The best GM in baseball
In my opinion it's Larry Beinfest, but this isn't about me, and besides, my opinion might be just a little skewed, considering I LOVE THE FLORIDA MARLINS.
Anyway, there are 32 GMs, and only 10 slots in the poll, so I'm going to eliminate a few fringe candidates right here.
Walt Jocketty's Cardinals may have just won the World Series, but the man still traded Dan Haren (and Kiko Calero and Daric Barton) for Mark Mulder. Atrocious. He also paid good money for ex-Marlins Juan Encarnacion and Braden Looper, when any bleacher bum in our stadium could tell you that they $%&#ing suck.
Omar Minaya only knows how to do one thing: spend the Mets money. Granted, he's done it fairly well (Delgado, Pedro, Beltran) but I don't think he knows how to do anything else. The man set the Expos/Nats back five years by trading Grady Sizemore, Cliff Lee, and Brandon Philips for half a year of Bartolo Colon. What a jerk.
Terry Ryan made one ENORMOUS trade, I'll give him that. A.J. Pierzynski for Francisco Liriano, Joe Nathan, AND Boof Bonser might be the most one-sided deal of all-time. But other than that, what has he done? The Twins are a product of an amazing farm system. Meanwhile, Ryan has done little to augment his team's stellar young talent, adding scorching bats such as Luis Castillo, Rondell White, Nick Punto, Shannon Stewart...you get the picture. I refuse to include him in the poll.
Ned Colletti just gave Juan Pierre $45 million. I'll repeat that. Ned Colletti just gave Juan Pierre FORTY FIVE MILLION DOLLARS. Enough said.
Brian Sabean: on the other end of that Liriano deal.
Jim Hendry. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Thanks for Dontrelle Willis!
Josh Byrnes almost made the cut, and then I remembered he let the Marlins have Dan Uggla for $50,000.
Bill Stoneman is just all over the place, Tim Purpura is just a punk, and I just don't like Doug Melvin. Maybe it's the moustache.
And that leaves us with our field of ten! I think the top contenders are Beinfest (obvious), Billy Beane (even more obvious), and Schuerholz (won 79 straight division titles...but only one WS. nyah, nyah braves fans), with Epstein and Cashman sure to draw a lot of votes thanks to know-nothing Red Sox and Yankees fans. Let the voting begin! UPDATE: Actually, Doug Melvin is probably more valuable than Kevin Towers. I'm still not putting Melvin on the list, so I'm just going to change the spot to "OTHER", but should you vote that way, I DEMAND an explanation.
0 recs |
112 comments
Comments
Wow
You say "The Twins are a product of an amazing farm system" and then write off Ryan like he had nothing to do with it. To me, what the Twins and A's have been able to do is remarkable considering their bastard owner's unwillingness to spend money. Somehow, someway, they continue to put winning teams on the field.
I've met and spoken with Mr Ryan at length, and while we are on pretty opposite ends of the spectrum on a lot of issues, his results are undeniable, and to dismiss him like you did up top I think is foolhearty.
by Jgaztambide on Nov 30, 2006 8:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I completely understand the Beinfest...
My choice has to be Terry Ryan. Guy is sick as far as keeping the payroll low, and the farm system strong. Amazing at that.
After that I have to go with Beane. While all the shine from that book alot of people think he wrote has worn off, no GM is better at finding the bargain.
And one thing I will always respect from Beane is the balls the guy has. He has a complete and absolute confidence in everyone one of his moves, and really has not let the fan base or anything like that dictate his moves.
When you have a GM like Jim Hendry, it's quite possibly the most commendable things to see in a GM.
It's nice to see a GM with a plan. Only problem I really have is that, while I agree with the premise Beane works with, I like Ryan and Beinfest's use of the farm system and/or young players a little more.
After them I like Schuerolz, but because of the Braves Butt Boy Bill Shanks I just can't look at that orginization the right way.
A perfect GM would blend Ryan's farm system saavy with Beane's will and drive.
It's amazing to watch a GM like Beane and Beinfest adjust year after year. It's amazing to see a GM like Terry Ryan keep the farm system chugging talent.
Pretty soon Shapiro and even the Brewers GM (beyond the Estrada trade) could be on this list soon. I am mighty impressed by Shapiro, he's built a young and exciting team. And when Adam Miller and Chuck come up, they finally get the pitching they need.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 12:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Terry Ryan
In addition to the Nathan-Liriano-Bonser trade you mention (which I'm guessing you think is the sole reason the Twins are any good), Ryan has drafted Joe Mauer, Justin Morneau, Michael Cuddyer, the rest of the Twins' amazing bullpen (except Joe Nathan), as well as one of the top pitching prospects in the league (Garza), and several other potential ML caliber starting pitchers (Slowey, Perkins, Baker, etc.). I'll admit that he hasn't made the greatest free agent signings, but it is often difficult to make an impact FA move when you have only $2 - $5 million total to spend on free agents in a typical year.
