and I'd be happy with the results of the trade. I'm pretty confident he WILL achieve at least that level of success.   But make no mistake, the  D Backs gave up a lot of talent and value for him, and he needs to deliver the goods to make the trade work.

As far as dragging Conor Jackson into it, you and I both know what the dynamic is, so don't pretend. My point about what a difference a year makes was clearly in relation to the COMPOSITION of the top 10-20 lists.  The D backs promoted most of their top hitting prospects, and traded a few others, and now their lists is made up primarily of pitchers.  Thats clearly what I was talking about.

But somehow you found a way to inject your negativity and hatred of Conor Jackson into the discussion.  Surprise  surprise. After reading your hateful attacks and diatribes against Jackson for over 2 years now, don't expect anyone who actually knows who you are to believe you just happened upon that comparison as an example about the relative value of prospects or how perceptions of players change. You were just hatin on CJ again, like you always do.  Don't quite know how expressing this hatred everywhere you go, albeit in subtle ways, enhances yours or anyone elses life. I guess you will just have to figure out what your motives are for yourself.

Feel free to keep stalking  me around the internet and posting rebuttals to anything I post, as you have been lately.  But this will be the last response you ever get from me here or anywhere else. Your game is played out.    

by shoewizard on Jan 8, 2008 10:47 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Billy Buckner
Interesting that he still ranks fairly high-look forward to reading your commentary on him. He's shown some progress last year or 2 but I see his high end as a backend rotation guy. He didn't show a lot in MLB chances last year. The fact that the pitching starved Royals traded him suggests to me that they see more upside with Calyspro than him. Keep up the good work.

by ribman on Jan 6, 2008 7:36 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bizarre concentration of righties here
...yet they traded 3 lefties and no righties to the A's for Haren.

Seems like it might have been worth giving away a little extra talent to keep a top-quality lefty arm in the system, but what do I know.

by PaulThomas on Jan 6, 2008 8:26 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

a question...
... would you give up Jarrod Parker or Max Scherzer to keep Brett Anderson? (forget for a minute that the Dbacks couldn't easily trade either one of them). i wouldn't. and Anderson is the only lefty who's really worth keeping of the three, given AZ's situation at the major league rotation.

by levski on Jan 6, 2008 10:03 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dallas Buck
Here's hoping that his TJ rehab goes well, loved this guy. If his stuff recovers to what it was a couple of years ago he could be one hell of a sleeper. If it doesn't, you've still got a pretty intriguing pitcher who could slot in at the back of a rotation.

by mrkupe on Jan 7, 2008 5:03 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Buck
I agree about Buck..I was really following him as a solid sleeper. Sounds to me like it was inevitable he would undergo TJ. Anyone know when he had his surgery, what the time table is?

by NYSOX on Jan 8, 2008 8:38 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Buck's TJ
It was sometime in the summer of 07. He should come back sometime in the summer of 08, and should be fully healthy for 09.

Dan Stange had his TJ surgery in September 07

by levski on Jan 8, 2008 10:37 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Favorite All-Time Tool?
Img_small
Vin Mazzaro 6/28 predictions
Pulp_fiction_small
Which team has the best young players in the MLB?

Recent FanPosts

Small
My Top 50 Prospects
Small
Who is the best available?
Small
BEST PROSPECT IN BASEBALL
Small
Smoak Promoted to AAA
27_small
Frederick's Top 50 Prospects
Small
Lars Anderson v. Chris Carter
Small
Braves Top 50 Mid Season Prospect List
Small
Who the hell is Robert Carson?
Zackgreinke2_small
Independence Day weekend MiLB thread

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Carew_small John Sickels

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports


Site Meter