Crystal Ball: Phil Humber
Remember, the Crystal Ball is not a PROJECTION. It is meant to stimulate discussion about the player in question.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Think He'll be better
Looks solid
I have to say John, one of the most reasonable Crystal Balls I've seen yet. A guy doesn't necessarily need to compete for the Cy Young or win a ton of games to have a very successful career . . .this shows it.
Bring on Anna
Seriously, looks about right. Mets pitching farmhands never seem to quite pan out to be stars, but he should be a League-Average Innings Machine (LAIM), as they say at BP.
by tim @ Minor League Ball on Sep 7, 2007 4:32 PM EDT reply actions
looks like an innings eater
Response
Guys who can eat innings and post an ERA in the low 4s are hard to come by. If he does this, he'll have been a hell of an investment for the Mets.
A bit better than that
I think also his bout with food poisoning in August, where he lost 10 pounds, hurt him this season. Take out the four starts after the food poisoning, and this is the last 6 remaining starts:
ERA RA/9 H/9 HR/9 BB/9 SO/9
2.39 2.87 5.73 1.43 2.39 8.12
Now I realize that's sort of cherry picking and a small sample, and I'm not saying he's really that good, but I do think he made more progress in the second half than some realize. And I don't think he'll end up with an H9 much over 9.00 in the majors.
Also, context has to be considered here. Those numbers would be OK for the AL, but the guy in this projection is at best a #4 starter in his time in NY. The league average ERA for a pitcher on the Mets this year is about 4.23. That means the guy in this crystal ball puts up about a 92 ERA+ during his time with the Mets, before busting out with career years at ages 30 and 31. The Kris Benson comparison are fun, but the truth is Benson has had a much better career than the Phil Humber above.
All that is possible, but doesn't really seem likely for Humber who seems to have good command of 3 good pitches right now. But really, only knock about a third of a run off those ERAs, and it looks reasonable to me.
In response to myself...
After taking a closer look, I'll say maybe shave just 0.20 runs off those ERAs from 2009-2012. But the win totals look just right.
And I think he will struggle some early on. Not quite as much with the hit rate, as suggested here, but more with the HR rate.
OMG I CAN'T BELIEVE
I think his winning percentage/ERA will be better
i dont think...
Exactly
by MontrealMets on Sep 10, 2007 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow.
A reasonable projection of a very solid career from a guy without a ton of upside. Well done, a refreshing change from the extreme Crystal Balls. Though of course those are quite fun!
by abbreviatedman on Sep 10, 2007 11:55 PM EDT reply actions

by 
















