Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Young Pitcher Symposium: Jake Peavy

AP photo

Young Pitcher Symposium: Jake Peavy

Comparable Pitchers by Raw Sim Score

  1. Andy Benes   (979)
  2. Chuck Estrada  (973)
  3. Bill Stafford  (973)
  4. Dennis Martinez  (973)
  5. Johnny Kucks    (972)
  6. Stan Williams   (971)
  7. John Smoltz   (968)
  8. Don Robinson  (967)
  9. Bill Parsons  (966)
  10. Silvio Martinez  (965)
Other Comparables
Bill Gullickson
Steve Busby
Ramon Martinez
Denny McLain
Alex Fernandez
Rich Dotson
Dave Boswell

   In form, Peavy's list isn't much different than Harden and Beckett: some early burnouts, mixed in with some guys who had long and productive careers, even if there was no one Clemens-like.

   I must admit that Peavy is one of my personal favorites, for purely selfish reasons: I had him pegged as a sleeper as early as 1999 and was ahead of the curve in recommending him to readers. Guys like that tend to become my favorites. Human nature I guess, and it helps me forget about all the guys I'm wrong about.

   I think Peavy is the most polished of the young pitchers we have discussed so far. His league-leading 2.27 ERA last year was a bit flukey, as his "component ERA" was closer to 3.20, still very impressive of course. He could easily add a run to his ERA this year without really pitching any worse than he did in '04, although I imagine the average sportswriter wouldn't look at it that way.

   My main worry here is injury risk. His "strained forearm ligament" last May turned out OK, and he certainly showed no ill effects in the second half, being very tough down the stretch. If he can avoid further injury hiccups, he'll be an elite pitcher for the next ten years. Not bad for a 15th round draft pick, eh?

   A question for you today: if Jake Peavy, Josh Beckett, and Rich Harden all lost 2-3 MPH off their fastballs permanently, due to specific injury, gradual wear-and-tear, or the alignment of Pluto in the fourth house, who would be most likely to adjust to the loss of velocity and remain an effective pitcher?

0 recs  |  Comment 33 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good question
I don't know much about Peavy's pitching arsenal. I do know that if 2-3 miles were taken off Beckett or Harden's fastball, they wouldn be nearly as good. Beckett throws all his pitches hard. He has like a hard sinker, fastball and i think a cutter. Taking a few MPS's off him would really hurt him. With Harden, it would hurt the same. His splitter is really good, so i think he would be a little more effective. Probably a little better than average. As i said, i don't know about Peavy.

by ohad on Feb 24, 2005 12:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

yeah
peavy isnt really covered by any major media outlets. its hard to know what his arsenal is...at least here in michigan. i would like to judge, but i didnt here anything about peavy's incredible numbers last year until the offseason for my fantasy baseball team. east coast bias maybe?
"Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte

by michigan moxie on Feb 24, 2005 12:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Peavy
To answer your question, I think Peavy, by far, would be more likely to remain an effective pitcher if he lost 2-3 mph.  My reasoning is because Jake doesn't rely on his fastball to overpower hitters.  Despite the fact that he's a good strikeout pitcher and he can dial it up to 94-95 mph, he uses his heater mainly as a "show" pitch to set up his off-speed stuff.  I believe this is what makes him such a special pitcher.  He also has the ability to spot his pitches much better than Beckett or Harden...and that will help him more in the event they each lose some velocity.  

by dkny22 on Feb 24, 2005 12:20 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I would take Peavy
Harden relies a lot on his fastball because he really does not have another plus pitch.  He would still have a 90+ MPH fastball, though it may not be enough to keep a major league hitter off balance.

Beckett has other pitches in his arsenal.  He has a great curveball but his change can be inconsistent at times.  His fastball would likely still be 90+ MPH.

Peavy's fastball may dip as low as 88 MPH in this scenario.  I think Peavy's control is as good if not better than Beckett's (I have not taken the time to look up the BB/9, so if I am wrong someone correct me).  The difference is that Peavy's BEST pitch is his changeup.  When he gets into a count, he often sets people up using his change and not his fastball.  Peavy also has enough command of his curve that he can throw at any point in an at bat.

Picking Peavy over Beckett may be debatable, but I think that since the fastball is not really even Peavy's best pitch, he is the most adaptable in this scenario.

Sickels, this site rules!!!

by count sutton on Feb 24, 2005 12:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Plus pitch
Splitter is a plus pitch. Forkball i don't really know, but japanese import Keichi Yabu showed him some new grips, so i have a feeling it will bust lose this year. =)

John, what is your opinion on this?

by ohad on Feb 24, 2005 12:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Peavy
I really like his motion - he's got a tough, deceptive throwing style. He's got great control and plus stuff. I see him being one of the NL's best for a long time to come, and I'm certainly more confident in his future than I am in Beckett's (which is sad, because I think Beckett could be legendary).
The Future Is Now - Jeff Francis, #26, Colorado Rockies

by Franchise26 on Feb 24, 2005 12:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Peavy
I'm inclined to agree that Peavy would be the one pitcher out of this group most likely to succeed if he lost 2-3 MPH off his fastball. I really like the movement on all of Peavy's pitches, much better than Beckett's. His off-speed pitch truly is a thing of beauty when he's on.
Mike Emeigh http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org

by MikeE on Feb 24, 2005 12:32 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

peavy
I think Peavy would be most likely to adjust. He has the more diverse arsenal at this point and seems to have somewhat better pitching instincts.

by John Sickels on Feb 24, 2005 12:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

What kind of pitches
Does Peavy have? (anyone who wants to answer this)

by ohad on Feb 24, 2005 12:46 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

peavy
Fastball: 90-95 MPH, will use different grips to vary movement on the pitch.

