My Grading System
I've received a few questions lately about my grading system. Here is what the grades mean.
Grade A prospects are the elite. They have a good chance of becoming stars or superstars. Almost all Grade A prospects develop into major league regulars, if injuries or other problems don't intervene. Note that is a major "if" in some cases.
Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.
Grade C prospects are the most common type. These are guys who have something positive going for them, but who may have a question mark or three, or who are just too far away from the majors to get an accurate feel for. A few Grade C guys, especially at the lower levels, do develop into stars. Many end up as role players or bench guys. Some don't make it at all.
A major point to remember is that grades for pitchers do NOT correspond directly to grades for hitters. Many Grade A pitching prospects fail to develop, often due to injuries. Some Grade C pitching prospects turn out much better than expected.
Also note that there is diversity within each category. I'm a tough grader; Grade C+ is actually good praise coming from me, and some C+ prospects turn out very well indeed.
Finally, keep in mind that all grades are shorthand. You have to read the full comment for my full opinion about a player, the letter grade only tells you so much. A Grade C prospect in rookie ball could end up being very impressive, while a Grade C prospect in Triple-A is likely just a future role player.
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
Thanks John.
Don't worry. I'm going to buy the book, but, I live far away from the US and don't want to buy John's 2001 edition to see how things worked out.
by kmdarcy on Dec 27, 2005 6:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Pujols
by GregJP on Dec 27, 2005 6:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
pujols
by John Sickels on Dec 27, 2005 7:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
wrigth
by John Sickels on Dec 27, 2005 7:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
felix
by John Sickels on Dec 27, 2005 7:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
John
by So Cal Bob on Dec 27, 2005 7:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
points
by John Sickels on Dec 27, 2005 7:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pujols
I stand corrected. I guess I just remember him having no buzz at all the year he broke out his first year in the bigs.
by GregJP on Dec 27, 2005 7:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks guys
by kmdarcy on Dec 28, 2005 7:24 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Santos
by okbluejays on Dec 28, 2005 2:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
grades
I realize nothing will change but i really like how hockey futures rate players:
http://www.hockeysfuture.com/playerprojections.php
It combines potential and probability.
How is the +/- work or is there not any specific classification for this one.
looking forward to the book!
by goggles pisano on Dec 28, 2005 5:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs










