Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Postseason Picks?

So, now that the playoff picture is finally set, what is everyone's postseason picks?

I'll give it a shot:

Twins over A's in 3
Tigers over Yankees in 4
Padres over Cardinals in 5
Dodgers over Mets in 4

Tigers over Twins in 6
Dodgers over Padres in 5

Tigers over Dodgers in 5

ALCS MVP: Craig Monroe
NLCS MVP: Nomar Garciaparra

WS MVP: Joel Zumaya

Comment 48 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wow
There's some Tigger-homerism if I've ever seen it.

I don't believe the Twinkies or the A's survive the 1st round.  Pitching should hurt them and be their Achilles.

A's over Twins in 5.
Yanks over Tigers in 4
Cards over Pads in 4
Mets over Dodgers in 4

A's over Yanks in 6
Mets over Cards in 7

A's over Mets in 6

ALCS MVP - F. Thomas
NLCS MVP - Reyes

WS MVP - Chavez

by slurve on Oct 2, 2006 7:59 AM EDT reply actions  

oops
Brain fart.  I was thinking about the A's winning it all while typing - should read "I don't think the Twinkies or the Tigers survive the 1st round."

by slurve on Oct 2, 2006 8:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Tiger Homerism?
Yeah, I live in Boston and have been a die hard Sox fan my entire life. But anyway...

With the Tiger's pitching staff, I don't see how they would be an outrageous pick.  Their biggest challenge will be getting past the Yankees.  If they do that, I think they'll cruise.

by SmokeyJoeWood on Oct 2, 2006 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

HOMER!!!
You lie!!!  OK, maybe not.  Just looks like someting a Tiger fan would do.  

I think the Tiger's pitching will actually be their undoing.  Verlander hasn't thrown this much in his life and it's starting to show up.  Even Bonderman is starting to show signs of fatigue.  They are a team who peaked months ago and have been sliding - not a good thing going into post-season.

by slurve on Oct 2, 2006 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree sort of
but in spite of that - Verlander kicks @ss tomorrow.

by pedrophile on Oct 4, 2006 3:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

My Hopes...
Twins over A's in 4
Tigers over Yankees in 5
Cards over Padres in 4
Mets over LA in 3

Tigers over Twins in 6
Mets over Cards in 6

Tigers over Dodgers in 5

ALCS MVP: Magglio Ordonez
NLCS MVP: David Wright

WS MVP: Justin Verlander

by ChrisRef19 on Oct 2, 2006 8:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Playoffs predictions:

Padres over Cardinals in 4.
Mets over Dodgers in 5.

Yankees over Tigers in 3.
A's over Twins in 5.

League Championship

Padres over Mets in 6.
A's over Yankees in 7.

World Series

Padres over A's in 7.

Playoff heroes:

Jake Peavey/Khalil Greene
Frank Thomas/Rich Harden

by gogotabata on Oct 2, 2006 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

huh?
How are the Dodgers losing in the NLDS and the World Series?
"Dying is no big deal. The least of us will manage that. Living is the trick." - Red Smith

by finman on Oct 2, 2006 9:03 AM EDT reply actions  

my thought
1st Round
Twins over A's
Yanks over Tigers
Padres over Cards
Mets over Dodgers

LCS
Twins over Yanks (Mauer, MVP)
Mets over Padres (Wagner, MVP)

WS
Twins over Mets in 4 (Nathan, MVP)

by Azteca on Oct 2, 2006 9:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Not to pick too much...
.... but if the Twins win the World Series, Santana will almost certainly be their MVP over Nathan. I dont think they can win it without Johan putting the team on his back and carrying them

by grozzy on Oct 2, 2006 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

implied here....
"Twins in 4" is that the Mets pitching staff falls apart, and Nathan closes 3 or 4 games...a few being of the 2-inning variety.  (anyway, it's just fantasy)

by Azteca on Oct 2, 2006 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Torn's Thoughts
1st Round
Twins over A's 4 games - better pitching, hitting for Twins
Yanks over Tigers 4 games - Tigers running out of gas
Padres over Cards 4 games - Carpenter wins one game
Mets over Dodgers 4 games - Mets bash their way through Round one

2nd Round
Twins over Yankees 6 games - better pitching wins
Mets over Padres 6 games - offense offsets arms

World Serious
Twins over Mets 5 games - best team over last 4 months wins

Alternative Series
Ditkas over Twins 4 games - Bears' best D in business, new offense impressive

"Strikeouts are good...groundballs are better. Home runs are okay...but walks SUCK!" Mike Caldwell

by Torncuff on Oct 2, 2006 10:47 AM EDT reply actions  

DA BEARS!!!
Not going to crown them Super Bowl-bound yet, but damn they look good in all facets of the game.  Not only that but they have some serious depth across the board with exception of linebacker.  Exactly the kind of team that usually wins it all.

by slurve on Oct 2, 2006 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Prediction...
Divisional Series
Twins over A's 5 games
Yanks over Tigers 4 games
Padres over Cards 5 games
Mets over Dodgers 4 games

League Championship
Yankees over Twins 6 games (MVP - D.Jeter )
Mets over Padres 6 games   (MVP - D.Wright edges Piazza)

WS - Subway!!!
Hurts but Yankees over Mets 7 games  (MVP - Arod, ironically)

by louief1 on Oct 2, 2006 10:59 AM EDT reply actions  

I'll bite
Twins over A's in 4
Yankees over Tigers in 4
Padres over Cardinals in 5
Mets over Dodgers in 4

Twins over Yankees in 7
*Bonus prediction: A-Rod hits .400 with 7 HR in the series, yet is blamed exclusively when they lose.
Mets over Padres in 6

Twins over Mets in 6

ALCS MVP: Justin Morneau
NLCS MVP: Carlos Beltran

WS MVP: Johan Santana

No sweeps...  I just think everyone's pitching staff is crappy enough that the other team can beat up on someone at least once in each series.  And as an illustration of how much these predictions are worth, I had Indians over Phillies in the WS as my preseason prediction :p

by delomir on Oct 2, 2006 11:10 AM EDT reply actions  

picks
twins in 5
yanks in 3

padres in 5
mets in 5

yanks in 6
mets in 7

yanks in 5

by TexasHeat on Oct 2, 2006 11:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm rooting for the Cards with all my might, but..
DS
Twins over Athletics in 5
Tigers over Yankees in 5
Mets over Dodgers in 3
Padres over Cardinals in 4

CS
Tigers over Twins in 6(MVP: Rodriguez)
Padres over Mets in 6(MVP: Wells)

WS
Tigers over Padres in 7(MVP: Bonderman)

by mateodh on Oct 2, 2006 11:26 AM EDT reply actions  

No Dodger love
I am surprised that the Mets are getting so much play over the Dodgers.  The Mets don't have much in the way of pitching, and seem to struggle against lefties.  Meanwhile the Dodgers won 7 straight down the stretch and split with the Mets on the road only a month or so ago.  I bet the Dodgers win in 4.

My picks (unbiased I swear... well I pretend)

Twins over A's in 4
Yankees over Tigers in 5
Padres over Cards in 4
Dodgers over Mets in 4

Twins over Yanks in 6 (MVP Mauer)
Dodgers over Padres in 7 (MVP Furcal)

Twins over Dodgers in 6 (MVP Santana)

by benaiah on Oct 2, 2006 12:02 PM EDT reply actions  

mets pitching
The Mets were 65-32 (.670) in games started by their four playoff starters (Hernandez, Glavine, Trachsel, Maine). Not that they're great by any stretch of the imagination, but all year they've been good enough to let the Mets offense and bullpen do their thing.

by jeck on Oct 2, 2006 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Huh?
The Mets have been the best team in the NL all year, by a wide margin. Obviously not having (the good) Pedro hurts, but their pitching has been good enough to win 96 games. Sure, they could lose, but they are prohibitive favorites to win the NL IMO.

by jc3 on Oct 2, 2006 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Picks
A's over Twins in 4
Tigers over Yankees in 5
Padres over Cards in 4
Dodgers over Mets in 4

A's over Tigers in 6(MVP Thomas)
Dodgers over Padres in 7(MVP Lowe)

A's over Dodgers in 6(MVP Bradley)

I don't get enjoyment out of reading baseball books. I'd rather watch a sci-fi movie on TV. -Joe Morgan, Emmy winning BASEBALL analyst

by gatling on Oct 2, 2006 12:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Pretty easy to pick
Yankees over Tigers in 4 (The Tigers match up really poorly against the Yankees, especially Moose/Wang)
Twins over A's in 5 (purely on the strength of Santana)

Yankees over Twins in 5 (Only Santana manages to beat them... sense a theme?)

