Cleveland Indians Top 20 Prospects

- Adam Miller, RHP, A
- Grady Sizemore, OF, B+
- Michael Aubrey, 1B, B+
- Franklin Gutierrez, OF, B+
- Brad Snyder, OF, B+
- Ryan Garko, C-1B, B+
- Fernando Cabrera, RHP, B
- Jeremy Sowers, LHP, B
- Francisco Cruceta, RHP, B-
- Nick Pesco, RHP, B-
- Justin Hoyman, RHP, B-
- Kevin Kouzmanoff, 3B, B-
- Fausto Carmona, RHP, C+
- Brandon Pinckney, SS, C+
- Ryan Goleski, OF, C+
- Scott Lewis, LHP, C+
- Matt Whitney, 3B, C+
- Jake Dittler, RHP, C+
- Tony Sipp, LHP, C+
- Mike Butia, OF, C+
On the position player side, catcher Javi Herrera, outfielder Argenis Reyes, third baseman Chris Gimenez, outfielder Juan Valdez, second baseman Jake Gautreau (recently acquired from the Padres), outfielder Jason Cooper, and outfielder Ben Francisco are all possible contributors at some point. There are a host of other Grade C candidates who could also be mentioned. This is a deep system with a blend of both stathead favorites and raw tools players.
Of the guys in my Top 20, most of the grades shouldn't be particularly controversial. An exception is third baseman Kevin Kouzmanoff, who doesn't impress scouts but who has hit .309/.374/.498 in 184 career games. A University of Nevada product, he has an excellent work ethic and has hit the hell out of the ball so far. Grade B- may be too aggressive; he wasn't young for the South Atlantic League last year at 22, and you can make a good case that he should be several slots lower than on the list until he proves himself in Double-A. For now, I will leave him where he is, with the acknowledgement that it is a risky pick.
Another grade of interest is pitcher Fausto Carmona. He has a great arm, but I can't get around him giving up 114 hits in 87 innings in Double-A.
I no longer count Brandon Phillips and Jhonny Peralta as "prospects" given the amount of playing time they received in 2003. I think both are capable of helping in 2005, with Peralta probably more likely to do well.
I'm not going to be around today, but will be back for Sunday. Chat away, but play nicely.
0 recs |
27 comments
Comments
Kazmir or Miller?
by Goodfella on Feb 26, 2005 8:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Indians prospects
by LargeBill on Feb 26, 2005 8:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
wow
I also did not think Sizemore was considered a prospect. If he is, I have not heard his name mentioned in the top-100 lists from bloggers, other sites, or Baseball America's top ten for each team.
by mrmetaa on Feb 26, 2005 8:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Gutierrez
by count sutton on Feb 26, 2005 10:05 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Can somebody
by ohad on Feb 26, 2005 10:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Weight
by Doug on Feb 26, 2005 12:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
210
by rdiersin on Feb 26, 2005 12:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh
by ohad on Feb 26, 2005 12:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
spreasheet
by rdiersin on Feb 26, 2005 1:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
updated:
by natsfan2005 on Feb 26, 2005 1:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey John,
by ultxmxpx on Feb 26, 2005 12:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jason Cooper
by Der Komminsksar on Feb 26, 2005 2:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
cooper
by John Sickels on Feb 27, 2005 10:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rafael Perez?
No love for Rafael Perez? It seems like he should've made your top 20.. he has put up decent #'s last year.
by jprotzel on Feb 26, 2005 9:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Bruddah Choy Foo
How do you rate Rodney "Bruddah" Choy Foo? I don't really know a darned thing about him, but I just have to root for a guy with that great of a name.
Say the word and I will start a campaign to get him to go back to using "Bruddah," as he has apparently dropped it once he got to the minors.
Hang loose!
by achiappanza on Feb 27, 2005 4:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Phillips and Peralta
Sure Phillips and Peralta no longer count as prospects given the amount of playing time they received in 2003. So i can understand why they weren't in the book.
But they didn't succeed in their major league trials and spent nearly all of 2004 in AAA. Since this is "minorleagueball.com" afterall, can you humor some of you blog readers and give these two a grade and a couple short paragraphs (even if its just an update to what you've wrote about them in the past)?
In reality, for many readers of this site, its more useful for us to get a handle on these guys than a low A-baller like Kevin Kouzmanoff.
by natsfan2005 on Feb 27, 2005 12:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
that's fair
by John Sickels on Feb 27, 2005 12:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Kouz
love the new site, what with all the battleships and brooke burke pics
by jrose643 on Feb 27, 2005 1:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
kouz
by John Sickels on Feb 27, 2005 2:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Peralta and Phillips
His 181 hits were one of the few best seasons in the last 40 years. (He had 55 multi-hit games!)
His range and body type are better suited for 2B or 3B. But he could stick at SS.
As far as Brandon Phillips goes, the world is split on him. Some say he's the next Derek Jeter while others say he has the same problem with his swing that Alex Escobar had. Consequently, he will never hit Major League pitching.
Conclusion: Peralta is a consistent hit machine. Phillips is a total and complete wild card who has not proven anything at the major league level. Also, Peralta is 1 year younger.
by Goodfella on Feb 27, 2005 6:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: pure
Looking at Peralta's 2002 stats in AA Akron they seem to mirror his 2004 AAA numbers in many ways other than 40 points of batting average. I'm not sure how much of the progress he made is real and how much is just a natural fluctuation in batting average.
Neither Phillips or Peralta has proven anything at the MLB level. It isnt just Phillips who looked lost in his 2003 audition.
All that said, I think Peralta is the better bet to get playing time in 2005. I wonder what Sickel's new "2005 Projection JSPS-2" says for these guys?
by natsfan2005 on Feb 27, 2005 7:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Peralta - "pure hitter"
by Goodfella on Feb 28, 2005 10:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: your pure hitter quote
I don't want to argue about semantics here b/c we won't agree anyway. You are looking at results and I'm looking at the components. I just don't throw around words like "best" freely.
by natsfan2005 on Feb 28, 2005 10:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Pure Hitter
by Goodfella on Feb 28, 2005 12:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Miller
Sickels - great site! I read Down on the Farm religiosly and just finally got around to looking this site up. Keep up the good work.
by joerote on Feb 28, 2005 9:42 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
miller
Thanks for the kind words. The site is going well.
by John Sickels on Feb 28, 2005 10:02 AM EST reply actions 0 recs










