Matt Murton vs Jeff Francoeur
I know this is a minor league site, and that these players each spent the entire last season in the bigs, but they are both young(Murton is 3 years older than Francoeur, I think) and there is still some doubt about them long term.
Who will have a better career, Matt Murton or Jeff Francoeur?
Francoeur certainly has the hype as a young player, but Murton has had real good numbers in the bigs. Francoeur plays a better defense, and I think by a lot.
Murton 2005 321/386/521 22K 16BB 140AB
Murton 2006 297/365/444 62K 45BB 455AB
Francoeur 2005 300/336/549 58K 11BB 257AB
Francoeur 2006 260/293/449 132K 23BB 651AB
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
hmmm...
Second, BJHB (The Fielding Bible +/-) shows Murton as being very good on defense in 2006, which surprised me. He appears to have slightly below-average range when I see him, which is a lot.
by BobbyMac on Dec 9, 2006 12:26 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Murton
by BenB on Dec 9, 2006 2:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Francouer, easily
Francouer is a more gifted athlete, and his one major flaw (plate discipline) is one that can be improved upon.
by SmokeyJoeWood on Dec 9, 2006 9:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Francouer
Can be, but seldom is. Reality is that Francouer's poor plate discipline will probably prevent him from reaching his ceiling. Sometime the light goes on with strikezone control, but most times the player never learns. That being said I still think Francouer will have a better career than Murton. I don't think Murton will be anything above an average player, and Francouer even with a modest improvement in his strikezone control should be better than that.
by eastin on Dec 9, 2006 12:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 












