Why I Like Curtis Granderson

Why I Like Curtis Granderson
I like Curtis Granderson for much the same reason I like Brandon Wood: he boosts my ego.
Granderson was an outfielder at the University of Illinois-Chicago. I saw him play college ball and was impressed. He had a smooth swing, good command of the strike zone, and to me at least he looked like he had good tools, decent speed that helped him on the outfield and on the bases. The only tool that didn't look at least average to me was his throwing arm.
Granderson hit .483 with nine homers and 17 steals for Illinois-Chicago in '02, ranking second to Rickie Weeks in the NCAA Division I batting hunt. So we had a guy with an excellent performance track record and good physical tools. I picked him in the second round of my Twins Shadow Draft. In real life, he went to the Tigers in the third round.
He lasted until the third round because scouts didn't like his tools. The word was that his speed and athleticism were mediocre, and that he wouldn't hit for much power with wood. But that's not what I saw in him. I saw a player with solid tools, a good measure of refinement, and a fine track record. He also had a good work ethic and was intelligent.
Now, I've been watching baseball games for 30 years, but I've never had formal scout training. So I wasn't sure that I was right about Granderson. I've been wrong about personal "toolsy" calls in the past, so I like Granderson because (so far at least) he's confirmed my original judgment of him. The funny thing is, as Granderson has played well up the ladder, more and more scouts talk about how he has pretty decent tools after all.
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
Granderson projections
Any possibility of doing a crystal ball on Curtis Granderson, like you did with Matt Murton and others?
I'll be honest, as a fantasy ball player and Granderson owner, I'd be curious what you see him doing.
Personally I prefer him to Murton, but I might be wrong, and that's part of the reason for my asking.
by nutworld on Apr 9, 2006 4:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
question for John
by sabernar on Apr 9, 2006 5:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Feel obligated to like him
by mrkupe on Apr 9, 2006 5:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Granderson
He has been doubted his entire career. People doubted he would hit. Then when he did they doubted he would be a good enough CF and be forced to a corner spot where he would be less valuable. Then he proved that he could play good enough D.
He is just a solid player all around that was a bit of a slow starter in the minors... but if his current rate holds up it looks like that was just him struggling to adjust to leagues at the beginning.
by VtTigers on Apr 9, 2006 5:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Granderson
Curtis Granderson is a stud today, he was a stud in college, and he'll be a stud in the future.
And John.....thanks for your advice too because I have both Wood and Granderson....thanks to you!
I think you and Ken Warren are the two absolute best in the business.
by grandslam on Apr 9, 2006 9:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rotoworld
You are absolutely right on about the 3 hole. I think he projects best as a 2 or 3 hole hitter. They have him in the leadoff spot right now and I think that is fine because he will probably get on base quite a bit. Long term I think they will find he has enough power to hit lower in the lineup... Although they might still keep him there just due to his speed...
His future will be fun to watch and as a Tiger fan I will love every minute of it.
by VtTigers on Apr 9, 2006 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
great weekend
The thing that intrigues me is Granderson's plate discipline regression last season. His BB/K ratios went down last year in AAA and the majors and I remember reading that he was "swinging for the fences" and thus striking out more. It seems like he has regained his plate discipline since being named the starting CF in spring training. If he has the discipline to go along with the power and speed, he is a top 5 CF in the AL.
by youALREADYknow on Apr 10, 2006 12:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Tigers...
by Stealfirstbase on Apr 10, 2006 2:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re:
I've noticed this as well(not directly from scouts, but from scouting publications). A couple of years ago he was seen as a solid guy who could get on base a little but didn't have the pop for a corner spot or the ability to cover center defensively. Now, after a few strong minor league campaigns and a quick start to his major league career, everyone talks about how athletic and fast he is.
by Ian Miller on Apr 10, 2006 2:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is it an accident...
by Azteca on Apr 10, 2006 2:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I know you should not base an evaluation solely on
http://www.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/news/boxscore.jsp?gid=2005_09_15_detmlb_anamlb_1&c_id=det
by RodgerL on Apr 10, 2006 7:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
replying to your previous comment
by Isisaston on Dec 19, 2006 5:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs









