Post Draft Decompression
Use this thread to praise/condemn the various drafts.
0 recs |
103 comments
Comments
Yankees
by Kanst42 on Jun 7, 2007 9:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mets
by Ludacrispat26 on Jun 7, 2007 9:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you win with pitching.
but that's speaking as a phillies phan.
Variables Don't; Constants Aren't
by overlord on Jun 7, 2007 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dislike the Mets draft
by mtk52983 on Jun 7, 2007 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
billy wagner, 4 years, 42 million
it's a lot safer to draft a college closer that projects to the bullpen, than a high schooler that you're going to turn into a reliever.
and if you think that going after a college starter, then turn him into a reliever, is an idea that is more likely to produce a useful part, i'm not sure where i would come down on that, except to say that the arms of most high level college starters have been abused fairly badly, and a quick move to the bullpen might result in more serious arm injuries than occur normally.
Variables Don't; Constants Aren't
by overlord on Jun 7, 2007 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by andwoo on Jun 7, 2007 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
phillies:
i understand the savery pick, and i don't much mind it, and taylor and spencer, the two behemouth college outfielders, fill an organizational need for power hitters, which is nice. i don't think either are real prospects, however. mattair, i'm not too high on, but i understand taking him if they can sign him.
but the other three are projects at best, flunkeys at worst. tyler mach has no upside whatsoever for the phillies. even if he can hit .320 in the minors, he offers no versatility, and he is not surplanting utley, howard, cardenas, donald, or henry. just kidding on that last one. seriously though, even if utley is kicked to the curb, and adrian cardenas and jason donald flop, does anyone have any confidence that mach profiles as being better than the two drafted last year?
workman? fine, he has a large projectable body, but he's 4 years away at best. d'arnaud at 37? yeah, he probobly wouldn't have lasted until 83, but to be honest, what upside does he have? i mean really, he hasn't hit for average, he isn;t likely to hit for power, and his speed will diminish as soon as he gets to full season ball. i sincerely hope that they aren't drafting a catcher with the 37th pick because he profiles as a strong defensive catcher.
i've been talking about cory gearrin for a few weeks, and it really pains me to see him drafted by the braves with their 4th round pick. he could have stepped into the phillies bullpen almost immedietly, just because of how deceptive his pitching motion is, but now he'll go to atlanta, and at some point in the next 7 seasons, he'll probobly help quash the phillies hopes of a playoff berth.
Variables Don't; Constants Aren't
by overlord on Jun 7, 2007 9:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re: phillies
as a phils fan though, this is what i have come to expect. i'll cross my fingers and hope for the best.
by Illadelph on Jun 7, 2007 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
JOE TABLE!
by mroak89 on Jun 10, 2007 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tigers
how sick could a potential rotation of bonderman, verlander, miller, and porcello be down the road?
by BlackSox on Jun 7, 2007 9:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Crosby
by CW on Jun 7, 2007 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and Casey Crosby
by asinwreck on Jun 7, 2007 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crosby
by CW on Jun 8, 2007 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cardinals
In a draft supposedly void of College RHP's the Cards felt it necessary to take every college RHP not tied down.
A boring, unimaginative draft that saw them pass on much higher talent to take cheaper slot players.
Day 2 better be special or this is heading for a repeat of the 2004 draft for the Redbirds
by Picklefork on Jun 7, 2007 9:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Signability
by mtk52983 on Jun 7, 2007 9:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pirates
Although i am not familiar with their 2nd round pick, Welker, who is a RHP out of Arkansas. scouting reports I have read on him seem to think his ceiling is a 5th starter.
The third round brought yet another small, "scrappy", infielder in the form of Brian Friday, a shortstop out of Rice. While it seems like he can certainly field his position well enough to stay at short in the pros, he has little pop and seemingly average plate disipline at best.
Their 4th round was Frederick Latimore, and while I didn't know him before today, but after watching mlb.com's scouting video I came away fairly impressed. The batting practice portion of his video was extremly impressive, as he showed great bat speed and an overall good looking swing.
Their 5th round pick was Walker, a catcher out of TCU. I know nothing about him but apparently he is a solid field and maybe hit catcher.
All in all, the first 5 round of the 2007 mlb draft has been yet another disappointment for this Pirates fan. Dave Littlefield stated before the draft that "money would be no object". He had his chance to prove this to all of the fans once and for all by taking Wieters with the 4th pick. Instead he went the cheaper, and much less talented route.
