Salty or Escobar::fantasy type question
I am in a simulation/replay league. I am faced with a decision. who do I like better, Jarrod Saltalamacchia or Yunel Escobar?
On my team I have a SS in Furcal and a C in Pierzynski. This tells me that C is more of a need.
However, I am not contending next season and thus Furcal could be flipped for SP, which is a major need on my team. Thus, getting Escobar is helpful. However, I am already noting the downward spiral that AJ Pierzynski is undergoing, and long term I need a new solution at catcher.
My question to you minor league folks is this: Who would you rather have on your team long-term, Yunel Escobar or Jarrod Saltalamacchia?
My thoughts on each player:
Yunel Escobar hit very well this year in MLB:326/.385/.451. Outside his stint at AA Mississippi, Escobar has a +.800 OPS at every stop. His BABIP is very high, at .367 in MLB and .354 and .384 in his 2 minor league stops outside of Mississippi. At this point, I would not think that this means he is getting lucky, but rather that he hits the ball hard(perhaps a high LD%? not sure where that data is..)
Thus, I think Escobar is bound to be good. How good, I don't know, but certainly an above average MLB SS, if he stays there.
Jarrod Saltalamacchia has had a lot of coverage. He was the key acquisition in the Texiera trade, which says something. His combined MLB stats this year are: .266/.310/.422. Not great, but he is young. A concern is if he will stay at C. If he becomes a 1B, he is of much less value.
I am torn on this. For the purposes of the poll, assume that both Escobar and Saltalamacchia are in a draft and you can choose between them.
Thank you for your votes, and I would appreciate comments.
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
salty
by the pinstripes on Nov 6, 2007 2:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Why Salty?
My question for further elaboration is, why is he winning by such a large margin? Are poeple non-believers in Escobar? Is this based on the belief that Salty will remain at C?
Thanks
by dbimberg on Nov 6, 2007 2:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re:
by McLovin on Nov 6, 2007 3:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree in way
by casejud on Nov 6, 2007 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Real life v Fantasy
by Yakker on Nov 6, 2007 5:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Salty
by nevin on Nov 6, 2007 4:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
salty.
by wily mo on Nov 6, 2007 5:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1
by realityconquest on Nov 7, 2007 12:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It depends...
Escobar could very possibly put up Renteria-like numbers year in, year out, .290/.350/.400, and that's quite good from a shortstop. But Furcal's coming off a bad year, so I don't know if you should unload him now or hope that he hits better next year and try to get better value.
by alexwithclass on Nov 7, 2007 12:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
my thoughts too..
I guess the question could become, will Furcal hit better in the future? If so, then perhaps its ok to keep Furcal as my SS and get Salty...if not, then its a gamble on how much I can get for Furcal vs. if Salty sticks at C...
Does anyone have any insight on if Salty will be the main C next year for Texas?
by dbimberg on Nov 7, 2007 4:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Salty at C
I think Laird played C over him to see what they have in Laird and possibly to boost his trade value.
by pedrophile on Nov 7, 2007 8:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 












