Burgess or Heyward
I don't really know if this board is big on the draft but I'll throw this out there anyways. Of the two bopping HS outfielders in the upcoming draft, which one would you take? Which one has more power potential?
I have read many descriptions of Burgess launching moon shot after moon shot even against some of the best competition in the country. On the other hand you have Heyward who clearly has the size advantage at 6'4'' and 220 and a pretty decent track record himself. Who would you take?
0 recs |
22 comments
Comments
vitters
by fewgoodcards on Mar 8, 2007 3:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Burgess
That said, the truly elite preps are Porcello and Harvey - I see each one slipping into the top 5.
by eazyb81 on Mar 8, 2007 4:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Draft Talk
As for the question at hand, I personally like Burgess best at this point. The combination of raw power, explosive (though inconsistent) swing mechanics, 94 mph arm strength, playable speed (6.9 60), and baserunning instincts well beyond his years make for a heck of a total package. Heyward and Vitters are both excellent prospects in their own right and any argument supporting either would definitely have merit.
Speaking of Vitters, I've really been impressed with him and the group of high school third basemen in general this season. My favorite of that group and minor sleeper come draft day is Victor Sanchez from California. I don't think I'll be able to go see any of the top HS third basemen this year in person, but I'd be very interested to see how they stack up against last year's consensus top high school infielder, Billy Rowell (a player who I was lucky enough to see in person multiple times).
by roboz on Mar 8, 2007 4:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What did you think of Rowell?
I have his baseball card and he looks like a man child. Do you think he will stick at 3rd?
Thanks
by The Scout on Mar 8, 2007 4:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Billy Rowell
He played a ridiculously deep shortstop at Bishop Eustace, positioning him self so far back that he would stand on the cutoff where infield dirt meets outfield grass at times. I have to figure that he played so deep in order to hide his lack of range and lateral mobility...though on the plus side, he could only get away with playing so deep because of his plus arm strength. Obviously these reasons are why the Orioles see him as their third baseman of the future
Rowell does not lack in athletic ability - the guy moves well enough for a big man and has at least average footwork. Unfortunately, he had a very bad rap around town about not being receptive to coaching, so the conversion to third will be extra difficult if he continues to resist advice.
If I had to guess right this second what position he'd play most in his big league career, I'd guess RF. I think he'll be good enough at third base to stay there in his younger years, but will have to move to the outfield sooner rather than later once he reaches the bigs. To me it comes down to this: either his lack of lateral quickness could be a problem at third OR he could have some crazy natural reactionary instincts that help him stick at the new spot - third base is one of the tougher positions to predict in my mind as it requires such instinctual movements. His arm is plenty strong for the spot, it's a matter of range more so than anything else.
Sorry if I kept going in circles, I suppose it just shows that where Rowell will wind up is still very much open to debate.
by roboz on Mar 8, 2007 5:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
Living in Connecticut I don't get the chance to see many prospects. Although I suppose I could see Matt Harvey pitch this year.
Thanks again. I really like Rowell and no matter what position he settles at, I think he will hit.
by The Scout on Mar 8, 2007 10:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
re
by ScottAZ on Mar 8, 2007 5:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Great Draft!
The Giants are in a commanding position to really restock their farm system in this draft with 3 first rounders and 3 supplemental picks. I can't wait.
Fear factor! Brian Sabean loves to draft college RHP's.
by DrBGiantsfan on Mar 8, 2007 7:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
re
by fewgoodcards on Mar 8, 2007 8:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
forgot
by fewgoodcards on Mar 8, 2007 8:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Catchers
by DrBGiantsfan on Mar 8, 2007 11:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wieters
Book it!
by Savoy on Mar 9, 2007 12:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
6'7"?
by DrBGiantsfan on Mar 9, 2007 12:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Weiters is
by slurve on Mar 9, 2007 6:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
re
by fewgoodcards on Mar 9, 2007 8:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
David Price
by slurve on Mar 9, 2007 6:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
re
David Price goes #1
by ScottAZ on Mar 9, 2007 9:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wishful thinking
Then there's KC. Do they also pass on him due to money? Think about it... they have spent a lot on top picks the last few years, especially when you contrast it to their ML payroll. They just blew a $55 million wad on Meche and will need some financial flexibility in the next few years if they are serious about building a winner around Butler/Gordon/Hochevar.
Hmmmmm..... That leaves my Cubs staring at Price. The odds may be long for both TB and KC passing on Price, but I do hold out hope as I think it's a reasonable outcome based on what I said in this post.
by slurve on Mar 9, 2007 2:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
re
I do think teams learned from SD's 04 blunder and we haven't seen quite as ridiculous cost saving decisions made since. Price won't last to the Cubs, not saying that I wouldn't like to see him in a Cubby uni more than being wasted in KC or TB
by ScottAZ on Mar 9, 2007 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was pretty ignorant...
by doublestix on Mar 10, 2007 12:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No chance....
by doublestix on Mar 10, 2007 12:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I know
Like Scott says, weirder things have happened in the draft. I don't hold out much hope for Price to fall, but if he does, I think what I posted would explain / will have a lot to do with it.
by slurve on Mar 10, 2007 9:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 