Most of the other picks also appear to be stadard Pirate picks from the Littlefield "era". College players who have little to no upside. They are what they are, and that appears to be AAA players or Maajor League backups.
by baseballgg24 on Jun 7, 2007 9:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Welker
by Dfarth on Jun 7, 2007 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nonsense
He pitched 2 years at JUCO and one in Fayetteville.
Hundreds of high draft pick pitchers do that. Pitching in JUCO ball, esp in a state like Oklahoma, does not impede your pitching development one bit.
I'd bet at least one in 5 American (and Canadian) pitchers in the majors today pitched JUCO at some point
by nms on Jun 7, 2007 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actions speak louder than words
Welker could be great, he could be a bust, or anywhere in between. Great fastball, marginal secondary pitches, marginal command of his arsenal. Again, there was some power potential available: Desme, Mattair, Freeman. Also Davis - although there again you'd have to deal with Boras.
Friday, as I've said before, is Jack Wilson all over again: slick glove, little pop. This pick smacks of the possibility of turning into Taber Lee. Lucroy was available, as was Nefi Soto.
Lattimore doesn't profile as being able to stay in CF, and his bat isn't likely to play very well in a corner. Walker's a solidly above-average catcher, but WYSIWYG with him. There are several pitchers not much worse than Moskos who could have been taken there, if you really felt you needed a late-inning reliever, at much less cost to the team.
by MikeE on Jun 8, 2007 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Twins
by StatFreakNYM on Jun 7, 2007 9:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Twins=Smal ball
I'm with you, it makes no sense to draft for small ball when none of these players will play in a big park.
by cmathewson on Jun 7, 2007 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rams is okay
The Twins past on too many players who were better and fit organizational needs for my liking.
by Jaerbesan on Jun 8, 2007 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Braves!!!
by was385 on Jun 7, 2007 9:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Braves
Absolutely love the position players they drafted.
by youALREADYknow on Jun 7, 2007 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
love what the braves did
by parrot11 on Jun 7, 2007 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yankees
I like their first round pick but it was all head scratchers after that.
by emac2 on Jun 7, 2007 9:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the Yankee picks, actually
by MikeE on Jun 8, 2007 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marlins
In particular, I think Heyward should've been taken at #13.
by ISC on Jun 7, 2007 9:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dominguez vs Heyward
by MikeE on Jun 8, 2007 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rangers
Beaven, Borbon and matt west all got picked by them.
by robb on Jun 7, 2007 9:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Texas made out like bandits
by parrot11 on Jun 7, 2007 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can somebody please tell me
Regardless, I love Beavan and Main, and I like Ramirez and Nash. However I absolutely can't stand Borbon and Hunter...
I'm indifferent towards Evan Reed, I just don't see why they'd draft a RP when the only thing they have decent in the majors is their bullpen. Plus, West I'm a bit negative toward too, I just see him as a utility player.
I was ecstatic early in the draft, but my enthusiasm just dwindled as it went on though.
by TRanger on Jun 7, 2007 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
question
Honestly, it seems sometimes as if people would rather their picks LACK tools.
I dont love him or anything but Borbon that low is a relative bargain
by nms on Jun 7, 2007 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Borbon
Tools are great but from what I've heard (and seen on video) he doesn't have any power nor does he have a strong arm so he isn't even amazingly toolsy. Sure he's fast, and a good fielder but that's really all I see. I know he's projected to hit for a decent batting average, but in college he didn't hit for a good batting average except when he played the weaker teams outside of his conference. Now I know scouts love him, but I just don't see why everyone thinks he's such a great pick here.
...and why in the world did you randomly bring up the race card?
by TRanger on Jun 7, 2007 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
John
by was385 on Jun 7, 2007 9:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Couple of thoughts
by gatling on Jun 7, 2007 9:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Love the what the Nats did too
by parrot11 on Jun 7, 2007 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rockies
by MHD on Jun 7, 2007 9:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What
by melt12 on Jun 8, 2007 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he does....then what
The Rockies seem to refuse to draft high school talent any more. They seemed to change their philosophy every two years on what kind of route they want to take with this team, whether it be speed, power, in the draft, with free agents.. etc. This team needs new management and ownership.
by MHD on Jun 8, 2007 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Has anybody Drafted
by NYYLover1000 on Jun 7, 2007 9:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not yet
by MikeE on Jun 8, 2007 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Went in the 25th round
by MikeE on Jun 8, 2007 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who
Matt
by WayneCampbell05 on Jun 8, 2007 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Royals
Runion was a fine pick, though I'm disappointed that they didn't go for Harvey or someone like that. I was pretty surprised at how far Harvey slid. Daniel Duffy? Eh. A little puzzling for the third round, but the Royals have a habit of taking head scratchers in the 3rd.