I challenge any one of the GMs you listed above to get so much out of so little, particularly GMs of high payroll teams, like Cashman, Epstein, Williams, etc. Of course, if you don't want to include Ryan on your list because he pilfered Johan Santana from your beloved Marlins for Jared Camp, I can respect that.
by MauerPower on Nov 30, 2006 8:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget
by joeywyen on Nov 30, 2006 9:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget
by FrozenTed9 on Nov 30, 2006 9:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What?
by Metty5 on Nov 30, 2006 9:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What?
by Metty5 on Nov 30, 2006 9:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
seriously
as far as omar, the perception of him (especially on this site) is that he does nothing but mindlessly spend...yet for some reason cashman is on the list, odd...but then how do you explain vital VITAL players to the '06 mets like endy chavez, darren oliver (who he was ridiculed on this site for acquiring), duaner sanchez, chad bradford, jose valentin, PAUL LODUCA...but yeah he doesn't know anything unless hes signing bigtime free agents right?
by robcast23 on Nov 30, 2006 9:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because...
Abreu for a bucket of balls with potential?
Building up the farm system with 3 straight decent to very good drafts?
Resisting to overspend on this years crappy FA market.
I really think Cashman on another team would be one of the best in the game. Theres a reason why he became the Yankees GM so young, the man is smart.
He was one of the men behind the scenes in the late 80's and early 90's overseeing the rebuilding of what would become a great dynasty.
Seriously, Cashman is kind of an unknown as a GM, but I have alot of faith that if he somehow ended up with the Cubs I'd feel pretty secure.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 12:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thinking logically....
I mean I can't prove it, but I think he's much smarter than that. Plus, Irabu was "George's Golden Boy" or something.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 12:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pavano and Wright
Kevin Brown too.
by OneHitWonder on Dec 1, 2006 9:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re Cashman
by wir963 on Dec 1, 2006 9:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Um...
Posting this year has been ridiculous, but if you think these teams don't weigh the risks in these situations you're crazy.
The Japanese market is largely untapped, but the Yankees and Seattle have already seen the kind of money and growing fan base these guys can bring.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 11:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wrong Wright
by finman on Dec 1, 2006 2:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And don't forget Omar ...
by Yoda on Dec 1, 2006 1:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
um
by Metty5 on Dec 1, 2006 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
At this point
by drjayphd on Dec 1, 2006 2:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ryan or JS
by Havok1517 on Nov 30, 2006 9:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
you cant eliminate
by nyybaseball99 on Nov 30, 2006 9:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sure I can
As for Terry Ryan...look I could be wrong. Maybe he is directly responsible for the Twins farm system...and maybe he isnt. Maybe he has amazing scouts, or is massively lucky. In any event, I refuse to give him all the credit, and yes, I am mad that the Twins stole Johan Santana.
by jrfelix on Nov 30, 2006 9:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
This is the reason that most GM's have "Director of Baseball Operations" as their official title: anything relating to the baseball side of things is their responsibility, directly or indirectly.
by Jgaztambide on Nov 30, 2006 9:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
so then why aren't you killing theo?
hes about to trade the best hitter in baseball over the last decade
blew it big time with the edgar renteria/coco crisp/matt clement signings
wouldn't offer johnny damon more than $40mil allowing him to have a very big year with the yankees but now gives jd drew $75mil like its nothing
gave away clay meredith for NOTHING
and imagine if matsuzaka is a bust? wow that'd be one of the alltime blunders...
come on, i know its your list but at least be consistent
by robcast23 on Nov 30, 2006 10:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ok...
by robcast23 on Nov 30, 2006 11:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
'kay.
He's been trying to trade the guy every season. A bad GM would've already pulled the trigger on Manuel Aristides.
"blew it big time with the edgar renteria/coco crisp/matt clement signings"
First off, Crisp came over in a trade. Covelli Loyce, David Riske, and Josh Bard for Andy Marte, Guillermo Mota, and Kelly Shoppach. Shoppach was blocked, Mota's arm had been reduced to a nub, and maybe he saw something in Marte that we haven't (but Schuerholz did?). Coco didn't progress as expected, but he needed a CF. Think Damon and his noodle arm were coming back?
