2007 San Francisco Giants Prospects

2007 San Francisco Giants Prospects
- Tim Lincecum, RHP, Grade A (terrific)
- Jonathan Sanchez, LHP, Grade B (a solid pitcher if he stays healthy)
- Marcus Sanders, 2B, Grade B (this assumes that his shoulder injury was the cause of his problems last year. I am not certain of this grade and am open to arguments either way).
- Billy Sadler, RHP, Grade B- (I like him best of all the middle relief candidates)
- Kevin Frandsen, 2B, Grade B- (is this too high?)
- Eddy Martinez-Esteve, OF, Grade B- (this assumes good health)
- Emmanuel Burriss, SS, Grade B- (borderline C+ but draft status boosts him a bit)
- Fred Lewis, OF, Grade C+ (I like him better than this grade implies but he's getting old for a prospect)
- Nate Schierholtz, OF, Grade C+ (I keep going back and forth on this guy)
- Travis Ishikawa, 1B, Grade C+ (Good glove, mediocre bat for a first baseman)
- Brian Wilson, RHP, C+ (another middle relief candidate)
- Brian Anderson, RHP, C+ (another middle relief candidate)
- Eugenio Velez, OF, C+ (added to 40-man roster after strong '06 but already 24)
- Ben Copeland, OF, C+ (possible fourth outfielder eventually, perhaps should be grade C)
- Osiris Matos, RHP, C+ (another middle relief candidate)
- Clayton Tanner, LHP, C+ (young pitcher a long way away)
- Antoan Richardson, OF, C+ (speed demon but can he hit at higher levels?)
- Justin Hedrick, RHP, C (another middle relief candidate)
- Joseph Martinez, RHP, C (good control)
- Jesse Floyd, RHP, C (interchangeable with guys below)
Young pitchers Pichardo and Pucetas are being considered for the Top 20; this is all a work in progress.
The Giants in a Sentence: The Giants have some interesting relief arms after Lincecum and Sanchez, but have shown little ability to develop hitters with plate discipline or plus offensive potential.
This list took forever and it is really not done yet, but I wanted to get it out there since it is already late. There is a large mass of Grade C type guys who are marginal prospects or just too far away to tell for sure. The only guy I'm really certain about at all is Lincecum, which is a no-brainer. I like Sanchez a lot, but all the other guys have at least one question mark and in some cases several. Injuries were also a huge issue. I may also be too generous with some of those C+ grades and some of them may get reduced to regular Cs later on.
Note: Remember that ALL GRADES ARE PRELIMINARY. There is a lot of slack in the B-/C+/C range and players may move up and down depending on how my thinking progresses. Feel free to make comments, point out sleepers I may have missed, etc. Note that there is only a limited amount of space in the book, and the max I can do is 35-36 players per team.
Of course, the best thing you can do is buy my book
0 recs |
163
comments
Comments
re
by bootsy on Nov 26, 2006 6:31 PM EST 0 recs
Yeah as good as Lincecum
by Havok1517 on
Nov 26, 2006 7:11 PM EST
up
0 recs
94 MPH
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 8:30 PM EST
up
0 recs
drB
by z4 landshark on
Nov 26, 2006 8:43 PM EST
up
0 recs
Lincecum
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 8:53 PM EST
up
0 recs
Lincecum
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:04 AM EST
up
0 recs
Lincecum
by slurve on
Nov 27, 2006 8:04 AM EST
up
0 recs
Size
Remember Pedro was shipped off in one of the worst trades in baseball history because Tommy Lasorda thought he was too small to be a decent starter.
by Roger on
Nov 27, 2006 11:48 AM EST
up
0 recs
Cowart?
Also, Adam Witter?
by nostocksjustbonds on Nov 26, 2006 6:40 PM EST 0 recs
I'm not a pacifist, I'm a...
Personally, I wanted to see McBryde in the top 20. BA went sorta bonkers over him a couple weeks ago, and he does seem to be totally injury free, not to mention tool-laden.
by multiphasic on
Nov 26, 2006 7:56 PM EST
up
0 recs
Cowart
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 8:59 PM EST
up
0 recs
Cowart's delivery
I do think that he could make it as a starter if he gets to the majors, a la Reuter. He'll definitely be interesting to follow. Does he start 2007 in San Jose, Augusta or...Connecticut? I'm guessing San Jose, but sometimes I can't tell how they decide those things.
by nostocksjustbonds on
Nov 26, 2006 10:16 PM EST
up
0 recs
Cowart, Witter and McBryde
When he comes set, he's bent over at the waist, almost like he's in a three-point stance in football, but his left leg is halfway down the mound. He lifts the foot barely, doing practically a toe-tap, and then he pushes off with his rear leg. The motion is a true underhand, dirt-scraping with the knuckles.