I can't find anything on Peter Hodge Nielsen, but I love the name of his school...
Adrian Ortiz sounds like a project, but he's got good speed.
All in all, I'd say it was an alright draft. Not blown away by anything they did, unless they really think Moustakas can be a shortstop...
by ajohnst1 on Jun 7, 2007 9:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jays
Decent pickup: K.Ahrens(#16)
Good: E.Eiland(#88),J.Tolisano(#85)
So-So: B.Cecil(#38)
Worse: T.Magnuson(#56),M.Rzepczynski(#175)
WORST: J.P.Arencibia(#21)
Arencibia is waste of pick, we should pick High-ceiling HS Pitchers. JP showed he's still allegic to HS pitchers. pick Arencibia over Alderson,Porcello?? That was real diappointing pick. picking HS hitters was good stretegy but they picked too much future-relievers and college guys. I hope we pick Tanner Robles at #205 , Kentrail Davis at #235. another HS high-ceiling guys are also welcome.
by moffydream on Jun 7, 2007 9:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jays did OK, but could have done better
The Cecil pick I really don't get (sounds like a LOOGY). He only projects as a reliever and doesn't throw hard and has control problems. So why take the guy?
JP might as well have thrown his pick of Magnuson and Rzepczynski away because they don't project like being much of anything. I hope those 2 don't sign with us, so we can recoup those picks next year.
Don't know enough about Farina and Mills to make a judgement.
by parrot11 on Jun 7, 2007 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok?
by god allah star on Jun 7, 2007 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
21
by KaoticKlown on Jun 8, 2007 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Royals
- Mike Moustakas- I love this pick. He's got lighttower power, can hit for average, great character, and it sounds like he is going to be a SS, which is great. Also, BA is reporting that he is already signed.
- Sam Runion- I liked this pick, but I would've of gone with someone else. He has a big frame and throws strikes, and hopefully he can develop his stuff.
- Danny Duffy- I love this pick. He's a lefty with a good frame, and good stuff who knows how to attack the strike zone.
- Peter Hodge Nielsen- Probably a signibility pick, but I have no idea who this kid is. All I know is that he is a 6'3" RHP from British Columbia. The only thing I could find on him is a site created by himself and his family. If anyone could fill me in on this guy, that would be great.
- Adrian Ortiz- I'm kinda indifferent on this pick. He's is FAST, but I am worried about his ability to hit. He's great defensively, but his success will be dependent on his hitting production.
by adschofield on Jun 7, 2007 9:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
I don't know about Ortiz, but if Ladnier and Co. think he can hit enough, than it's a good pick. I'll wait and see how he does in Idaho Falls before making judgement.
by doublestix on Jun 7, 2007 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Royals
I also heard a lot of speculation about his ability to play SS or 3B (or even catcher?), but I don't think that matters when drafting a prospect out of HS. If he can't play SS in KC and the Royals end up with too many 3B or 1B, it's a good problem to have. Maybe Alex Gordon will be a better OF anyway (as was speculated when he was drafted) -- it's certainly been a great move for Mark Teahen.
The real questions about this pick are whether Moustakas was equally worthy or more worthy of the #2 pick and whether the Royals (or any club) can truly get decent value for their money playing the signability game with a top five pick. Since they're stuck paying millions of dollars (probably around $4M+) for their top pick regardless, so why not try to select the 2nd-best player? We won't know whether Wieters (a college catcher who will be ready much earlier), Vitters (another HS infielder with arguably better contact skills despite being 8 months younger), Porcello, Detwiler, or any number of available talents on the board will have been better than Moustakas for 5+ years.
I'm much more excited about Moustakas than I was at this time last year when the Royals pulled a signability stunt with Luke Hochevar. It's too early to definitively say that they made a mistake taking Hochevar first overall, but several members of last year's draft class have passed him on prospect lists, and rightfully so far. Maybe David Glass will rollback ticket prices if Hochevar stinks next year (doubtful), but I'd rather see the club try to select the best player with every pick. I think it's much easier to forgive a well-intentioned bust than to get excited about a slightly-above-average (and slightly or grossly overpaid) player on a small-market payroll.
It's hard enough to pick the right guy anyway, let alone when the club isn't necessarily aiming for The BEST available talent. The only thing worse than a first-round signability buzzkill is to watch the Royals seem to be playing the signability game the wrong way. They've paid #1 and #2 money for two consecutive Boras clients and probably created bargains on better players for rival teams in the process.
Runion Maybe the club prefers control pitchers who throw 2-3 pitches in the lower 90's now, or maybe they missed out on a power lefty they hoped would fall to them here. I don't mean that in a critical sense because I have no idea whether any particular pick is great or just right or a reach or whatever, jus' sayin' Runion seems to fit a different mold than some of the conventional wisdom out there. It probably is a good thing.
Ortiz Personally, I LOVE the Royals' apparent strategy to spend ONE pick to draft the fastest guy available in round 4 or 5 (like Derrick Robinson in round 4 last year). Teams used to spend higher picks on this sort of player, so it's still a good value pick for the Royals. Even if it only works 20% of the time, it would be great to develop a burner into a serviceable major leaguer once every five years or so. Some draft picks are inevitably going to be projects anyway. I'd like to see the Royals use their 25th roster spot on a pinch-runner/basestealer type. They're already good enough to play a bunch of close games, so why not try to get that last run home more often? Again, I understand and like the thinking behind the strategy more than I care whether Ortiz or Robinson are particularly successful.
by Stat Ninja on Jun 10, 2007 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Phillies
Savery
Mattair
Workman
The okay
d'Araund
Taylor
The bad
Spencer
The ugly
Mach
by phuturephillies on Jun 7, 2007 10:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A's
Sean Doolittle: a "safe" pick. excellect hitting skills and very athletic 2 way player. issue is power. is this another daric barton type?
Corey Brown: steal. possible 5 tool CF and one of the few high upside college players in the draft. BP: "But at 59, his bonus will be a fraction of what Drew Stubbs got at near the same talent level."
Greg Desme: another 5 tool OF type. couldve gone higher but had an injured wrist.
Josh Horton: UNC SS, kind of a qustionable pick. but BA ranked him higher than where he was picked so i guess solid value
Demel and Carignan could both be fastracked relievers. Carignan was more stats based pick based off his great season as the UNC closer
Travis Banwart: similar type pitcher to Simmons. solid mid rotation SP upside, fastracked
solid B overall, wish they would've took more high upside pitchers, but they did that the past couple yrs and it hasn't gona as planned
by rayver723 on Jun 7, 2007 10:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re
I do wish they had taken a chance on Russell. There is nobody in the system with that kind of power bat, except possibly Robnett, and maybe Russell would have the same problems as RR, but they got so many safe guys, it would have been nice to get a higher ceiling power guy with a genuine track record. I guess no team liked him in the end though, so what do I know.
by bootsy on Jun 7, 2007 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
re
by bootsy on Jun 8, 2007 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Russell
by natsfan2005 on Jun 8, 2007 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A's
i really like some of the guys they nabbed later. doolittle isn't daric barton (who is only one year older but already in his second tour of duty at AAA), but he is much more athletic and has a better glove. who knows if he will develop power, but this rates to be another low-upside pick.
the guy i'm really, really happy about is corey brown. then again, i felt the exact same way about the richie robnett pick (oops!) back in 2004, and they had pretty similar college profiles. still, the system is in desperate need of some athleticism, and brown is definitely good value at 59.
i don't know a lot about the lower guys, but then again, it's not particularly likely that anybody picked outside of the top 60 or so will turn into anything useful.
by jpahk on Jun 8, 2007 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rays
From afar, it seemed to me like the Tigers, the Royals and the Blue Jays all had pretty good drafts.
by Brickhaus on Jun 7, 2007 10:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And somehow
by Brickhaus on Jun 7, 2007 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
First Impression Ramblings
Its just that with other guys like Beau Mills, Jason Heyward, and Porcello available, I would rather have gone after them then Madison.
I just think that Madison has a higher risk factor and will take longer to fully reach his development. We may have to wait 3 or more years before he reaches the majors, and I dont think his impact would be much greater than the other three I mentioned. Plus, given the current state of the big league team and the minor leagues, the Giants REALLY could have used a bat. I am just hoping that the Giants went BPA and really believe that Bumgarner is better than Mills and Heyward at least.
And from what I can tell, the Giants essentially had 3 draft picks that they actually really cared about. They then proceeded to punt away their next picks. I am not saying that those other guys that they draft will not make the major leagues, but they were bigtime signability picks. The Giants very easily could have signed that Oklahoma catcher Jackson Williams in the 5th round if they really liked him so much. In the 5th round, I would have loved if they had drafted Willie Middlebrooks, for example. Even Nick Noonan (I think) is going to be a hard pick for us to sign. He is committed to Clemson and is excited about that apparently. I would have rather just drafted Todd Frazier out of Rutgers (who was taken 2 picks later).
I just wish the Giants would admit that they had a limited budget and were not going to spend a whole lot after their first three picks.
