Prospect Retro: Brett Tomko

Prospect Retro: Brett Tomko
Brett Tomko was drafted by the Cincinnnati Reds in the seond round of the 1995 draft, out of Florida Southern College. Assigned to Charleston in the Sally League after signing, he pitched brilliantly in his pro debut, going 4-2, 1.84 in seven starts, with a 46/9 K/BB ratio in 49 innings. At this point, he would have rated as a Grade B+ prospect: an early round draftee with strong full-season league performance in his pro debut.
Moved up to Double-A Chattanooga in 1996, Tomko went 11-7, 3.88 in 27 starts, with a 164/54 K/BB in 158 innings, allowing 131 hits. His K/BB, K/IP, and H/IP were all significantly better than Southern League average, and I rated him as a Grade B+ prospect in the '97 Minor League Scouting Notebook. Some scouts were already expressing concerns that Tomko didn't concentrate well on the mound at times, but it was hard to find anything wrong with his numbers.
He began '97 in Triple-A, going 6-3, 2.95 in 10 starts with a 60/9 K/BB in 61 innings. Promoted to the Majors, he went 11-7, 3.43 in 19 starts for the Reds. I thought he was clearly one of the best young pitchers in the game, and I thought he would become a star.
Alas, it did not happen. Tomko HAS had success. He's been very effective at times, but he's also been erratic, and certainly hasn't developed into a star pitcher. He currently owns a career record of 80-72, 4.54 in 1402 innings, basically being a slightly above-average starting pitcher. That's good, but I thought he was capable of better. His journey through the minors was quick and successful, but he didn't really develop his skills beyond where they were in 1997 when he made his debut for the Reds.
Similar Pitchers to Brett Tomko:
Mark Clark
Joey Hamilton
Len Barker
Aaron Sele
Jim Lonborg
Mike Smithson
Poll Question about Tomko in the comments section
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
All the Talent in the World
His problems seem to be all mental. He can be sailing along, and if there is an error behind him, or the ump makes a bad call, or any number of other things, he gets this look on his face and you just know the next pitch is going out of the park.
Another thing with him is that he is generally better than his numbers would indicate in that he has more good games than bad. It's just that his bad games are so bad, they inflate his ERA considerably.
Last year he consulted a sports shrink who seemed to work wonders and Tomko was nails down the stretch. Us Giants fans had very high hopes for him this year, but alas, we saw much of the same old "Bombko."
IMO, he's pitched much better this year than his record would indicate. He's had very poor run support, and as in the past, he's had a handful of bad games that have inflated his ERA. If his price isn't too high, I wouldn't be upset if the Giants re-signed him for next year. I certainly wouldn't get into a bidding war with another team though. Anything over $3 M/yr is overpaying.
by DrBGiantsfan on Sep 14, 2005 1:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Career Wins
He's got 80 now and is 32 yo. He averaged 11 wins a season for the last 3 years but only has 7 so far this year. He is very durable and could average 10 wins/yr over the next 4 years. He could have one career year where he wins more than 15. He could accumulate a few more after age 36 although I don't see him as being the type of pitcher who will do well after a dropoff in velocity. I voted 110-120 wins.
by DrBGiantsfan on Sep 14, 2005 1:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
More Tomko
With a little more run support, he would probably be pretty close to the 10-12 wins he's averaged for the last 3 years.
by DrBGiantsfan on Sep 14, 2005 2:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cheesecake Alert
by DrBGiantsfan on Sep 14, 2005 2:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
tomko's wife
by John Sickels on Sep 14, 2005 2:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tomko
by BenB on Sep 14, 2005 5:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Watching Tomko
by kenshin1 on Sep 14, 2005 9:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
braves
by cookiedabookie82 on Sep 15, 2005 12:08 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wife
by John Sickels on Sep 15, 2005 9:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL!
by DrBGiantsfan on Sep 15, 2005 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
replying to your previous comment
by Isisaston on Dec 20, 2006 1:15 AM EST reply actions 0 recs