He probably has no more power to gain off his pitching unless he does a real change to his motion, but then he may lose his control.
I agree that he probably won't be an effective starter at the highest levels, but with his motion, his superb control and his ability to throw a couple of pitches with consistency, he's a very intriguing relief prospect. And I wouldn't say never about the starting.
Witter: I didn't get to see much of him. Natural power swing, though it's not heavily projectible. I've heard reports that his defense is lacking, but unlike Sandoval before him, the Giants don't plan to move him elsewhere.
McBryde: The funny thing is, he might be a better reliever than an outfielder. But he's a very good outfielder with plus defense and speed tools, and solid enough hitting. He'll probably never become a power guy, but he's not the type who needs to be to be successful. He will have to stave off lingering doubts about his legs and health after missing most of 2006's college year with a severe Hamstring injury.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:13 AM EST
up
0 recs
Valdez?
How does the TJ surgery effect his roster standing?
by Bhaakon on Nov 26, 2006 6:46 PM EST 0 recs
Daniel Griffin
by tupelodylan on Nov 26, 2006 6:50 PM EST 0 recs
griffin
by John Sickels on
Nov 26, 2006 7:08 PM EST
up
0 recs
Sorry, John
I know Whitaker pulled an oblique very early in the year. He came back briefly then, according to a knowledgeable source over on mccoveychronicles.com, he developed some kind of elbow problem and had surgery. Must not have been TJ because he's supposed to be ready for spring training. I'm not sure non-TJ elbow surgery is reassuring. As raw as Whitaker is, he can ill afford to lose development time to multiple injuries. Not ready to say he's a bust, but he's skating darn close to the edge.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 8:35 PM EST
up
0 recs
Griffin
However, since a lot of Griffin's upside depends on his curve, any injury will be very, very impactful on his rating.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:15 AM EST
up
0 recs
Good Job!
IMO, you are being generous with the C+'s. Thank you.
I would rank Frandsen higher, not lower.
I would probably rank Burris higher.
I would probably put Schoop in the top 20, more by default than anything.
Craig Whitaker and Dan Griffin are two injuries that could come back strong, but very iffy.
I know Angel Villalona has not played yet, but just reading the tea leaves, a top Dominican prospect, high signing bonus, Scott Boras throwing dust in the air..........I would rank him #2 just because everyone else below Lincecum is just so bad.
by DrBGiantsfan on Nov 26, 2006 6:57 PM EST 0 recs
Agreed on Frandsen
by StickRat on
Nov 26, 2006 8:56 PM EST
up
0 recs
Toronto or San Francisco?
by Jurgen on Nov 26, 2006 6:59 PM EST 0 recs
toronto
I just dont know if Ricky Romero has what it takes to be a starter in the majors. Maybe, a reliever..?
by z4 landshark on
Nov 26, 2006 8:10 PM EST
up
0 recs
Yes, but...
by Jurgen on
Nov 26, 2006 10:21 PM EST
up
0 recs
EME
by cinqua on Nov 26, 2006 8:49 PM EST 0 recs
No way
by Jurgen on
Nov 26, 2006 10:15 PM EST
up
0 recs
EME
If Manny Ramirez can play left field for an AL team, EME's defense is nothing that makes him a so-called 'AL Player.'
His health is the more pertinent issue, and how he'll come back from labrum surgery is a big deal. That said, he came back from labrum surgery on his throwing shoulder in 2005 and had a very good year, so coming back from the labrum surgery on his non-throwing shoulder this year, with more time in the offseason to rest, shouldn't be a problem.
As a hitter, he's one of the best I've seen in the Giants system. Very good pitch recognition, sweet swing, solid power that can grow with health. I think a C+ is a low ranking on him.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:19 AM EST
up
0 recs
Nathan Pendley
by StickRat on Nov 26, 2006 8:54 PM EST 0 recs
Lefty Relievers
The Giants drafted a whole bunch of lefty reliever types in 2006. Paul Oseguera, from UCLA, had a rough start at Salem-Keizer, but turned in some spectacular strikeout numbers in August. Ryan Paul got a late start due to the College World Series with CS Fullerton, but he's another big lefty. He had a high ERA, but that was inflated by a couple of terrible outings from what I remember. He had some very good outings too. Steve Calicutt is another LHRP who pitched pretty well for S-K.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 9:05 PM EST
up
0 recs
Dr B. ...
I've been impressed with Quinowski's numbers. Haven't seen him pitch yet. It's tough to believe if he's pumping 95 that he'd still be an unknown, but stranger things have happen. I don't know how many people were raving about Brian Wilson a year or two ago. I really like Oseguera. He had a pretty heavy workload at UCLA, appearing in 29 games. I saw Ryan Paul in college. Not terribly impressed. Good velocity but he needs to rub some funk on it.
by StickRat on
Nov 26, 2006 9:19 PM EST
up
0 recs
I'd Love It
I'm a teetotler so I'll have a coke while you have your beer. How's that?
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 9:30 PM EST
up
0 recs
Sounds like a plan
by StickRat on
Nov 27, 2006 5:10 PM EST
up
0 recs
Quinowski
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 9:34 PM EST
up
0 recs
Redlands High/Riverside CC
Riverside CC is a perenial baseball power, and went through College Of San Mateo to win its last state championship. Both Scott Feldman and Mike Mooney played for that CSM team.
by StickRat on
Nov 28, 2006 2:14 AM EST
up
0 recs
EME's health
by philly on Nov 26, 2006 8:56 PM EST 0 recs
Move them all down
by RMF on Nov 26, 2006 8:59 PM EST 0 recs
B+?
I agree that most of the C+'s are too high. The problem with the Giants system is that it's very hard to figure out which ones are too high and whch ones aren't. Most of these kids have some upside which could surprise a lot of folks. On the other hand, most of them have significant warts too.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 9:11 PM EST
up
0 recs
tim
by z4 landshark on
Nov 27, 2006 1:16 AM EST
up
0 recs
Lincecum
by doublestix on Nov 26, 2006 10:19 PM EST 0 recs
Cal League parity
And this "hitters league" really didn't have any hitters in the league...
(Baseball America said in their write up that the "depth of talent was severely lacking", then cites these as the best hitters: Reid Brignac, Carlos Gonzalez, Travis Buck, Jonathan Herrera and Emilio Bonifacio)
...and much fewer during the time Lincecum was actually there.
From Aug. 1 to the end of the year:
Brignac was in AA
Gonzalez was in A+ for 37 AB's in AUG (never against Lincecum)
Buck was on the DL in AA
Herrera was there, but no ABs v. Lincecum
Bonifacio was there, but again not even 1 AB v. Lincecum
Now I do understand that it's a "hitters league" because hitters tend to put up better numbers there...It's still A+ and the hitters probably can't keep up with a high end fastball with other pitches to compliment it.
John, I would wait to see him play some ball at AA and put up more than 100 IP against a league before we just give a guy an A rating (There's no way he deserves the highest rating you can give a player based on these low numbers). A- may be too high as well, I can see it though with all the excitement about him.
by phiago on
Nov 26, 2006 11:53 PM EST
up
0 recs
Lincecum
I love Lincecum and he's got as much potential as anyone, but honestly, isn't his best-case scenario for him next year what Matt Garza did this year? And wouldn't that be fairly extraordinarily rare outside of Garza?
I can't see Lincecum at a straight A and Garza at an A-. If you ask me, it should be the other way around.
by limozeen on Nov 26, 2006 10:47 PM EST 0 recs
Well...
What a crappy system. Didn't they sign some guy last year from the Dominican with a 98 MPH fastball and a sick slider? What happened to him?
by SenorGato88 on Nov 26, 2006 11:26 PM EST 0 recs
Waldis Joaquin
by Derelict on
Nov 26, 2006 11:40 PM EST
up
0 recs
Schierholtz
by Savoy on Nov 26, 2006 11:42 PM EST 0 recs
Schierholtz
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 27, 2006 1:27 AM EST
up
0 recs
Schierholtz
He dealt with hand issues starting in May, and that plagued him most of the summer, but he came back with a strong August that made his overall numbers passable.
But then, he had a poor HWB stint, albeit in a league that heavily leaned towards pitchers.
Schierholtz has awesome power but the concern was his strikeout numbers. To Schierholtz's credit, he dealt with them and focused on improving in Double-A, and in a pitchers league, dropped his K rate considerably although his power did suffer.
I think he's one of the best hitting prospects in the Giants system, but he's obviously not perfect. He's prone to slumps and has had injury issues, albeit he's played through them.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:25 AM EST
up
0 recs
Response
The only pitching prospects who are clearly superior to him in my mind are Hughes and (if eligible) Garza. Bailey may be better but it's a very competitive comparison. It wouldn't be surprising at all if Lincecum proves to be the best of them all.
by mrkupe on Nov 27, 2006 2:51 AM EST 0 recs
Lince
JMO.
by limozeen on
Nov 27, 2006 3:19 AM EST
up
0 recs
My thoughts
I do think Wilson isn't just a middle relief candidate, but is a closer candidate and a very good one. He has the so-called stuff, but he also has the mentality.