"wouldn't offer johnny damon more than $40mil allowing him to have a very big year with the yankees but now gives jd drew $75mil like its nothing"
Where are you getting the $75M figure? The Herald? If he replaces Coco instead of Manny, that's fine by me. (Psst: Correct me if I'm wrong, but Damon was being offered $44M/4. $11M/year last year is pretty much $15M/year in this offseason.)
"gave away clay meredith for NOTHING"
Bard couldn't catch the knuckler. Meredith sucked in his time with the Mothership. Can't knock the hustle there.
"and imagine if matsuzaka is a bust? wow that'd be one of the alltime blunders..."
Or he might not be. If he is, then yeah, it's a blunder, but you'd also have to kill Cashman and Minaya for also bidding absurdly high amounts.
Let's review: Two of his blunders are things that haven't happened yet. The other three? Necessity, not much risk, and two understandable mistakes (Clement and Renteria were targeted as good FA options). The anti-Yanks/Sawx bias really is getting in the way.
by drjayphd on Nov 30, 2006 11:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry
first a bad GM wouldn't have traded manny yet, a bad one would be constantly trying to but lucky enough for his organization would be too inept to do so...the guy put him on waivers for god sakes, don't say theo has been shrewdly keeping manny despite what he says about trades
second, looks like you and theo have something in common, lack of player research...cla meredith did not "suck" for the red sox...in fact during his rise through the boston farm system before 2006 he posted era's of 0.00, 0.00, 2.20 and 0.00 and 5.59...that 5 isn't great but on the whole definitely not the kind of arm i'd be giving up for doug mirabelli...plus he was the best RP in baseball this year, a position the sox desparately lacked, and that kind of dominance doesn't just apear out of nowhere...the sox completely missed the boat in not even realizing what they had...so yes i can actually knock theo's "hustle" on that one
as for damon, it is widely known that he WOULD have come back but all he was doing was chasing the money...and while the market this year is inflated, that has nothing to do with the fact that they wouldn't OVERspend last year but are completely willing to open the checkbooks this year as evidenced by drew and matsuzaka...and while you're right $11mil last year is equal to more this year, drew's contracts net worth is $31mil more than what they offered damon, you're saying that $31 million has nothing to do with the sox willingess to spend and everything to do with market inflation? no way
by robcast23 on Dec 1, 2006 1:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Um..
Name one GM that hasn't made a poor signing or trade. Beinfest traded Derrek Lee for Choi and Nannini. JP Riccardi signed BJ Ryan, AJ Burnett and Corey Koskie to more money than they deserved. Cashman signed Irabu and Pavano, among many others. Towers traded Jason Bay and Oliver Perez for Brian Giles. Dombrowski went through a 119 loss season. Kenny Williams traded Carlos Lee for Podsednik. Why not target them for their bad signings like you did Epstein?
Coco Crisp wasn't a free agent signing. His extension isn't that terrible. $5,000,000 a year isn't that bad considering 2004 and 2005 and his position.
Drew has been a better player than Damon over his career, although paying him 7 million more too much.
Matzusaka isn't even signed yet and he isn't a bust yet.
by marinerjohn27 on Nov 30, 2006 11:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Have fun in the 1800's...
Drew has more power, gets on base more, and unlike Damon isn't a highly overrated defensive OFer.
But I won't get that get in the way of teammate dependent numbers.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 1:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Johnny Damon
by chaney on Dec 1, 2006 2:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Lol....
So you think that J.D. Drew has had a better career than Johnny Damon because he has more power and gets on base more? Um, okay.>>>
Re-read please. Then read it again. Can you even explain this logic?
It's like saying..."Yea, Drew does the stuff great baseball players do, but Johnny Damon piled up alot of countables as a player on two far better offense, therefore he's better."
Thats pretty much what you just said to me.
RBIs are a joke to judge guys on.
In 2003 Barry Bonds only had 90 RBIs, what a crappy player. Preston Wilson had 141, he's like a million times better.
His .282/.343/.537 with 141 RBIs while playing half his games at Coors Field are so much more valuable than Bonds' .341/.529/.749 but only 90 RBIS!!!
Oh wait, Barry Bonds is a top 5 player all time, and had one of the all time great seasons that year. Preston Wilson is a pretty crappy player.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 12:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
for the record
last time i checked the point of the game is to score runs: EVERY SINGLE rbi leads to a run, barely 30% of the OBP lead to runs...thus RBIS > OBP
by robcast23 on Dec 1, 2006 1:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude....