Slider and curveball are both above average.

Excellent changeup.

Command is very good and he'll throw any pitch in any count.

by John Sickels on Feb 24, 2005 12:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
I think i know the others, correct me if I'm wrong.

Harden:

Fastball: 93-97 (hits 98 occasionally)

Splitter: Above average, used as a changeup.

Forkball: (i just don't know)

Beckett:

Fastball: 91-96 with various movements

Sinker: 90--92

Curveball: Above average

Changeup: Average.

by ohad on Feb 24, 2005 12:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pitch speed
Thanks for the fastball readings, but how much faith do you have in those numbers? I mean, those speeds sound realistic but where do they come from? Scouts with radar guns, sure, but always the same gun in a similar place? Do organizations/scouts try to be accurate with top speed or just consistent?
"They have to be excited right now, they're ACTUALLY beating the Yankees!" - Al Trautwig, YES Network

by chunkylover22 on Feb 24, 2005 1:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Fastball readings
I believe they go for the normal range.  I read on Baseball Almanac that Beckett has actually hit 100 on the gun before.
Sickels, this site rules!!!

by count sutton on Feb 24, 2005 2:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am fairly sure that Harden has
hit 100 on the gun at some point as well.

by jmoney on Feb 24, 2005 2:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that's what I mean
It seems like everybody "hits" 100 on some radar gun, somewhere. Usually on the home park scoreboard readout, too. Seems like fast radar guns to me (try that on a state trooper), especially when I see guys like Harden and Beckett said here to top out at 98 or 96! Say what you will about Joe Morgan, but when he chortles at a pitch's speed readout, I believe him (at least for now...but I'm keeping my eye on him).

So who knows which numbers are reliable? Or at least most reliable?

"They have to be excited right now, they're ACTUALLY beating the Yankees!" - Al Trautwig, YES Network

by chunkylover22 on Feb 24, 2005 4:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Beckett
Since hs that nasty curve, a second pitch that neither Harden nor Peavy can match, I bet Beckett would be the best after losing 3 mph. He would still have good velocity, whereas Peavy would drop down to average. Harden? Only if he improves his splitter and slider.

My money is on Peavy having TJ in August. His motion makes me cringe.  

by irwin on Feb 24, 2005 1:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

No 2nd Pitch
Peavy's fastball is his 2nd because his changeup is so good.  He also has a plus curve.
Sickels, this site rules!!!

by count sutton on Feb 24, 2005 1:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Peavy
His fastball has the most movement so he would be less effective. I don't think that Beckett would be greatly affected because of his curve. I think Harden would lose a lot of value because he has the least movement and his secondary pitches aren't at Peavy's or Beckett's level.

by Ienpw on Feb 24, 2005 1:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Fastball
Usually guys who lose velocity who already have movement gain more movement.

by AaronMullen on Feb 24, 2005 2:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

peavy's arm motion
Yeah, John, what are your feelings about Peavy's throwing motion?  Like Irwin said, it makes him cringe.  I remember thinking the same thing when I saw Jesse Foppert pitch (his arm whipping across his body), and we all know how that turned out.....Is it somewhat reasonable to almost expect the same situation to crop up for Peavy?

by SpartanValor on Feb 24, 2005 1:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

peavy
Well, it certainly doesn't look that good...but if he is consistent about it and his muscles are used to the delivery, it may not be that big a deal. Some pitchers with "perfect" mechanics get hurt, and some guys with weird deliveries stay healthy.

Sometimes pitchers hurt themselves because they alter their mechanics, on purpose or accidently due to fatigue, and stress muscles and joints that aren't used to it.

Sometimes they just get hurt. Who knows?

by John Sickels on Feb 24, 2005 1:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Peavy
Peavy has much more movement on his pitches, the above radar readings and pitch array sound right to me as well. Peavy is smaller especially compared to Beckett and probably has more of an injury risk due to his mechanics. I think Harden would be lest effective without the good heat, as his 93-95 would be fairly straight. But he has the least amount of wear on his arm (not a pitcher all of his life). I will say that saying Beckett's curve wouldn't be affected by reduced velocity isn't necessarily true. One of the things that makes a real good, sharp curve is arm speed. You can throw a later years Blyleven or Mike Boddicker rainbow curve without throwing hard, but a Nolan Ryan, early Mark Langston, or Kerry Wood hard yaker has to have arm speed. Beckett does have alot of speed to lose! BTW, Beckett is a huge guy, if he and Peavy stood side by side people would not believe the difference.

by twoseamer on Feb 24, 2005 2:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Peavy
I would take Peavy.  I think having such a good changeup keeps hitters off balance so losing 2-3 mph wouldn't hurt him much.

by AaronMullen on Feb 24, 2005 2:53 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Actually
I would argue the other. By losing a few MPH off his fastball, his changeup would become not as effective. The fact that his fastball is probably 93-94 most of the time is part of the reason why his changeup is so good. take that down to 90-91 and that changeup is now 3 miles per hour closer to the fastball. I don't think i have to explain this.

by ohad on Feb 24, 2005 4:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Peavy's Change
Maddux often works in the low 90s and his change is his most effective pitch.  Peavy is not as refined, obviously, but he stuff would still allow him to work there.
Sickels, this site rules!!!

by count sutton on Feb 24, 2005 4:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Changeup
If you understand the way a changeup works then you understand that you don't need a 95 MPH fastball for your changeup to be effective.  The effectiveness of the changeup comes 1. from its deception (since the best changeups are thrown with the same armspeed as the pitcher's fastball) and 2. some changeups tail or drop.  Jamie Moyer has made a very good living off of effectively using his changeup along with his LOW 80's fastball.  It really wouldn't make Peavy's changeup a lot less effective to lose a couple MPH off of his fastball.  All it has to do is be able to keep hitters off balance.  Any baseball player will tell you that.  That's why an elite minor league hitter like B.J. Upton said that Cole Hamels was the toughest pitchers he faced in the minors.  Hamels didn't have the best fastball in the minors, but he did arguably have the best changeup.

by AaronMullen on Feb 24, 2005 7:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Changeup
I didn't say "a lot less effective". I said "it might make it not as effective". I know about the changeup since crappy Mark Redman was on the A's last year. But losing a coule MPH would make him a different pitcher, he'd have to use the chanegup more.

by ohad on Feb 25, 2005 1:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Peavy
I would take Peavy then Harden then Beckett.  Peavy at this point has the best understanding of how to be a pitcher.  Harden has the least injury history and is the youngest and is with the team that is most likely to keep him healthy.  I like Beckett a lot but he still hasn't even put together one year yet and the blisters keep coming.  As far as Peavy's pitch selection goes he actually throws a lot of different pitches and because he has so much movement they all look a lot alike except for the change.  Here is how I would break him down:

Fastball:  Usually will throw it at the beginning of an at bat to get ahead or will throw it up in the zone if he's going for the strikeout.  Threw it harder last year than I've ever seen him before and topped out at 96.  Still has some movement but not nearly as much as the cutter

Cutter:  Will throw at any time and it moves a ton.  Reached 90-92mph with it consistently last year

Changeup:  Really effective pitch for him as the year went on as he got more confidence in it and started throwing it in all counts including first pitch of at bat or even when he fell behind.

Slurve: I'm not sure whether he calls it a slider or a curve so I'm calling it a slurve.  Sometimes he throws it hard and it looks like Cutter and sometimes he takes something off and it moves more like a curve.  

The local paper here mentioned that Peavy and Padres are close to new contract that would take him through arbitration and possibly into a year of free agency.  He switched agents last year to Barry Axelrod (from Boras) so I would expect he will stay in San Diego for a long time.

by duende5000 on Feb 24, 2005 3:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Peavy vs Bonds
Peavy is also one of my favorite pitchers in the league.  One thing that I always respected in this young guy, was how he attacked Bonds.  Of course, Bonds didn't always loose to Peavy.  But the first time I saw them match up, Peavy had Bonds completely confused.  That's not easy to do.

It was one of the best matchups I can remember from last year.

Brian

by bfos7215 on Feb 24, 2005 4:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Peavy isn't afraid of anybody
That was great baseball.  It's the only time that I can remember Bonds shaking his head after an at bat. Peavy had Bonds guessing wrong a lot of the time.  He went right at him.

Peavy kept the Giants off balance over several appearances.  Almost always ahead in the count and rarely a hard hit ball.

by splitter on Feb 25, 2005 10:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK
I think people forget that Beckett gets alot of movement on his fastball to, and ALOT on his other three pitches (his changeup is so underrated IMO).

On pure talent, I don't think any of them really touch Beckett, and I think he'd survive if he lost velocity, cause he did it this season after his injury, when he throw alot more 92-93 than 95-96.

by SenorGato88 on Feb 24, 2005 9:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I would take Harden
if not only because if Harden went from 97 down to 94-95, its still pretty fast.

by Zonis on Feb 24, 2005 11:32 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Arizona Fall League 2009 Video Posted

Recent FanPosts

413niegoftl__sl500_aa280__small
UPDATED - Open Thread: Best of the Unprotected; Top Rule V Prospects
Small
BP DET Top 15
Small
BA Pirates Top 10
Small
Last year's rookies, #12 runoff
Small
Great block at plate by A.J. Jimenez
Small
BA MIL Top 10
Small
Last year's rookies, top community prospects for future performance #12
Small
Last year's rookies, top community prospects for future performance #11
Adam_jones_small
Dustin Ackley to 2nd base

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Carew_small John Sickels


Site Meter