I wonder if it's telling that two of the top three pitchers in this list (the ones not named Lincecum) are ones with very consistent control issues, and if that doesn't rank as high of a red flag for John as it does for me? I'm still very hesitant on Sanchez, myself.
It is nice to see Hedrick and Martinez get some recognition.
However, if I had one thing I'd argue about on John's list, it's Frandsen. B-??? Come on. No, he doesn't have the 'potential' that a lot people want to find on lists, but what he does have is no small bit of skills, and what's more important, he gets the most out of them, and has done so consistently. He may never be an All-Star, but he will give some team a strong performance at second base, with good doubles power and be a threat on the basepaths, and he'll play better defense than he showed this past year.
I truly believe that, even if he doesn't have the 'potential', Frandsen will have a much more successful career than 2/3rds of this list. And I could probably run that up to 3/4ths.
by BruteSentiment on Nov 27, 2006 3:34 AM EST 0 recs
Tim Lincecum's Durability
Go to www.calleaguers.com and click on Tim Lincecum to see a 41-second clip of Timmy pitching against Cal this spring. Look at the incredible pushoff he gets from the rubber. It is said to be the best since Nolan Ryan. Look at how he uses his whole body when he pitches, reducing the strain on his arm.
Go to dectovision.com and click on POTD pitchers at the bottom right of the home page. Then click on Tim Lincecum and then Tim Lincecum mechanics to see how exceptional Timmy's mechanics truly are.
Timmy has never missed a start or even had a sore arm. In his two-hit, 18-strikeout shutout over UCLA this spring, he threw 146 pitches. Pitch #146 was delivered at 95 mph. The following day Timmy was viewed easily playing long toss from foul pole to foul pole.
Timmy has never thrown an inning above High A, but in his regular-season professional career, he has struck out 58 batters while allowing only 14 hits. That's a ratio of 4.14. We're talking only Class A here, but the best career major-league record for K/H is 1.51 by Randy Johnson. The single-season record is 2.22 by Pedro Martinez in 2000. The Giants single-season record is 1.52 by Jason Schmidt in 2004. Beginning to get the idea that Timmy strikes out a lot of batters and is pretty hard to hit?
Timmy isn't perfect by any means. His control needs work. It doesn't appear his fastball has the hop that Matt Cain's does, which means he may give up more homers than Matt. But his fastball has touched 101 and he consistently throws it in the 94-97 range. His waterfall curve ball comes in 15-20 mph slower and has a tremendous 11-5 break. While both pitches are rated plus-plus, the curve is Timmy's best pitch. Timmy is also said to throw a changeup, slider and knuckleball, but he's been pretty much a two-pitch pitcher as a professional.
Timmy's pitching at San Jose in the California League has been compared to Danny Almonte's pitching in the Little League World Series, so two pitches may be all he needs.
The most pitches Timmy has thrown in a professional game was 94, when he opened the California League Northern Championship series. The pitch was a high, outside fastball at 96 mph that was swung on and missed. Timmy went seven innings, also his longest professional stint in innings.
If not for a dropped third strike, he would have been out of the seventh inning after only 84 pitches, although he more typically averages about 16 pitches per inning. In that particular game Timmy was more efficient than dominant. He yielded five hits, walked one and struck out "only" 10.
One observer has nicknamed Timmy "The Future." For Giants fans frustrated with the team's lack of position players at present, that's a pretty apt nickname. Timmy also has been called the "Freak of Nature" and "Seabiscuit." To relieve tension he does back flips or walks on his hands.
Timmy's dad, who taught Timmy his motion and whose own motion is said to have been indistinguishable from Timmy's was once clocked at 88 mph -- when he was 55 years old. Likely beginning sometime next season Timmy should be relieving (as a starter) the growing tension of Giants fans. With his solid mechanics, he should be doing so for a long, long time.
If he still throws 88 mph at age 55 as his dad Chris did, he could be Livan Hernandez 33 years from now.