They are RUNS BATTED IN.
Tell me, how do you get RBIs without your teammates? Can you hit 100 HRs to get 100 RBIs by yourself?
Thinking LOGICALLY, RBIs are a teammate driven stat. How much water should that hold when analyzing players?
Hint: The answer is none.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
His logic is as follows
Drew
Who gets on base more, thus NOT getting out more? (Bear in mind the out is the most important thing in baseball, the first person to reach 27 outs loses)
Drew gets on base more
Who is better defensively?
Drew
Who has had better batters to bat him in, so that his RS stats are inflated by players like "the greatest hitter of the last decade (Manny)" and Papi and the rest of the Sox lineup?
Damon
Who is more durable?
Damon
But look at it this way -- if Drew bats leadoff for the Red Sox, his power #s and his OBP lead to a nearly 100% chance that his precious RBI and RS stats would be far higher than Damon's over the same period of time (if given the same production from his teammates). The only thing going for Damon (outside of speed) is his durability. Make no mistake, that's very important. But if and when Drew has a full season, it will be a colossal season. And you'll be singing a different tune about his value if that happens w/ the Sox.
by mroak89 on Dec 1, 2006 6:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Missing the point
by jc3 on Dec 1, 2006 7:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
It's the argument of A.J. Burnett. Sure, he's got all of the ability in the world. But, a vast majority of people bash Riccardi for giving him that kind of contract based on unreliability due to injuries. The same rule applies to Drew IMO, except ace pitchers are more valuable than good OF, so IMO it's more excusable to take the chance on Burnett.
by jc3 on Dec 1, 2006 9:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Reliable...
Drew has played in at least 145 games in 2 of the past 3 years, and missed last year because he got hit by a fastball in the wrist.
Even then he's put up a 1.005 OPS, a .932 OPS, and a .891 OPS. The .891 OPS is one of the LOWEST of his career.
Damon meanwhile led off in one of baseballs best hitters park for baseballs best lineups. He saw alot more fastballs than anyone deserves to, and still his HIGHST OPS in his whole career is lower than Drew's career OPS.
But I'm sorry, his runs scored and RBIs in two of baseballs best lineups are alot more telling right?
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 11:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Reliability
I stated that Damon's had a more productive career than Drew and I stand by that. He has produced more for his teams based on the fact that he has played a ton more games, and that counts for a lot in assessing a career.
by jc3 on Dec 1, 2006 12:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah...
I'm talking more recently.
145 and 146 games are signs hes "injury prone?"
Breaking your wrist becaues a 91 MPH fastball hit you there is injury prone?
Drew could probably hit .300/.400/.500 in Boston's lineup at Fenway. Thats better production than other FAs like Lee and Soriano who got paid far more for longer.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 1:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And yet...
And he was more productive in a lesser lineup than Damon.
BTW, you also forget that Damon, as a leadoff hitter, is garaunteed to get more plate appearances than most.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying Drew is more durable....
Plus, he's a far better hitter than Damon, even with Johnny's big bad RBIs.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 1:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
AJ Burnett
by mroak89 on Dec 1, 2006 6:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
Please get your facts straight. It's his durability that's the issue, not his ability. A lot like Drew, quite frankly.
by jc3 on Dec 1, 2006 7:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My mistake
Additionally, I'm not comparing him to Beckett.
Thirdly, I think a gargantuan JD Drew contract would be stupid. Just like the gargantuan contract to Burnett was stupid. Except pitchers are more fragile than hitters... At least, flamethrowers like Burnett with a track history of being injured are. A hitter, it's mostly luck... Rare is the occassion when their bones or mechanics are so different from another player that they are consistently injured. Whereas pitchers vary more greatly, mechanics etc. Sucking in terms of his contract, I would still say he's not where he should be... I guess I'm just a little stunned at how greatly market value is rocketing above player value.
by mroak89 on Dec 1, 2006 10:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, what I should have said was...
by marinerjohn27 on Dec 2, 2006 4:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ryan
But if guys like Ricciardi are on the list, I can't see how a reasonable case can be made that Ryan should be left off completely. The poll is useless because people are not voting on a valid pool of candidates.
It's like voting for the #1 prospect with Delmon Young left on the list while guys like Daric Barton make the cut.
by FI on Nov 30, 2006 9:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
re: Jocketty and Ryan
terry ryan is right up there with billy beane with what he has done with the twins and he made perhaps the best trade of the last 25 years when he stole Nathan and Liriano from the giants for a guy they needed to get rid of.
by fewgoodcards on Nov 30, 2006 9:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
^I agree
And how anyone can not think Terry Ryan is a great GM is beyond me.
by BobbyMac on Nov 30, 2006 9:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed with most of the above comments
by Pawtucket Pat on Nov 30, 2006 10:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with this...
I especially underrated Jocketty now that I look at Rolen.
For all this talk of injury and blah blah blah, he had a damn good offensive season.
Edmonds will be gone soon, and that is going to be a major whole to fix though.
Still, the Cards will have Pujols for a long time and thats major. We'll see what Jocketty can do with his Bonds. Sabean never handled it, Jocketty has done a FAR better job.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 1:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
JS ?
as for bad trades, didn't JS trade Bret Boone and Ryan Klesko for next to nothing ( ok, Mike Remlinger )? and Dye?
until the last 5-6 yrs, JS had lot of money to play around with. So if you going to eliminate Minaya based on that...and after that, he had a great farm system :)
Hey, I am a Braves fan, just not sure you got the criteria for rating right. There was a huge thread on primer a while back on this. look it up when Primer wakes up again
by Godot on Nov 30, 2006 9:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Remlinger?
by aCone419 on Dec 1, 2006 12:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
re: Omar
In 2005, the Mets biggest weakness was their bullpen. In 2006, it was their biggest strength. The casual observer might note that Minaya spent a lot of money to bring in Billy Wagner. They'd be ignoring the fact that he built an entire bullpen around him (Sanchez, Bradford, Feliciano, Oliver and later Mota) for virtually nothing. They combined for 275 IP and a 2.70 ERA.
He turned one starter (Benson) into two better ones (Maine, El Duque) who combine to make less money. He got Endy Chavez and Jose Valentin off the scrap heap, both of whom play great defense and had career years offensively.
Minaya excelled at making small moves last year. To say he can only spend money is ignorant.
by jeck on Nov 30, 2006 9:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You're looking at the trees
The Mets, for all their scrap heaping, certainly did not pick the core of their team up from any kind of scrap pile. Your logic is that Minaya excels at picking up players from the scrap heap -- history proves this to be false. He had a team (Expos) that he would have had to excel at this to make good. Since he didn't make them good, one can conjecture that perhaps his scrap move deals are solid, but nothing actually exceptional.
Imagine the Mets w/o Delgado, Beltran, Pedro, and Wagner? And others? Lo Duca ain't cheap. Keep going. He's a good GM, but the backbone of his team is money. That is undeniable -- just look at the damn payroll the Mets have.
by mroak89 on Dec 1, 2006 6:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Funny...
Mets
Year W L Payroll
'04 71 91 $96 mill
'05 83 79 $101 mill
'06 97 65 $101 mill
Now maybe I'm not so good at all of this new math, but to me that says the Mets have gained 26 wins in two years under Minaya while raising the payroll by a whopping $5 million. We have established one thing here though, people will always complain about big market teams spending no matter how they go about it, and perception often trumps reality...
by MetfanBren on Dec 1, 2006 9:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wait a second
Isn't the payroll still $101m?
What the hell does it matter that payroll has only increased by 5 mil to 101mil?
THIS FRANCHISE USES A LOT OF MONEY. HENCE, IT IS BUILT ON PAYROLL.
Just because they've relocated where they're spending the huge $$s doesn't mean that it's NOT A HUGE SUM to spend on payroll.
Now maybe I'm not good at any math, but it seems to me that a payroll that is consistently in the top 3 or so of the MLB is built on $$. Nor am I complaining about big market teams spending $$, to be honest I don't give a rats ass about market size. I'm stating simple, overly obvious truth. And you contradict yourself -- you admit that big market teams spend, and regardless of how it goes about it, a dollar is a dollar. 26 wins in 2 years -- coincides with giving monster contracts to Beltran and Martinez and Wagner, am I right? Kudos to Minaya to relocating his money to better players, but without Beltran and Martinez and Delgado and co, for all the Endy Chavez's that you value so highly, the Mets would STILL BE A ~80-85 WIN team. Maybe a little better. Without those gargantuan salaries and superstars, the Mets are David Wright and Jose Reyes and a solid bullpen and not much else. You can't get by with that. What are you arguing? That the Mets don't have a big payroll? They do. Big payrolls = clubs built in cash. It's that simple
by mroak89 on Dec 1, 2006 9:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Alright...
People make it sound like the Mets went on a Steinbrenner type spending spree and just blew the rest of the NL out of the water. Once again the numbers prove otherwise though...
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/teams/salaries?team=nym
2006 Payrolls:
- NY Mets - $100,901,085
- LA Dodgers - $99,176,950
- Chicago Cubs - $94,841,166
- Atlanta - $92,461,852
- Houston - $92,101,503
- San Francisco - $90,862,064
He also went into the playoffs with John Maine and Oliver Perez in the rotation, rather than make a panic trade for someone like Zito. That tells me that he actually does realize the value of young players..
by MetfanBren on Dec 2, 2006 8:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Right
For example, look at Oakland. This is a team not built on money. They have just one truly expensive contract relative to the league (Eric Chavez, $11m/yr or so), and even he is homegrown. Now look at the Mets. They have several exorbitant contracts, none of whom are homegrown. That's the difference between being built on money and not being built on money. Of course, it's all relative, since every franchise on some level is built on money.
by mroak89 on Dec 3, 2006 10:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ryan? O' Dowd? Melvin?
by Angels and Demons on Nov 30, 2006 9:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I have
by FrozenTed9 on Nov 30, 2006 10:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Riccardi...
But his draft strategy really does blow, and I'm just not a fan of his moves.
Great, like Hendry he paid big money to overrated players.
Not a fan.
Doug Melvin is slowly turning over a Brewers orginization, and is getting no credit for it. I don't think anyone even notices that the Brewers may actually be good, and VERY soon. That trade for David Bush is one of the biggest long term sleeper moves in baseball IMO.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 12:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Minaya
Minaya has done a great job with the Mets trading spare parts for contributors
by mtk52983 on Nov 30, 2006 9:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Minaya...
Signing Beltran and Pedro were no brainers. Pedro looks like that contract is going to blow up in their face. Delgado...Lo Duca...getting up there in age.
Not a big fan of him as a GM.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 12:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
disagree
The Mets were able to get insurance on Pedro's contract so it's not going to cripple them. Lo Duca is signed for one more year. Delgado is still productive, the players he was traded for don't appear to be anything special, and his contract is a bargain in today's market (the Marlins even kicked in some cash).
The Beltran contract was not a no-brainer. If it was, the Astros would have him in their outfield instead of Carlos Lee. The Mets haven't participated in any of this year's insanity yet.
You'd have to elaborate on how anything he's done so far is going to hurt them beyond 2008.
by jeck on Dec 1, 2006 12:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True enough...
Still, I'm just not a fan of Minaya as a GM. But right now I can't deny that he's made some very good moves for the Mets.
We'll see how they look in 3 years though. Wright, Reyes, Milledge, Humber, and Pelfrey are a nucleus for the future, but only two of those are actually good major leaguers right now.
Still, can't deny his results right now. NY was PERFECT for him actually.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 1:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This offseason
Teams with money, key holes in their roster, and expectations from ownership to win next year don't have the luxury to sit back and wait regardless of the market. That doesn't make Baltimore's $20 million bullpen defensible per se, but not everybody has the core players from a playoff team returning, or sufficient depth/cash to trade if the free agent market doesn't address their needs.
by BGWoodsman on Dec 1, 2006 10:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
and obviously omar did that last season with relatively cheap additions like carlos delgado and paul loduca
by robcast23 on Dec 1, 2006 1:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
hard to give credit there...
Big market GM's face results-oriented pressure more than financial pressure anyway, so if Omar thought he needed a guy, he'd overpay because he can. He may still, but right now he has enough options not to sweat it.
by BGWoodsman on Dec 1, 2006 10:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
More on the Colon deal
Cliff Lee is not a guy who would have made a lot of difference in Montreal/Washington
The only player who developed for Cleveland that Montreal/Washington probably wished they had was Sizemore and when the deal was made, he was probably the least highly regarded of the 3
Hell, look at the guys who Jason Bay has been traded for in his career. The fact is some guys develop and some don't and if this were a science, everyone would be getting it right. We cannot look back with hindsight how a deal panned out
by mtk52983 on Nov 30, 2006 9:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dombrowski
He took a 119 loss team in 2003 to AL Champions in 2006. He's definitely top 5. It takes a special guy to come in to the Tigers in the situation they were in at the time and do what Dombrowski did.
by mcq fesijiba on Nov 30, 2006 10:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
John Schuerholz-Not even close
by thedude on Nov 30, 2006 10:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The best GM in baseball
How you could possibly leave Ryan & Jocketty off is ridiculous. Ryan has done a remarkable job considering his constraints & the Cardinals have been to the WS two of the last three years & are always in the running.