Mets over Dodgers in 5 (Despite losing Pedro, the Mets still have the batters to come out on top_

Padres over Cards in 4 (The Cards are simply weak. Besides Pujols and Carpenter, they have major weaknesses)

Padres over Mets in 7 (Met's pitching staff just doesn't hold up here. Mike Piazza shows them who is boss)

Yankees over Padres in 4 (Once again, the NL doesn't stand a chance)

ALCS MVP: Mike Mussina
NLCS MVP: Mike Piazza
World Series MVP: Alex Rodriguez

by DownFromNJ on Oct 2, 2006 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Twins over Padres
I'm just going to skip to the end and say that it'll be the Twins over the Padres in 6 games.

by BaseballBrain on Oct 2, 2006 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I'll Shoot
ALDS
Yanks over Tigers:
I think the Yankees got lucky. Not having the face the twins was huge for them. The tigers are running out of gas, and the yankees pitching in not as bad as it seems. Yankees in 4
MVP: Abreu

Twins over Oakland:
I think Justin Morenu is without a doubt the MVP IMHO. And it will show as the Twins out his the A's by a substainal margin. Twins in a Sweep
MVP: Morenu
NLDS
Mets over Dodgers:
As a met fan i'm pulling for the Mets and can't wait to see glavine vs. Maddux. I'm a little worried but i think the bullpen is great and thats what makes this seris. Mets in 4
MVP: Beltran

Cards over Padres:
I just think the Padres can't hit a lick, and Puljos has been rediculous in the playoffs so far. The Cards bullpen is terrible, but I think Rolen steps it up and they take it. Cards in 5
MVP: Rolen

ALCS
Twins over Yankees:
I think it will be a great seris, but i think Santana wins both games he pitches. I want a subway seris, but i dont see it. Twins in 7
MVP: Santana

NLCS
Mets over Cards:
Maybe some homerism, but i think the Mets get lucky in playing the Cardinals. A team that they have better hitting and overall pitching against. Puljos makes it tough, but i think the Mets would win this one easily. Mets in 5
MVP: Jose Reyes

WS
Twins over Mets:
This is the team i think the mets have the best chance at beating because the mets offense is better, but Santana will overwhelm them pitching games, 1,4,and, 7. Winning just two of them, boof with win his 1st start as well. Both these teams bullpens match up, and the mets have an edge in hitting. Due to the Large advatnage in pitching for the Twin is a No brainer. Twins in 7

by JD Sussman on Oct 2, 2006 2:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Padres hitting
Actually the Padres had the BEST Road OPS in the NL.  It's just their ridiculously pitching friendly home park that makes them look bad.

by BaseballBrain on Oct 2, 2006 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll Shoot
ALDS
Yanks over Tigers:
I think the Yankees got lucky. Not having the face the twins was huge for them. The tigers are running out of gas, and the yankees pitching in not as bad as it seems. Yankees in 4
MVP: Abreu

Twins over Oakland:
I think Justin Morenu is without a doubt the MVP IMHO. And it will show as the Twins out his the A's by a substainal margin. Twins in a Sweep
MVP: Morenu
NLDS
Mets over Dodgers:
As a met fan i'm pulling for the Mets and can't wait to see glavine vs. Maddux. I'm a little worried but i think the bullpen is great and thats what makes this seris. Mets in 4
MVP: Beltran

Cards over Padres:
I just think the Padres can't hit a lick, and Puljos has been rediculous in the playoffs so far. The Cards bullpen is terrible, but I think Rolen steps it up and they take it. Cards in 5
MVP: Rolen

ALCS
Twins over Yankees:
I think it will be a great seris, but i think Santana wins both games he pitches. I want a subway seris, but i dont see it. Twins in 7
MVP: Santana

NLCS
Mets over Cards:
Maybe some homerism, but i think the Mets get lucky in playing the Cardinals. A team that they have better hitting and overall pitching against. Puljos makes it tough, but i think the Mets would win this one easily. Mets in 5
MVP: Jose Reyes

WS
Twins over Mets:
This is the team i think the mets have the best chance at beating because the mets offense is better, but Santana will overwhelm them pitching games, 1,4,and, 7. Winning just two of them, boof with win his 1st start as well. Both these teams bullpens match up, and the mets have an edge in hitting. Due to the Large advatnage in pitching for the Twin is a No brainer. Twins in 7
MVP: Santana

by JD Sussman on Oct 2, 2006 2:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Giving it a shot
Round I

Yankees over Tigers in 4
Twins over A's in 4
Padres over Cardinals in 3
Dodgers over Mets in 4

Round II
Twins over Yankees in 7
Padres over Dodgers in 6

World Series
Twins over Padres in 5

by avehoward on Oct 2, 2006 2:27 PM EDT reply actions  

A touch of revision
Divisionals:
Yankees def. Tigers in 5
Twins def. A's in 4
Mets def. Dodgers in 4
Padres def. Cardinals in 4

Champeenships:
Twins def. Yankees in 6
Mets def. Padres in 5

Series That Encompasses the World:
Mets def. Twins in 5

Really not sure about the Yankees pitching, but their offense should do enough in the ALDS.  All things are possible through the Boof-Johan Connection, of course, so that'll carry Minnesota through.  The Cardinals have just completely fallen apart, but I don't know how the Padres have done it.  I'll take the great unknown.  As for the Mets, they just do everything well enough to beat out everyone else.  Can't think of a recent analogy, as the White Sox pitchers made everyone look like fools in 2005 and Boston went super Saiyan in the 2004 ALCS.  Don't think you'll get anything like those efforts for a while.

"What you're forgetting is that you need at least three DWIs before you're considered a 'dominant' drunk driver." (limozeen)

by drjayphd on Oct 2, 2006 3:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Johan!
Okay, I think Johan Santana deserves to be the AL MVP, but you guys are going nuts with this.  He's not Roy freakin' Hobbs, or even vintage Maddux/Pedro/Clemens.  He's not going to win every game he pitches.  Seriously, what percentage chance do you think he has to beat an opposing ace like Zito, Mussina, Peavy, Carpenter, etc.?  It might be better than 50%, but it would have to be like 90% for him to be likely to win as many games as y'all want him to.  Plus he can't make three starts in a series unless the Twins dispose of the previous opponent very quickly.  If you want to be serious about endorsing the Twins to go a long way, you have to acknowledge that Johan isn't gonna win every game, and that one or more likely two other SP who haven't done much this year are going to have to step up.  I personally don't think it's gonna happen, but in any event, that's the only realistic way it could happen.
and boom goes the dynamite.

by Mean Dean on Oct 2, 2006 3:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Thinking exactly the same way
Yes, Santana is the best pitcher in the sport. He's beatable, though. His road ERA was 3.38, excellent, but not unbeatable, certainly not in Yankee Stadium if they play them in the ALCS.

To the contrary, if Santana ever got beat in Game 1 of any series, the Twins would be in huge trouble. Certainly in more trouble than say if the Yanks lost with Wang or Oakland with Zito because the other areas of those teams (Yanks offense, A's SP depth) can more than make up for a loss by their ace more than the other components of the Twins can.

by jc3 on Oct 2, 2006 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dodgers are underrated
The Dodgers team OPS in 2006 is actually higher than the Mets.  While they scored 14 runs less than the Mets I think a lot of people are underestimating how good the Dodgers offence is.  Plus, their rotation of Lowe, Maddux and Kuo can compete with any of the other NL teams (Glavine, El Duque, Traschel and Main or Peavy, Williams and Young or Carpenter, Suppan and Weaver) and they their bullpen, while not deep has two very good players at the top of it (Saito and Broxton).  All in all, they are a very dangerous team and I think some people will be surprised how the Mets series turns out.  (But hey, I am biased as hell).

by benaiah on Oct 2, 2006 3:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Okay...
Yanks over the Tigers in 3. Tigers have nothing left.
A's over the Twins in 5. A's I think have a better staff, and beat Johan in game 5.

Dodgers over the Mets in 5. Mets havent played a meaningful game in months while the Dodgers have basically been in a play-off mindset since the ASB.
Padres over the Cardinals in 4. Carpenter wins his only start. The other three SPs for the Cards give up an average of 6ER per start.

Yankess over the A's in 7. Their bats are just too strong 1 through 9. A's put up a valiant effort though. Robinson Cano is the ALCS MVP.

Padres over the Dodgers in 6. The Padres pitching staff is just too good. No game is decided by more than three runs though. Josh Bard NLCS MVP for hitting 2 HR, one off Saito in a pinch hit situation and the other off Dessens.

Padres over the Yanks in 7. Wow... when I started this post I didnt expect to have that as my final answer... ummm. Go Padres? I aint even a SD fan! Jake Peavy wins the WS MVP.

by Boxkutter on Oct 2, 2006 3:39 PM EDT reply actions  

hmmm..
Padres over Yanks...?? Maybe you haven't seen the Yankees' Lineup

by JD Sussman on Oct 3, 2006 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tigers vs. Yankees

Game 1
Wang pitches solid giving up 3 runs in 7 and the pen does the rest
Robertson goes 7 as well giving up 4 and the pen gives up another.

Game 2
Mussina pitches 8 innings giving up 2
Verlander pitches 7 innings giving up 2, but the pen gets the loss.

Game 3
RJ gets shelled for 7 runs in 5
The gambler goes 6 innings giving up 3 and the Tigers barely hold on.

Game 4
J.Wright Pitches 5 innings of 3 run ball but the pen implodes especially after being overworked the game before.
Bonderman struggles early but holds on for 7 innings of 4 run ball and gets the win.

Game 5
Wang pitches 6 innings giving up 4 runs.
Westbrook gives up 5 runs in 2 innings getting pulled. The Yankees go on to route the Tigers.

IMO - I really think Yankees will win game 1 and lose game 3 & 4. Game 2 will be a great matchup and game 5 will probably be the Yankees if it goes that far. I'm thinking it's 50/50 who wins this series but would never bet against the Yankees.

by pedrophile on Oct 2, 2006 9:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Westbrook? Who are you referring to?
Hello pedrophile,

Nice analytical prediction of the Tigers-Yankees series; in fact, you weren't too far off in Game 1 when it came to Wang.

However, I'm not sure who you mean by "Westbrook" in Game 5 for the Tigers.  Do they have a "Westbrook" I don't know about it; do you mean Robertson, Grilli, Miner?  The only "Westbrook" I know of who plays MLB is Jake Westbrook of the Indians.  

Please elaborate - thanks!  :-)

Take care and have a great day!

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Oct 4, 2006 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Meant to say!
Hello again pedrophile,

I meant to say,

"Do they have a "Westbrook" I don't know about; do you mean Robertson, Grilli, Miner?"

Take care and have a great day!

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Oct 4, 2006 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I blame it on beer, too much beer or too little be
I meant of course Robertson.

did you watch the game? I really didn't know much about Wang. Holy SH*T I really was wrong about this guy. I thought he would have great offspeed stuff with a decent sinker. I didn't see one decent offspeed pitch all night. Granted I didn't see the whole game. But he was throwing a 96 mile sinking heater that was amazing. Sometimes it only moved average for that heat. The problem I saw is he offered nothing else. If this guy had quality slider/curve/change he would be ace material.

I totally overestimated his pitchability and totally underestimated his stuff. But ended in the same place :)))))

by pedrophile on Oct 4, 2006 3:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I watched a good portion of the game!
Hello pedrophile,

Yes, I watched at least 70-80% of the game.  I agree that Wang kept getting the Tigers to beat it into the ground, though it would have been interesting to see how Wang would have responded if the Tigers had scored some runs in the 2nd and 3rd innings.  I hope Fausto Carmona can do a Wang imitation (to some extent at least) next year.

As for Robertson, this is why I have serious doubts about the Tigers in this series - yes, he had a nice September, but Robertson is not a guy you want to have starting a Game 1 and a Game 5!  He arguably is the weakest of the Tigers' starting quartet, as his margin for error is too small, and once the hits start coming, it seems he has a very difficult time trying to stop the bleeding - that's why he gave up 5 runs in the 3rd inning.  Then, he gave up those two runs in the 6th, just when the Tigers were in a position to actually come back and take the lead.