If I were the Giants front office, instead of spending money on old guys like Mark Sweeney, I would used that money to actually utilize all of our top six draft picks. After we drafted, Wendell Fairley, the Giants still could have gone on to gain more impact talent, but I dont know if this will happen now.
There were so many guys I would have undoubtedly preffered to Jackson Williams!!! We could have had Porcello, Harvey, and many others. Why Sabes?? Why do you pony up money for old vets but you cant pony up money for young talent.
by z4 landshark on Jun 7, 2007 10:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Giants Draft
We need hitters. Good hitters were available. No way is Bumgarner a better talent than Mills, Heyward or Dominguez.
Fairley may be a prospect, but he's the hitter we got from this draft? OMG! Now, Mills/Alderson/Fairley would be a pretty good draft. Not great, but good. Without Mills to balance out Fairley it stinks.
Those last two picks in the supplemental round pretty much stunk it up too.
Just unbelievably disappointing.
by DrBGiantsfan on Jun 8, 2007 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
was there any chance
by wildthang on Jun 8, 2007 2:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sabean
by jpahk on Jun 8, 2007 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aurilia's also....
by bleedjaxblue on Jun 13, 2007 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yankees
by T for Jose Tabatha on Jun 7, 2007 10:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the catcher.
by NYYLover1000 on Jun 7, 2007 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
by Kanst42 on Jun 8, 2007 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Diamondbacks
by AZDBACKS on Jun 7, 2007 11:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Orioles
by odogs101 on Jun 7, 2007 11:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's a shame...
by Harold Baines on Jun 7, 2007 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Question...
by adschofield on Jun 7, 2007 11:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
GIANTS.....
by bartonboi on Jun 8, 2007 12:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jordan Zimmerman
by BenB on Jun 8, 2007 12:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jarrod Washburn
by SLK on Jun 8, 2007 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scouts Inc
by Brickhaus on Jun 8, 2007 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cubs....
Anyway, our draft was very...safe if anything.
by SenorGato88 on Jun 8, 2007 1:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Did Cubs really want Doolittle?
by rayver723 on Jun 8, 2007 1:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
by the way
by limozeen on Jun 8, 2007 2:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LaPorta
But I'm going to stop short of comping LaPorta to a Berkman. I don't think he's that pure a hitter. Two years ago as a college sophomore while he led the nation in HR he did have over 65Ks.
Phil Nevin had more HR than K in his monster Golden Spikes year at Fullerton. Pat Burrell averaged only 10 more SO than HR per year in his amazing career in Coral Gables. Both those guys went on to annually K more than 100 times per year in the bigs. I think LaPorta is more of their mold than the Berkman mold. Nevin and Burrell have great talent and they had some years where they put it all together. I think LaPorta can do that talent wise. Will he put in the work to produce more consistently than they did? Nobody can answer that.
I just hope the Brewers are right he can handle LF. If so, that'll be a fun team to watch.
by natsfan2005 on Jun 8, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bats vs. arms, the great debate
Also, I noticed someone down in the dumps about Casey Weathers to the Rox. Just tossing this out there - could this mean Fuentes is traded next month? My guess is that Weathers is close to major-league ready.
by grits n gravy on Jun 8, 2007 6:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think the issue here is
Where did young PITCHERS net a lot of HITTING in a trade? You can normally trade young pitchers for pitchers, but rarely can you trade young pitchers for hitters, at least not without including hitting as well.
by MikeE on Jun 8, 2007 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Braves
by hisslk on Jun 8, 2007 9:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Random Thoughts
Another 4'th rounder I really like is the Reds taking my man Blake Stouffer. Very, very smart pick there.
I'm looking for Wes Etheridge and Reid Fronk today as well as Clemson Sr's Andy D'Alessio and Marquez Smith.
by DrBGiantsfan on Jun 8, 2007 10:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Heyward
by Mike Green on Jun 8, 2007 10:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Red Sox

by Zero Gs on Jun 8, 2007 10:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
time
by Ludacrispat26 on Jun 8, 2007 11:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
11:30...
by MetfanBren on Jun 8, 2007 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup
by Ludacrispat26 on Jun 8, 2007 11:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wow
by Ludacrispat26 on Jun 8, 2007 12:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i wouldn't be so sure
by jpahk on Jun 8, 2007 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Royals
by doublestix on Jun 8, 2007 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re:
The Fernando Cruz pick was outstanding.
by Bowser on Jun 8, 2007 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
by doublestix on Jun 8, 2007 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kentrail Davis
by doublestix on Jun 8, 2007 1:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gary Brown 12th rd A's
by rayver723 on Jun 8, 2007 1:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs












