Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Boras impact

With the way that the rules have changed regarding compensation if a team fails to sign their first round pick, does anyone think it is reasonable that teams will ignore the 'Boras effect' and draft his clients and if they can't sign them by Aug. 15th just be content with picking up a similar pick next year. IMO, if teams played it like this for a couple years it would certainly lessen Boras' leverage in the future. Thoughts?

0 recs  |  Comment 7 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Boras
It's possible that Boras will be even more likely to "kill the hostage" this year out of his disdain for the new rules. Perhaps he'll be overly bold to prove he won't bow to bullying.

That said, there is no way around it. Teams are in better position to walk away this year. Rather than getting a pick at the end of next year's supplemental round if you fail to sign the 3rd overall pick you'll now get slotted 4th overall next year.

If you absolutely no you won't meet Porcello's price and one of the other top echelon talents is ripe for the taking then I could see why you would avoid the hassle. Esp since HS RHP have a big attrition rate. However, by the time we get to the 10-20 range of the first round when Porcello is vastly superior talent wise to what's left you'd be lame coward not to roll the dice. He shouldn't fall to the Tigers or Yanks.

sig: Karim Garcia posted dominant AAA stats at 19. So can we stop acting like ARL trumps all in every discussion...

by natsfan2005 on Jun 6, 2007 11:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Boras
If the draft economics operated in a vacuum I think we'd see Boras's negotiating power greatly reduced. However, he has a penchant for getting a lot of the top flight talent. Let's not forget that the big contracts and big FA players are also Boras guys and he controls where they go. That's his ace in the hole. And we are about to see just how much power that ace has.

by RMF on Jun 6, 2007 11:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Boras
Boras gets what his clients want.  I don't think he's in any position to "kill the hostages."

by limozeen on Jun 6, 2007 11:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Boras
I would love to see Boras get burned. Teams should draft the player they feel in the best avialable, period. Dictating where a player goes is terrible for the game and a big reason why baseball is not as popular as it once was. Football is king in America now because it has a competetive balance fair to all teams.

Yes, Boras gets his players top dollar, but if more teams started taking a firmer approach the game may benefit. Look what happened to Matt Harrington. Why wouldn't a team draft a player, even is they are represented by Boras, and point that out to the player? I guess because Boras would point to Hochevar as a counter example. (Even is Hochevar ends up as a bust Boras won't care, he got his $$$.)

It's a shame that the sport most of us are most passionate about has the biggest flaws when it comes to the way the league is run.

by bl on Jun 7, 2007 12:04 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The Draft
The Draft in and of itself isn't fair a system, so all Boras is doing is making the best of a bad situation for his clients, put weiters, porcello etc. on the open market and see what they would get, it would make their draft bonuses look like pocket change.

by jlost284 on Jun 7, 2007 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boras
is great for baseball.  He gets top dollar for his clients even when owners cry they they are operating in the red.  He does a service to the athletes and has a great relationship with certain teams.  He gets villified all too often.

by riktermiller on Jun 7, 2007 12:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

MLB Teams
Teams with the first five picks in the draft who let elite talent slide are run by morons.

These are the same teams that complain about the $100+M payrolls of the Yanks/Sox, yet won't front $4-8M to acquire elite talent in the draft which provides no direct competition with the major markets.

If you're moaning and groaning about having to compete with the big spenders, then don't pass on elite talent because of a few million dollars because now you're spoon feeding these teams who don't care about spending money and giving them elite talent with a mid-late round pick.

It's an absolute joke that a team would allow Boras or any agent to run their draft for them. Boras doesn't price his players out of a team's range. Instead, the team psyches themselves out of a player's range because of the man who represents them. The MLB teams have let Scott Boras run the draft and have lost all leverage due to being soft and passive with their draft negotiations.

Rays in '08.... Free Andy Sonnanstine.

by youALREADYknow on Jun 7, 2007 8:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Arizona Fall League 2009 Video Posted
Small
Top-10 Prospects of the Last 20 years: Hitters

Recent FanPosts

Adam_jones_small
Dustin Ackley to 2nd base
Super_grover_small
Throwing stuff against the wall: What would it cost the A's to trade for Florida's Josh Johnson?
Small
AFL Championship Game Thread
Small
Last year's rookies, top community prospects for future performance #10
Small
Any surprises with your team's 40 man protection today?
Small
Mock MLB offseason: Should A's trade for Reid Brignac?
Small
This Stephen Strasburg guy
Deadhorse_small
BP's Indians Top 15
Small
BA Astros Top 10

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Carew_small John Sickels


Site Meter