Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Wandy Rodriguez--Breakthrough?

So far into 2007, Wandy Rodriguez is putting up some seriously impressive component numbers.  In 77 IPs so far this year, he's registering ratios of 8.26 K/9, 2.09 BB/9, and 3.94 K/BB, which are #1/#2 starter-type credentials.  In fact, those almost exactly mimic Aaron Harang's numbers for the year.

What do people who've seen him regularly think?  Is he a good bet to keep putting up these kinds of #s this year, and will his counting stats like W/L come into line?  Has he been doing anything different, or is it just that he's locating better?

Thanks for any thoughts.

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Numbers
Yeah i've noticed those numbers throughout the season but haven't seen him pitch this year because houston may be one of the least watchable teams at the moment.

Anyway the peripherals have been great and considering his age, these numbers could be legit and a sign of good things to come, but i still remain on the fence and would like to see more consistency and him go deeper into games because often he doesn't make it past the 5th or 6th.

by jlost284 on Jun 19, 2007 6:04 PM EDT reply actions  

take a look at the link
chris sampson vs. wandy rodriguez

by overlord on Jun 19, 2007 7:02 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm liking him
he's looking legit. His K-rate has been high since late last year. Not only is he striking guys without walking many, he's inducing a fair amount of groundballs which is important in that park.
Jack Cust is this year's Marcus Thames

by Team Moneyball on Jun 19, 2007 9:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Talk to me
after the A-S break. I may prove wrong, but Wandy always seems to start hot and then implode come July/August.
Curtis Granderson fan

by jrose643 on Jun 19, 2007 10:53 PM EDT reply actions  

It's mainly command and determination
His fastball is still really flat and juicy, but his command of it is much improved.  He has done a much better job of keeping it down in the zone and throws a lot of excellent pitches low and on the outside corner to righties.  Command of his curve has also improved, but it is still inconsistent.  

Another key, imo is that he is also much more determined in key situations.  He used to be the master of the big inning, but this year, he tends to fight through those situations.  In short, he has emotionally matured.

I've been fascinated watching him lately, as he seems to either throw an excellent pitch, or he misses badly.  You can simply watch his follow through, on a fastball or curveball, and determine which variety it will be.

In sum, it's definitely a breakthrough of sorts as he was really bad, and I waiver on his future.  He still has the same limitations of a very flat and hittable fastball, and no change up to speak of.  Unless he develops an effective change, I see him peaking at a possible high 3 ERA, but more likely a mid 4 ERA, or regressing back towards 5.

by jbm on Jun 19, 2007 10:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Numbers better than he is
I am an Astros fan and have been watching him the last few years.  

I think his numbers are just a fluke.  He has no plus pitches and has had quite a few lucky outs that saved his era.  He is one that should implode any minute.  He is listed at 5' 10" I think but looks more like 5' 8" with little power.  He has never impressed me and I have seen him a lot.  His control has been solid this year but he has just dodged bullets.  His numbers are way better than what he will end up at.  I think it was St. Louis that demolished him last year with HR's in one game.  He is due for a very nasty run of starts because those weak pitches are going to move up and get drove out of the park eventually.  

On his best, his K's per inning go way down and his era gets closer to 5.00 by the end of the year.  I wish for better since I am a Stros fan but he is very hittable and really has AAA stuff at best.  Watch for his HR's given up to really rise.  I have never been a fan of his stuff and I watch his games and am amazed that he has not been eaten alive yet.  

Sampson is a much better pitcher.  He has the potential to be a number 3 but his age is very high and he surely is not a prospect.  I love the way he trusts his stuff and forces batters into groundballs.  He could have a solid future in the organization.  The Angels just lit him up but they can just plain hit and he had a rough game.

As for the Astros being unwatchable, lately they have been really putting some runs up and since Adam Everett broke his leg the lineup just seems to be clicking.  If Berkman does what he is capable of and the rest of the team stays hot they may be a team to keep an eye on the rest of the way.

by bbaffert on Jun 20, 2007 4:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Thanks
I trust your insight.  Although it's interesting, Wandy's stats don't suggest an imminent regression.

His BABIP is actually a little high so far at .311, though he's traditionally had a worse-than-league-average BABIP (perhaps it's the park or that flat FB another poster mentioned).  His strand rate isn't unnaturally high.  In fact, it's slightly below league average at 69.4% (someone mentioned in a previous diary he struggled from the stretch, but a 2% divergence isn't statistically significant).

I love debating guys like this.  The eyes and the stats tell two completely different stories.  My instincts from watching him last year are like yours.  Poor stuff, lack of mental toughness, etc.  But man, these numbers are something else.  Maybe we'll chalk it up to small sample size.

by Yakker on Jun 20, 2007 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Calling my shot
Wandy gets hammered tonight.
Curtis Granderson fan

by jrose643 on Jun 20, 2007 8:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Pussballer
This guy wouldn't make my beer league team.
Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est.

by HuskerBob on Jun 20, 2007 8:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Curveball
His games revolve around his curve. His 2 seam is good and located better. If he has a good curve he seems to have 9+K/9 stuff. At least that is what happens. On nights when he doesn't have the good curve he really struggles. So depending on the night he can look great or not, like most avg guys.  
"You hear a lot of things... because there are a lot of people talking." (Shamus original)

by Shamus on Jun 20, 2007 1:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Catch-22: Is Travis D’Arnaud the ‘Next One?’
Bullpen_banter_logo_small
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects: 100-51
Hal2_small
AA and MLB hitting production by AA batters between 1995-2002

Recent FanPosts

Small
Overall Community Prospect #93
Small
New Cubs Draft Strategy/Player Development
Small
Stride Length, release point, and Drag
Small
Community Pitching Prospect #61 RUNOFF
Small
Community Positional Prospect #64
Small
5 yrold Dynasty Fantasy League team openings
Ryan_pic_small
Super Sickels Keeper League has one more opening
Small
Overall Community Prospect #92
Small
Catch-22: Is Travis D'Arnaud the 'Next One?'
Firebeall11_small
Blazing Fastball's Top 300 Prospect Rankings

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter