Chris Tillman vs Brandon Erbe
I'm trying understand why Brandon Erbe is considered a much lesser prospect than Chris Tillman.
John rated Tillman a B+ and Erbe a C+, Goldstein gave Tillman 4 stars and Erbe 3 stars, and Baseball America dropped Erbe to #10 in their Orioles rankings (they haven't rated the Mariners yet).
So the percieved gap between the two is not exactly controversial.
-Both players are the same age (well, Tillman is 3.5 months younger).
-Both are right-handed.
-Both are similar size/build.
-Both have plus fastballs that sit in the mid-90s and can dial it up to 97ish.
-Both have developing changeups and breaking pitches.
-Both shredded the short season leagues and low-A:
Erbe: 145 IP, 11.78 K/9, 3.78 BB/9, 0.19 HR/9, 6.33 H/9
Till: 64 IP, 11.11 K/9, 4.64 BB/9, 0.70 HR/9, 9.14 H/9
-Both struggled this year in high-A:
Erbe: 119 IP, 8.39 K/9, 4.69 BB/9, 1.06 HR/9, 9.60 H/9
Till: 102 IP, 9.25 K/9, 4.23 BB/9, 1.06 HR/9, 9.25 H/9
Tillman's performance at high-A was slightly better, but Erbe's past performance is stronger (and a bigger sample size). What am I missing?
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My two cents
I'm not sure I buy that
In fact, looking closer at August/September, it looks like he had two great starts, and 5 solid starts:
2 great starts: 13IP, 20K, 2BB, 0HR, 7H, 1ER
5 other starts: 26IP, 27K, 16BB, 3HR, 21H, 10ER
So Tillman should get that much of a bump because he had two great starts in August?
all I said
Two thoughts
- California League is significantly tougher for pitchers compared to the Carolina League, which makes Tillman's performance even more impressive.
- Tillman showed improvement and growth over his season, dropping his ERA and raising his K/9 every month from May-August, along with a big drop in BB/9 from May/June to July/August. Erbe was inconsistent all year and really fell apart his last two months, though he was able to maintain a solid strikeout rate.
by patsfan @ Minor League Ball on Jan 25, 2008 3:03 PM EST reply actions
+1
Without researching the Cal league indices, I;d say those numbers from Tilman are very strong, especially from a young guy already thought to have high upside. Erbe's numbers are actually worse, and probably put him more in the middle of the pack...and they reinforce some concerns about him going in.
Whatever the adjustment is for the Cal League, I think they'd be enough for Tillman's to look MUCH better in the Carolina league.
Fair enough
Frederick is a very strong HR park, but Tillman's environment overall was more difficult.
I still don't think there's a full grade difference between these two.
+1
+1
As silly as that seems
Erbe
In other words, scouts still think he's got the stuff but his delivery issues prevent him from locating it. For pure talent Tillman and Erbe aren't that far from each other, it's just that Tillman is more likely to reach his ceiling based on recent performance.
I love Erbe though, and hope he turns it around.
One thing I noticed
Tillman moved up to a harder league and improved his control while still mantaining a very healthy K rate.
Erbe moved up to the lesser league and saw his K rate drop a lot and his Hit and BB rate rise a lot.
With young prospects you want to see them improving their weaknesses not regressing.
by Kanst42 on Jan 25, 2008 3:44 PM EST reply actions

by 