Ricciardi should be on the list for worst GM. IMHO
by golfboy10 on Nov 30, 2006 10:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You are a complete fool
Hey, you wanna talk fleecings?
Luis Vizcaino and Scott "Tron" Podsednik for Carlos Lee... Melvin completely owned Kenny with that one.
As far as scouting, I think the 2004 and 2005 drafts have gone pretty well for the Crew... From '04 you have Rogers (who, as expected, is still raw with a huge ceiling) and Gallardo emerging as a blue-chip prospect.
From 2005, Braun has turned out great numbers so far, and the regard for his bat seems to be generally nice. Not to mention Inman in round 3 is looking great as well.
So, The Moustache has been able to build a team that's on the rise with a mediocre payroll/marker. I can't see how he's not deserving of a top 10 spot, especially with J.P. getting up there...
by ufoboy90 on Nov 30, 2006 10:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Kinda funny
by e 6 on Nov 30, 2006 10:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Fringe? Walt?
Walt settled for guys like Looper and Juan because he had holes to fill and little cash to fill them with. Those guys did exactly what was expected of them.
The Mulder deal was hardly atrocious if he didn't have shoulder issues. Not as atrocious as giving Bonderman up as a PTBNL anyway.
J.P. Ricciardi? Huh?
by sungod7 on Nov 30, 2006 11:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Shapiro
by The Origenist on Nov 30, 2006 11:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Mark Shapiro
by acchapello on Nov 30, 2006 11:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Duh
Oh, and to the above poster, Jhonny Peralta is Angel Berroa II. Just letting you know.
by doublestix on Nov 30, 2006 11:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
lololol
by Maverick on Nov 30, 2006 11:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How so
by doublestix on Dec 1, 2006 12:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lololol
jhonny will bounce back. ill bookmark this thread for ya
by Maverick on Dec 1, 2006 1:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Beane vs. Ryan
Even though both GM's are quite different, however, I think both the A's and Twins have been able to compete with the "big boys" because of their perpetual emphasis on developing good, young pitching. You can admire Beane's outside-the-box thinking about offense, but in reality, his teams have won on the strength of their pitching depth, just as the Twins have.
In my opinion, Beane's Moneyball philosophy is merely a way of improving a team's offense on the margins for a relatively low price, with the underlying ideal that the core of the team must be built on pitching and defense. I see the A's team of this past season, which was last in OBP, and one of the worst offensive teams in the league, yet still won 90+ games, as a perfect example of this. Ryan's division winning Twins teams of the early 2000's won in a very similar manner. However, Ryan doesn't get nearly as much credit because he is not flashy and does not have the Moneyball publicity machine behind him.
by MauerPower on Dec 1, 2006 12:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why Beane over Ryan?
Beane: 825-633 (4 Division Titles, 1 WC)
Ryan: 944-1000 (4 Division Titles)
Postseason
Beane: 11-16 (one series win)
Ryan: 6-15 (one series win)
And, of course, the AL West has been the best division in baseball during Beane's tenure, while the AL Central has been one of the worst. If the Twins were in the AL West or East, they'd probably only have playoff appearance under Ryan.
by AthertonA on Dec 1, 2006 10:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
last in OBP??
The A's were 10th in MLB in OBP last year with a .340 mark
They were 7th in the AL for team OBP.
by jakarta on Dec 1, 2006 1:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
by MauerPower on Dec 1, 2006 5:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You know
Honestly, I'd also throw Pat Gillick in there with some of the names in that list, although his Phillies tenure has so far been a bit questionable. But he's had a solid track record producing strong teams, and he has a strong philosophy with which he adheres by. Of course, it's arguable that his strong adherence to his beliefs have limited some of his teams that had potential.
by toonsterwu on Nov 30, 2006 11:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I Refuse
What a joke.
by StatFreakNYM on Nov 30, 2006 11:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
as a Marlins fan...
not top 3 though
by Maverick on Nov 30, 2006 11:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
doug Melvin
But then again you didn't include him simply because he has a moustache so obviously this is a joke.
by Team Moneyball on Nov 30, 2006 11:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
we have a winner!
Larry Beinfest - On this, I'm not backing down. I really do think Beinfest is amazing. Whether it's finding closers off the scrap heap (Todd Jones, Joe Borowski) or trading overpriced, declining veterans for premium young talent (Anibal Sanchez and Hanley Ramirez), Beinfest is the man. I defy you all, Larry is number one!
Billy Beane - I mean, come on. We've all read Moneyball.
Dave Dombrowski - two champions on his resume now.