Those of you who are worried about Tim Lincecum's future durability shouldn't be. It seems to run in his family.
by sharksrog on Nov 27, 2006 3:59 AM EST 0 recs
cool family
Seriously, since I don't know much at all about the Giants farm system, I have enjoyed reading the comments, especially the debates about Lincecum. Let's all hope he stays healthy and can reward baseball fans for years to come.
by Savoy on
Nov 27, 2006 9:25 AM EST
up
0 recs
Brute and Shark
Love the story about Timmy's dad. Sounds like Tim is already collecting a few nicknames. Over at MacChron they're calling him Tim the Enchanter. Wonder which one is going to stick?
by DrBGiantsfan on Nov 27, 2006 9:30 AM EST 0 recs
Thanks, DrB
Hopefully, next year will be a better year for Giants prospects than this year was, with most of the top guys suffering injuries and slumps.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 7:09 PM EST
up
0 recs
I'll have to disagree
First off, Garza started 2006 in High-A which is the same level that Lincecum dominated in 2006. He was in the pitcher friendly FSL and posted a 1.42 ERA with a 5.48 H/9, 2.23 BB/9, and 10.76 K/9 in 44.1 innings.
Let's examine Lincecum last year in High-A in a hitter's league (it's the park factors just as much as the talent, so don't give me the BS that some guys were promoted to AA). Including the postseason, Lincecum posted a 1.81 ERA with a 4.67 H/9, 3.37 BB/9, and 15.05 K/9 in 34.2 innings.
Besides the walk rate, which was respectable, Lincecum dominated High-A and put up a far superior K/9 while allowing a hit less per 9 than Garza.
Based on that information and my opinion after watching both guys pitch that Lincecum's FB/CB combo is better than anything Garza brings to the table.... it's safe to assume that Lincecum is already just as good of a pitcher as Garza.
If the Giants wanted Lincecum in the majors to start 2007, I'm pretty sure he would put up respectable numbers.
Also note how major leaguers ripped Garza's stuff apart. His H/9 ballooned to 11 while his K/9 dropped below 7 and his BB/9 raised over 4... that means you're hittable and not dominant.
Lincecum's upside seems higher than Garza's and I'd be the first to bet that his 2007 season will be better than Garza's 2006 season.
by youALREADYknow on Nov 27, 2006 11:33 AM EST 0 recs
Rumors
by Metty5 on Nov 27, 2006 3:14 PM EST 0 recs
no
by youALREADYknow on
Nov 27, 2006 3:27 PM EST
up
0 recs
Matt Palmer
Just wondering if anyone knows anything about Palmer so I have some ammo to smack back at him. :)
by The Colonel on Nov 27, 2006 4:30 PM EST 0 recs
Re: Matt Palmer
At 27, that's old for any prospect. It's harsh, but hell, there are some people on sites like this who think 23 is old to be major league rookies. Those people are foolish morons, but it's an example of how age affects how people see things.
To be more reasonable...Palmer had a spectacular year in Connecticut, but it was the 4th year he'd been in Double-A. It's expected that when you repeat a level, you do better there, and he's been repeating (and yes, improving) at double-A since 2003.
Also, a reliever who repeats levels is often viewed with suspicion. Palmer was a reliever until this year, the first year since his pro debut that he was primarily a starter. Why didn't he move up to Triple-A before then?
The answer to that: injuries. I'm afraid I don't know what afflicted Palmer in 2005, but he missed a significant portion of the season. It is nice to see he came back, though.
And, finally, his numbers in Fresno, while good for the league, are not mind-blowing good numbers.
That's not to say Palmer doesn't deserve credit for what he did. He stepped in for Sanchez in the rotation in Double-A and dominated. And he finally made a push to get higher in the system. That's no small thing, and his numbers in Fresno were solid.
But he doesn't have any one overwhelming major league pitch, nor does he have the plus plus control that a major leaguer with no great pitches would need to survive.
Palmer's got an outside shot of becoming a major leaguer, most likely in a long/middle relief role. But he's not the type of player that should make the tops in a list like this.
He did fairly well on my list.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 7:08 PM EST
up
0 recs
Linc
He wasn't just good this year. He was dominant and absolutely over matched hitters at A+. That was just the start.
by yoda1 on Nov 27, 2006 4:41 PM EST 0 recs
The odds are stacked
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 4:55 PM EST
up
0 recs
So what?
by yoda1 on
Nov 27, 2006 4:57 PM EST
up
0 recs
There is no evidence
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 5:16 PM EST
up
0 recs
Nowadays
by yoda1 on
Nov 27, 2006 5:19 PM EST
up
0 recs
Okay,,,
...then look at the former starting pitchers that have turned relievers with same size and similar stuff. I think you'll find more similarities here.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 5:29 PM EST
up
0 recs
No need
by yoda1 on
Nov 27, 2006 6:05 PM EST
up
0 recs


