Selig Sort of Willing to Listen on Instant Replay
Selig Will Let GMs Make Recommendation on Instant Replay
At their Nov. 5th-8th meetings, the GMs are likely to decide to recommend or not recommend instant replay to the commissioner. At which point Bud Selig will either say, "I agree, we shouldn't have instant replay," or "I disagree, we shouldn't have instant replay."
Will baseball ever implement it? Should baseball ever implement it? Could baseball ever get a comissioner who looks more like a sausage pizza?
Discuss.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think
I don't know if they will implement instant replay, but I'm starting to think that they should. And they probably should in the NBA as well, given all the referee favoritism that goes on.
by ajohnst1 on Oct 13, 2007 12:49 PM EDT reply actions
Holliday's play
Agree
by goalieguy on Oct 13, 2007 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I think
I would not, however, allow balls and strikes, or safe and out calls to be reviewed (except for the above mentioned situations) because it would slow the game down too much and the umpires are remarkably accurate most of the time. In addition, reviews of those situations are not always conclusive so it might not help that much. anyways
Actually
The same can be said almost any time an "out" is in question - so I would not allow safe/out calls to be reviewed at all. Only situations where the play itself resulted in a dead ball (ie. HRs, foul balls), should be reviewable.
Instant replay
by DrZoidberg on Oct 13, 2007 2:50 PM EDT reply actions
That's what
Fix
by CrimsonLiederhosen on Oct 13, 2007 5:15 PM EDT reply actions

by 













