Boras impact
With the way that the rules have changed regarding compensation if a team fails to sign their first round pick, does anyone think it is reasonable that teams will ignore the 'Boras effect' and draft his clients and if they can't sign them by Aug. 15th just be content with picking up a similar pick next year. IMO, if teams played it like this for a couple years it would certainly lessen Boras' leverage in the future. Thoughts?
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Boras
That said, there is no way around it. Teams are in better position to walk away this year. Rather than getting a pick at the end of next year's supplemental round if you fail to sign the 3rd overall pick you'll now get slotted 4th overall next year.
If you absolutely no you won't meet Porcello's price and one of the other top echelon talents is ripe for the taking then I could see why you would avoid the hassle. Esp since HS RHP have a big attrition rate. However, by the time we get to the 10-20 range of the first round when Porcello is vastly superior talent wise to what's left you'd be lame coward not to roll the dice. He shouldn't fall to the Tigers or Yanks.
by natsfan2005 on Jun 6, 2007 11:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Boras
by RMF on Jun 6, 2007 11:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Boras
by limozeen on Jun 6, 2007 11:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Boras
Yes, Boras gets his players top dollar, but if more teams started taking a firmer approach the game may benefit. Look what happened to Matt Harrington. Why wouldn't a team draft a player, even is they are represented by Boras, and point that out to the player? I guess because Boras would point to Hochevar as a counter example. (Even is Hochevar ends up as a bust Boras won't care, he got his $$$.)
It's a shame that the sport most of us are most passionate about has the biggest flaws when it comes to the way the league is run.
by bl on Jun 7, 2007 12:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Draft
by jlost284 on Jun 7, 2007 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boras
by riktermiller on Jun 7, 2007 12:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
MLB Teams
These are the same teams that complain about the $100+M payrolls of the Yanks/Sox, yet won't front $4-8M to acquire elite talent in the draft which provides no direct competition with the major markets.
If you're moaning and groaning about having to compete with the big spenders, then don't pass on elite talent because of a few million dollars because now you're spoon feeding these teams who don't care about spending money and giving them elite talent with a mid-late round pick.
It's an absolute joke that a team would allow Boras or any agent to run their draft for them. Boras doesn't price his players out of a team's range. Instead, the team psyches themselves out of a player's range because of the man who represents them. The MLB teams have let Scott Boras run the draft and have lost all leverage due to being soft and passive with their draft negotiations.
by youALREADYknow on Jun 7, 2007 8:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 