Terry Ryan - yes, yes he matches Billy for operating on a shoestring budget. I still hate him for Santana, and oh, I forgot to mention before, he let Ortiz go for nothing. How's that for your best GM in baseball?
John Schuerholz - ten straight division titles, etc. etc.
Doug Melvin - another guy awesome at finding guys off the scrap heap. brady clark anyone? handled the carlos lee trade nicely as well.
Brian Cashman - I agree with the theory that he isnt always in control, and at those times the Yankees pull a Sheffield (instead of Vlad) or a Pavano.
Mark Shapiro - rarely overspends, good at trading for young talent. I like the Barfield pick-up.
Walt Jocketty - 2006 WS champs...who could argue with that? (Billy Beane still RAPED him).
Omar Minaya - yeah, he's been great for the Mets. I still think he's a $%&#er for what he did to the Expos. That was a hatchet job committed for the sole intention of landing Omar Minaya another GM job, and I firmly believe that.
by jrfelix on Dec 1, 2006 1:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
beinfest
I think he's in the top 10.
by Team Moneyball on Dec 1, 2006 2:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What did you expect Omar to do in Montreal?
by mtk52983 on Dec 1, 2006 7:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
regarding Ortiz
Granted, Ryan should take more heat on it, but keep it in perspective.
by dbimberg on Dec 1, 2006 10:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The
by FrozenTed9 on Dec 1, 2006 4:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good one.
Anyway, my take.
REALLY GOOD
A's/Marlins / Twins / Indians / Braves
most other teams are a mix, there are some that are obviously somewhat better, but not to the degree of both ends... but...
The terrible.
Pirates / Mariners / Cubs / Baltimore / Phillies
by RollingWave on Dec 1, 2006 12:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would call Nats more terrible than Mariners.
by marinerjohn27 on Dec 1, 2006 12:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So in order....
- Terry Ryan
- Billy Beane
- John Schuerholz
- Mark Shapiro
- Larry Beinfest
- Doug Melvin
Guys we'll see in the future?
Dayton Moore.
Now my Paul DePodesta rant:
Firing DePodesta was such a retard idea for the Dodgers, cause his replacement blows and DePodesta could be a good GM for someone if he works on those craptastic negotiating skills. He really has serious potential, he's young, and he had experience that sent him through turmoil. But his moves all look good in retrospect.
Here's hoping Jim Hendry gets on this list (doubtful) or that the Cubs get someone who can, and can do it without spending 200 million.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 12:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
almost
and does anybody wonder why they always hear praise for brian sabean? i mean that guys gotta be bottom 3 no doubt
by robcast23 on Dec 1, 2006 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sabean blows...
And I like Beinfest alot more than Minaya, because in a situation where a team is rebuilding, he does amazing.
Minaya is good because of his market (highly hispanic NY), and the high payroll. Horrible in Montreal, even given the circumstances.
by SenorGato88 on Dec 1, 2006 10:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Epstein Behind Ricciradi?
On the plus side for Theo, he won the WS in his second year as GM, with a team featuring:
-- A HOF-caliber DH that he picked up for nothing a year before and was paying $4.5 mill
-- A guy who was actually the team's regular-season and WS MVP that he picked up for nothing and paid $490,000 (yes, I'm talking Mark Bellhorn, and WPA numbers once adjusted for position plus Fielding Bible numbers show that he indeed matches that description, as outrageous as it sounds)
-- A very good 3B that he picked up for nothing and was paying $2.1 mill
-- A very solid 1B that he picked up for nothing and was paying $3.3 mill
-- A SS that he obtained at the trade deadline in one of the ballsiest GM moves of all time
-- A rotation ace that he was able to afford because of deep pockets, but one he stole in trade after it was universally assumed that he had no shot at getting him to waive his no-trade
-- A great 5th starter (178.2 IP, 4.03 ERA) that he not only grabbed off the waiver wire from the Pirates, but snuck through waivers the next spring in order to get him the AAA innings he needed.
The only pure big market-bully move was signing Foulke.
This was one of the gretest GM seasons in recent MLB history, done under almost inconceivable pressure from the fan base.
In terms of downside, he's struggled filling the middle of the bullpen (who hasn't?), the jury is out on Arroyo for Pena (although that's really getting Pena for nothing, as above), and he made one bad trade when he reacquired Mirabelli. No one knows whether he endorsed the Beckett deal which was made during his sabbatical, and the jury is still out on that one, too.
by Eric Van on Dec 1, 2006 2:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 