The Tigers really need Verlander to pitch like he did early this season; if they can somehow win Game 2, this series could go 5 games.  If the Tigers lose Game 2, it's possible this series might only go 3, though it's possible it could go 4, but I wouldn't expect it to go 5 if the Tigers lose again tonight, and 4 might be a stretch if the Tigers can't take advantage of the excitement generated by their home crowd in Game 3 and/or Rogers falters.

Take care and have a great day!

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Oct 4, 2006 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

hi IndiansFan!
The rain-out tonight was strange. When you think the Verlander possibly could have pitched in game 5 (before the rain-out) it's looking difficult now.

I'm still liking Detroits chances. I think tomorrows game will be a good one. I hope the kid keeps his composure.

If the Tigers can steal one tomorrow - and I do think it will be a little of a steal considering they are facing Mussina - then the Tigers are the favorites IMO. Because then its Rogers & Bondo vs RJ and Wright. If they win tomorrow I wouldn't be suprised if they run the table.

At the moment I think Carmonas upside is Wang. If he learns to keep his composure and pitches smart. He has the stuff. What both of them lack is a major league out pitch IMO.

by pedrophile on Oct 5, 2006 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

My bite
Yanks over Tigers in 3 (MVP, someone with a bat.)

Twins over A's in 5 (MVP, Santana)

Dodgers over Mets in 5 (MVP, Saito)

Padres over Cards in 4 (MVP, Hoffman)

The only real questionmark is the Dodger /Mets series. but I just think the Mets SP is simply too abysmal to make it, the Dodger staff have some serious unpredictability as well. but the upside is simply much better.

CS

Yankees over Twins in 5 (MVP, major toss up. )

Doger over the Padres in 6 (MVP Kuo!!)

Yankees catch a break, facing Twins in CS is siginficantly easier, espically if the A's and Twins go into game 5 as I predicted (meaning they can't throw out Santana 3 times) whoever wins the MVP is really up in the air, but probably either Wang or again someone with a bat.

Dodgers and Padres are a hard call, but I like Dodgers a lot right now, and they got progressively better as the season went on. I think Kuo will win both start and grab the MVP here.

WS

Yankees over Dodgers in 5, MVP, Chien Ming Wang.

(Yes i'm from Taiwan :P .. still though, if the Yanks win the WS Wang getting a MVP along the way seems highly likely)

by RollingWave on Oct 2, 2006 11:34 PM EDT reply actions  

yankees
yankees over tigers in 3
twins over a's in 4
cards over padres in 5 (I want the padres, but I don't usually get what I want)
dodgers over mets in 5

yankees over twins in 6 (rivera mvp)
dodgers over cardinals in 6 (kent mvp)

yankees (lineup just too tough) over dodgers in 5 (Abreu mvp)

by bolton on Oct 3, 2006 12:00 AM EDT reply actions  

here goes nothing
Mets over Dodgers in 5
Padres over Cardinals in 4
Twins over A's in 5
Yankees over Tigers in 4

Mets over Padres in 5 (MVP: Tom Glavine)
Yankees over Twins in 6 (MVP: Bobby Abreu)

Yankees over Mets in 5 (MVP: Jason Giambi)

by jeck on Oct 3, 2006 1:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Time to revise your picks?
OK, now that the first game of the playoffs has been played, and the Twins (and Santana) lost, does this change all those rampant Twins win predictions?  

by FunWithHeadlines on Oct 3, 2006 3:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Not for me
I believe in Boof.  In Boof we trust.

by delomir on Oct 3, 2006 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reasons to still believe
OK, Boof didn't work, but take heart Twins fans.  The usual pattern for Oakland is to lose game 5.  That means you can now look for a three-game sweep beginning with game three of the series.

by FunWithHeadlines on Oct 4, 2006 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Catch-22: Is Travis D’Arnaud the ‘Next One?’
Bullpen_banter_logo_small
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects: 100-51
Hal2_small
AA and MLB hitting production by AA batters between 1995-2002

Recent FanPosts

Small
Community Pitching Prospect #62
Small
Community Positional Prospect #65
Small
Overall Community Prospect #93
Small
New Cubs Draft Strategy/Player Development
Small
Stride Length, release point, and Drag
Small
Community Pitching Prospect #61 RUNOFF
Small
Community Positional Prospect #64
Small
5 yrold Dynasty Fantasy League team openings
Ryan_pic_small
Super Sickels Keeper League has one more opening
Small
Overall Community Prospect #92

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter