Fowler v Hunter
I haven't read too much about Dexter Fowler or Cedric Hunter.....either of these prospective CF's going to make it long-term? Having looked at John's book on these 2, it appears that they may have a future at some point. Others have opinions on these 2 guys? Will they be the CF's in the future for their clubs? What is the gap between these 2 and Bruce, McCutheon, and Rasmus or any other CFer that comes to mind?
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
re
Hunter has a much more limited tool set than Fowler. His only standout tool is his bat and his eye. He doesn't have great speed (solid) so he probably won't be a CFer, doesn't have much power. High end he is a .300+ hitter with very high OB% and 15ish HRs and steals.
Both are a ways off, so neither are a sure bet. We can tell a lot about Fowler this year. If he has a big year he will be mentioned with the elite guys and be a top100 player
my two cents worth
Fowler is more intriguing as a prospect because he has a higher ceiling, but he also has a long way to go to achieve his potential.
As ScottAZ says, Hunter offers a much more limited tool set and therefore less upside. And he's also a long way off.
So if you're looking for fantasy advice, I think the smarter pick/play is Fowler. I agree that we should know a lot more about both of these guys 1 year from now.
I like Fowler
I think Fowler is already a top 100 prospect in my proverbial book.
I think Bruce and McCutcheon are at the top of the OF prospect list. Rasmus in the middle (I'm not a big Rasmus guy) Fowler and Hunter are somewhere after that.
I do think Fowler will move to the front of the pack this time next week.
I meant next year
Response
Bruce, McCutchen and Rasmus are all ahead of Fowler still, but it's not as big a difference as you might think. It's very, very close between Fowler and Maybin IMO, and I wouldn't fault anybody for choosing one over the other.

by 













